[The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on first-line primary care in southeastern France: Feedback on the implementation of a real-time monitoring system based on regional health insurance data]. / L'impact de l'épidémie de COVID-19 sur les soins de premier recours en région Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur : retour d'expérience sur la mise en place d'un dispositif de surveillance en temps réel à partir des données régionales de l'Assurance maladie.

BACKGROUND: Starting in spring 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic markedly impacted the French healthcare system. Lockdown and risks of exposure to the coronavirus induced patients to modify their ways of use. The objective of this article was to share feedback on the implementation of a real-time monitoring system concerning (a) the activity of private practitioners in southeastern France, and (b) the evolution of reimbursements for drugs prescribed to persons with diabetes, for treatment of mental health disorders, and for performance of some vaccines. METHODS: Data regarding 2019 and 2020 were extracted from regional health insurance databases. They were used to elaborate several indicators relative to the general health insurance scheme, which were calculated and updated each week, starting with week 2. RESULTS: We observed a drop in private physician activity during the lockdown (-23% for general practitioners; -46% for specialist doctors), followed by a return to a semblance of normalcy. Concomitantly, a boom in teleconsultations occurred: at the height of the crisis they represented 30% of medical acts. The initial stage of the lockdown was characterized by peak provisioning for drugs, whereas vaccination strongly declined (-39% regarding measles, mumps and rubella vaccine among children aged less than 5 years; -54% regarding human papillomavirus vaccine among girls aged 10 to 14 years). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic could lead to health effects other than those directly attributable to the coronavirus itself. Renouncing care may result in healthcare delays highly deleterious for people and society. Public authorities are preoccupied with these questions; they have set up action plans aimed at encouraging patients to seek treatment without delay. That said, the COVID-19 pandemic crisis has also created opportunities, such as the expansion of telemedicine. Although partial, these indicators can provide useful information enabling public decision makers to be reactive and to implement specific actions to meet the health needs of the population.

The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on primary care in South-eastern France: implementation of a real-time monitoring system based on regional health insurance system data.

BACKGROUND: The spring 2020 COVID-19 epidemic severely impacted France's healthcare system. The associated lockdown (17 March- 11 May 2020) and the risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 led patients to change their use of healthcare. This article presents the development and implementation of a real-time system to monitor i) private doctors' activity in South-eastern France, and ii) changes in prescription of drugs for people with diabetes, mental health disorders and for certain vaccines from Mars 2020 to October 2020. METHODS: Data extracted from the regional healthcare insurance databases for 2019 and 2020 were used to construct indicators of healthcare use. They were calculated on a weekly basis, starting from week 2 2020 and compared for the same period between 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: Private doctors' activity decreased during the spring 2020 lockdown (by 23 % for general practitioners and 46 % for specialists), followed by an almost complete return to normal after it ended until week 41. Over the same period, a huge increase in teleconsultations was observed, accounting for 30 % of private doctors' consultations at the height of the crisis. The start of the lockdown was marked by a peak in drug prescriptions, while vaccinations declined sharply (by 39 % for the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine in children under 5 years old, and by 54 % for human papillomavirus vaccine in girls aged 10-14 years old). CONCLUSION: The ongoing COVID-19 epidemic may lead to health consequences other than those directly attributable to the disease itself. Specifically, lockdowns and foregoing healthcare could be very harmful at the individual and population levels. The latter issue is a concern for French public authorities, which have implemented actions aimed at encouraging patients to immediately seek treatment. However, the COVID-19 crisis has also created opportunities, such as the roll-out of teleconsultation and tele-expertise. The indicators described here as part of the monitoring system can help public decision-makers to become more responsive and to implement tailored actions to better meet the general population's healthcare needs.

Impact of medication review via tele-expertise on unplanned hospitalizations at 3 months of nursing homes patients (TEM-EHPAD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate drug prescribing causes preventable drug-related adverse events that result in increased morbidity and mortality, additional costs and diminished quality of life. Numerous initiatives have been launched to improve the quality of drug prescribing and safeguard the security of drug administration processes in nursing homes. Against the backdrop of implementation of telemedicine services, the focus of the present work is to evaluate the impact of a telemedication review carried out by a hospital physician and pharmacist as part of the telemedicine offer. METHODS: The present study is a randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 364 patients will be randomized into two groups: (1) an experimental group (182 patients) benefiting from a telemedication review using tele-expertise and (2) a control group (182 patients) receiving standard care. The primary endpoint will be rate of all-cause unplanned hospital admissions occurring within 3 months of randomization. The secondary endpoints will be rate of unplanned admissions at 6 months, patient quality of life, incidence of behavioral disturbances, number of falls, number of residents prescribed at least one inappropriate medication, nursing staff satisfaction, proposed medication reviews and their acceptability rate, characteristics of patients whose general practitioners have taken account of tele-expertise, efficacy of tele-expertise as compared to standard prescription and acceptability and satisfaction surveys of participating caregivers. DISCUSSION: In the literature, various studies have investigated the utility of structured medication review processes, but outcome measures are heterogeneous, and results vary widely. Medication review can detect medication-related problems in many patients, but evidence of clinical impact is scant. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios will be used to compare the cost and effectiveness of the experimental strategy and that of standard care. Our approach, involving the combination of an acceptability survey and a mixed-method (qualitative and quantitative) satisfaction survey, is particularly innovative. The results of this randomized trial are expected to confirm that medication review using tele-expertise has potential as a worthwhile care management strategy for nursing home residents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03640845; registered August 21, 2018 (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03640845).

Supporting informed decision-making about vaccination: an analysis of two official websites.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the content of two official French-speaking websites that are used to inform the general public about recommended vaccines in France and Quebec. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative content analysis. METHODS: All pages that inform and educate parents regarding childhood vaccination were downloaded and analyzed according to evidence-informed risk communication metrics. RESULTS: A total of 32 webpages, 14 videos, and two infographics were included in the analysis. The following were the most frequent risk communication approaches: 'debunking common misconceptions about vaccination' or 'answering common questions about vaccines.' Harm and benefit information focused primarily on the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases and the risks of adverse events after immunization. Most materials used qualitative terminology to describe the risk (e.g., vaccines are among the safest tools, adverse events are rare). Very few materials provided numeric likelihood of harms and benefits. When numeric information was stated, they were only presenting the risks of the diseases or number of cases in an outbreak. The approaches used to debunk misconceptions generally focused on the myth itself rather than the correct information. Few materials used visual aids (e.g., graphics, pictures, icons arrays, etc.) to convey important information. CONCLUSIONS: It is often assumed that misinformation and rumors about vaccination found online is a leading cause of the increase in vaccine hesitancy. Existing communication materials could be improved to better align with best practices in risk communication. Given the availability of confusing and conflicting vaccine narratives, it is crucial that authoritative communication materials aim to build trust and support informed choices about vaccination.

Multi-trajectories of antidepressant and antipsychotic use: a 11-year naturalistic study in a community-based sample.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the temporal dynamic of antidepressant and antipsychotic co-prescribing in real-life conditions. METHODS: The study was performed using reimbursement data from the French Insurance Healthcare system in a cohort of 118 454 persons with at least one dispensing of antidepressants and/or antipsychotics over the period 2006-2016. Latent class analyses were used to identify homogeneous groups of persons following similar multi-trajectories of antidepressant and/or antipsychotic dispensing. Multivariate polynomial logistic regression models were used to explore the characteristics independently associated with distinct trajectories. RESULTS: Five multi-trajectories of antidepressant and/or antipsychotic dispensing were identified: more than half of the sample (58%) had very low antidepressant and antipsychotic use; two groups had chronic (12%) or decreasing (11%) antidepressant use with very low antipsychotic use; two groups used both antidepressants and antipsychotics simultaneously either in an increasing (12%) or chronic (7%) way. Persons with chronic antidepressant-antipsychotic use presented with markers of poor social and mental health conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Most persons using antipsychotics over the follow-up also used antidepressants over the same period. The benefit/risk ratio of these prescribing practices should be further explored as the long-term efficacy of antidepressant-antipsychotic polypharmacy is poorly documented, while this combination increases the risk of adverse effects.

Trajectory analysis of anxiolytic dispensing over 10 years among new users aged 50 and older.

OBJECTIVE: To identify temporal trajectories of anxiolytic benzodiazepine (A-BZD) use over 10 years among new A-BZD users aged 50 and older and describe treatment patterns and demographic and clinical characteristics associated with each trajectory. METHOD: A representative cohort of the French national health insurance fund users was tracked from 2006 through 2015. We used latent class mixed models to identify the trajectories. RESULTS: We observed four trajectories among new users (no A-BZD dispensing in 2005) plus one non-use trajectory. The proportion of occasional use among users was 60%; early increasing use, 10%; late increasing use, 17%; and increasing/decreasing use, 13%. Prevalence of occasional use decreased with age in women, but not men. Duration of treatment episodes and doses differed between trajectories. Multiple regression analyses with occasional use as the reference showed that the other three trajectories shared characteristics (age, coprescriptions of other psychotropic drugs, and more general practitioner consultations) but differed by the presence at inclusion or occurrence during follow-up of psychiatric, neurodegenerative, and somatic conditions. CONCLUSION: We found four different long-term temporal trajectories in new A-BZD users (occasional, early increasing, late increasing, and increasing/decreasing use). Difficulties quitting or reducing consumption may be very different for each trajectory, requiring tailored care approaches.

[Trends in social inequities in diabetes care in the Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur region of France between 2008 and 2011]. / Évolution des inégalités sociales de suivi du diabète en région Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur entre 2008 et 2011.

BACKGROUND: Social inequities in healthcare are known to exist for the management of many chronic diseases in France, including diabetes. The recession that began in 2008 has led to increased income disparities but has it also exacerbated health inequities. The aim of this study was to describe trends in inequities in diabetes-related healthcare between 2008 and 2011 in the PACA region (Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur). METHODS: This analysis used two sources of data: the regional national health insurance fund (PACA region) reimbursement database and the socio-demographic databases of the national statistics office (INSEE) for four full years (2008 to 2011). It included individuals who had been reimbursed for three purchases of oral diabetes drugs during the previous year and assessed the association between the median household income (weighted by number and age of household members) of each patient's municipality of residence and seven indicators of diabetes monitoring and care. Using adjusted mixed logistic models, including an interaction term between time (number of years) and the median household income of the municipality, we examined the performance of the indicators for each year. RESULTS: The total number of patients with diabetes in the 941 municipalities of the PACA region varied by year from 142,055 to 164,929. Models showed that living in a town with a high or intermediate household income was significantly associated with better performance of the seven indicators and that the interaction term was significant for six of them. The effect of the municipal median income decreased significantly between 2008 and 2011 for five indicators: HbA1c, LDL-cholesterol, microalbuminuria, ophthalmoscopy and diabetes specialist visit. CONCLUSION: Social inequities in diabetes-related healthcare persisted between 2008 and 2011 but appeared to be decreasing, despite the recession.

Geographical disparities in prescription practices of lithium and clozapine: a community-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the socioeconomic and health resource characteristics associated with geographical variations of lithium and clozapine dispensing rates in France. METHOD: The study was performed using reimbursement data from the French Insurance Healthcare system over the period 2006-2013 in a community-based sample of persons aged 16 years and over. An ecological design was used to assess whether lithium and clozapine prescribing rates were associated with socioeconomic and health resource characteristics of the zone of residence (n = 95 French administrative subdivisions). RESULTS: Large geographical disparities were observed in dispensing rates: lithium dispensing rates by zone of residence ranged from 0 to 6.6 per 1000 (mean 2.4 per 1000) and clozapine dispensing rates ranged from 0 to 4.9 per 1000 (mean 0.8 per 1000). Higher density of GPs and regular communication between mental health services and primary care were independently associated with higher rates of lithium and clozapine dispensing and with a higher proportion of lithium users among mood-stabilizer users. CONCLUSION: A sufficient density of GPs and an effective communication and collaboration between mental healthcare services and primary care seems to favor greater access to psychotropic drugs with demonstrated efficacy but often viewed as 'risky' to prescribe.

[Relevance of the health insurance databases to study spatial disparities in asthma prevalence: A study in southeastern France]. / Intérêt des données de remboursement de l'assurance-maladie pour l'étude des disparités territoriales de la prévalence de l'asthme : une étude en Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur.

BACKGROUND: Data on asthma prevalence at a small-area level would be useful to set up and monitor French local public health policies. This study, based on drug reimbursement databases in southeastern France, aimed to (1) compare asthma-like disorders prevalence estimated by using three different indicators; (2) study sociodemographic characteristics associated with these indicators; (3) verify whether these indicators are equivalent to study geographical disparities of the asthma-like disorders prevalence at a small-area level. METHODS: The study was conducted among the beneficiaries of the National Health Insurance Fund aged 18-44 years residing in southeastern France in 2010 (n=1,371,816). Using data on asthma drugs reimbursements (therapeutic class R03), we built three indicators to assess asthma-like disorders prevalence: at least 1, 2 or 3 purchase(s) in 2010. We analyzed sociodemographic characteristics associated with these indicators, and their geographical disparities at a small-area level using multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS: The crude asthma-like disorders prevalence varied between 2.6 % and 8.4 % depending on the indicator. It increased with age, was higher for women than for men, and among low-income people for all three indicators. We measured significant geographical disparities. Areas with high prevalence rates were the same regardless of the indicator. CONCLUSION: The indicators built in this study can be useful to identify high prevalence areas. They could contribute to launch discussion on environmental health issues at the local level.

[How do we catch flu? Beliefs in France in 2010]. / Comment attrape-t-on la grippe ? Les croyances des Français en 2010.

AIMS: Our goals were to describe beliefs held by French people concerning the contagiosity of influenza and analyze the relationship of these beliefs with vaccination against seasonal flu. METHODS: A subsample (4749 people aged 15-79) of the Health Barometer 2010 responded to questions dealing with influenza. Responses were analyzed using clustering analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, observed beliefs were quite good, but also socially differentiated. 'False' beliefs were more frequent among people with a lower socioeconomic status. Those who overestimated the contagiosity of influenza were less likely to have been vaccinated against seasonal influenza in 2008. CONCLUSIONS: The beliefs analyzed here were associated with vaccination behaviors. 'False' beliefs may be difficult to change as they are nevertheless coherent. These beliefs also exhibit social inequalities that should be taken into account when determining preventive measures.

Factors associated with the use of rapid antigen diagnostic tests in children presenting with acute pharyngitis among French general practitioners.

In this investigation, we wanted: (i) to describe the attitudes and declared practices of a representative sample of French general practitioners (GPs) regarding rapid antigen diagnostic tests (RADTs) for acute pharyngitis and (ii) to identify the GPs' characteristics associated with the use of an RADT in the last paediatric patient with pharyngitis. We performed a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2012 among a representative sample of 1,126 self-employed GPs in France. 60.1 % of GPs declared that they used an RADT in their last patient aged between 3 and 16 years presenting with acute pharyngitis; 29.6 % of these tests were positive. Among the GPs who did not use an RADT, 50.2 % prescribed an antibiotic, compared to 30.5 % of prescriptions among GPs who performed an RADT, whatever its result. In a multivariate analysis, GPs' age between 45 and 54 years and having attended Continuing Medical Education (CME) sessions on infectious diseases in the past year were significantly associated with an increased use of an RADT in the last patient with pharyngitis, whereas a low volume of activity, occasionally practising alternative medicine, receiving pharmaceutical representatives at the practice and declaring a consultation duration <15 min were factors associated with a decreased use of RADTs. The use of RADTs by GPs must be promoted; our findings could help define interventions to improve practice.

Is exposure to night-time traffic noise a risk factor for purchase of anxiolytic-hypnotic medication? A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that road traffic noise increases risks of sleep disturbances, anxiety and depressive symptoms, but few have focused on psychotropic drug use. We examined whether exposure to night-time road traffic noise in Marseilles (France) is associated with an increased risk of purchasing anxiolytic or hypnotic medications. METHODS: Cohort of 190,617 inhabitants of Marseilles (aged 18-64 years) covered by the National Health Insurance Fund. We used the CadnaA noise propagation prediction model to calculate a potential road noise exposure indicator at dwellings for the night-period: Ln. Association between the number of purchases of anxiolytics-hypnotics in 2008-9 and the Ln was analysed with a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model adjusted for characteristics of individuals (sociodemographic, consultations with general practitioners, presence of chronic psychiatric disorder), prescribers (demographic, specialty, workload) and neighbourhoods (medical density, complaints filed for environmental noise). Analyses were stratified by the deprivation level of the census block of residence to control for the confounding effects of neighbourhood socio-economic status. RESULTS: The ZINB model showed a small but significant increase in the risk of purchasing higher numbers of anxiolytics-hypnotics for Ln greater than 55 dB(A) only in the low deprivation stratum. CONCLUSION: We found some evidence that potential exposure to night-time road traffic noise might affect individual use of anxiolytics-hypnotics. Further research based on strictly individual approaches is warranted to assess exposure to road traffic noise more precisely and reliably than allowed by noise propagation prediction models.

Indicators show differences in antibiotic use between general practitioners and paediatricians.

The purpose of this investigation was to adapt to an individual physician level and to the paediatric context a set of drug-specific indicators of outpatient antibiotic use developed by the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC) project, and to describe the differences in antibiotic prescriptions between general practitioners (GPs) and paediatricians. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study analysing antibiotic prescriptions in 2009 for children below 16 years of age in south-eastern France, using the National Health Insurance (NHI) outpatient reimbursement database. A generalised linear model adjusted on physicians' characteristics and patient population characteristics was used to compare indicators between GPs and paediatricians. We included 4,921 self-employed GPs and 301 paediatricians. Penicillins accounted for 47% and 45% of all antibiotics prescribed by GPs and paediatricians, respectively, followed by cephalosporins (33% and 39%) and macrolides (14% and 9%). In both specialties, there were around 70% more antibiotic prescriptions during the winter quarters compared to the summer quarters. The 13 indicators we calculated showed wide variations in antibiotic prescriptions among GPs, among paediatricians, and between GPs and paediatricians. In an adjusted econometric model, GPs were found to issue 54% more antibiotic prescriptions than paediatricians, whereas paediatricians used a significantly higher proportion of co-amoxiclav (18% vs. 12%) and cephalosporins (39% vs. 33%) and a significantly lower proportion of macrolides (9% vs. 14%) compared to GPs. A set of 13 indicators may be calculated using reimbursement data to describe outpatient antibiotic use at the physician level. We observed very different prescribing profiles between GPs and paediatricians.

Approaching the quality of antibiotic prescriptions in primary care using reimbursement data.

Our objectives for this investigation were: (i) to design quality measures of outpatient antibiotic use that could be calculated at the individual general practitioner (GP) level using reimbursement data only; and (ii) to analyse the variability in antibiotic prescriptions between GPs regarding these measures in south-eastern France. Based on the literature and international therapeutic guidelines, we designed a set of quality measures in an exploratory attempt to assess the quality of antibiotic prescriptions. We performed a cross-sectional study of antibiotic prescriptions in adults in south-eastern France in 2009, using data from the outpatient reimbursement database of the French National Health Insurance (NHI). We carried out a cluster analysis to group GPs according to their antibiotic prescribing behaviour. Six quality measures were calculated at the GP level, with wide variations in practice regarding all these measures. A six-cluster solution was identified, with one cluster grouping 56 % of the sample and made up of GPs having the most homogeneous pattern of prescription for all six quality measures, probably reflecting better antibiotic prescribing. Total pharmaceutical expenses (per patient), penicillin combinations use, quinolone use and seasonal variation of quinolone use were all positively associated with a more heterogeneous and possibly less appropriate use of antibiotics in a multivariate analysis. These quality measures could be useful to assess GPs' antibiotic prescribing behaviour in countries where no information system provides easy access to data linking drug use to a clinical condition.

Dramatic change in public attitudes towards vaccination during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic in France.

We investigated the potential impact of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic on attitudes towards vaccination among people aged 18 to 75 years and living in metropolitan France. We used data from three national telephone surveys conducted on representative samples in 2000, 2005 and 2010 (n=12,256, n=23,931, n=8,573 respectively). In France, unfavourable attitudes towards vaccination in general dramatically increased from 8.5% in 2000 and 9.6% in 2005 to 38.2% in 2010. In 2010, among respondents who held unfavourable attitudes towards vaccination, 50% mentioned specifically their opposition to the influenza A(H1N1) vaccine. The sociodemographic profile associated with these attitudes also changed greatly. In particular, unfavourable attitudes towards vaccination in general became significantly more frequent among less educated people in 2010. These attitudes were also correlated with vaccination behaviours. For example, parents who were unfavourable towards vaccination in general were more likely to report that they had at least one child who did not get the measlesmumps- rubella vaccine. As this shift in attitude may have a significant impact on future vaccination coverage, health authorities should urgently address the vaccine confidence gap.

[Professional practices and perceptions about job retention systems for the chronically ill: a qualitative study in south-eastern France]. / Pratiques et perceptions des professionnels vis-à-vis du dispositif de maintien dans l'emploi: étude qualitative en région Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur.

BACKGROUND: Continued employment of people with health problems that reduce their ability to work is a major social issue. The French measures to optimize job retention are characterized by a multiplicity of participants, and their efficacy depends largely on the capacity of these different participants to work together. The objective of this study was to document the perceived role, attitudes and practices of participants involved in these job retention measures and of general practitioners, as well as their difficulties in this domain. METHODS: In 2009, 15 semi-directive interviews were conducted in the region of Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (PACA) of occupational physicians, general practitioners, and other participants involved in the occupational reclassification of workers no longer completely fit for their job. The data collected were analyzed from a thematic perspective. RESULTS: The different groups of professionals questioned agreed on the primacy of the role of the occupational physician, on the importance of early consideration of each worker's case, and on the need to work together as partners to optimize the prospects of job retention. This study nonetheless showed numerous communication difficulties between the various professionals: although informal exchanges have developed over time, the efficacy of the system seems to be limited by a lack of clarity about the role of each institution, divergences of opinions on some key points including the role of the physicians caring for the patient, and, more largely, lack of information about the tools for job retention. CONCLUSION: The distribution of homogeneous knowledge, the development of multidisciplinary collaborative practices and the pooling of the lessons of experience between the different groups of participants are essential for the success of job retention procedures.

[Potentially inappropriate prescriptions for the elderly: a study of health insurance reimbursements in Southeastern France]. / Prescriptions médicamenteuses potentiellement inadaptées chez les personnes âgées : une étude en Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur à partir des données de remboursements de l'Assurance maladie.

BACKGROUND: This study conducted in the region of Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur (PACA) sought to assess the feasibility of constructing and using indicators of potentially inappropriate prescriptions for the elderly from health insurance reimbursement data. We present and discuss different indicators of inappropriate prescriptions for people aged 70 years or older (at-risk prescriptions, dangerous or at-risk coprescriptions, absence of necessary coprescriptions) and reports their prevalence in PACA. METHODS: The indicators were constructed from the French list of inappropriate prescriptions, national agency guidelines, and the advice of experts in the field. The indicators selected were applied to the databases of the PACA Salaried Workers' Health Insurance Fund for 2008 for all recipients aged 70 years or older and compared according to age, sex, chronic disease status, and, after standardization for age and sex, according to district of residence. RESULTS: In January 2009, 500,904 recipients aged 70 years or older were identified in the data base of the Salaried Workers' Health Insurance Fund, 60.8% of whom were women and 52.1% of whom had approved coverage for a chronic disease. The potentially inappropriate prescriptions most frequently observed here, in decreasing order, were: prescription of an NSAID without the coprescription of gastric protection (28.1%); long-term benzodiazepine treatment (21.5%); prescription of long half-life benzodiazepine (14.9%), and long-term treatment with NSAIDs (11.6%). Overall, the prevalence of each increased significantly with age and was higher among women and people with chronic diseases. Significant variations were also observed between the different districts of PACA. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that a substantial proportion of elderly people receive potentially inappropriate prescriptions. They also suggest that health insurance reimbursement data could be used in some prescription domains for monitoring trends in the potentially inappropriate prescriptions in the populations of various territories, provided that specific limitations are considered.

"We don't have the same bodies; we don't react the same way": mothers and adolescent girls' perceptions of the risks and benefits of HPV vaccination in France.

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is one of the most publicly mistrusted vaccines in Europe, with countries such as France struggling with low vaccine uptake due to parental questioning of vaccine risks and benefits. However, limited evidence exists on adolescent girls' perceptions of the risks and benefits of HPV vaccination. The aim of this qualitative study was to provide an in-depth exploration and comparison of French mothers (n = 21) and adolescent girls' (n = 36) perceptions of the risks and benefits of HPV vaccination. A thematic analysis showed that adolescent girls and mothers perceived the risks and benefits of HPV vaccination differently, with girls reporting positive and beneficial views and emotions toward vaccination and mothers expressing concerns about possible risks. Adolescent girls also reported that both perceptions and actual risks and benefits may vary from one individual to another. Vaccine safety was also understood differently, with mothers reporting a widespread view that vaccines are unsafe and focusing on controversial side effects and girls discussing short-term consequences of vaccination (e.g. pain, fever) and administration and storage issues. Strategies to improve uptake of HPV vaccination should consider and address both the mothers' and daughters' perceptions and understandings of HPV vaccination.

'I trust them because my mum trusts them': Exploring the role of trust in HPV vaccination decision-making among adolescent girls and their mothers in France.

The success of vaccination programmes relies on high uptake and acceptance of vaccines, which is in part influenced by public trust in vaccines, providers, policy-makers and information. France is one of the countries in the world with the lowest confidence in vaccination, with parents expressing particular concerns about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. This qualitative study explored the role of trust in HPV vaccination decision-making among mothers and adolescent girls in France. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 15-16-year-old adolescent girls and their mothers in Paris. A thematic analysis based on deductive and inductive coding was conducted. HPV vaccination decision-making was described as a complex and uncertain process, a possible consequence of erosion of trust in the vaccine, in healthcare professionals and health authorities, and in information itself. Due to public criticism of the vaccine and conflicting advice received from medical professionals, the vaccine was perceived as controversial. The mothers' strong trust in doctors did not always increase HPV vaccine acceptance, as doctors themselves failed to recommend or recommended against the vaccine. Furthermore, the perceived mismanagement of previous health events tainted the mothers' trust in health authorities. Contrastingly, while adolescents expressed trust in doctors and health authorities, their trust in their own mothers was stronger. A lack of exposure to positive sources of information (e.g. from doctors, schools or media) contributed to low awareness about HPV vaccination among adolescent girls. While both mothers and girls discussed the importance of trusting themselves, they also acknowledged being influenced by others around them as well as information, often negative, from the internet. Adolescent girls also expressed mistrust about information in general, explaining that any information can be manipulated. Low confidence in HPV vaccination in France can be explained by broader trust issues, which will require long-term efforts to address.

Feedback and lessons from the prescription of rimonabant, a drug to be used under strict guidelines, in southeastern France, March 2007 through June 2008.

BACKGROUND: To provide feedback on the initial market authorization of rimonabant, a drug to be used under strict guidelines, we conducted a study with information from the National health insurance reimbursements database for southeastern France. The aims of this study were to: (1) describe the characteristics of subjects who have had one rimonabant prescription reimbursed; (2) study the frequency of prescriptions that did not comply with reimbursement criteria; (3) study the frequency of prescriptions for patients simultaneously treated with antidepressants; and (4) analyse the factors associated with both types of prescription (patient and prescriber characteristics). METHODS: Using the database of drug reimbursements maintained by the southeastern France general health insurance fund, we studied the characteristics of outpatients with at least one reimbursement for rimonabant, compared them to the rest of the population, and analysed compliance with the indications, contraindications, and regulations for rimonabant prescription with multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: A total of 10,510 beneficiaries (0.28%) had at least one rimonabant reimbursement. Among them, 55.7% were treated for diabetes. For at least 62.4% of rimonabant beneficiaries, the reimbursement regulations were not respected: this was significantly more frequent among women less than 57 years old, subjects with no chronic diseases, and when the prescriber was not an endocrinologist; 11.4% of rimonabant beneficiaries also received an antidepressant treatment. CONCLUSION: Despite the specific status of rimonabant regarding its reimbursement modalities, these results suggest that some prescribers get around reimbursement instructions and that a significant percentage of prescriptions did not respect an important contraindication. Tools to follow up the prescriptions of new drugs with strict guidelines for use should be developed and physicians should be better informed and trained regarding specific prescription regulations.