Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 49(3): 397-402, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31611048

RESUMO

One in 16 patients prescribed opioids after a surgical procedure will become a long-term user. The lack of procedure-specific guidelines after common dental procedures contributes to the opioid overprescribing problem. We convened a multidisciplinary panel to develop consensus recommendations for opioid prescribing after common dental procedures. We used a three-step modified Delphi method to develop a consensus recommendation for outpatient opioid prescribing for 14 common dental procedures. The multi-institution, multidisciplinary panel represented seven relevant stakeholder groups (oral surgeons, periodontists, endodontists, general dentists, general surgeons, oral surgery residents, and oral surgery patients). The panel determined the minimum and maximum number of opioid tablets a clinician should consider prescribing. For all 14 surgical procedures, ibuprofen was recommended as initial therapy. The maximum number of opioid tablets recommended varied by procedure (overall median = 5 tablets, range = 0-15 tablets). Zero opioid tablets were recommended as the maximum number for six of 14 (43%) procedures, one to 10 opioid tablets was the maximum for four of 14 (27%) procedures, and 11-15 tablets was the maximum for four of 14 (27%) procedures. Procedure-specific prescribing recommendations may help provide guidance to clinicians and help address the opioid overprescribing problem.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Cirurgiões , Consenso , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória , Padrões de Prática Médica
2.
J Dent Res ; 86(1): 58-63, 2007 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17189464

RESUMO

For individuals with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction with limited mouth opening (closed lock), interventions vary from minimal treatment to surgery. In a single-blind trial, 106 individuals with TMJ closed lock were randomized among medical management, rehabilitation, arthroscopic surgery with post-operative rehabilitation, or arthroplasty with post-operative rehabilitation. Evaluations at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 60 months used the Craniomandibular Index (CMI) and Symptom Severity Index (SSI) for jaw function and TMJ pain respectively. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, we observed no between-group difference at any follow-up for CMI (p > or = 0.33) or SSI (p > or = 0.08). Both outcomes showed within-group improvement (p < 0.0001) for all groups. The findings of this study suggest that primary treatment for individuals with TMJ closed lock should consist of medical management or rehabilitation. The use of this approach will avoid unnecessary surgical procedures.


Assuntos
Luxações Articulares/terapia , Disco da Articulação Temporomandibular/patologia , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia , Artroscopia , Aconselhamento , Seguimentos , Humanos , Luxações Articulares/tratamento farmacológico , Luxações Articulares/cirurgia , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Placas Oclusais , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Simples-Cego , Disco da Articulação Temporomandibular/cirurgia , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 43(2): 217-26, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24042068

RESUMO

A previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) by Schiffman et al. (2007)(15) compared four treatments strategies for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction with limited mouth opening (closed lock). In this parallel group RCT, 106 patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed TMJ closed lock were randomized between medical management, non-surgical rehabilitation, arthroscopic surgery, and arthroplasty. Surgical groups also received rehabilitation post-surgically. The current paper reassesses the effectiveness of these four treatment strategies using outcome measures recommended by the International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (IAOMS). Clinical assessments at baseline and at follow-up (3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 60 months) included intensity and frequency of TMJ pain, mandibular range of motion, TMJ sounds, and impairment of chewing. TMJ MRIs were performed at baseline and 24 months, and TMJ tomograms at baseline, 24 and 60 months. Most IAOMS recommended outcome measures improved significantly over time (P≤0.0003). There was no difference between treatment strategies relative to any treatment outcome at any follow-up (P≥0.16). Patient self-assessment of treatment success correlated with their ability to eat, with pain-free opening ≥35mm, and with reduced pain intensity. Given no difference between treatment strategies, non-surgical treatment should be employed for TMJ closed lock before considering surgery.


Assuntos
Disco da Articulação Temporomandibular/cirurgia , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Artroplastia , Artroscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Disco da Articulação Temporomandibular/fisiopatologia , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA