Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Paavilainen Femoral Shortening Osteotomy Can Provide Good Results at 10 Years in Patients Who Have Crowe IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to present the clinical and radiologic results of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the femoral shortening osteotomy technique described by Paavilainen in patients who have Crowe IV developmental dysplasia of the hip. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the results of primary THA using the Paavilainen technique in 335 hips. The mean follow-up was 10.2 years. The degree of limp, leg-length discrepancy, and patient satisfaction were assessed. The Oxford Hip Score was used to examine functional outcomes. A number of radiographic parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: The most common reason for revision surgery was nonunion of the distally advanced greater trochanter. This complication was observed in 22 hips (6.5%). The 10-year survival for acetabular components, it was 97.3%, and for femoral components was 98.7% with aseptic loosening as the end point, and 85.9% with reoperation for any reason as the end point. Patients demonstrated improved functional outcomes. The mean limb lengthening was 27.8 mm. Nonunion was more common if the contact length of the proximal femoral fragment with the lateral surface of the distal femoral fragment was less than 35 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Cementless primary THA using the femoral shortening osteotomy technique described by Paavilainen in patients who have Crowe IV dysplasia of the hip demonstrates good clinical and radiologic postoperative results. If the contact between the fragments after osteotomy is less than 35 mm, there is a high risk of nonunion, and supplemental fixation may be warranted.

Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty implications in young patients with post-traumatic sequelae.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) performed for trauma sequelae in patients <45 years of age. METHODS: This retrospective study included 63 patients aged <45 years who underwent TEA between 2005 and 2017 for previous elbow injuries. The average follow-up period was 5.23 years (range, 2-13 years). The clinical analysis included limb function according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Oxford Elbow Score, and range of motion. The degree of radiolucency was determined using plain radiographic images. RESULTS: The average amplitude of elbow flexion/extension increased from 49.1 ± 36.7 to 98.7 ± 28.2 (P < .01), and the average amplitude of elbow pronation/supination increased from 87.2 ± 52.3 to 118.7 ± 26.3 (P = .02). Functional results improved from 21.4 ± 13.1 to 67.3 ± 14.5 (P < .01) on the Mayo scale, and those measured according to the Oxford scale improved from 15.4% ± 7.0% to 28.0% ± 10.6% (P < .01). Complications were observed in 16 (32.7%) patients. Among them, 10 patients (20.4%) required revision elbow arthroplasty with replacement of implant components. The overall 5-year implant survival rate was 79.4% (95% confidence interval: 63.4-91.2), and the 10-year survival rate was 77.5% (95% confidence interval: 59.3-88.2). CONCLUSION: TEA allows restoration of the full range of motion in the elbow joint and significantly improves limb function in most cases. However, the low survival rate of implants and high incidence of complications do not permit TEA to become a routine intervention for treating post-traumatic consequences in young patients.

Standard Versus Custom-Made Acetabular Implants in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Today, various options are used for the reconstruction of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA). The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of using standard acetabular implants (SAIs) and custom-made acetabular implants (CMAIs) in RTHA in cases with extensive acetabular bone loss. METHODS: This was a comparative analysis of the results of 106 operations of RTHA performed during the period from January 2013 to December 2019. In 61 cases (57.5%), CMAIs were used. In 45 cases (42.5%), SAIs were implanted. RESULTS: The incidence of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component after RTHA in uncontained loss of bone stock of the acetabulum (type III-IV as per the Gross and Saleh classification) using the CMAI was less than that using the SAI (2.4% and 10.0%, respectively). The most significant differences in aseptic loosening rates were noted after implantation of the CMAI and SAI in pelvic discontinuity with uncontained bone defect (0% and 60.0%, respectively; P<.001). CONCLUSION: The ideal indications for the use of the CMAI are uncontained defects and pelvic discontinuity with uncontained loss of bone stock (types III-V Gross and Saleh classification). Treatment of these defects with the SAI leads to a higher incidence of aseptic loosening requiring re-revisions. Further observation is required to assess the effectiveness of using the CMAI and SAI in the long-term follow-up period.

Intrawound navigation for custom-made acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty: Does it improve implant positioning?

Background: The number of hip revisions makes up over 12 % of all hip arthroplasty cases. For large acetabular defects custom-made acetabular component (CMAC) are required. Rates of malposition of CMACs are highly variable. Our study aims to develop a readily available, reliable and easily reproducible method for positioning of the CMAC. We tried to answer the following questions: 1) how often does the postoperative position of the implant corresponds to the planned one; 2) is the use of intrawound navigation improve the precision of acetabular implant position. Methods: This was a single-center observational cohort study and included two groups: the experimental group (use of 3D navigation for implant positioning) and the control group (no navigation use). All the patients were scheduled for acetabular revision surgery with custom-made 3D-printed acetabular components. All surgeries took place between 2016 and 2020. Results: 25 % freehand group, 85 % implants in the navigation group matched accuracy positioning criteria. The relative risk of malposition was significantly higher without the intraoperative navigation, with 5 times greater risk of malpositioning in the freehand group versus the navigation group. Conclusion: Navigation method allows planning of the implant and reamer sizes for optimal bone preparation and preservation. It provides easier implantation of the complex implant with reliable, stable primary fixation in massive bone defects. It reliably decreases malposition rate, allowing for implant placement in a proper position with sufficient bone-implant contact. Further research is needed to determine the relationship between CMAC position accuracy and long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes.