Efficacy of combined ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation with hyaluronic acid and physical therapy in patients with adhesive capsulitis: A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of combining ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation with hyaluronic acid and physical therapy compared with physical therapy alone in patients with adhesive capsulitis. DESIGN: A prospective, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Single medical centre. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with adhesive capsulitis (N = 62) were divided into group A: ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation with hyaluronic acid + physical therapy (N = 31) and group B: physical therapy alone (N = 31). INTERVENTIONS: Group A received three doses of ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation with hyaluronic acid-based injectates (20 mL in total). Both groups underwent structured physical therapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was Constant score, while secondary outcomes included Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score, numerical rating scale (at rest, night, and during motion), 36-item Short Form Health Survey, and range of motion of the shoulder. All measurements were collected at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks post-injection. RESULTS: At week 12, the Constant scores were 68.29 ± 14.55 and 62.77 ± 14.44 for groups A and B, respectively. There was a greater reduction in the Constant score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and numerical rating scale between the baseline and 6 weeks and between the baseline and 12 weeks in group A (Constant score: p < 0.05, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: p < 0.01, and numerical rating scale: p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation with hyaluronic acid in conjunction with physical therapy provides additional benefits compared to physical therapy alone for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis at up to 12 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02708706.

Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain: A Narrative Review.

Neuropathic pain, affecting 6.9-10% of the general population, has a negative impact on patients' quality of life and potentially leads to functional impairment and disability. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)-a safe, indirect and non-invasive technique-has been increasingly applied for treating neuropathic pain. The mechanism underlying rTMS is not yet well understood, and the analgesic effects of rTMS have been inconsistent with respect to different settings/parameters, causing insufficient evidence to determine its efficacy in patients with neuropathic pain. This narrative review aimed to provide an up-to-date overview of rTMS for treating neuropathic pain as well as to summarize the treatment protocols and related adverse effects from existing clinical trials. Current evidence supports the use of 10 Hz HF-rTMS of the primary motor cortex to reduce neuropathic pain, especially in patients with spinal cord injury, diabetic neuropathy and post-herpetic neuralgia. However, the lack of standardized protocols impedes the universal use of rTMS for neuropathic pain. rTMS was hypothesized to achieve analgesic effects by upregulating the pain threshold, inhibiting pain impulse, modulating the brain cortex, altering imbalanced functional connectivity, regulating neurotrophin and increasing endogenous opioid and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Further studies are warranted to explore the differences in the parameters/settings of rTMS for treating neuropathic pain due to different disease types.

Ultrasound Imaging and Guidance for Distal Peripheral Nerve Pathologies at the Wrist/Hand.

Ultrasound has emerged as a highly valuable tool in imaging peripheral nerve lesions in the wrist region, particularly for common pathologies such as carpal tunnel and Guyon's canal syndromes. Extensive research has demonstrated nerve swelling proximal to the entrapment site, an unclear border, and flattening as features of nerve entrapments. However, there is a dearth of information regarding small or terminal nerves in the wrist and hand. This article aims to bridge this knowledge gap by providing a comprehensive overview concerning scanning techniques, pathology, and guided-injection methods for those nerve entrapments. The median nerve (main trunk, palmar cutaneous branch, and recurrent motor branch), ulnar nerve (main trunk, superficial branch, deep branch, palmar ulnar cutaneous branch, and dorsal ulnar cutaneous branch), superficial radial nerve, posterior interosseous nerve, palmar common/proper digital nerves, and dorsal common/proper digital nerves are elaborated in this review. A series of ultrasound images are used to illustrate these techniques in detail. Finally, sonographic findings complement electrodiagnostic studies, providing better insight into understanding the whole clinical scenario, while ultrasound-guided interventions are safe and effective for treating relevant nerve pathologies.

Blink synkinesis monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.

BACKGROUND: In the present study, we investigated whether blink synkinesis monitoring during microvascular decompression (MVD) is effective for predicting long-term outcomes in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS). METHODS: This retrospective study included 69 patients who had undergone MVD for HFS at a tertiary hospital. All patients underwent intraoperative monitoring of blink synkinesis, lateral spread responses (LSRs), and facial nerve motor-evoked potentials (FNMEPs). Baseline signals were compared to those obtained following decompression with Teflon, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were observed with complete relief of symptoms after 1 year after MVD, while 61 patients were observed with initial disappearance of blink synkinesis, 57 patients were observed with initial elimination of the LSR, and 45 patients with initial decreases in FNMEP amplitude (>50%). The highest sensitivity and accuracy values were observed for blink synkinesis. Chi-square tests comparing the sensitivity of the three methods revealed that FNMEP monitoring was associated with significantly lower sensitivity values than the remaining methods. Combined use of blink synkinesis and LSRs did not significantly increase sensitivity (61/65 vs 62/65) or accuracy (62/69 vs 63/69). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that blink synkinesis monitoring is safe during MVD for HFS. Furthermore, blink synkinesis was associated with the highest sensitivity and predictive values among the three methods evaluated. These findings suggest that blink synkinesis can be regarded as the first choice for intraoperative monitoring during MVD. Concurrent use of blink synkinesis and LSR monitoring may maximize the ability to predict patient prognosis and determine the extent of decompression.