Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 30(4): 324-332, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841918

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review the current Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) cardiogenic shock classification system and consider alternatives or iterations that may enhance our current descriptions of cardiogenic shock trajectory. RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies have identified the potential prognostic value of serial SCAI stage re-assessment, usually within the first 24 h of shock onset, to predict deterioration and clinical outcomes across shock causes. In parallel, numerous registry-based analyses support the utility of a more precise assessment of the macrocirculation and microcirculation, leveraging invasive haemodynamics, imaging and additional laboratory and clinical markers. The emergence of machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities offers the opportunity to integrate multimodal data into high fidelity, real-time metrics to more precisely define trajectory and inform our therapeutic decision making. SUMMARY: Whilst the SCAI staging system remains a pivotal tool in cardiogenic shock assessment, communication and reassessment, it is vital that the sophistication with which we measure and assess shock trajectory evolves in parallel our understanding of the complexity and variability of clinical course and clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Choque Cardiogênico , Humanos , Choque Cardiogênico/fisiopatologia , Choque Cardiogênico/diagnóstico por imagem , Prognóstico , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Sociedades Médicas
2.
Heart Lung Circ ; 33(3): 310-315, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320880

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a well-recognised predictor of outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Psoas muscle area (PMA) is a surrogate marker for sarcopaenia and is a validated assessment tool for frailty. The objective of this study was to examine frailty as a predictor of outcomes in TAVI patients and assess the prognostic usefulness of adding PMA to established frailty assessments. METHODS: Frailty assessments were performed on 220 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI. These assessments used four markers (serum albumin, handgrip strength, gait speed, and a cognitive assessment), which were combined to form a composite frailty score. Preprocedural computed tomography scans were used to calculate cross-sectional PMA for each patient. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality at 1-year and post-procedure length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Frailty status, as defined by the composite frailty score, was independently predictive of length of hospital stay (p=0.001), but not predictive of 1-year mortality (p=0.161). Albumin (p=0.036) and 5-metre walk test (p=0.003) were independently predictive of 1-year mortality. The PMA, when adjusted for gender, and normalised according to body surface area, was not predictive of 1-year mortality. Normalised PMA was associated with increased post-procedure length of stay within the female population (p=0.031). CONCLUSIONS: A low PMA is associated with increased length of hospital stay in female TAVI patients but does not provide additional predictive value over traditional frailty scores. The PMA was not shown to correlate with TAVI-related complications or 1-year mortality.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Fragilidade , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Feminino , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Força da Mão/fisiologia , Músculos Psoas/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Transversais , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Valva Aórtica , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur Heart J Open ; 4(3): oeae038, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751456

RESUMO

Aims: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction disproportionately affects women. There are no validated sex-specific tools for HF diagnosis despite widely reported differences in cardiac structure. This study investigates whether sex, as assigned at birth, influences cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP), a hallmark of HF agnostic to ejection fraction. Methods and results: A derivation cohort of patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension and HF from the Sheffield centre underwent invasive right heart catheterization and CMR within 24 h of each other. A sex-specific CMR model to estimate LVFP, measured as pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), was developed using multivariable regression. A validation cohort of patients with confirmed HF from the Leeds centre was used to evaluate for the primary endpoints of HF hospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Comparison between generic and sex-specific CMR-derived PCWP was undertaken. A total of 835 (60% female) and 454 (36% female) patients were recruited into the derivation and validation cohorts respectively. A sex-specific model incorporating left atrial volume and left ventricular mass was created. The generic CMR PCWP showed significant differences between males and females (14.7 ± 4 vs. 13 ± 3.0 mmHg, P > 0.001), not present with the sex-specific CMR PCWP (14.1 ± 3 vs. 13.8 mmHg, P = 0.3). The sex-specific, but not the generic, CMR PCWP was associated with HF hospitalization (hazard ratio 3.9, P = 0.0002) and MACE (hazard ratio 2.5, P = 0.001) over a mean follow-up period of 2.4 ± 1.2 years. Conclusion: Accounting for sex improves precision and prognostic performance of CMR biomarkers for HF.

4.
ESC Heart Fail ; 2024 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39132877

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging shows promise in estimating pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) non-invasively. At the population level, the prognostic role of CMR-modelled PCWP remains unknown. Furthermore, the relationship between CMR-modelled PCWP and established risk factors for cardiovascular disease has not been well characterized. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of CMR-modelled PCWP at the population level. METHODS: Employing data from the imaging substudy of the UK Biobank, a very large prospective population-based cohort study, CMR-modelled PCWP was calculated using a model incorporating left atrial volume, left ventricular mass and sex. Logistic regression explored the relationships between typical cardiovascular risk factors and raised CMR-modelled PCWP (≥15 mmHg). Cox regression was used to examine the impact of typical risk factors and CMR-modelled PCWP on heart failure (HF) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: Data from 39 163 participants were included in the study. Median age of all participants was 64 years (inter-quartile range: 58 to 70), and 47% were males. Clinical characteristics independently associated with raised CMR-modelled PCWP included hypertension [odds ratio (OR) 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.44-1.70, P < 0.001], body mass index (BMI) [OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.52-1.62, per standard deviation (SD) increment, P < 0.001], male sex (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.26-1.47, P < 0.001), age (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.27-1.41, per decade increment, P < 0.001) and regular alcohol consumption (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02-1.19, P = 0.012). After adjusting for potential confounders, CMR-modelled PCWP was independently associated with incident HF [hazard ratio (HR) 2.91, 95% CI 2.07-4.07, P < 0.001] and MACE (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.16-1.89, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Raised CMR-modelled PCWP is an independent risk factor for incident HF and MACE. CMR-modelled PCWP should be incorporated into routine CMR reports to guide HF diagnosis and further management.

5.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e087175, 2024 May 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806422

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Smoking during pregnancy is harmful to unborn babies, infants and women. Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is offered as the usual stop-smoking support in the UK. However, this is often used in insufficient doses, intermittently or for too short a time to be effective. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) explores whether a bespoke intervention, delivered in pregnancy, improves adherence to NRT and is effective and cost-effective for promoting smoking cessation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-arm parallel-group RCT was conducted for pregnant women aged ≥16 years and who smoke ≥1 daily cigarette (pre-pregnancy smoked ≥5) and who agree to use NRT in an attempt to quit. Recruitment is from antenatal care settings and via social media adverts. Participants are randomised using blocked randomisation with varying block sizes, stratified by gestational age (<14 or ≥14 weeks) to receive: (1) usual care (UC) for stop smoking support or (2) UC plus an intervention to increase adherence to NRT, called 'Baby, Me and NRT' (BMN), comprising adherence counselling, automated tailored text messages, a leaflet and website. The primary outcome is biochemically validated smoking abstinence at or around childbirth, measured from 36 weeks gestation. Secondary outcomes include NRT adherence, other smoking measures and birth outcomes. Questionnaires collect follow-up data augmented by medical record information. We anticipate quit rates of 10% and 16% in the control and intervention groups, respectively (risk ratio=1.6). By recruiting 1320 participants, the trial should have 90% power (alpha=5%) to detect this intervention effect. An economic analysis will use the Economics of Smoking in Pregnancy model to determine cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by Bloomsbury National Health Service's Research Ethics Committee (21/LO/0123). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated to the public, funders, relevant practice/policy representatives, researchers and participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16830506. PROTOCOL VERSION: 5.0, 10 Oct 2023.


Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Humanos , Gravidez , Feminino , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Adulto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Complicações na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Aconselhamento/métodos , Fumar , Terapia de Substituição da Nicotina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA