Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 76(4): 1060-1065, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35697313

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Balloon-assisted maturation (BAM) by an endovascular method plays an important role in treating an immature arteriovenous fistula. However, the results between radiocephalic fistula and brachiocephalic fistula were rarely reported. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and outcome of BAM in different sites of autogenous arteriovenous fistulas. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent BAM procedures from January 2015 to December 2016. Of 148 patients, 117 and 31 patients had a radiocephalic fistula (RC) and a brachiocephalic fistula (BC), respectively. The primary outcome was BAM success. Data regarding fistula lesions, balloon types and size, frequency of procedures, and maturation time were collected for BAMs. The secondary outcome was the patency of a fistula in the follow-up period. RESULTS: No difference was observed in procedure of BAM frequency between the RC and BC groups. The total success rate was 77.7%, without significant difference between the RC and BC groups (81.20% vs 64.50%; P = .055). Within the procedures, the culprit lesion of juxta-anastomosis segment (73.5% vs 25.5%; P < .001) and arterial inlet (21.2% vs 7.8%; P = .04) were more common in the RC group, whereas the venous outlet was more common in the BC group (88.2% vs 57.7%; P < .001). Both groups had an equivalent patency rate after the BAM within the follow-up period (P = .272). CONCLUSIONS: BAM was an effective procedure for immature fistulas, without significant difference between RCs and BCs. Through the procedure, the culprit lesions causing non-maturation were found to be different between the two groups. The patency rate between the two groups after surgery seems to be equivalent within the follow-up period.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Fístula , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/métodos , Humanos , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Radial/cirurgia , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 80: 113-119, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34687887

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To compare the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition methods used for superficialization of the basilic vein in terms of complication and patency rates. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent 2-stage basilic vein transposition between August 2016 and December 2019. Patients were categorized into brachial-basilic fistula tunnel transposition (n = 32) and elevation transposition (n = 21) groups using medical records. Primary patency was defined as a conduit that remains patent without any re-intervention to maintain patency. Primary assisted patency was defined as a conduit that has undergone intervention to maintain patency but has never been thrombosed. RESULTS: The distribution of baseline characteristics was similar between the 2 groups. Coronary artery disease was the only variable that was significantly different between the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition groups (31.1% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.035). The tunnel transposition group had a greater amount of blood loss (P < 0.001) and a longer period of hospitalization (P = 0.002) than the elevation transposition group. The rates of suture repair to stop bleeding from the conduit was significantly different between the tunnel transposition and elevation transposition groups (31.8% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.035), whereas those of other complications were not significantly different. The elevation transposition group had a significantly higher primary patency rate than the tunneled transposition group (P = 0.033); however, primary assisted patency was achieved in all patients (100%) in both groups. CONCLUSION: Elevation transposition might be a more reliable method than tunnel transposition for superficialization of a basilic venous fistula.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/métodos , Diálise Renal , Extremidade Superior/irrigação sanguínea , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Idoso , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
3.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 32(3): 466-471, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33334666

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of outpatient percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic repair (PEVAR) versus inpatient PEVAR without or with adjunct procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and June 2019, a cohort of 359 patients comprising 168 (46.8%) outpatients and 191 (53.2%) inpatients who had undergone PEVAR were enrolled. All the patients were asymptomatic but had indications for endovascular aortic repair, ie, fit for intravenous anesthesia and anatomically feasible with standard devices. Patient sex, age, comorbidities, smoking status, type of anesthesia, adjunct procedures, type of graft device, operative times, mortality, complications, and readmissions were analyzed. RESULTS: Median follow-up period was 16.5 months (interquartile range, 9-31 months). Except for a higher percentage of tobacco use (42.6% vs 28.8%; P = .04), dyslipidemia (39.7% vs 19.2%; P < .01), and use of local anesthesia (99.4% vs 82.2%; P < .01) in the outpatients, there was no significant difference in the type of graft and adjunct procedures used. No outpatient mortality occurred. There was no difference in the number, severity, and onset of complications (all P > .05). Outpatient unexpected same-day admission, 30-day readmission, and emergency department visit rates were 4.8%, 2.4% (P = .13), and 10% (P < .01), respectively. Operative times for outpatient PEVAR without adjunct procedures were shorter (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient PEVAR can be performed with a safety profile similar to that of inpatient PEVAR. The unexpected same-day admission, 30-day readmission, and emergency department visit rates were low. The outpatient PEVARs without adjunct procedures took less time.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Pacientes Internados , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente , Segurança do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 74: 141-147, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33508462

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term outcome of totally percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (pEVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) compared with femoral cut-down endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients with ruptured AAAs that underwent EVAR between March 2010 and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic information, preoperative vital signs, preoperative laboratory data, method of anesthesia, procedure duration, aneurysm morphology, brand of device used, length of hospital stay, access complications, and short-term outcomes were recorded. Univariate as well as multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Among 77 patients with ruptured AAAs, 17 (22.1%) received cEVAR and 60 (77.9%) received pEVAR. Significant differences in the procedure time (P = 0.004), method of anesthesia (P = 0.040), and 30-day mortality (P = 0.037) were detected between the cEVAR and pEVAR groups. Local anesthesia plus intravenous general anesthesia (odds ratio = 0.141, P = 0.018) was an independent factor associated with 30-day mortality and local anesthesia was better than general anesthesia for 24-hr mortality (P = 0.001) and 30-day mortality (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In patients with ruptured AAAs, pEVAR procedures took less time than cEVAR procedures, but the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly. The 30-day mortality rate was lower with pEVAR than with cEVAR. Local anesthesia may be the key factor in EVAR to improved technical and clinical success.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Ruptura Aórtica/mortalidade , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Duração da Cirurgia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 71: 200-207, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32768531

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection could be an eradication treatment for patients with infected hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of 3 surgical methods, including total resection, subtotal resection, and revision. METHODS: The patients who underwent surgical excision of infected AVGs performed at a single center from August 2012 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The following 3 surgical methods were used in our study: revision, subtotal resection, and total resection. Patients' demographics, medical history, perioperative details, reconstruction time, and follow-up data were collected. The outcomes including perioperative complications (within 30 days), mortality, reinfection rate of AVGs, with new access reconstruction or not, and the outcomes between reconstruction and nonreconstruction in the follow-up period were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-one patients had infected AVGs in our study. Patients' mean age was 62 years, and 65.9% of the patients were female. The mean duration from the time of diagnosis to the operation was 14.4 days. Signs and symptoms at presentation included fever (51.2 %), swelling (43.9%), pain (58.5%), erythematous change (92.7%), and more severe features, such as altered consciousness (14.6%) and hypotension (12.2%). The pathological changes in the infected grafts included bleeding (29.3%), pus formation (73.2%), pseudoaneurysm (26.8%), and graft exposure (17.1%). Wound and graft cultures revealed an infectious etiology with fungi (7.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.2%), Enterococcus spp. (2.4%), and Staphylococcus spp. (58.5%), with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus accounting for only 7.3%. Total resection, subtotal resection, and revision surgery were performed in 17.1%, 63.4%, and 19.5% of patients, respectively. Seven patients with complications required reoperation (17.1%), and adhesion ileus and hospital-acquired pneumonia occurred in only 2.4% and 7.3% of patients, respectively. During follow-up, most patients (82.9%) had reconstruction of the peripheral hemodialysis access with mean time of 64.3 (range: 21-92) days; mean time of use of new access was 90.5 days; and mean time of removal of catheter was about 106.3 days. Mortality rates in patients without and with reconstructed AV access during follow-up were 50% and 18%, respectively (P < 0.004). Eight cases (19.5%) had recurrence of AV access infections during follow-up; of these, 2 had revision surgery and 6 had subtotal resection. However, no patient with total resection had recurrent infections. CONCLUSIONS: The total resection group had no recurrent infection compared to the subtotal and revision groups. In addition, patients with reconstruction of peripheral hemodialysis access had a low mortality rate during the follow-up period.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Diálise Renal , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Remoção de Dispositivo/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/mortalidade , Recidiva , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(6): 969-976, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32414571

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To demonstrate post-treatment computed tomography (CT) findings and outcomes of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for mycotic aortic aneurysm (MAA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of patients with MAA who underwent EVAR from June 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 22 patients were included (19 men and 3 women). The periaortic features of the MAA regression after EVAR were graded and evaluated by follow-up CT. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 36.5 months (range, 0.5-97 months.). The cumulative survival rate at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years was 95.5%, 86.4%, 81.6%, and 73.4%, respectively. The early and late infection-related complication (IRC) rate was 18.2% and 13.6%, respectively. One patient died within 1 month from severe acidosis and shock. Of the other patients, the median time to stable response of the MAA was 6 months (range, 3-36 months). Fourteen patients (66.7%) showed early response of the MAA, while 7 patients (33.3%) showed delayed response. A significant association was observed between delayed response and late IRCs (P = .026). CONCLUSIONS: The post-EVAR periaortic features on follow-up CT aid in monitoring the treatment response of the MAA. Early response of the MAA was associated with a low rate of late IRCs and might aid in adjusting the antibiotic duration after the patient has achieved complete or nearly complete regression of the MAA.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Infectado/cirurgia , Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Aortografia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma Infectado/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Infectado/mortalidade , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Aórtico/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(4): 495-502, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30876806

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate feasibility and effectiveness using the octopus endograft technique to treat complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endovascular repair of CAAs, including thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAAs) and dissections involving major side branches, was performed at a single center from June 2014 to June 2017. Patients included 9 men and 2 women (mean age, 60.5 y; range, 40-89 y) were included. The octopus technique was applied using standard aortic grafts with branch stent grafts to preserve the renovisceral arteries. RESULTS: Aortic pathologies comprised 3 mycotic aneurysms, 2 chronic dissections with acute rupture, 1 progressively enlarging chronic type B dissection, 1 acutely ruptured TAAA, and 4 unruptured TAAAs. Mean procedural and fluoroscopic times were 562 min (range, 324-840 min) and 183 min (range, 73-338 min), respectively. Three patients died within 1 month. Mean duration of follow-up was 26.3 months (range, 8-42 months) for remaining patients. Technical success rate of target vessel stent placement was 89.7% (35/39). Major complication rate was 45.5% (5/11), including 3 deaths, 1 permanent paraplegia, and 1 temporary paraplegia that resolved in 2 months. All 3 mycotic aneurysms with mean duration of follow-up of 29 months (range, 8-42 months) were excluded successfully without endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: The octopus technique is feasible for treatment of CAAs requiring urgent management or with difficult anatomy without the use of available custom-made or off-the-shelf branched devices. The procedure carries substantial morbidity and mortality and requires further investigation for its long-term durability.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Aórtico/mortalidade , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Implante de Prótese Vascular/mortalidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
J Vasc Surg ; 68(2): 546-553, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29622355

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis graft outflow stenosis is a significant complication occurring in hemodialysis patients with prosthetic grafts for vascular access. Balloon angioplasty remains the first-line endovascular treatment of this complication, although covered stent graft implantation after balloon angioplasty also appears to be an effective and promising treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and durability of stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty in comparison to balloon angioplasty alone for the treatment of graft outflow stenosis in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized study of 98 patients with clinically significant dialysis graft outflow stenosis treated in the vascular surgery section of a tertiary medical center. The patients were randomized into two groups; 49 patients were treated with stent graft placement after balloon angioplasty, and 49 patients were treated with balloon angioplasty alone. All patients underwent angiography of the graft site at 3 and 6 months after intervention, and restenosis rates were compared between the two groups. In addition, the duration of postintervention primary patency in the two groups was recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The postintervention restenosis rate of the stent graft placement group was superior to that seen in the balloon angioplasty alone group (9% vs 69% at 3 months [P < .0001] and 29% vs 72% at 6 months [P < .0001]). The mean postintervention primary patency duration was 380.22 ± 28.54 days for the stent graft placement group and 151.08 ± 16.79 days for the balloon angioplasty alone group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of stent grafts in hemodialysis patients with graft outflow stenosis yielded superior results compared with the results seen in hemodialysis patients treated with balloon angioplasty alone. Patients treated with stent grafts after balloon angioplasty had a lower restenosis rate and a longer duration of postintervention primary patency. The placement of a stent graft after balloon angioplasty appears to be an optimal therapeutic approach for the treatment of hemodialysis patients with graft outflow stenosis.


Assuntos
Angioplastia com Balão , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Diálise Renal , Idoso , Angioplastia com Balão/efeitos adversos , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Terapia Combinada , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Feminino , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Stents , Taiwan , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular
9.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 28(4): 570-575, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28190708

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes and predictive factors for additional ProGlide device deployment in percutaneous endovascular aortic repair (PEVAR) with the preclose technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data of patients who underwent PEVAR with the preclose technique from February 2012 to January 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 268 patients (229 men, 39 women) who underwent PEVAR (thoracic endovascular aortic repair [TEVAR], n = 113; endovascular abdominal aortic repair [EVAR], n = 152; simultaneous TEVAR and EVAR, n = 3) with 418 femoral access sites were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 69 years ± 14. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictive factors associated with additional ProGlide device deployment. RESULTS: Primary technical success with adequate hemostasis and two ProGlide devices was 87.6%, and 48 femoral arterial access sites (11.5%) required additional ProGlide device deployment. The secondary technical success rate was 99.0%. Four femoral access sites (1.0%) needed surgical repair. Anterior wall calcification near the arteriotomy increased the risk of additional ProGlide device deployment (adjusted odds ratio, 6.19; 95% confidence interval, 2.81-13.64; P < .001), whereas larger sheath size, common femoral artery (CFA) diameter, and depth from the skin to the arteriotomy did not. CONCLUSIONS: Additional ProGlide device deployment reduces the rate of surgical repair after primary hemostasis failure in PEVAR. Anterior CFA wall calcification is a significant predictor for additional ProGlide device deployment.


Assuntos
Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentação , Dispositivos de Oclusão Vascular , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aortografia/métodos , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Hemorragia/etiologia , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Punções , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Stents , Resultado do Tratamento , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular
11.
Hemodial Int ; 27(3): 241-248, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37134023

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Balloon angioplasty maturation (BAM) is a salvage method for autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation failure. AVF creation using small-diameter veins is considered to have poor outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the long-term patency of small-diameter veins (≤3 mm) using BAM. METHODS: BAM was performed if the fistula failed to mature and function adequately to provide prescribed dialysis. FINDINGS: Out of 61 AVFs, 22 AVFs successfully matured without further intervention (AVF group) and 39 AVFs failed to mature. Except for 1 patient who required peritoneal dialysis, the remaining 38 patients received salvage BAM, and 36 of those successful matured (BAM group). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences between the AVF and BAM groups in terms of primary functional patency (p = 0.503) and assisted functional patency (p = 0.499). Compared with the AVF group, the BAM group had similar assisted primary functional patency (1-year: 94.7% vs. 93.1%; 3-year: 88.0% vs. 93.1%; 5-year: 79.2% vs. 88.3%). In addition, there were no significant difference between groups in the duration of primary functional patency and assisted primary functional patency (p > 0.05). Multivariate analyses showed that vein diameter and number of BAM procedures were independent predictors of primary functional patency in the AVF group and BAM group, respectively. Patient with 1 mm increase in vein size had 0.13-fold probability of having decreased duration of patency (HR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.99, p = 0.049), while patients who received two times of BAM procedures were 2.885 as likely to have decreased duration of primary functional patency (HR = 2.885, 95% CI: 1.09-7.63, p = 0.033) than patients who received one BAM procedure. DISCUSSION: BAM is a relatively effective salvage management option with an acceptable long-term patency rate, even for small cephalic veins.


Assuntos
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Humanos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Resultado do Tratamento , Diálise Renal , Fatores de Risco , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
J Vasc Access ; : 11297298231166426, 2023 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37309828

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report the efficacy and safety of a drug-coated balloon (Ranger, Boston Scientific) in patients with dysfunctional autogenous arteriovenous fistula. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, prospective observational cohort study, 25 participants with dysfunctional arteriovenous fistula were enrolled from January 2018 to June 2019. The drug-coated balloon was applied after successful vessel preparation by high-pressure balloon angioplasty. The primary endpoint was the target lesion primary patency rate at 6 months. The secondary outcome included anatomical and clinical success rate, postoperative major adverse events within 30 days, and the target lesion primary patency rate at 12 months. Statistical analysis of the data was performed. The χ test or Fisher's exact test was used for analyzing categorical variables, and continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t-test. Also, Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the target lesion primary patency days with the log-rank test. RESULTS: At 6 months, the target lesion primary patency rate was 68% in the drug-coated balloon treatment group. The anatomical and clinical success rates were 100%. One patient had thrombosed access 10 days after the index procedure, and two died of cardiovascular events 4 months after the operation. Subgroup analysis showed that the early recurrent stenosis group had non-inferior mean drug-coated balloon primary patency days (less than 90 days after prior percutaneous angioplasty, n = 10) compared with the late recurrence group (prior PTA patency days more than 90 days, n = 10), 179.3 ± 102.9 versus 257.1 ± 71 days (p = 0.153). DCB angioplasty had significant improvement in primary patency days for early recurrent stenosis (67.7 ± 19.3 vs 179.3 ± 102.9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated the appliance of Ranger DCB in stenotic AVFs is a safe and effective treatment modality, especially for early recurrent AVF stenosis.

13.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 15(5)2022 May 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35631422

RESUMO

The efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) after lower-limb intervention remains controversial. Currently, the prescription of DAPT after an intervention is not fully recommended in guidelines due to limited evidence. This study compares and analyzes the prognosis for symptomatic PAD patients receiving DAPT versus monotherapy after lower-limb revascularization. Up to November 2021, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies reporting the efficacy, duration, and bleeding complications when either DAPT or monotherapy were used to treat PAD patients after revascularization. Three randomized controlled trials and seven nonrandomized controlled trials were included in our study. In total, 74,651 patients made up these ten studies. DAPT in PAD patients after intervention was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79−0.94; p < 0.01), major adverse limb events (HR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47−0.78; p < 0.01), and major amputation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64−0.96) when follow-up was for more than 1-year. DAPT was not associated with major bleeding events when compared with monotherapy (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.69−2.18; p = 0.50) but was associated with a higher rate of minor bleeding as a complication (OR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.59−4.08; p < 0.01). More prospective randomized studies are needed to provide further solid evidence regarding the important issue of prescribing DAPT.

14.
J Int Med Res ; 50(6): 3000605221100134, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35650686

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) is an anatomic stenotic variation associated with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the left leg. The classical DVT treatment strategy is medical treatment without thrombus removal. This study was performed to assess the clinical outcomes of the combination of AngioJet™ rheolytic thrombectomy and stenting for treatment of MTS-related DVT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for MTS-related DVT from January 2017 to June 2020 at a single institution. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (nine women) underwent AngioJet™ rheolytic thrombectomy for MTS-related DVT during the study period. The median DVT onset time was 8 days (interquartile range (IQR), 3-21 days). The median procedure time was 130 minutes (IQR, 91-189 minutes), and the median hospital stay was 7 days (IQR, 5-26 days). One patient had a residual thrombus and occluded iliac stent and underwent adjuvant catheter-directed thrombolysis for revascularization. The primary patency rate for the iliac stent was 92.9% at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Concomitant AngioJet™ rheolytic thrombectomy and stenting of MTS-induced lesions may be beneficial for patients with MTS-related DVT.


Assuntos
Síndrome de May-Thurner , Trombose Venosa , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome de May-Thurner/complicações , Síndrome de May-Thurner/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombectomia , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Trombose Venosa/cirurgia
15.
BMJ Open ; 11(9): e048149, 2021 09 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34588244

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have proposed associations between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and atherosclerosis and between SSc and cardiovascular disease. However, in Asia, no large-scale studies have focused on the association between peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and SSc. SETTING: A nationwide observation retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The National Health Insurance Research Database was used for selecting patients diagnosed with SSc from 2000 to 2011. Patients diagnosed with PAD before the index date were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The SSc cohort comprised 1106 patients with SSc, and the non-SSc cohort comprised 4424 matched controls. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for analysing the adjusted risk of PAD between the case and control patients. RESULTS: The SSc cohort exhibited a significantly higher risk (HR=2.15, 95% CI=1.47 to 3.14) of PAD than did the non-SSc cohort. Patients with heart failure exhibited the highest risk of PAD (adjusted HR=2.10, 95% CI=1.20 to 3.70). Moreover, even without any comorbidities, the SSc cohort exhibited a significantly higher risk (adjusted HR=4.17 fold, 95% CI=1.98 to 8.77) of PAD than did the non-SSc cohort. CONCLUSION: SSc is associated with a significantly high risk of PAD. Further studies are required to reduce the PAD risk among patients with SSc.


Assuntos
Doença Arterial Periférica , Escleroderma Sistêmico , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Humanos , Incidência , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Escleroderma Sistêmico/complicações , Escleroderma Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Taiwan/epidemiologia
16.
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech ; 5(2): 122-127, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31193393

RESUMO

Renal arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are rare vascular abnormalities. Their high-flow nature may result in increased cardiac output and lead to heart failure. Transcatheter endovascular management of renal AVFs with various embolization materials has been the treatment of choice in recent years. Embolization of large renal AVFs poses a risk of embolization through the AVF to the pulmonary circulation. Herein, we present the case of a patient whose large high-flow renal AVF was treated by a novel method involving the use of a bare stent and detachable metallic coils-called a wire-trapping technique-as well as compare this method with vascular plugs.

17.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 51(1): 47-50, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28100155

RESUMO

Inadvertent coverage of origin of internal iliac artery (IIA) during endovascular aneurysm repair may lead to type II endoleak. Except for open surgery, the endovascular solution is limited. We report a case with such complication that was successfully treated with coil embolization using retrograde extrastent approach. This is a new technique that has not been reported before, and as such, had been useful in the treatment of type II endoleak from IIA as an alternative to open ligation of IIA origin.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Embolização Terapêutica , Endoleak/terapia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Artéria Ilíaca/cirurgia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aortografia/métodos , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Endoleak/diagnóstico por imagem , Endoleak/etiologia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Humanos , Artéria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(41): e1655, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26469900

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to elucidate the relationship between spinal cord injury (SCI) and the risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in a cohort study with a large representative sample.The National Health Insurance Database was used to select patients who were diagnosed from 2000 to 2010. Patients with a history of PAD were excluded. The SCI group comprised 42,673 patients diagnosed with SCI, and we enrolled 170,389 matched controls (non-SCI group). We used a Cox proportional hazards regression model to analyze the adjusted risk of PAD between the case and control patients.Patients with SCI exhibited a significantly higher risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-1.53) of PAD than patients without SCI. Patients with diabetes were at the highest risk of developing PAD (adjusted HR = 3.11, 95% CI = 2.80-3.44). Among patients without comorbidity, SCI patients exhibited a significantly higher risk of PAD than non-SCI patients. Furthermore, lumbar, sacral, or coccygeal spine, and multiple spine SCI were significantly associated with an increased risk of PAD (HR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.33-1.84, HR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.59-2.79, respectively).SCI is associated with an increased risk of PAD. Future studies should focus on modifying risk factors to reduce PAD risk among patients with SCI.


Assuntos
Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais
19.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(33): e1381, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26287429

RESUMO

Vascular cutdown and echo guide puncture methods have its own limitations under certain conditions. There was no available algorithm for choosing entry vessel. A standard algorithm was introduced to help choose the entry vessel location according to our clinical experience and review of the literature. The goal of this study is to analyze the treatment results of the standard algorithm used to choose the entry vessel for intravenous port implantation.During the period between March 2012 and March 2013, 507 patients who received intravenous port implantation due to advanced chemotherapy were included into this study. Choice of entry vessel was according to standard algorithm. All clinical characteristic factors were collected and complication rate and incidence were further analyzed.Compared with our clinical experience in 2006, procedure-related complication rate declined from 1.09% to 0.4%, whereas the late complication rate decreased from 19.97% to 3.55%. No more pneumothorax, hematoma, catheter kinking, fractures, and pocket erosion were identified after using the standard algorithm. In alive oncology patients, 98% implanted port could serve a functional vascular access to fit therapeutic needs.This standard algorithm for choosing the best entry vessel is a simple guideline that is easy to follow. The algorithm has excellent efficiency and can minimize complication rates and incidence.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Hematoma/prevenção & controle , Pneumotórax/prevenção & controle , Venostomia/efeitos adversos , Algoritmos , Veias Braquiocefálicas , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Tratamento Farmacológico/métodos , Falha de Equipamento , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Hematoma/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/terapia , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taiwan , Resultado do Tratamento , Venostomia/métodos
20.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 94(17): e728, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25929903

RESUMO

An entry vessel is crucial for intravenous port implantation. A safe alternative entry vessel that can be easily explored is crucial for patients without feasible cephalic vein or for those who need port reimplantation because of disease relapse. In this study, we tried to analyze the safety and feasibility of catheter implantation via the deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial vein.From March 2012 to November 2013, 802 consecutive oncology patients who had received intravenous port implantation via the superior vena cava were enrolled in this study. The functional results and complications of different entry vessels were compared.The majority of patients (93.6%) could be identified as thoracoacromial vessel. The deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial vein is located on the medial aspect of the deltopectoral groove beneath the pectoralis major muscle (85.8%) and in the deep part of the deltopectoral groove (14.2%). Due to the various calibers employed and tortuous routes followed, we utilized 3 different methods for catheter implantation, including vessel cutdown (47.4%), wire assisted (17.9%), and modified puncture method (34.6%). The functional results and complication rate were similar to other entry vessels.The deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial vein is located in the neighborhood of the cephalic vein. The functional results of intravenous port implantation via the deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial vein are similar to other entry vessels. It is a safe alternative entry vessel for intravenous port implantation.


Assuntos
Braço/irrigação sanguínea , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres de Demora , Tórax/irrigação sanguínea , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA