Application of probiotics in cervical cancer infections to enhance the immune response.

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common cancer among female patients. The primary cause of all types of cervical cancer is human papillomavirus (HPV), which was projected to account for 5,70,000 reported cases in 2018. Two HPV strains (16 and 18) account for 70 % of cervical abnormalities and precancerous cervical cancers. CC is one of the main causes of the 17 % cancer-related death rate among Indian women between the ages of 30 and 69 is CC. The side effects of the currently approved treatments for cervical cancer could endanger the lives of women affected by the illness. Thus, probiotics may be extremely important in the management of CC. Numerous studies on probiotics and their potential for use in cancer diagnosis, prevention, and treatment have been conducted. This review describes the enhancement of the immune system, promotion of a balanced vaginal microbiome, and decreased risk of secondary infections, which have anti-inflammatory effects on the body. Probiotics have the potential to reduce inflammation, thereby adversely affecting cancer cell growth and metastasis. During the course of antibiotic therapy, they support a balanced vaginal microbiome. Oncogenic virus inactivation is possible with probiotic strains. In postmenopausal women, the use of vaginal probiotics helps lessen menopausal symptoms caused by Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM). The antitumor effects of other medications can be enhanced by them as potential agents, because they can both promote the growth of beneficial bacteria and reduce the quantity of potentially harmful bacteria. The development of tumors and the proliferation of cancer cells may be indirectly affected by the restoration of the microbial balance. Probiotics may be able to prevent and treat cervical cancer, as they seem to have anticancer properties. To identify probiotics with anticancer qualities that can supplement and possibly even replace traditional cancer treatments, further investigation is required, including carefully planned clinical trials.

Delayed identification of treatment failure causes high levels of acquired drug resistance and less future drug options among HIV-1-infected South Indians.

PURPOSE: HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations (DRMs) among Immunological failure (IF) on NRTI based first-line regimens, Thymidine analogue (TA) - AZT & D4T and Non-Thymidine Analogue (NTA) -TDF; and predict viral drug susceptibility to gain vision about optimal treatment strategies for second-line. METHODS: Cross-sectionally, 300 HIV-1 infected patients, failing first-line HAART were included. HIV-1 pol gene spanning 20-240 codons of RT was genotyped and mutation pattern was examined, (IAS-USA 2014 and Stanford HIV drug resistance database v7.0). RESULTS: The median age of the participants was 35 years (IQR 29-40), CD4 T cell count of TDF failures was low at 172 cells/µL (IQR 80-252), and treatment duration was low among TDF failures (24 months vs. 61 months) (p < 0.0001). Majority of the TDF failures were on EFV based first-line (89 % vs 45 %) (p < 0.0001). Level of resistance for TDF and AZT shows, that resistance to TDF was about one-third (37 %) of TDF participants and onefourth (23 %) of AZT participants; resistance to AZT was 17 % among TDF participants and 47 % among AZT participants; resistance to both AZT and TDF was significantly high among AZT participants [21 % vs. 8 %, OR 3.057 (95 % CI 1.4-6.8), p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: Although delayed identification of treatment failure caused high levels of acquired drug resistance in our study. Thus, we must include measures to regularize virological monitoring with integrated resistance testing in LMIC (Low and Middle Income Countries) like in India; this will help to preserve the effectiveness of ARV and ensure the success of ending AIDS as public health by 2030.