RESUMO
NIH has acknowledged and committed to ending structural racism. The framework for NIH's approach, summarized here, includes understanding barriers; developing robust health disparities/equity research; improving its internal culture; being transparent and accountable; and changing the extramural ecosystem so that diversity, equity, and inclusion are reflected in funded research and the biomedical workforce.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Racismo Sistêmico , Diversidade Cultural , Humanos , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/economia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
This Viewpoint discusses specific areas of improvement in the National Institutes of Health's funding of and research criteria for clinical trials to be inclusive, transparent, and broad reaching.
Assuntos
Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos/ética , Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , Experimentação Humana/ética , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/ética , Política Organizacional , Betacoronavirus , Bancos de Espécimes Biológicos/história , Pesquisa Biomédica/história , COVID-19 , Códigos de Ética , Infecções por Coronavirus , Células HeLa , História do Século XX , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/história , Pandemias , Autonomia Pessoal , Pneumonia Viral , Racismo/história , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Mulheres , Feminino , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Ciência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Institutions that receive National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding for research involving recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules are required, as a term and condition of their funding, to comply with the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules (NIH Guidelines) (NIH, 2013). Under the NIH Guidelines, institutions must establish and register an Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) with the NIH. The IBC is then responsible for reviewing and approving research projects subject to the NIH Guidelines. The IBC review of projects involving recombinant or synthetic nucleic acid molecules is critical to ensuring that such research is conducted in a safe and responsible manner. In 2006, staff from NIH began conducting educational site visits to institutions that had an IBC registered with NIH. The purpose of these site visits is to assist IBCs with their institutional programs of oversight for recombinant or synthetic nucleic molecules. Based on our findings, the site visit program has been beneficial to institutional biosafety programs. The information gathered during the site visits has allowed NIH to tailor its educational materials to help institutions address their oversight challenges. Additionally, since NIH's visits are primarily educational in nature, we have been able to foster a positive environment in which IBC members and staff feel comfortable reaching out to NIH for advice and assistance.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Governo Federal , Financiamento Governamental/economia , Política de Saúde/tendências , Ciência/tendências , Bioética , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Financiamento Governamental/legislação & jurisprudência , Financiamento Governamental/tendências , Política de Saúde/economia , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economia , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/legislação & jurisprudência , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/tendências , Política , Ciência/economia , Ciência/legislação & jurisprudência , Medidas de Segurança , Estados Unidos , United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration/economia , United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration/legislação & jurisprudência , United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration/tendênciasRESUMO
After a decade of intensive policy discussions on the topic of dual-use research of concern (DURC) in the life sciences, there has been a lack of consensus on how to practically define DURC; whether it is feasible to identify and regulate DURC experiments; how to address the risks associated with DURC; and how to balance this risk with the necessity of fostering life sciences research for public health and biodefense. The publication of two avian influenza studies has brought the DURC issue back into sharp focus and has resulted in a new set of federal guidelines. However, the new DURC policy raises questions regarding whether this is the best policy solution to a complicated biosecurity concern.