Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep ; 24(5): 289-301, 2024 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38632138

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Historically, systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) primarily consisted of immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids and Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDS), which provided symptomatic relief but often had long-term adverse effects. Newer treatments have shown significant efficacy with less side effects in clinical trials. This review discusses and compares conventional and newer systemic treatments for AD. RECENT FINDINGS: Newer medications for AD including dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, and oral JAK inhibitors have been shown to be safe and efficacious. High dose cyclosporine and dupilumab were more effective than methotrexate and azathioprine in improving clinical signs of AD. High-dose upadacitinib was shown in another meta-analysis to be most effective in the measured outcomes but had the highest frequency of adverse events. Targeted biologic treatments are increasingly favored over traditional immunosuppressive treatments of AD. Treatment can be individualized based on potency, adverse side effects, mechanism of action, and administration preference. Ongoing research continues to expand treatment options for AD.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Imunossupressores , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/imunologia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Janus Quinases/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico
2.
Curr Opin Pediatr ; 35(6): 671-679, 2023 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37522635

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Conventional treatments of atopic dermatitis have been inadequate, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past 5 years, four immunomodulators have been approved for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children. These include dupilumab, ruxolitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib. The review summarizes the pivotal phase 3 trials of these medications. SUMMARY: The newer immunomodulators have transformed the treatment of atopic dermatitis, particularly in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. Dupilumab targets IL-4 and IL-13, which are the main causes of allergic inflammation, resulting in great efficacy and few side effects. Upadacitinib and abrocitinib are alternative systemic medications for adolescents who have failed or are unable to tolerate dupilumab. Ruxolitinib cream is the latest addition to the current topical therapy. It is indicated for children 12 years and older with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. Further studies are needed to confirm its safety and efficacy for younger children and for patients with more severe disease.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Duplo-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA