RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at a disproportionate risk for HIV infection and common mental disorders worldwide. In the context of HIV, common mental disorders are important and are frequent drivers of suboptimal prevention and treatment outcomes. Mobile ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), or the repeated sampling of people's behaviors and psychological states in their daily lives using mobile phones, can clarify the triggers and HIV-related sequelae of depressive-anxious symptoms and contribute toward the design of ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) that cater to the contextually varying needs of individuals to optimize prevention and treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the feasibility and acceptability of mobile EMA among high-risk MSM in Hanoi, Vietnam. It aims to evaluate the perceived relevance, usability, and concerns of this group with regard to the content and delivery of mobile EMA and the potential of leveraging such platforms in the future to deliver EMIs. METHODS: Between January and April 2018, a total of 46 participants were recruited. The participants completed 6 to 8 mobile EMA surveys daily for 7 days. Surveys occurred once upon waking, 4 to 6 times throughout the day, and once before sleeping. All surveys queried participants' perceived safety, social interactions, psychological state, and mental health symptoms. The morning survey further queried on sleep and medication use within the past 24 hours, whereas the night survey queried on sexual activity and substance use and allowed participants to share an audio recording of a stressful experience they had that day. At the end of the week, participants were interviewed about their experiences with using the app. RESULTS: Participants completed an average of 21.7 (SD 12.7) prompts over the 7-day period. Excluding nonresponders, the average compliance rate was 61.8% (SD 26.6%). A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews suggested an overall positive reception of the app and 5 recurring themes, which were centered on the relevance of psychological and behavioral items to daily experiences (eg, mental health symptoms and audio recording), benefits of using the app (eg, increased self-understanding), worries and concerns (eg, privacy), usability (eg, confusion about the interface), and recommendations for future design (eg, integrating more open-ended questions). CONCLUSIONS: Mobile EMA is feasible and acceptable among young MSM in Vietnam; however, more research is needed to adapt EMA protocols to this context and enhance compliance. Most participants eagerly provided information about their mental health status and daily activities. As several participants looked toward the app for further mental health and psychosocial support, EMIs have the potential to reduce HIV and mental health comorbidity among MSM.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Globally, men who have sex with men (MSM) experience a disproportionate burden of mental health issues. While HIV service providers may possess the skills and relationships to provision mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) to this population, task-sharing models that integrate MHPSS into HIV contexts remain limited. The aim of this study was to explore the sociodemographic, psychological, and structural factors operant at the client and HIV service provider levels that shape MHPSS access and burden among MSM and opportunities for integration in Vietnam. METHODS: Between June and August 2018, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 MSM and 13 service providers at out-patient clinics (OPCs) and community-based organizations (CBOs) in Hanoi, Vietnam. Interviews explored participants' understandings of and experiences with the signs, causes, and appropriate treatments for mental health concerns; and perceived barriers to MHPSS integration in HIV contexts. Data were coded thematically and analyzed in MAXQDA. RESULTS: Most MSM did not view their mental distress as constituting illness or as warranting clinical attention. Specifically, terms like "mental illness" were often associated with being "crazy" or immoral, while symptoms of distress were interpreted as having to do with everyday difficulties associated with being MSM and/or HIV-positive. Due to mental health stigma, MSM were reluctant to access services while service providers were similarly reluctant to query about needs. Few service providers knew where to refer patients for MHPSS, and none had done so previously. Most service providers reported lacking the human capital, expertise, and funding to address MHPSS needs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that aside from mental health stigma, future integration strategies must address competing demands and incentivization structures, limitations in existing mental health infrastructure and funding, misperceptions around MHPSS needs and symptoms, and opportunities to streamline MHPSS with existing CBO activities to strengthen community wellbeing.