Changes in disability and their relationship with skin thickening, in diffuse and limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The burden of disability associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc) is being increasingly recognized. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that changes in functional ability over time differ between patients with limited (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc) subtypes, and that in dcSSc (but not lcSSc) these changes correlate with skin thickening. METHOD: This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively between 2005 and 2016 at a single centre. Data recorded at annual review visits included modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Yearly rates of mRSS and HAQ-DI change were assessed by individual linear regressions, and those gradients were compared between disease groups (lcSSc/dcSSc) for each of early/late disease (less/greater than 5 years' duration). RESULTS: The study included 402 patients (110 dcSSc, 292 lcSSc), with mean length of follow-up of 5.5 years (sd 3.5). Mean baseline HAQ-DI was 1.4 in dcSSc and 1.2 in lcSSc. In dcSSc, increased mRSS was associated with worsening disability (ρ = 0.36, p = 0.004) during early but not late disease (ρ = 0.12, p = 0.331). In lcSSc, changes in mRSS were not associated with changes in disability for early (ρ = -0.15, p = 0.173) or late disease (ρ = 0.10, p = 0.137). CONCLUSION: These findings confirm high disability in patients with SSc. A relationship between HAQ-DI and mRSS (worsening mRSS associated with increasing disability) was found only in patients with early dcSSc, suggesting that in other patient subgroups other factors play the major role.

Unsupervised Online Paired Associates Learning Task from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB®) in the Brain Health Registry.

BACKGROUND: Unsupervised online cognitive assessments have demonstrated promise as an efficient and scalable approach for evaluating cognition in aging, and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, usability, and construct validity of the Paired Associates Learning task from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery® in adults enrolled in the Brain Health Registry. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, MEASUREMENTS: The Paired Associates Learning task was administered to Brain Health Registry participants in a remote, unsupervised, online setting. In this cross-sectional analysis, we 1) evaluated construct validity by analyzing associations between Paired Associates Learning performance and additional participant registry data, including demographics, self- and study partner-reported subjective cognitive change (Everyday Cognition scale), self-reported memory concern, and depressive symptom severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) using multivariable linear regression models; 2) determined the predictive value of Paired Associates Learning and other registry variables for identifying participants who self-report Mild Cognitive Impairment by employing multivariable binomial logistic regressions and calculating the area under the receiver operator curve; 3) investigated feasibility by looking at task completion rates and statistically comparing characteristics of task completers and non-completers; and 4) evaluated usability in terms of participant requests for support from BHR related to the assessment. RESULTS: In terms of construct validity, in participants who took the Paired Associates Learning for the first time (N=14,528), worse performance was associated with being older, being male, lower educational attainment, higher levels of self- and study partner-reported decline, more self-reported memory concerns, greater depressive symptom severity, and self-report of Mild Cognitive Impairment. Paired Associates Learning performance and Brain Health Registry variables together identified those with self-reported Mild Cognitive Impairment with moderate accuracy (areas under the curve: 0.66-0.68). In terms of feasibility, in a sub-sample of 29,176 participants who had the opportunity to complete Paired Associates Learning for the first time in the registry, 14,417 started the task. 11,647 (80.9% of those who started) completed the task. Compared to those who did not complete the task at their first opportunity, those who completed were older, had more years of education, more likely to self-identify as White, less likely to self-identify as Latino, less likely to have a subjective memory concern, and more likely to report a family history of Alzheimer's disease. In terms of usability, out of 8,395 received requests for support from BHR staff via email, 4.4% (n=374) were related to PAL. Of those, 82% were related to technical difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support moderate feasibility, good usability, and construct validity of cross-sectional Paired Associates Learning in an unsupervised online registry, but also highlight the need to make the assessment more inclusive and accessible to individuals from ethnoculturally and socioeconomically diverse communities. A future, improved version could be a scalable, efficient method to assess cognition in many different settings, including clinical trials, observational studies, healthcare, and public health.

A prospective study of systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcers: prevalence, location, and functional impact.

OBJECTIVES: Although digital ulcers (DUs) are common in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), prevalence estimates vary, and functional impact and pathophysiology have been relatively little studied. We investigated the point prevalence of all DUs (both digital-tip and extensor) in a cohort of patients with SSc, testing the hypothesis that both digital-tip and extensor ulcers are associated with functional impairment. METHOD: Over a 12-month period, patients attending an SSc clinic for annual review were assessed by specialist nurses: active DUs were documented and the Hand Mobility in Scleroderma (HAMIS) test performed. Patients also completed the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ), the Scleroderma Functional Index (SFI), and the Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS). RESULTS: A total of 25 active DUs (nine digital-tip and 16 extensor surface) were found in 15 of the 148 patients recruited, giving a prevalence for each ulcer type of 6% and an overall point prevalence of 10%. HAMIS scores were higher (indicating greater impairment) in those with active DUs than in those without: left hand difference 8.8 points [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-14.5], p = 0.002; difference significant for extensor as well as digital-tip ulcers. Active DUs were associated with higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain (p = 0.04), DUs (p < 0.001), and 'overall' assessment (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Extensor surface ulcers have the same prevalence as digital-tip ulcers in patients with SSc, and are equally disabling. Clinical trials should therefore include both categories of DUs.