Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 33(11): 3091-102, 1992 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1399412

RESUMO

The eyes of 47 subjects with exudative age-related macular degeneration in the fellow eye were tested with a battery of visual function tests at baseline and followed for at least 18 mo. Fundus photographs also were obtained at baseline. These photographs were used to verify the absence of exudative lesions in the 47 eyes tested. Functional and funduscopic baseline data each were compared against outcome data obtained typically at 18 mo. The baseline data were analyzed for their ability to distinguish eyes that had developed detectable exudative age-related macular degeneration from eyes that had not. Eyes with relatively slow foveal dark adaptation rates despite low foveal quantum absorption capabilities (as inferred from the effects of test area on the Rayleigh color match) were especially likely to develop subretinal neovascularization. The resulting sensitivity/specificity and odds ratios were comparable to those of the most effective funduscopic risk indicators. Low S (blue) cone-mediated sensitivity also was associated with an exudative outcome.


Assuntos
Degeneração Macular/fisiopatologia , Acuidade Visual , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Testes de Percepção de Cores , Sensibilidades de Contraste , Adaptação à Escuridão , Exsudatos e Transudatos , Feminino , Fundo de Olho , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fotografação , Células Fotorreceptoras/fisiopatologia , Neovascularização Retiniana/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
2.
Harv Bus Rev ; 78(6): 100-7, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11184964

RESUMO

It's no secret that the track record of corporate acquirers has been dismal. But there is a group that's had consistent success. A recent study on M&A reveals that between 1984 and 1994, fund investors at some 80% of LBO firms enjoyed returns equal to or greater than their cost of capital on their M&A investments. And this was true even though in many cases the prices paid for the companies were pushed up by competing bidders. Why are financial acquirers so much more successful than their corporate counterparts? It's because they approach the negotiation process differently. Most corporate managers treat acquisitions as a direct-march-up-the-hill kind of exercise: "I want to buy this company. Let's find out what it's worth, offer less, and see if we get it." The actual deal management is delegated to outside experts--investment bankers and lawyers. But fund investors treat deal management as a core part of their business conducted by a permanent group of experienced executives, and they have well-established processes that they stick to. The authors examine how the best acquirers approach all five stages of deal negotiations--screening potential deals, reaching initial agreement, conducting due diligence, setting final terms, and reaching closure--comparing good practice with bad, to reveal the secrets of their success.


Assuntos
Negociação , Afiliação Institucional , Comunicação , Comportamento Cooperativo , Guias como Assunto , Instituições Associadas de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Técnicas de Planejamento , Competência Profissional , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA