Clinical efficacy of sodium aescinate administration following endovenous laser ablation for varicose veins.

BACKGROUND: Endovenous interventions and minimally invasive procedures are effective in the management of varicose veins. However, they can cause postoperative discomfort. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of sodium aescinate (SA) in improving edema, pain, vein-specific symptoms, and quality of life in patients following endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for varicose veins. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients were allocated into two groups: in Group A, 60 mg SA was administered twice daily for 20 days, and in Group B (control), no venoactive drug was prescribed. The Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification system for chronic venous disorders was used to assess the varicose veins. The circumferences of the calf and ankle were recorded for evaluating edema. The 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and Aberdeen Varicose Veins Questionnaire (AVVQ) were used to measure the pain intensity, overall varicose vein severity, and patient's quality of life, respectively. RESULTS: The study included 87 patients (mean age, 59.9 ± 10.7 years; 54 men) with CEAP class C2-C5 varicose veins who underwent EVLA and phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy. The calf circumference recovered quicker in Group A than in Group B by days 10, 21, and 30 (difference from baseline was 1.04 ± 0.35 vs 2.39 ± 1.15 [p < .001], 0.48 ± 0.42 vs1.73 ± 1.00 [p < .001], and 0.18 ± 0.64 vs 0.82 ± 0.96 [p < .001], respectively). The ankle circumference recovered quicker in Group A than in Group B by days 10 and 21 (the difference from baseline was 1.37 ± 0.52 vs 2.36 ± 0.93 [p < .001] and 0.58 ± 0.60 vs 1.14 ± 0.88 [p = .002], respectively). Pain relief was achieved quicker in Group A than in Group B (0.257 ± 1.097 [p = .0863] vs 0.506 ± 1.250 [p = .0168] by day 21). There were no significant differences in the VCSS and AVVQ scores between both groups. There were no drug-related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: SA, in combination with compression therapy, can relieve edema and alleviate pain in patients following EVLA for varicose veins.

Internal iliac artery preservation during endovascular aortic repair using in situ laser fenestration.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the technical and short-term clinical outcomes of internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction during endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with in situ laser-assisted fenestration in cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in which the iliac artery is unfit for an internal branched device (IBD). METHODS: In the present single-institution retrospective study, we analyzed patients with AAAs who had undergone EVAR with in situ laser-assisted fenestration for IIA reconstruction between January 2018 and April 2021. The study included patients with iliac artery anatomy unfit for the use of commercial IBDs. The primary safety end point was freedom from major adverse events and unplanned reinterventions within 30 days. The primary efficacy end point was freedom from IIA restenosis, reintervention, and symptoms due to pelvic ischemia at 1 year after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients requiring IIA reconstruction but with anatomy unfit for IBD placement were treated with in situ laser-assisted fenestration during EVAR for aortoiliac aneurysms during the study period. The mean age of our patients was 72 years, and 90% were men. The technical success rate was 100%. No patient had died within 30 days after the procedure. A suspicious IIA perforation had occurred in one patient, which was treated with an additional covered stent, for a primary safety end point of 95.0%. After a mean follow-up of 11 months, all except for one of the reconstructed IIAs were patent. Three patients reported symptoms of buttock claudication on the IIA occluded side at their 3-month follow-up after the procedure. However, these symptoms had subsided in two of these patients at 6 months. Type II endoleaks without sac expansion had occurred in two patients owing to retrograde blood flow from the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar artery. Both patients were kept under close surveillance. The rate of freedom from major adverse events and unplanned reinterventions within 30 days (primary efficacy end point) was 86.3% at 1 year after procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In situ laser-assisted fenestration was found to be a safe and effective alternative method for IIA reconstruction during EVAR for aortoiliac aneurysms in patients with anatomy unfit for IBD.

Covered Stents vs Bare Metal Stents for Aortoiliac Arterial Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Covered stents and bare metal stents (BMS) have been regarded as viable treatment options for aortoiliac arterial diseases. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of covered stents with BMS for aortoiliac arterial diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline databases were searched by 2 authors (C.Z. and Z.W.) to retrieve all studies comparing the outcomes of covered stents vs BMS for aortoiliac arterial diseases. The Cochrane tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. The outcomes at the same stage reported in at least 2 studies were pooled together. The fixed effects model combined the data when I2<50%, otherwise the random effects model was applied. The results for dichotomous variables were presented as odds ratio (OR) or risk difference and 95% confidence interval (CI); continuous variables were reported as mean difference and 95% CI. RESULTS: Herein, 10 studies with a total of 1695 limbs were included. The covered stents significantly increased the freedom from target lesion revascularization (OR 2.85, 95% CI: 1.28-6.33, p=0.010) compared to the BMS during a 24-month follow-up. However, no statistically significant difference was found in the technical success, primary patency, secondary patency, major adverse events (MAEs), ankle-brachial index (ABI) improvement, limb salvage, and survival between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to BMS, covered stents appear to have similar technical success, primary patency, secondary patency, MAEs, ABI improvement, limb salvage, and survival but may have advantages in reducing target lesion revascularization. More well-designed, prospective studies are warranted to determine such findings. CLINICAL IMPACT: Covered stents may increase freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared to bare metal stents (BMS) in the treatment of aortoiliac arterial diseases. However, technical success, primary patency, secondary patency, major adverse events (MAEs), ABI improvement, limb salvage, and survival were similar. The aforementioned results are still not sufficient to draw a solid conclusion about the selection of stents for aortoiliac arterial diseases. More well-designed, prospective studies are warranted to determine such findings.

TNFα activation and TGFß blockage act synergistically for smooth muscle cell calcification in patients with venous thrombosis via TGFß/ERK pathway.

Venous calcification has been observed in post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) patients; yet, the cell types and possible mechanisms regulating this process are still unclear. We evaluated the calcium deposition within the venous wall, the cell type involved in the calcified remodelling of the venous wall after thrombosis and explored possible mechanisms in vitro. Calcium deposition was found in human specimens of superficial thrombotic veins and was co-localized with VSMCs markers αSMA and TAGLN (also known as SM22α). Besides, the expression of osteogenesis-related genes was dramatically changed in superficial thrombotic veins. Moreover, the inhibition of the TGFß signalling pathway after TNFα treatment effectively induced the expression of osteogenic phenotype markers, the calcium salt deposits and the obvious phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and JNK2 in the VSMCs calcification model. Supplementing TGFß2 or blocking the activation of the ERK/MAPK signalling pathway prevented the transformation of VSMCs into osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Taken together, VSMCs have an important role in venous calcification after thrombosis. Supplementing TGFß2 or inhibiting the ERK/MAPK signalling pathway can reduce the appearance of VSMCs osteogenic phenotype. Our findings may present a novel therapeutic approach to prevent of vascular calcification after venous thrombosis.

Allogeneic adipose-derived stem cells promote ischemic muscle repair by inducing M2 macrophage polarization via the HIF-1α/IL-10 pathway.

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are multipotent stromal cells that possess considerable therapeutic potential for tissue remodeling. However, their protective mechanism in critical limb ischemia has not been fully defined. After the occlusion of blood vessels, hypoxia becomes a prominent feature of the ischemic limb. This study investigated the immunomodulatory effect of ASCs on ischemic muscle repair and explored the specific mechanism. We found that the ability of RAW264.7 cells to migrate was impaired in hypoxia, whereas coculturing with ASCs could enhance the migration capacity. In addition, under hypoxic conditions, the paracrine effect of ASCs was enhanced and ASCs could induce RAW264.7 macrophages toward the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. We further demonstrated that ASCs-derived interleukin 10 (IL-10), mediated by hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), played a crucial role in the induction of M2 macrophages by activating the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)/Arginase (Arg-1) pathway. Our in vivo experiments revealed that transplanted ASCs exhibited an immunomodulatory effect by recruiting macrophages to ischemic muscle and increasing the density of M2 macrophages. The transplantation of ASCs into ischemic limbs induced increased blood flow reperfusion and limb salvage rate, whereas the depletion of tissue macrophages or transplanting HIF-1α-silenced ASCs inhibited the therapeutic effect. These findings elucidated the critical role of macrophages in ASCs-mediated ischemic muscle repair and proved that allogeneic ASCs could exert the protective effect by enhancing the recruitment of macrophages and inducing macrophages toward M2 phenotype through HIF-1α/IL-10 pathway.

Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Isolated Chronic Occlusion of the Popliteal Artery: A Retrospective Single-Institution Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the 12-month safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of patients with isolated chronic occlusions in popliteal arteries and evaluate the risk factors of lesion reocclusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2018 to December 2019, DCB angioplasty was performed in 54 limbs with isolated chronic popliteal artery occlusion of 48 patients (32 men) with a mean age of 71.5 ± 12.1 (range, 50-97) years, mean occlusive length of 6.3 ± 3.0 (range, 1-15) cm, and mean preoperative ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.42 ± 0.12 (range, 0.19-0.58). A total of 18.5% (10/54) of lesions were long-segment occlusions involving the entire popliteal artery from P1 to P3. Twenty seven of 54 limbs presented with critical limb ischemia (CLI) with a mean ABI of 0.33 ± 0.10 (range, 0.19-0.51). The primary endpoint was primary patency rate at 12 months. The secondary endpoints included technical success rate, 1-year secondary patency rate, limb salvage rate, and improvement in clinical symptoms. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of lesion reocclusion. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 85.2% (46/54), and bailout stenting was performed in 14.8% (8/54) of lesions. The 12-month primary and secondary patency rates by the Kaplan-Meier estimate were 72.6% and 88.3%, respectively. Two thirds of the reocclusions occurred within 6 months after intervention. No 30-day mortality was observed. The limb salvage rate was 100% during a mean follow-up period of 13 months, and all minor amputations occurred in the limbs presented with CLI. The mean ABI increased from 0.42 before the procedure to 0.73 after the procedure. Patients younger than 60 years and the lesions exhibiting long-segment occlusions present as trending risk factors for lesion reocclusion. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel DCB angioplasty is safe and effective in managing isolated chronic occlusion of popliteal arteries. Younger patients and long-segment occlusions of the popliteal artery are associated with a relatively higher reocclusion rate after the procedure.

Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban with Warfarin for Patients after Successful Stent Placement for Chronic Iliofemoral Occlusion: A Retrospective Single Institution Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban and warfarin as anticoagulants for treating patients with post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting. METHODS: This single institution retrospective study analysed patients with PTS with chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion who were prescribed rivaroxaban or warfarin for one year after successfully undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were bleeding complication rate and primary patency rate at one year. Secondary outcomes included Villalta score, symptom recurrence rate, ulcer healing rate, and clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR) rate during follow up. RESULTS: From January 2016 to December 2017, 154 legs from 154 patients were included in this study (69 in rivaroxaban group and 85 in warfarin group). The groups were well matched for patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and procedural details. There was no significant difference between the rivaroxaban group and warfarin group in bleeding complication rate (10% vs. 16%, p = .23, hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 - 1.37) at one year, as well as major bleeding complication rate (0% vs. 2%, p = .20, HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.01 - 2.61) and minor bleeding complication rate (10% vs. 14%, p = .40, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.27 - 1.66). The primary patency rate was higher in the rivaroxaban group at one year (84% vs. 71%, p = .049, HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.26 - 0.96) and at two years (79% vs. 63%, p = .037, HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 - 0.93). At a mean follow up of 24 months (range 1 - 42 months), the rivaroxaban group had a significantly lower post-operative Villalta score (4.87 ± 3.51 vs. 6.88 ± 5.85, p = .010, t = 2.64, 95% CI 0.50 - 3.52), lower rate of symptom recurrence (4% vs. 32%, p < .001), lower CD-TLR rates (3% vs. 13%, p = .039), and higher ulcer healing rate (90% vs. 59%, p = .004) than the warfarin group. CONCLUSION: For PTS patients with chronic iliofemoral venous occlusion undergoing iliofemoral venous stenting, rivaroxaban probably exhibited similar safety but superior efficacy to warfarin. However, further prospective control studies with large sample size are necessary to confirm the results.

Atherectomy Combined with Balloon Angioplasty versus Balloon Angioplasty Alone for de Novo Femoropopliteal Arterial Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and cost effectiveness of atherectomy for femoropopliteal (FP) arterial diseases have not been determined yet. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to compare the efficacy and safety between atherectomy combined with balloon angioplasty (BA) and BA alone for patients with de novo FP steno-occlusive lesions. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Medline, and Embase were used to search for studies evaluating outcomes of atherectomy combined with BA compared with BA alone in FP arterial diseases from inception to July 2020. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the level of evidence for each outcome. The fixed effects model was chosen to combine the data when I2 < 50%; otherwise, the random effects model was used. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to further analyse the results. RESULTS: Four RCTs were included. The meta-analysis showed that atherectomy combined with BA was associated with improved technical success rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.38, p < .001; I2 = 0; high quality), reduced bailout stenting (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07-0.32, p < .001; I2 = 16%; high quality), and flow limiting dissection (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.47, p < .001; I2 = 0; high quality). No statistically significant difference was found in target lesion revascularisation (TLR), primary patency, mortality, major adverse event (MAE), or ankle brachial index (ABI) after one year follow up. CONCLUSION: Compared with BA alone, atherectomy combined with BA may not improve primary patency, TLR, mortality rate, or ABI, but may reduce the need for bailout stenting and the incidence of flow limiting dissection and increase the technical success rate in FP arterial diseases. More studies are warranted to further confirm the conclusion.

Clinical Outcomes of Distal Tapered Restrictive Covered Stent Applied in Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Dissection Involving Zone 0.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy of a distal tapered restrictive covered stent (RCS) applied in the endovascular treatment of aortic dissection involving Zone 0 was evaluated. METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed 43 patients with acute aortic dissection involving Zone 0 who received in situ laser fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair with distal tapered RCS from January 2015 to February 2019. The indication for the distal tapered RCS procedure was an inappropriate distal size of the main stent graft. Technical success, aortic remodelling, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients. The 30 day post-operative mortality rate was 0%. All patients had complete false lumen thrombosis in the stent coverage segment. True lumen volume increased significantly (p < .001) with an average change of 87.0% ± 34.3%, while false lumen volume decreased significantly (p < .001) with an average change of -71.0% ± 13.5% between baseline and 12 months. During the follow up period (mean 28.7 months, range 12-63 months), no distal stent graft induced new entry (SINE) was observed. The average distance between the distal end of the RCS and the coeliac trunk was 57.5 mm. Two (4.7%) patients had spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) and recovered without permanent paraplegia after undergoing conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: The distal tapered RCS applied in the endovascular treatment of aortic dissection involving Zone 0 is considered to be a feasible and effective approach along with satisfactory aortic remodelling, a low risk of SINE, and SCI. The favourable results are partly explained by selection. No patients had an entry tear near the coronary artery, nor were the coronary arteries, pericardium, or aortic valve involved at the time of repair.

A meta-analysis of combined proximal stent grafting with or without adjunctive distal bare stent for the management of aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of placement of a proximal covered stent graft combined with a distal bare stent are controversial because of the lack of evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the outcomes of combined proximal covered stent grafting with distal bare stenting (BS group) and proximal covered stent grafting without distal bare stenting (non-BS group). METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases and key references were searched up to January 26, 2019. Predefined outcomes of interest were mortality, morbidity, and postoperative assessment of aortic remodeling. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) of the outcomes of interest using fixed effects model or random effects model. RESULTS: Overall, eight observational studies involving 914 patients were included. There were no significant differences in overall aorta-related mortality (RR, 0.54; confidence interval [CI], 0.24-1.24; P = .15), complete thoracic false lumen (FL) thrombosis rate (RR, 1.23; CI, 0.83-1.81; P = .30), or complete abdominal FL thrombosis rate (RR, 1.96; CI, 0.68-5.69; P = .21) between the BS group and the non-BS group. The BS group had a lower rate of partial thoracic FL thrombosis (RR, 0.40; CI, 0.25-0.65; P = .0002), a lower stent graft-induced new entry rate (RR, 0.08; CI, 0.02-0.41; P = .003), and a lower reintervention rate (RR, 0.42; CI, 0.26-0.69; P = .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Combined proximal covered stent grafting with distal adjunctive bare stenting had the potential to reduce the partial thoracic FL thrombosis rate and the rates of stent graft-induced new entry and reintervention but was not associated with lower aorta-related mortality or the complete FL thrombosis rate. Further research with a stricter methodology is needed.

Outcomes of emergency in situ laser fenestration-assisted thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection unfit for open surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the outcomes of emergency in situ laser fenestration (ISLF)-assisted thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection unfit for open surgery. METHODS: Twenty patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection who were found to be unfit for open surgery, underwent emergency ISLF-assisted TEVAR in our center between March 2016 and December 2018. Anatomic criteria for endovascular repair: coronary artery and aortic valve was not involved, proximal landing zone diameter of 45 mm or less, and proximal landing zone length of 20 mm or greater. Their clinical outcomes were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Twenty patients achieved a procedural success of 100.0%. The 30-day mortality was 10%; two patients died, one of severe pneumonia and the other from cerebral hemorrhage after the operation. Rate of stroke at 30 days was 5%. The average follow-up time was 16 months (range, 3-26 months). One death owing to heart failure occurred at 23 months postoperatively. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that the 24-month survival rate was 77.1%. Two patients had type Ia endoleaks and one had a type II endoleak. There was no stent graft migration or fenestration-related endoleak and all patients had a thrombosed false lumen in the covered section of the stent grafts. No reintervention, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attacks, cerebral infarction, or other complications occurred during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency ISLF-assisted TEVAR is a safe and effective alternative method for treating acute Stanford type A aortic dissection unfit for open surgery.

In Situ Laser Stent Graft Fenestration of the Left Subclavian Artery during Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Type B Aortic Dissection with Limited Proximal Landing Zones: 5-Year Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To assess safety and feasibility of in situ laser stent graft fenestration to revascularize the left subclavian artery (LSA) during thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with limited proximal landing zones with 5 years of follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single-center retrospective study, 130 patients with TBAD with limited proximal landing zones (≤ 1.5 cm) underwent in situ laser stent graft fenestration revascularizing the LSA during TEVAR from April 2014 to April 2019. Outcomes were assessed by CT angiography and clinic visits, including technical success rate, operative time, LSA patency, ischemic events, and late aorta-related complications during follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 53 y (range, 33-73 y). Primary technical success rate was 96.9% (126/130). Three chimney stents were placed instead of fenestration, and 1 LSA fenestration was combined with a left common carotid artery (LCCA) chimney stent. Mean operative time was 53 min ± 28 with fluoroscopy time of 40 min ± 15. There were no neurologic complications and no deaths, with a mean duration of hospital stay of 9 d (range, 5-21 d). At a mean follow-up of 42 mo (range, 5-60 mo), there was a 97% primary LSA patency. Four patients had a type I endoleak, which disappeared during follow-up. One LCCA became occluded after 6 months. No type II or III endoleaks were found. Retrograde type A aortic dissection and stent graft-induced new distal entry were not found during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In situ laser fenestration to revascularize the LSA during TEVAR of TBAD with limited proximal landing zones was efficient, safe, and feasible based on 5-year follow-up.

Limb Salvage After Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Lower Limb Ischemia: A Retrospective Analysis from Two Institutions.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the short-term outcomes of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) in patients with acute lower limb ischemia (ALI) and to analyze the effect of ALI of different etiologies on the limb salvage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2017, a retrospective analysis was performed on 112 patients (mean age: 66.5 years; 117 limbs in total; 66 limbs in 61 males) with ALI treated with PMT at 2 vascular institutions. Of the 117 limbs, 44 (41 patients) had acute arterial embolism, 36 (34 patients) had acute arterial thrombosis, and 37 (37 patients) had acute stent (31 limbs in 31 patients) or graft (6 limbs in 6 patients) thrombosis. The primary end point was limb salvage rate, and subgroups were analyzed by etiological factors. The secondary end points included patency rates, major bleeding complications, 30-day mortality, and reintervention rates. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 3.6%. The incidence of major bleeding complications was 2.7%. During the follow-up, the limb salvage rates at 1 year and 2 years were 83.8% and 74.7%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the limb salvage rate in patients with acute arterial embolism was 92.9% at 2 years after PMT, which was higher than that in patients with acute arterial thrombosis (73.3%, P = 0.04, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-11.7) and acute stent/graft thrombosis (62.5%, P = 0.01, HR: 4.7, 95% CI: 1.5-13.6). CONCLUSIONS: PMT in patients with ALI is effective in preventing amputations over the 3-year study period with a reasonable safety profile, especially in patients with acute arterial embolism.

Functional blocking of Ninjurin1 as a strategy for protecting endothelial cells in diabetes mellitus.

Ongoing efforts to remove pathological inflammatory stimuli are crucial for the protection of endothelial cells in diabetes. Nerve injury-induced protein 1 (Ninj1) is an adhesion molecule that not only contributes to inflammation but also regulates the apoptosis of endothelial cells. In the present study, Ninj1 was found highly expressed in endothelial cells in Type 2 diabetic mice and increased in high-glucose (HG) cultured HUVECs. Furthermore, we found that Ninj1 levels are up-regulated in endothelial cells in clinical specimens of diabetic patients when compared with nondiabetic tissues, indicating a biological correlation between Ninj1 and endothelial pathophysiology in diabetic condition. Functional blocking of Ninj1 promoted endothelial tube formation and eNOS phosphorylation in the HG condition. Additionally, blocking Ninj1 inhibited the activation of caspase-3 and increased the Bcl-2/Bax ratio, thus inhibiting HUVECs apoptosis induced by HG. HG-induced ROS overproduction, p38 MAPK and NF-κB activation, and the overexpression of VCAM-1, ICAM-1, MCP-1, and IL-6 genes were ameliorated after Ninj1 was blocked. Using the signaling pathway inhibitor LY294002, we found that Bcl-2 expression and eNOS phosphorylation after Ninj1 blockade were regulated via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. The in vivo endothelial contents, α-SMA+PECAM-1+ vascular numbers, and blood perfusion in the hindlimb were markedly up-regulated after Ninj1 was blocked. According to our findings, functional blocking of Ninj1 shows protective effects on diabetic endothelial cells both in vitro and in vivo Thus, we consider Ninj1 to be a potential therapeutic target for preventing endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus.

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis of Acute Entire Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis From below the Knee Access: A Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of below the knee (BTK) approach in the treatment of entire limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive CDT treatment of acute entire limb DVT using a BTK approach (September 2010-February 2016) was performed. The patients included 51 men and 28 women with a mean age of 54 years. RESULTS: CDT was performed by accessing the ipsilateral the small saphenous vein (SSV) and posterior tibial vein (PTV; 24 via incision and 64 via puncture). Thirty-four patients underwent CDT within 3 days of symptom onset and lysis was successful in all cases (i.e., grade III).In contrast, only 22 (68.6%, 22/32) of those treated within 4-10 days and 0 (0%) of those treated after 10 days achieved grade III lysis. A total of 16 bleeding complications occurred, none of which were classified as major, and 11 of which were related to numbness at the site of incision. Poor wound healing was observed in one patient. Three patients treated using an SSV approach exhibited partial occlusion. One patient treated using a PTV approach experienced occlusion. During the 24-month follow-up period, the patency and PTS rates were 80.4% (37/46) and 30.4% (14/46), respectively. The overall patency rate was 87.1% (54/62) during a mean follow-up duration of 3.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a BTK approach in entire-limb DVT via SSV and PTV puncture is feasible and safe and may be considered an alternative to traditional CDT approach. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparison of Direct Iliofemoral Stenting Following AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy vs Staged Stenting After AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy Plus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis.

PURPOSE: To compare the treatment outcomes in patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and iliofemoral stenosis who underwent either direct stenting after AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy or staged stenting after AngioJet thrombectomy plus catheter-directed thrombolysis with urokinase. METHODS: From June 2014 to February 2016, 91 DVT patients underwent 2 treatments for duplex-verified iliofemoral stenosis: direct stenting (n = 46; mean age 54.8 years; 32 men) or staged stenting (n = 45; mean age 56.5 years; 27 men). The degree of patency after thrombectomy or thrombolysis was evaluated using the Venous Registry Index (VRI), while the risk of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) was evaluated according to the Villalta scale. Patients were followed with periodic duplex ultrasound scans up to 1 year. RESULTS: The technical success rates were 100% in both groups; there was no 30-day mortality. Immediate (24-hour) clinical improvement was achieved in 42 (91%) of 46 direct group patients vs 33 (73%) of 45 staged group patients (p<0.001). A significant reduction (p<0.001) in the length of hospital stay was noted in the direct group (4.59±0.91) compared with that in the staged group (5.8±1.6). The stents used in the direct group were longer but with similar diameter compared with the staged group. The thrombolysis rates were 81.50%±5.76% in the direct group and 85.67%±3.84% in the staged group (p<0.001). The VRIs declined (improved) significantly in both groups (11.68±1.92 to 3.21±1.44 in the direct group and 12.17±2.29 to 2.36±1.19 in the staged group, both p<0.001). The Villalta scores were significantly better in the staged group (p<0.001). Recurrent DVT occurred in 2 patients in the direct group. The primary patency rates at 1 year were 93.5% in the direct group and 97.8% in the staged group (p=0.323). CONCLUSION: Both direct and staged stenting are effective treatment modalities for patients with acute proximal DVT. Compared with staged stenting, direct stenting provides similar treatment success and a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay; however, it has lower thrombolysis efficacy, and the risk of PTS at 1 year is greater with direct stenting.

Treatment of Femoral Vein Obstruction Concomitant with Iliofemoral Stenting in Patients with Severe Post-thrombotic Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the clinical and anatomical outcomes of iliofemoral stenting, with concomitant femoral stenting or balloon angioplasty alone, in patients with severe post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and compromised inflow. METHODS: A database of patients with severe PTS who successfully underwent endovascular iliofemoral stenting was reviewed retrospectively. Patients with impaired inflow with chronic post-thrombotic obstructive lesions in the femoral vein (FV), but patent profunda vein, were selected and divided into two groups: the FV stenting (FV-S) group and the FV angioplasty (FV-A) group. Patients in the FV-S group were treated with concomitant iliofemoral and FV stenting, and patients in the FV-A group were treated with iliofemoral stenting and balloon angioplasty alone of the obstructed femoral vein. The clinical and stent outcomes were recorded and compared in the two groups. RESULTS: There were 45 patients in the FV-S group and 69 patients in the FV-A group. The groups were well matched for age, gender, and diseased limbs. The pre-procedural symptoms, CEAP classifications, VCSS scores, Villalta scores, and prevalence of active ulcers were also similar between the two groups. Immediate failure (<30 days post-procedure) in the femoral segment occurred more frequently in the FV-A group (70% in FV-A group vs. 24% in FV-S group, p < .001); however, all treated femoral vein segments had occluded at 12 months. There was no significant difference between the FV-S and FV-A groups in cumulative primary and secondary patency rates of the iliofemoral stent at 3 years (55% vs. 52%, p = .71, and 77% vs. 85%, p = .32, respectively). Complete pain relief, swelling relief, VCSS score, Villalta score, and freedom from ulcers at a median of 22 months (1-48 months) following the procedure were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Stent placement to treat post-thrombotic iliofemoral obstruction with concomitant obstructed femoral vein but patent profunda vein shows cumulative patency rates and clinical outcomes similar to previous reports. Adjunctive femoral stenting or angioplasty of the obstructed femoral vein does not appear to improve clinical or stent outcomes in patients with severe PTS.

Endovascular repair of aortic arch intramural hematoma and penetrating ulcers with 810 nm in situ laser-assisted fenestration: Preliminary results of a single-center.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to report the clinical outcomes of the use of 810 nm in situ laser-generated fenestration (ISLF) for the treatment of aortic aneurysms (AAs) and intramural hematomas (IMHs) located in the aortic arch. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between April 2014 and September 2017, 23 patients (15 men, mean age 66.0 years) with AAs (n = 12) or IMHs (n = 11) underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with 810 nm ISLF of the arch. The primary outcomes of the safety assessment were the presence of endoleaks, mortality and morbidity, including adverse in situ fenestration-related, cardiovascular, and cerebral events. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all cases. Urgent intervention was performed in 15 (65.2%) cases. Left subclavian artery (LSA) ISLF was applied in six patients, LSA and left common carotid artery (LCCA) ISLF in three patients, and total aortic arch vessel ISLF in two patients. One patient suffered minimal stroke after the procedure and recovered without permanent disability to the extremities in 2 weeks. There were no fenestration-related complications except in one patient with brachial artery access who suffered a hematoma and underwent incision repair at the puncture site. All fenestrations remained patent, and there were no endoleaks during a mean follow-up of 10.5 ± 5.7 (range: 2-21) months. CONCLUSIONS: Complete or incomplete endovascular arch reconstruction by ISLF in arch diseases (AAs and IMHs) is feasible and reproducible with safe, effective, and favorable primary results and no need for customized endografts. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:837-843, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Outcomes of endovascular recanalization versus autogenous venous bypass for thromboangiitis obliterans patients with critical limb ischemia due to tibioperoneal arterial occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the outcomes of endovascular recanalization (ER) vs autogenous venous bypass (AVB) for tibioperoneal arterial occlusion in thromboangiitis obliterans patients with critical lower limb ischemia. METHODS: A total of 90 limbs in 75 patients, successfully treated with ER (ER group, 35 patients, 43 limbs) and AVB (AVB group, 40 patients, 47 limbs) for tibioperoneal arterial occlusions from January 2009 to December 2015 in a single institution, were retrospectively analyzed. The characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was the amputation-free survival rate during follow-up; the secondary outcomes were patency rates, immediate failure, periprocedural complications, and rates of reintervention. Univariate and multivariate analysis to identify potentially significant predictors of amputation-free survival and primary patency in the whole study group was performed. RESULTS: Not all patients in the ER group were bypass candidates because of unavailable runoff arteries or adequate conduit for bypass. Other baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the ER group had a much higher incidence of immediate failure (36.36% in femoropopliteal segment and 65.52% in tibioperoneal segment vs 14.89% in AVB bypass; P = .03 and < .001). Although patients in the ER group had a significantly higher rate of reintervention (62.79% vs 27.66%; P < .001) associated with a significantly lower primary patency rate (18.96% in femoropopliteal segment and 14.37% in tibioperoneal segment vs 60.41% in AVB bypass; P = .008 and < .001) and secondary patency rate (33.85% in femoropopliteal segment and 21.29% in tibioperoneal segment vs 68.78% in AVB bypass; P = .04 and .002) at 3 years, the amputation-free survival in the ER group and AVB group was similar at 1 year (92.9% vs 93.2%; P = .81) and 3 years (87.8% and 90.6%; P = .66). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the presence of gangrene was independently associated with major amputation (hazard ratio, 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-4.3; P = .02); however, the presence of active ulcer was the only risk factor for poorer primary patency during follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-5.6; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: ER is a valid strategy for limb salvage in thromboangiitis obliterans patients who are unsuitable for bypass, contributing an acceptable amputation-free survival as high as with AVB, even though it is associated with lower patency rates and a higher rate of reintervention.

Acute Intramural Hematoma of the Descending Aorta Treated with Stent Graft Repair Is Associated with a Better Prognosis.

PURPOSE: To compare midterm outcomes of optimal medical treatment (OMT) alone with OMT and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of acute type B intramural hematoma (IMHB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of 65 patients treated with OMT alone (31 patients) or OMT with TEVAR (34 patients) for acute uncomplicated or complicated IMHB from January 2006 to December 2015 in a single institution. Primary outcome was aortic-related mortality during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were aortic-related adverse events, all-cause mortality, and occurrence of complete aortic remodeling. RESULTS: Except for the morphologic nature of the aortic lesion, no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were observed. Mean follow-up time was 32 months ± 19 (range, 1-120 months). Patients in the OMT group had a significantly increased rate of aortic-related mortality (12.9% vs 0% in TEVAR group, P = .046) and aortic-related adverse events (29.0% vs 0% in TEVAR group, P < .001) and an insignificant but higher trending all-cause mortality rate (38.8% vs 19.8% in TEVAR group, P = .15). The occurrence of complete aortic remodeling was significantly lower in the OMT group (15.4% vs 82.1% in TEVAR group, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR is likely to protect from progression of IMHB and to be associated with a better prognosis than OMT alone.