Intravenous dexamethasone fails to prolong psoas compartment block when assessed by objective pinprick sensory testing: a prospective, randomised, dose-dependent, placebo-controlled equivalency trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have concluded that i.v. dexamethasone can prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blockade. We hypothesized that a 4 mg dose would equally prolong the duration of psoas compartment blocks (PCBs) when compared with 8 mg, and that both doses would prolong the duration when compared with placebo. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-dependent, equivalency trial with 115 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The patients received a PCB. Subsequently, 15 patients received i.v. normal saline (placebo), 50 patients received i.v. dexamethasone 4 mg, and 50 patients received i.v. dexamethasone 8 mg. The primary outcome was the duration in hours of PCB, determined by serial pinprick assessments. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first analgesic, and opioid consumption. An intention-to-treat-analysis (ITA) and per-protocol analysis (PPA) were performed. RESULTS: The ITA showed that block duration in the 4 and 8 mg groups was equivalent [mean (standard deviation), 18.5 h (8.0) vs 18.1 h (7.1)]. However, neither group differed from placebo [19.6 h (6.7), (4 mg vs placebo), P=0.97; (8 mg vs placebo), P=0.77)]. Postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption were not different between groups. Time to first analgesic was not different between the 4 and 8 mg groups, or the 4 mg and placebo groups. The 8 mg group, however, had a longer time to first analgesic (median of 533 vs 432 min, P=0.047) when compared with placebo, although the significance was not observed in the PPA (P=0.058). CONCLUSIONS: I.V. dexamethasone did not prolong PCB when duration was objectively assessed, or decrease total opioid consumption. However, dexamethasone 8 mg prolonged the time to first analgesic. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT 02464176.

A response algorithm for the low-pressure alarm condition.

A response algorithm consists of a logical sequence of maneuvers to be performed in response to a specific condition. With the advent of alarm-equipped monitors that alert anesthesiologists to the presence of potentially hazardous clinical conditions, a need has arisen to develop the corresponding alarm-oriented responses expected from anesthesiologists; this problem, however, has not been satisfactorily addressed in the literature. An algorithm is proposed that guides the anesthesiologist through the three limbs of the ventilation system--gas supply system, breathing circuit, and mechanical ventilator--in response to a low-pressure alarm condition during automatic mechanical ventilation. The three-limbed algorithm rapidly and efficiently localizes the likely cause of the low-pressure condition without compromising patient safety; in the event that the search for a cause is fruitless, a default mode of ventilation is employed. A discussion is provided of common causes (e.g., disconnections), alarm-defeating circumstances (false negatives), and potential algorithm-defeating situations (multiple faults).

Flumazenil antagonism of midazolam-induced ventilatory depression.

Flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, reliably reverses midazolam-induced sedation; however, its effect on respiratory depression has not been established completely. Twelve healthy volunteers received sufficient midazolam (0.13 +/- 0.01 mg.kg-1 mean +/- SE) to render them unresponsive to verbal command; they then received flumazenil 1.0 mg or placebo (flumazenil vehicle) in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Ventilatory drive was measured before and after administration of midazolam, as well as 3, 30, 60, and 120 min after administration of flumazenil or placebo. Seven to 30 days later, the study was repeated, with subjects receiving placebo or flumazenil (whichever they had not received during their first trial). Midazolam caused significant decreases in the slope of the CO2 response (-29 +/- 5%; P less than 0.005); minute ventilation (VE) at end-tidal CO2 tension (PETCO2) = 46 mmHg (-28 +/- 4%; P less than 0.001), and tidal volume at PETCO2 = 46 mmHg (-44 +/- 4%; P less than 0.005). Three minutes after intravenous administration of flumazenil 1.0 mg, VE46 and tidal volume increased to 108 +/- 6% and 105 +/- 6%, respectively, of their premidazolam values; at the same time after administration of placebo, VE46 and tidal volume remained significantly depressed (between groups, P less than 0.005 for each variable). Thirty minutes later, these variables did not differ between groups, probably because the effects of flumazenil and midazolam were diminishing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Activation of the Bezold-Jarisch reflex in the sitting position for shoulder arthroscopy using interscalene block.

A retrospective analysis of 116 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the sitting position with interscalene block (ISB) revealed 20 patients who experienced potentially dangerous vasovagal events characterized by sudden severe hypotension and bradycardia (Group 1). The event occurred 61 +/- 18 min after the block placement. Ninety-six patients (Group 2) did not experience a vasovagal event. Of the patients in Group 2, 18 received beta-adrenergic blockers for increasing heart rate and/or arterial blood pressure (Group 2B) while 78 did not (Group 2A). The number receiving beta-adrenergic blockers was significantly greater than in Group 1 (18/96 vs 0/20, P < 0.05). There were no significant demographic or baseline hemodynamic differences between groups, but the beta-adrenergic blocker and vagal groups showed significantly greater intraoperative peak heart rates (P < 0.05). All patients received epinephrine in their local anesthetic for ISB, incision sites, and articular irrigating solution. Total and weight-corrected epinephrine doses differed significantly between groups (lowest in Group 2A, P < 0.01). Activation of the Bezold-Jarisch reflex, induced by increased circulating epinephrine levels and the sitting position, is the postulated mechanism.

Nerve stimulator polarity and brachial plexus block.

To determine whether needle polarity significantly affects nerve stimulation during peripheral nerve block, we performed a randomized double-blinded study of 10 patients undergoing axillary block for upper extremity surgery. Using an insulated needle, we determined the minimum current necessary to elicit muscle contraction with positive and negative needle polarity at two needle placements: (A) where stimulation was first observed and (B) where stimulation was maximal. At Position A, stimulation required significantly more current when the needle was positive (2.32 +/- 0.45 mA, mean +/- SEM) than when it was negative (1.05 +/- 0.23 mA, P < 0.001). Similarly, at Position B, stimulation required more current when the needle was positive (1.49 +/- 0.49 mA) than when it was negative (0.47 +/- 0.15 mA, P < 0.001). The mean ratio of positive to negative threshold stimulation current at Position B (3.11 +/- 0.20) was significantly greater than that at Position A (2.37 +/- 0.19, P < 0.05). Our results emphasize the importance of attaching the negative terminal of the nerve stimulator to the stimulating electrode. Use of the positive terminal could lead to abandoning a block if stimulation were not obtained at a low enough current; alternatively, motor contraction might not be observed before neural contact or vascular puncture.

Ibuprofen provides longer lasting analgesia than fentanyl after laparoscopic surgery.

The authors compared the analgesic efficacy of one dose of oral ibuprofen with that of intravenously administered fentanyl for relief of pain after outpatient laparoscopic surgery. Thirty healthy female patients received either 800 mg of oral ibuprofen preoperatively or 75 micrograms of intravenous fentanyl intraoperatively plus respective intravenous or oral placebos in a randomized, double-blind manner. Patients recorded their degree of pain and nausea in the recovery room, in the same-day surgery stepdown unit, during the ride home, and upon arrival at home. The postanesthesia care nurse recorded the amount of fentanyl and droperidol needed to treat pain and nausea in the recovery room. Patients who received ibuprofen were more comfortable in the stepdown unit (P less than 0.05) and after arrival home (P less than 0.05) than those in the fentanyl group. Additionally, patients who received ibuprofen had lower nausea scores in the step-down unit (P less than 0.05); this may have been related to the lower total fentanyl dose in these patients. The authors conclude that ibuprofen may be a useful alternative to fentanyl for providing postoperative analgesia for outpatient surgery.