Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Transplant ; 16(7): 1982-98, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26990570

RESUMO

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is found in approximately 25% of 1-year biopsies posttransplant. It is known that IFTA correlates with decreased graft survival when histological evidence of inflammation is present. Identifying the mechanistic etiology of IFTA is important to understanding why long-term graft survival has not changed as expected despite improved immunosuppression and dramatically reduced rates of clinical acute rejection (AR) (Services UDoHaH. http://www.ustransplant.org/annual_reports/current/509a_ki.htm). Gene expression profiles of 234 graft biopsy samples were obtained with matching clinical and outcome data. Eighty-one IFTA biopsies were divided into subphenotypes by degree of histological inflammation: IFTA with AR, IFTA with inflammation, and IFTA without inflammation. Samples with AR (n = 54) and normally functioning transplants (TX; n = 99) were used in comparisons. A novel analysis using gene coexpression networks revealed that all IFTA phenotypes were strongly enriched for dysregulated gene pathways and these were shared with the biopsy profiles of AR, including IFTA samples without histological evidence of inflammation. Thus, by molecular profiling we demonstrate that most IFTA samples have ongoing immune-mediated injury or chronic rejection that is more sensitively detected by gene expression profiling. These molecular biopsy profiles correlated with future graft loss in IFTA samples without inflammation.


Assuntos
Atrofia/mortalidade , Fibrose/mortalidade , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Rejeição de Enxerto/mortalidade , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Túbulos Renais/patologia , Nefrite Intersticial/mortalidade , Atrofia/genética , Fibrose/genética , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Rejeição de Enxerto/genética , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/genética , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Testes de Função Renal , Túbulos Renais/metabolismo , Nefrite Intersticial/genética , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
2.
Am J Prev Med ; 19(4): 230-7, 2000 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11064226

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Routine screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) is endorsed by numerous health professional organizations. Screening rates in health care settings, however, remain low. In this article, we present a review of studies focusing on provider-specific barriers to screening for IPV and interventions designed to increase IPV screening in clinical settings. METHODS: A review of published studies containing original research with a primary focus on screening for IPV by health professionals was completed. RESULTS: Twelve studies identifying barriers to IPV screening as perceived by health care providers yielded similar lists; top provider-related barriers included lack of provider education regarding IPV, lack of time, and lack of effective interventions. Patient-related factors (e.g., patient nondisclosure, fear of offending the patient) were also frequently mentioned. Twelve additional studies evaluating interventions designed to increase IPV screening by providers revealed that interventions limited to education of providers had no significant effect on screening or identification rates. However, most interventions that incorporated strategies in addition to education (e.g., providing specific screening questions) were associated with significant increases in identification rates. CONCLUSION: Barriers to screening for IPV are documented to be similar among health care providers across diverse specialties and settings. Interventions designed to overcome these barriers and increase IPV-screening rates in health care settings are likely to be more effective if they include strategies in addition to provider education.


Assuntos
Violência Doméstica/prevenção & controle , Violência Doméstica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Programas de Rastreamento , Papel do Médico , Mulheres Maltratadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Guias como Assunto , Pessoal de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Notificação de Abuso , Fatores de Risco , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Psychol Rep ; 88(1): 265-76, 2001 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11293041

RESUMO

The Quality of Life Profile is a 54-item multidimensional measure of quality of life. The measure is based upon a theoretical approach that considers quality of life to include satisfaction with nine subdomains of functioning. To date, the factor structure of this 54-item collection has not been examined. To do so, an examination was made of the factor structure that emerged from an administration to 219 gay men, half of whom were HIV+. Analysis indicated that seven subdomains were clearly represented in seven of the 11 factors that emerged. One subdomain was fractured into two factors and one subdomain did not appear in the factor structure. Two minor factors appeared to represent issues that may be especially important to gay men living in the HIV era. The study provides insights into the structure of quality of life among gay men living in Ontario.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Fatorial , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Satisfação Pessoal , Psicometria/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA