An evaluation of existing manual blood film schistocyte quantitation guidelines and a new proposed method.

Schistocytosis is the morphological hallmark of the microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Consensus guidelines for manual schistocyte quantitation are available, but limited research has evaluated them. The 2012 International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) recommends a schistocyte quantitation of 1% as a robust cut-off for significance, with the quantitation including helmet, crescent, triangle and keratocyte poikilocytes; and microspherocytes only in the presence of helmets, crescents/triangles, and keratocytes. We aimed to evaluate the relative contribution of these different poikilocytes to schistocyte counting; compare the ICSH method with our proposed method which counts only cells most specific for red cell fragmentation (helmet, crescent and triangular schistocytes); and evaluate inter- and intra-observer agreement. Blood films were sourced from the Australian Snakebite Project, including non-envenomed and envenomed cases, with and without TMA. In blood films across the range of schistocytosis, the predominant poikilocytes present were helmets and crescents. Triangles, keratocytes and microspherocytes were typically only present when ICSH schistocyte count was >1%. With results dichotomised as <1.0% or ≥1.0%, our proposed new method versus the ICSH method showed almost perfect agreement [observed agreement 95%, Cohen's kappa (κ)=0.84, SE 0.04, 95% CI 0.76-0.92, p<0.005]. Inter-observer strength of agreement for our method was moderate (Fleiss' κ for comparisons between three non-unique microscopists κ=0.50, SE 0.05, 95% CI 0.41-0.59, p<0.005). Intra-observer reproducibility assessed in two microscopists ranged from substantial (Cohen's κ=0.71, SE 0.08, 95% CI 0.55-0.86, p<0.005) to borderline almost perfect agreement (Cohen's κ=0.81, SE 0.07, 95% CI 0.68-0.93, p<0.005). Schistocyte quantitation using our new method is simpler than the 2012 ICSH method and had almost perfect agreement. Our finding of moderate inter-observer agreement in quantitating helmet, triangle and crescent schistocytes is applicable to both the ICSH and our newly proposed method. This finding underscores the importance of clinicopathological correlation and repeated examinations in the context of a clinically suspected TMA.

Donor white blood cell survival and cytokine profiles following red blood cell transfusion in Australian major trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: The potential for the co-existence of genetically disparate cells (microchimerism) and associated cytokine profiles following red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in trauma patients has not been well characterized to date. This study investigated the incidence of surviving donor white blood cells (known as transfused-associated microchimerism (TAM)) and cytokine changes following blood transfusion in trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Trauma patients with an injury severity score (ISS) >12 who had been transfused between 2012-2016 with at least 5 units of RBC units over a 4 h period were recruited. Trauma patients with ISS > 12 who did not require blood transfusion were recruited as controls. The incidence of TAM was determined using a panel of insertion/deletion (InDel) bi-allelic polymorphisms. Selected pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine profiles were analyzed using cytometric bead array. RESULTS: The transfused cohort (n = 40) had median ISS of 28 [12-66], received a median of 11 RBC units [4-114] and had median hospital length of stay of 35 days [1-152]. Only 11 (27.5%) patients returned for follow-up blood sampling after discharge. Of these, one patient showed an InDel pattern indicating the presence of TAM. No patients in the control cohort (n = 49) showed TAM. Cytokines IL-10 and IL-6 were found to be elevated in the transfused trauma patients. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, TAM was found to occur in one patient of the 11 who received a blood transfusion. Elevated IL-6 and IL-10 cytokines were detected in those patients who were transfused. However, the incidence of TAM could not be correlated with the elevated cytokine profiles for this cohort.

The diagnostic dilemma: dual presentations of clinical mucosal bleeding and venous thrombosis associated with the presence of thrombophilia markers and mild reduction in von Willebrand factor.

A prothrombotic and hemorrhagic state can separately manifest in one patient and can potentially cause several diagnostic problems. We report an intriguing case as an example of a potential hemostasis-based diagnostic dilemma. A 29-year-old female patient presented with a personal history of menorrhagia and other mucosal bleeding and renal ovarian thrombosis. Previous investigations had uncovered several diagnostic anomalies, including von Willebrand disease (VWD), factor V Leiden (FVL), antiphospholipid syndrome, and thrombocytopaenia. Previous therapy in this patient included heparin and warfarin for the thrombosis and desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) and antifibrinolytic therapy for surgical management. Subsequent laboratory testing with fresh samples consistently confirmed an equivocal (borderline normal/abnormal) level of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and FVL with activated protein C resistance (APCR). A patient sample, differentially labeled according to the tests being performed, was later distributed for blind testing to participants within several modules of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program (QAP). Most participants reported a low level of VWF consistent with possible mild Type 1 VWD, and most (but not all) reported a positive finding for APCR. All participants correctly reported the sample as heterozygous for the FVL mutation, negative for the Prothrombin gene mutation G20210A, and heterozygous for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation C677T. Interestingly, a significant number of laboratories performing Protein S testing using clot-based procedures also identified a false Protein S deficiency. In conclusion, this exercise showed how, either depending on the clinical review and specific laboratory investigation and tests performed, a pro-bleeding diagnosis (of either VWD or thrombocytopenia) or pro-thrombophilia risk (Antiphospholipid Syndrome or FVL/APCR or false Protein S deficiency) could potentially and differentially arise in the one patient.