Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 67(6): 1427-1436, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38363431

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early recurrence (ER) within a 90-day blanking period (BP) in catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for late recurrence (LR) after 90 days postoperatively. However, few reports have examined them in the second CA and compared them to the first CA. Moreover, in recent years, there have been reports suggesting that BP should be reduced from 90 to 30 days. Therefore, the association between ER and LR in the first and the second CA was examined, and the validity of a 30-day BP was evaluated. METHODS: A total of 511 consecutive patients undergoing the first CA and 116 of these patients undergoing the second CA for AF at a single institution from November 2016 to December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: When ER within a 90-day BP was divided into 0-30 days and 31-90 days according to the timing of the last ER episode, the hazard ratios on LR of them relative to no ER were 2.7 {95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-4.2} and 9.7 (95% CI 6.6-14.3), respectively, for the first CA and 15.3 (95% CI 4.7-50.1) and 44.1 (95% CI 14.0-139.4), respectively, for the second CA. CONCLUSIONS: ER was strongly associated with LR, especially in patients with the last episode of ER more than 30 days after CA. This was pronounced in cases after the second CA, when PVI appeared to be completed. With the current improvement in PVI durability, BP may be acceptable for 30 days.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Ablação por Cateter , Recidiva , Fibrilação Atrial/cirurgia , Humanos , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Fatores de Risco , Idoso
2.
J Cardiol Cases ; 28(4): 144-146, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37818433

RESUMO

We present a case of a ruptured mycotic coronary aneurysm effectively treated with covered stents and phased surgery. The covered stent, however, became occluded two years later. Because of the low invasiveness, a covered stent treatment may be advantageous over conventional surgery but trade off long-term vascular patency. Learning objective: To recognize the presence of a ruptured infectious coronary aneurysm after a primary coronary stenting for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.To discuss the treatment strategies for a ruptured infectious coronary aneurysm with a covered stent.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA