Acoustic Droplet Vaporization of Perfluorohexane Emulsions Induced by Heterogeneous Nucleation at an Ultrasonic Frequency of 1.1 MHz.

Droplets made of liquid perfluorocarbon undergo a phase transition and transform into microbubbles when triggered by ultrasound of intensity beyond a critical threshold; this mechanism is called acoustic droplet vaporization (ADV). It has been shown that if the intensity of the signal coming from high ultrasonic harmonics are sufficiently high, superharmonic focusing is the mechanism leading to ADV for large droplets (>3 µm) and high frequencies (>1.5 MHz). In such a scenario, ADV is initiated due to a nucleus occurring at a specific location inside the droplet volume. But the question on what induces ADV in the case of nanometer-sized droplets and/or at low ultrasonic frequencies (<1.5 MHz) still remains. We investigated ADV of perfluorohexane (PFH) nano- and microdroplets at a frequency of 1.1 MHz and at conditions where there is no superharmonic focusing. Three types of droplets produced by microfluidics were studied: plain PFH droplets, PFH droplets containing many nanometer-sized water droplets, and droplets made of a PFH corona encapsulating a single micron-sized water droplet. The probability to observe a vaporization event was measured as a function of acoustic pressure. As our experiments were performed on droplet suspensions containing a population of monodisperse droplets, we developed a statistical model to extrapolate, from our experimental curves, the ADV pressure thresholds in the case where only one droplet would be insonified. We observed that the value of ADV pressure threshold decreases as the radius of a plain PFH droplet increases. This value was further reduced when a PFH droplet encapsulates a micron-sized water droplet, while the encapsulation of many nanometer-sized water droplets did not modify the threshold. These results cannot be explained by a model of homogeneous nucleation. However, we developed a heterogeneous nucleation model, where the nucleus appears at the surface in contact with PFH, that successfully predicts our experimental ADV results.

[Multifocal ERG using ERG-jet and Gold Foil electrodes in normal subjects: comparison and reproducibility]. / ERG multifocal avec électrodes ERG-jet et Gold Foil chez le sujet normal: comparaison et reproductibilité.

PURPOSE: To compare multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) amplitudes with the Gold Foil electrode and ERG-jet electrode. To study mfERG amplitude changes between two successive records (intraindividual reproducibility). METHODS: The right eye of 27 normal subjects was examined. Two mfERG recordings using the 61-hexagon strategy (Vision Monitor, Métrovision, France) were made with both ERG-jet and Gold Foil electrodes. N1 and P1 wave amplitudes were analyzed in the central response and in four concentric rings. Bland and Altman analysis was used for the reproducibility study. RESULTS: MfERG amplitudes were significantly lower with the Gold Foil electrode, which averaged 72+/-10% of ERG-jet amplitudes. For N1 and P1 waves, the percentage change for the intraindividual reproducibility study was 9.1% and 6.7%, respectively, with the ERG-jet electrode and 18.2% and 13.5%, respectively, with the Gold Foil electrode. CONCLUSION: MfERG amplitudes were larger and more reproducible with an ERG-jet electrode than with a Gold Foil electrode. The limits of agreement of each ring can be used in clinical practice to determine whether the variation between two mfERG recordings over time is normal, which could reflect a retinal disorder.