Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Echocardiography ; 41(4): e15817, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648213

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital disease. The clinical characteristics of this disease remain unclear except for those in relatively young patients reported from tertiary referral hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical features of QAV in a regional population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively investigated 25 340 consecutive patients over middle age (median age, 73 (IQR 65-80) years; range, 45-102 years) who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at our institute during the period from April 2008 to December 2023. Eight (0.032%) of the patients (median age, 65 years; range, 47-91 years) were diagnosed with QAV. Six patients suffered from aortic regurgitation (AR), and one patient had mild aortic stenosis at the time of QAV diagnosis. Two patients who had severe AR at referral underwent aortic valve surgery. The severity of AR in the other patients was moderate or less. During a median follow-up period of 27 months (range, 1-171 months), none of the patients other than above two patients had cardiac events. One patient died from a non-cardiac cause at 94 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with QAV after middle age, who do not exhibit severe valve insufficiency at the time of diagnosis, may not experience worse clinical outcomes. However, further research is required for a better understanding of the long-term outcomes.


Assuntos
Valva Aórtica , Ecocardiografia , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Valva Aórtica/anormalidades , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Cardiopatias Congênitas/diagnóstico por imagem , Seguimentos
3.
ESC Heart Fail ; 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090841

RESUMO

AIMS: A fourth heart sound (S4) was reported to be almost never present in patients with amyloid light-chain cardiomyopathy. There have been no reports on S4 in patients with wild-type transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTRwt-CM). This study aimed to clarify the clinical implications of S4 in patients with ATTRwt-CM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-six patients with ATTRwt-CM (mean age: 80.4 ± 5.4 years, 68 males) who had undergone phonocardiography (PCG) were retrospectively assessed. We measured S4 amplitude on digitally recorded PCG. S4 was considered to be present when its amplitude was 1.0 mm or greater on the PCG. Distinct S4 was defined as S4 with an amplitude of 2.0 mm or greater, which is usually recognizable by auscultation. According to the rhythm and presence or absence of S4, the patients were divided into three groups, namely, sinus rhythm (SR) with S4, SR without S4, and non-SR. Non-SR consisted of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia. Thirty-six patients were in SR and the remaining 40 patients were in non-SR. In the 36 patients in SR, S4 was shown by PCG to be present in 17 patients (47%), and distinct S4 was recognized in 7 patients (19%) by auscultation. In patients who were in SR, those with S4 had higher systolic blood pressure (124 ± 15 vs. 99 ± 8 mmHg, P < 0.001), lower level of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (308 [interquartile range (IQR): 165, 354] vs. 508 [389, 765] pg/mL, P = 0.034) and lower level of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (0.068 [0.046, 0.089] vs. 0.109 [0.063, 0.148] ng/mL, P = 0.042) than those without S4. There was no significant difference in left atrium (LA) volume index or LA reservoir strain between patients with S4 and without S4. Patients with S4 had more preserved LA systolic function than those without S4 (peak atrial filling velocity: 53 ± 25 vs. 34 ± 9 cm/s, P = 0.033; LA contractile strain: 4.1 ± 2.1 vs. 1.6 ± 2.0%, P = 0.012). Patients in SR without S4 had worse short-term prognosis compared with the other two groups (generalized Wilcoxon test, P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: S4 was present in 47% of the patients in SR with ATTRwt-CM. Patients in SR without S4 had more impaired LA systolic function than those in SR with S4. The absence of S4 portends a poor short-term prognosis in patients with ATTRwt-CM.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA