Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cardiovasc Res ; 53(1): 175-80, 2002 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11744026

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Ischemic preconditioning is known to protect the human heart from ischemic injury during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery but is not practised routinely. Adenosine A1 receptor agonists may confer protection in this setting by mimicking preconditioning. The aim of this study was to compare preconditioning, by ischemia or an adenosine A1 receptor agonist (GR79236X), with an established method of myocardial protection in CABG, namely intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation. METHODS: In this prospective double-blind study, 30 CABG patients were randomised to receive: (a) intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation (control), (b) pharmacological preconditioning (GR79236X), or (c) ischemic preconditioning (two 3-min periods of ischemia, each followed by 2 min of reperfusion). Surgery was performed under standardised conditions by one surgeon (WBP). The primary endpoint was cardiac troponin T release. RESULTS: Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 91+/-11.6 (S.D.) min. Mean ischemic time was 33+/-5.5 (S.D.) min with no inter-group difference. Mean troponin T at 72 h was highest in the control group (1.32+/-0.99 (S.D.) microg/l), similar in the GR79236X group (1.22+/-1.22 (S.D.) microg/l; P=0.85) and significantly reduced in the ischemic preconditioning group (0.58+/-0.40 (S.D.) microg/l; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic preconditioning is superior to the other techniques at limiting myocardial necrosis during CABG. Pharmacological preconditioning may confer some benefit but this was not statistically shown using a specific adenosine A1 agonist (GR79236X).


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Doença das Coronárias/cirurgia , Precondicionamento Isquêmico Miocárdico/métodos , Miocárdio/patologia , Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Doença das Coronárias/patologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isquemia Miocárdica/metabolismo , Necrose , Estudos Prospectivos , Agonistas do Receptor Purinérgico P1 , Troponina T/metabolismo
2.
Cardiovasc Surg ; 10(3): 251-5, 2002 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12044434

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to compare ischemic preconditioning (IPC) with two established methods of myocardial protection, namely cold crystalloid cardioplegia and intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation (ICCF), in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. This was a prospective randomised study. Thirty CABG patients were randomised to receive: (a) St Thomas' cardioplegia solution no. 2; (b) ICCF; or (c) IPC (two 3-min periods of ischemia with 2-min of reperfusion). Surgery was performed under standardised conditions by one surgeon (WBP). The primary endpoint was cardiac troponin T release during the first 72 h after surgery. Mean troponin T at 72 h was significantly lower in the IPC group (0.5 microg/l; p=0.05, ANOVA) compared with the cardioplegia and ICCF groups (2.1 and 1.3 microg/l respectively). This suggests that ischemic preconditioning is superior at limiting myocardial necrosis during CABG, but there is no difference between cold crystalloid cardioplegia and intermittent cross-clamp fibrillation.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Parada Cardíaca Induzida/métodos , Precondicionamento Isquêmico Miocárdico/métodos , Aorta Torácica , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatologia , Soluções Cardioplégicas/administração & dosagem , Constrição , Eletrocardiografia , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Troponina T/sangue , Fibrilação Ventricular
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA