Prevalence and severity of scanxiety in people with advanced cancers: a multicentre survey.

PURPOSE: Scan-associated anxiety ('scanxiety') is a problem for people with advanced cancer. We aimed to determine the prevalence, severity and associations of scanxiety in this population. METHODS: People with advanced cancer and a computed tomography scan within the last 4 months completed a multicentre survey including self-rated presence (yes/no) and severity (distress thermometer, 0-10) of scanxiety, state anxiety (STAI-6), clinical anxiety and depression (HADS), and fear of progression (FOP-Q-SF). Associations with scanxiety were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 222 participants: mean age 64 years (range 26 to 91), female (61%), most common cancer types (breast 37%, lung 19%, colorectal 16%) and > 1 year since cancer diagnosis (82%). Sixty-two percent had a scan within the last month, and 70% reported waiting > 2 days for the result. Over half (55%) of participants experienced scanxiety. On multivariable analysis, scanxiety was more prevalent in participants who were younger (mean age 62 years with v 66 years without scanxiety, p = 0.02) and more remote (v major city, OR 2.6, p = 0.04). Among participants with scanxiety, the mean severity score was 6 (range 1-10) with peak severity occurring when waiting for scan results. On multivariable analysis, scanxiety was 1.2 points higher in participants who had been diagnosed within the past year (v > 1 year, p = 0.04) and was higher in participants who had higher STAI-6 scores (ß = 0.06, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Scanxiety is common and can be severe. Strategies to reduce scanxiety are needed.

Patterns of immunotherapy use and management of toxicities in regional and tertiary settings.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors and their subsequent listing on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for use in metastatic melanomas, renal cell carcinomas and non-small-cell lung cancers has resulted in routine use of these agents in oncology practices, including in regional areas. Although immunotherapeutic agents generally have a favourable toxicity profile compared to chemotherapy, they can provoke immune-related adverse effects (irAE) caused by an unregulated and hyperstimulated immune response. Some of these effects can be serious and life-threatening. AIMS: To compare the utilisation of immunotherapy and the rates, management and outcomes of irAE between a regional oncology service and a tertiary service. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records for all patients treated with immunotherapy in the participating services for the 5-year period from 31 July 2012 to 31 July 2017. RESULTS: Data demonstrated that rates of immunotherapy use are both similar and increasing across the tertiary and regional services. The rates, types and severity of irAE are equivalent and in concordance with pre-existing literature. Immune-related adverse events appear to be identified and treated earlier in the regional service with the corresponding reduction in the duration of immunosuppression and requirement for inpatient management. CONCLUSION: The use of immunotherapy in a regional setting is safe and equivalent to that of a tertiary centre.