Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AJOG Glob Rep ; 3(1): 100157, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36748028

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated the effectiveness of intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery as a contraceptive method. However, national-level use and outcomes of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery are currently understudied in the United States. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the trends, characteristics, and outcomes of patients who received a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used the National Inpatient Sample. The study cohort included patients who underwent cesarean delivery from October 2015 to December 2018. The exclusion criteria included hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, uterine anomaly, hysterectomy, and permanent surgical sterilization. Eligible cases were grouped on the basis of the use of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery. The primary outcome measures were temporal trends and characteristics associated with the use of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery, assessed using the generalized estimating equation model in multivariable analysis. The secondary outcome measure was perioperative morbidity (leukocytosis, endometritis, myometritis, and sepsis). Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Among 2,983,978 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 10,145 patients (0.3%) received a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery. The use of a postplacental intrauterine device increased from 0.1% in the fourth quarter of 2015 to 0.6% in the fourth quarter of 2018 (P<.001). In a multivariable analysis, the use of a postplacental intrauterine device increased by 14% every quarter-year (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.15). In addition, (1) patient characteristics of young age, non-White race, obesity, tobacco use, lowest quartile median household income, and insured with Medicaid; (2) hospital characteristics of large bed capacity and urban teaching setting in Northeast region; and (3) pregnancy characteristics of early gestational age at cesarean delivery, hypertensive disease, previous cesarean delivery, multifetal pregnancy, grand multiparity, placenta previa, and nonelective cesarean delivery represented the independent characteristics associated with the use of a postplacental intrauterine device (all P<.05). A regression tree model identified 35 discrete patterns of the use of a postplacental intrauterine device based on 8 factors (time, race or ethnicity, primary expected payer, obesity, hospital bed capacity, hospital teaching status, hospital region, and previous cesarean delivery). There were 9 patterns, representing 8.8% of the study population, exhibiting a use rate of ≥1.0%, whereas there were 7 patterns, representing 16.0% of the study population, exhibiting no use of a postplacental intrauterine device (absolute rate difference from the highest group to the lowest group, 4.7%). In a propensity score-matched model, postplacental intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery was not associated with increased risk of measured morbidity (any, 1.8% vs 1.7%; odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.69; P=.812), including postpartum endometritis (1.2% vs 1.0%; odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-2.14; P=.554). CONCLUSION: The use of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery increased significantly in recent years in the United States.

2.
F S Rep ; 3(4): 361-365, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36568937

RESUMO

Objective: To examine patient characteristics among those who selected the long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and surgical sterilization methods at vaginal delivery. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: The National Inpatient Sample. Patients: A total of 8,013,785 vaginal deliveries from October 2016 to December 2019. Interventions: Exposure assignment per LARC (subdermal contraceptive implant [implants] or intrauterine device [IUD]) or surgical sterilization (bilateral salpingectomy [BS] or bilateral tubal ligation [BTL]) type. Main Outcome Measures: Utilization trends of LARC or surgical sterilization, assessed with linear segmented regression with log-transformation, and differences in patient characteristics per the exposure strata (implants vs. IUD in the LARC group and BS or BTL in the surgical sterilization group), assessed using the multivariate binary logistic regression model. Results: In a comparison between LARC and surgical sterilization, surgical sterilization use decreased from 1.90% to 1.55% (18.4% relative decrease), whereas LARC use increased from 0.35% to 1.02% (191% relative increase). In the LARC group, implant use (from 0.12% to 0.50%) increased more compared with IUD use (from 0.22% to 0.52%): relative increase, 317% vs. 136%. In the surgical sterilization group, BTL use decreased from 0.66% to 0.18% (72.7% relative decrease), whereas BS use was statistically unchanged (from 1.24% to 1.37%). In a multivariate analysis, recent year remained an independent characteristic for implant use in the LARC group and BS use in the surgical sterilization group. Moreover, in both LARC and surgical sterilization strata, procedure choices significantly differed on the basis of patient, pregnancy, hospital, and delivery factors. Conclusions: Immediate postpartum contraception choice has evolved in recent years in the United States with an increasing demand for the LARC methods with implants at the time of vaginal delivery.

3.
AJOG Glob Rep ; 2(4): 100111, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36311297

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Severe maternal morbidity refers to the most serious complications of pregnancy. Whether severe maternal morbidity is associated with post-traumatic stress disorder is currently under active investigation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between severe maternal morbidity and post-traumatic stress disorder at delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study querying the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample, which included 12,857,721 patients for national estimates who had vaginal or cesarean deliveries between January 2016 and December 2019. Patients with mental health conditions other than post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder were excluded. Severe maternal morbidity was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition (a total of 21 indicators). Main outcomes were trends and characteristics related to post-traumatic stress disorder, assessed with a multivariable binary logistic regression model. Sensitivity analysis included subcohort assessment restricted to patients per clinical and obstetrical demographics. RESULTS: A total of 8880 patients had a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder during the hospital admission for delivery (prevalence rate, 6.9 per 10,000). The prevalence rate of post-traumatic stress disorder increased from 5.0 to 8.8 per 10,000 deliveries between 2016 and 2019. This increasing trend remained independent in multivariable analysis. The adjusted odds ratio, compared with 2016, was 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.35) for 2017, 1.50 (95% confidence interval, 1.41-1.60) for 2018, and 1.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.63-1.84) for 2019. Severe maternal morbidity occurred in 210,605 (1.6%) patients. Patients who had severe maternal morbidity were more likely to have a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder than those without severe maternal morbidity (12.8 vs 6.8 per 10,000 deliveries; adjusted odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.78) in multivariable analysis. This association remained robust in several subcohort analyses including (1) participants aged ≤35 years (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-1.86), (2) those aged ≤35 years without medical comorbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.70-2.37), and (3) those aged <35 years without medical comorbidity, cesarean delivery, and preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 4.52; 95% confidence interval, 3.56-5.74). CONCLUSION: There has been a gradual increase in the number of patients with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder at delivery in recent years among those without other mental health or substance use conditions. These data suggest that there is a possible association between severe maternal morbidity and post-traumatic stress disorder.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA