Risk of suicide in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving different oral anticoagulants: a nationwide analysis using target trial emulation framework.

BACKGROUND: The suicide risk in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving novel oral anticoagulants or warfarin has not been evaluated in real-world practice. Moreover, reducing vitamin K levels may increase the suicide risk, underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate oral anticoagulants to prevent unintended outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between different types of oral anticoagulants and the risk of attempted and completed suicide among patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: This nationwide study retrieved data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database from 2012 to 2020. This study included patients with atrial fibrillation aged 20 years and older who newly received oral anticoagulant treatment, and who had no contraindications for NOACs and no history of suicide-related events. The main outcomes were suicide-related outcomes, including attempted suicide and completed suicide. This study employed the target trial emulation framework to improve the causal inference for the observed association.  RESULTS: A total of 103,768 (71.74%) patients taking NOACs and 40,877 (28.26%) patients taking warfarin were included in this study. Compared to those receiving warfarin, patients receiving NOACs were associated with a lower risk of suicide-related outcomes (HR, 0.82; 95% CIs, 0.69-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this cohort study suggested that patients receiving NOACs were associated with a lower risk of suicidal attempts but similar risk of complete suicide, compared to those receiving warfarin. Considering the risk of suicide, NOACs could be the preferred anticoagulants for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Hydrochlorothiazide Use and Risk of Skin Cancer: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) exposure has been linked to increased skin cancer in Caucasian (white) populations, especially squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), but not basal cell carcinoma (BCC). This study aimed to evaluate and compare skin cancer risks associated with HCTZ- and other antihypertensives use. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. We identified patients aged 20 years and older, newly receiving antihypertensive medications between 2004 and 2015. We calculated the medication possession ratio (MPR) for the first 2 years of treatment to determine patient eligibility and treatment classification, whereby only patients with MPR above 80% were included. These were subsequently categorized by the type of antihypertensives they received, namely HCTZ, other thiazide diuretics, non-thiazide diuretics or non-diuretic antihypertensives. Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate skin cancer risks, and these were then classified as SCC or BCC. RESULTS: Our study included 41 086, 27 402, 19 613, and 856 782 patients receiving HCTZ, other thiazide diuretics, non-thiazide diuretics, and non-diuretic antihypertensives, respectively. We found BCC risks were similar when comparing HCTZ with other thiazides (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.54-1.33), non-thiazide diuretics (0.93; 0.51-1.67), and non-diuretic antihypertensives (0.91; 0.66-1.26). We observed a higher SCC risk in the HCTZ group, compared to other thiazides (1.24; 0.74-2.08), non-thiazide diuretics (1.32; 0.70-2.51), and non-diuretic antihypertensives (1.23; 0.87-1.73), although the confidence intervals (CIs) were wide and crossed the null. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that skin cancer need not be of major concern to physicians when prescribing antihypertensives for an Asian population.

Association between recently raised anticholinergic burden and risk of acute cardiovascular events: nationwide case-case-time-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between recently raised anticholinergic burden and risk of acute cardiovascular events in older adults. DESIGN: Case-case-time-control study (ie, incorporating a case crossover design and a control crossover design consisting of future cases). SETTING: Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. PARTICIPANTS: 317 446 adults aged ≥65 who were admitted to hospital because of an incident acute cardiovascular event between 2011 and 2018. Acute cardiovascular events included myocardial infarction, strokes, arrhythmias, conduction disorders, and cardiovascular death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The anticholinergic burden was measured for each participant by adding up the anticholinergic scores for individual drugs using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale. Scores were classified into three levels (0 points, 1-2 points, and ≥3 points). For each participant, anticholinergic burden levels during hazard periods (day -1 to -30 before the cardiovascular event) were compared with randomly selected 30 day reference periods (ie, periods between days -61 and -180). Conditional logistic regression determined odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to evaluate the association between acute cardiovascular events and recently raised anticholinergic burden. RESULTS: The crossover analyses included 248 579 current cases. Participants' average age on the index date was 78.4 years (standard deviation 0.01), and 53.4% were men. The most frequently prescribed drugs with anticholinergic activity were antihistamines (68.9%), gastrointestinal antispasmodics (40.9%), and diuretics (33.8%). Among patients with varying levels of anticholinergic burden in different periods, more patients carried higher levels of anticholinergic burden during hazard periods than during reference periods. For example, 17 603 current cases had 1-2 points of anticholinergic burden in the hazard period with 0 points in the reference period, while 8507 current cases had 0 points in the hazard period and 1-2 points in the reference period. In the comparison of 1-2 points versus 0 points of anticholinergic burden, the odds ratio was 1.86 (95% confidence interval 1.83 to 1.90) in the case crossover analysis and 1.35 (1.33 to 1.38) in the control crossover analysis, which yielded a case-case-time-control odds ratio of 1.38 (1.34 to 1.42). Similar results were found in the comparison of ≥3 versus 0 points (2.03, 1.98 to 2.09) and ≥3 versus 1-2 points (1.48, 1.44 to 1.52). The findings remained consistent throughout a series of sensitivity analyses (eg, cut-off points for anticholinergic burden categories were redefined and different scales were used to measure anticholinergic burden). CONCLUSIONS: An association was found between recently raised anticholinergic burden and increased risk of acute cardiovascular events. Furthermore, a greater increase in anticholinergic burden was associated with a higher risk of acute cardiovascular events.