Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 23(3): 267-271, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30963345

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is no demonstrated benefit of high-tie versus low-tie vascular transections in low rectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of high tie and low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery on colonic length. METHODS: This study was conducted in a surgical anatomy research laboratory. Anatomical dissections were performed on 11 human cadavers. We performed full left colonic mobilization, section of the descending-sigmoid junction, and high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery. Distance from the proximal colon limb to the lower edge of the pubis symphysis was recorded after each step of vascular division. Three measurements were successively performed: before vascular section, after inferior mesenteric artery ligation, and after inferior mesenteric artery and vein section. RESULTS: Before vascular section, the mean distance between colonic end and lower edge of the symphysis pubis was - 1.9 ± 3.5 cm. After combined artery and vein section, the mean distance was + 10.7 ± 4.6 cm for high tie and + 1.5 ± 3 cm for low tie. A limitation of this study is the use of embalmed anatomical specimens, rather than live patients, and the small number of specimens. This study also does not evaluate colon limb vascularization or the impact of proximal lymph node dissection on survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery at its aortic origin allows a gain of extra length of about 9 cm over low tie.


Assuntos
Colectomia/métodos , Colo/cirurgia , Ligadura/métodos , Artéria Mesentérica Inferior/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Visc Surg ; 153(4 Suppl): 33-43, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27519150

RESUMO

For the last 20 years, nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt hepatic trauma (BHT) has been the initial policy whenever this is possible (80% of cases), i.e., in all cases where the hemodynamic status does not demand emergency laparotomy. NOM relies upon the coexistence of three highly effective treatment modalities: radiology with contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) and hepatic arterial embolization, intensive care surveillance, and finally delayed surgery (DS). DS is not a failure of NOM management but rather an integral part of the surgical strategy. When imposed by hemodynamic instability, the immediate surgical option has seen its effectiveness transformed by development of the concept of abbreviated (damage control) laparotomy and wide application of the method of perihepatic packing (PHP). The effectiveness of these two conservative and cautious strategies for initial management is evidenced by current experience, but the management of secondary events that may arise with the most severe grades of injury must be both rapid and effective.


Assuntos
Fígado/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica , Hemorragia/terapia , Humanos , Hipertensão Intra-Abdominal , Hepatopatias/terapia , Doenças Peritoneais/terapia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Reoperação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA