Setting of the tentative epidemiological cut-off values of contezolid for Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus agalactiae.

OBJECTIVES: To set the tentative epidemiological cut-off values (TECOFFs) of contezolid for Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus agalactiae based on the distributions of inhibition zone diameters and MICs. METHODS: A total of 1358 non-duplicate clinical isolates of Gram-positive bacteria were collected from the patients across China from 2017 to 2020. The isolates were tested for susceptibility to contezolid and the comparator linezolid by broth microdilution and disc diffusion methods in three microbiology laboratories. The zone diameters and MICs of linezolid WT strains were used to set the WT TECOFFs of contezolid by normalized resistance interpretation calculations. RESULTS: Contezolid showed an aggregate MIC range from 0.03 to 8 mg/L and MIC90 value of 1-2 mg/L against all of the Gram-positive bacterial strains tested. The TECOFF of contezolid based on MIC distributions was 4 mg/L for both S. aureus and Enterococcus species, and 2 mg/L for S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae. The TECOFF of contezolid based on zone diameter was 24 mm for S. aureus, 18 mm for E. faecalis, 20 mm for E. faecium and S. pneumoniae, and 17 mm for S. agalactiae. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiological cut-off values of contezolid were set tentatively for selected Gram-positive bacteria using the MIC and zone diameter distributions. These data are helpful for clinical microbiologists and clinicians to interpret the antimicrobial susceptibility results of contezolid.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftobiprole and comparator agents when tested against gram-positive and -negative organisms collected across China (2016-2018).

BACKGROUND: Ceftobiprole is a fifth-generation cephalosporin which has been reported to have broad antibacterial spectrum when tested against bacteria collected from other countries except China. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftobiprole in comparison with other comparators against clinically significant isolates collected across from China. RESULTS: Susceptibility testing of ceftobiprole and comparators against 1163 clinically isolated Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria was performed with broth micro dilution method following the CLSI guidelines. All 110 S. aureus were susceptible to ceftobiprole with MIC50/90 of 1/2 mg/L for MRSA and 0.5/1 mg/L for MSSA. For Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), MIC50/90 of ceftobiprole for MRCNS and MSCNS was 1/2 mg/L and 0.25/0.5 mg/L. Ceftobiprole demonstrated good potency against E. faecalis (MIC50/90 of 0.5/1 mg/L) but limited activity against E. faecium (MIC50/90 of > 32/ > 32 mg/L). Ceftobiprole demonstrated potent activity against all 39 ß-hemolytic Streptococcus spp. with MIC50/90 ≤ 0.015/ ≤ 0.015-2 mg/L and 110 of PSSP with 98.2% susceptibility. Ceftobiprole inhibited all isolates of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis at ≤ 1 mg/L. 91.8% and 98.2% of the ESBL-negative E. coli and K. pneumoniae were susceptible to ceftobiprole, but most of the ESBL-positive or carbapenem-resistant strains were also resistant to ceftobiprole. Ceftobiprole inhibited 84.2% of carbapenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa and 94.1% of carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii at ≤ 8 mg/L, but only 52.6% of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and 5.3% of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. CONCLUSION: Ceftobiprole demonstrated good in vitro activity against a broad range of clinically relevant contemporary Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates.

Comparative activities of sitafloxacin against recent clinical isolates in hospitals across China.

Sitafloxacin is one of the newer generation fluoroquinolones. Considering the ever-changing antimicrobial resistance, it is necessary to monitor the activities of sitafloxacin against recent pathogenic isolates. Therefore, we determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of sitafloxacin and comparators by broth microdilution or agar dilution method against 1101 clinical isolates collected from 2017 to 2019 in 31 hospitals across China. Sitafloxacin was highly active against gram-positive isolates evidenced by the MICs required to inhibit the growth of 50%/90% isolates (MIC50/90): ≤ 0.03/0.25, ≤ 0.03/0.125, ≤ 0.03/2, 0.125/0.25, 0.25/2, and 0.125/0.125 mg/L for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MSCNS), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant CNS, Enterococcus faecalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae, respectively. Sitafloxacin inhibited 82.8% of the MRSA strains and 97.5% of MRCNS strains. Sitafloxacin was also potent against ciprofloxacin-susceptible Escherichia coli (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/0.06 mg/L) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/0.125 mg/L), non-ESBL-producing E. coli (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/1 mg/L) and K. pneumoniae (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.03/0.5 mg/L), Haemophilus influenzae (MIC50/90: ≤0.015/0.06 mg/L), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (MIC50/90: 0.125/0.5 mg/L), Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC50/90: ≤ 0.015/≤ 0.015 mg/L), Bacteroides fragilis (MIC50/90: 0.06/2 mg/L), Peptostreptococcus (MIC50/90: 0.125/4 mg/L), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (≤ 0.03/≤ 0.03 mg/L). However, sitafloxacin was less active for Enterococcus faecium, ciprofloxacin-resistant and/or ESBL-producing E. coli, and K. pneumoniae strains. Sitafloxacin was superior or comparable to most of the comparators in activities against the abovementioned isolates, so sitafloxacin is still highly active against most of the clinical isolates in hospitals across China, proving its utility in treatment of the abovementioned susceptible strains.

Comparative In Vitro Activities of Ceftaroline and Tedizolid against Clinical Strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus: Results from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2018.

The in vitro activities of ceftaroline and tedizolid were compared against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates collected from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network. Ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity against S. aureus isolates (MIC50/90, ≤0.25/1 mg/liter). Tedizolid was also highly active against S. aureus (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 mg/liter) and Enterococcus (MIC50/90, 0.5/0.5 mg/liter) isolates. Our results support the clinical usefulness of ceftaroline and tedizolid in treating Gram-positive infections.

In Vitro Activity of Cefepime-Zidebactam, Ceftazidime-Avibactam, and Other Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii: Results from China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2018.

This study evaluated the in vitro activity of cefepime-zidebactam in comparison with that of ceftazidime-avibactam and other comparators against clinically significant Gram-negative bacillus isolates. A total of 3,400 nonduplicate Gram-negative clinical isolates were collected from 45 medical centers across China in the CHINET Program in 2018, including Enterobacterales (n = 2,228), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 657), and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 515). The activities of cefepime-zidebactam and 20 comparators were determined by broth microdilution as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Cefepime-zidebactam demonstrated potent activity against almost all Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 0.125/1 mg/liter) and good activity against P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 2/8 mg/liter). Among the 373 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 57.3% (213/373) and 15.3% (57/373) were positive for blaKPC-2 and blaNDM, respectively. Cefepime-zidebactam showed a MIC of ≤2 mg/liter for 92.0% (196/213) of blaKPC-2 producers and 79.7% (47/59) of blaNDM producers. Ceftazidime-avibactam showed good in vitro activity against Enterobacterales (MIC50/90, 0.25/2 mg/liter; 94.0% susceptible) and P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 4/16 mg/liter; 86.9% susceptible). Ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 9.1% of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli isolates (63.6% were blaNDM producers) and 84.6% of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (74.3% were blaKPC producers). Most (90.1%) blaKPC-2 producers were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. Cefepime-zidebactam demonstrated limited activity (MIC50/90, 16/32 mg/liter) against the 515 A. baumannii isolates (79.2% were carbapenem resistant), and ceftazidime-avibactam was less active (MIC50/90, 64/>64 mg/liter). Cefepime-zidebactam was highly active against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, including blaKPC-2-positive Enterobacterales and blaNDM-positive Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa And ceftazidime-avibactam was highly active against blaKPC-2-positive Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa.

In vitro activity of omadacycline against pathogens isolated from Mainland China during 2017-2018.

Antibiotic resistance of bacterial pathogens isolated in China is a major concern. Omadacycline is a novel tetracycline derivative that has been approved for use in skin infections and community-acquired pneumonia. This study was conducted to determine the in vitro activity of omadacycline against a large collection of patient isolate medical centers across Mainland China. A total of 1041 recent clinical isolates are obtained from patients hospitalized in 29 provinces and municipalities across China. The in vitro activity of omadacycline and comparator agents was assessed using the microbroth dilution methodology. Omadacycline was active against methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus with MIC90 values of 0.25 and 1 mg/L, respectively. All isolates of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, including vancomycin-resistant isolates, were inhibited by ≤ 0.25 mg/L of omadacycline. It was active against Streptococcus pneumoniae irrespective of susceptibility to penicillin or macrolides (MIC90 =0.12 mg/L). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution of omadacycline was nearly identical against (extended-spectrum beta-lactamases) ESBL-positive, ESBL-negative, and carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli (MIC90 = 4 mg/L). Omadacycline also showed good activity against Acinetobacter baumannii, inhibiting all isolates at ≤ 8 mg/L. Against Hemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, the MICs of omadacycline were low and not influenced by the presence of ß-lactamase. Overall, the activity of omadacycline was very good against isolates commonly associated with skin infections and pneumonia, and the susceptibility of Chinese isolates was similar to that reported for these pathogens from large surveillance studies outside China. This suggests that omadacycline could be an option for treatment of these infections in Chinese patients.

Results from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2017 of the In Vitro Activities of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T), and comparators were determined for 1,774 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and 524 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected by 30 medical centers from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2017. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the CLSI broth microdilution method, and blaKPC and blaNDM were detected by PCR for all carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrated potent activity against almost all Enterobacteriaceae (94.6% susceptibility; MIC50, ≤0.25 mg/liter; MIC90, ≤0.25 to >32 mg/liter) and good activity against P. aeruginosa (86.5% susceptibility; MIC50/90, 2/16 mg/liter). Among the CRE, 50.8% (189/372 isolates) were positive for blaKPC-2, which mainly existed in ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (92.1%, 174/189). Among the CRE, 17.7% (66/372 isolates) were positive for blaNDM, which mainly existed in strains resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (71.7%, 66/92). Ceftolozane-tazobactam showed good in vitro activity against Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis (MIC50/90, ≤0.5/2 mg/liter; 90.5 and 93.8% susceptibility, respectively), and the rates of susceptibility of K. pneumoniae (MIC50/90, 2/>64 mg/liter) and P. aeruginosa (MIC50/90, 1/8 mg/liter) were 52.7% and 88.5%, respectively. Among the CRE strains, 28.6% of E. coli isolates and 85% of K. pneumoniae isolates were still susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, but only 7.1% and 1.9% of them, respectively, were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. The rates of susceptibility of the carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates to ceftazidime-avibactam (65.7%) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (68%) were similar. Overall, both ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam were highly active against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa recently collected across China, and ceftazidime-avibactam showed activity superior to that of ceftolozane-tazobactam against Enterobacteriaceae, whereas ceftolozane-tazobactam showed a better effect against P. aeruginosa.

Resistance reported from China antimicrobial surveillance network (CHINET) in 2018.

The aim of this study is to investigate the antimicrobial susceptibility of strains isolated from the major hospitals in China. A total of 44 teaching hospitals were involved. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted by Kirby-Bauer automated systems, and results were interpreted using CLSI criteria. Totally 244,843 strains were isolated in 2018, of which gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci were accounting for 71.8% and 28.2%, respectively. 39.7% of isolates were cultured from lower respiratory tract, 18.8% from urine, 14.8% from blood, 1.3% from cerebrospinal fluid, respectively. Of those, the five major species were most often isolated (65.5%, 63%, 52.3%, and 30.3%). The resistance rate of MRSA to most antimicrobial agents was significantly higher than that of MSSA strains, except for to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in urine specimen. E.coli was still highly susceptible to carbapenem antibiotics, and the resistance rate was less than 5%. Carbapenem resistance among Klebsiella pneumoniae, especially cultured from cerebrospinal fluid, increased significance from 18.6 to 64.1%. The resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to carbapenems were nearly 30% in the blood, in urine, and in the lower respiratory tract, but about 60% of that in cerebrospinal fluid. About 80% of Acinetobacter baumannii strains was resistant to imipenem and meropenem, respectively. Bacterial resistance of five major clinical isolates from cerebrospinal fluid to common antibiotics (in particular Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae) currently shows an increasing trend. It is worth to emphasize the importance of serious control of hospital infection and better management of clinical use of antimicrobial agents.

Current Status and Trends of Antibacterial Resistance in China.

The bacterial resistance surveillance system is relatively well established at the national, provincial, and hospital levels in China. Two representative national surveillance networks for bacterial resistance are the China Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (CARSS) and the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET), both established in 2005. CARSS data show the different bacterial resistance rates among different provinces and autonomous regions for each specific bacterium. CHINET data mainly represent the bacterial resistance profiles of teaching hospitals and show the changing trends of bacterial resistance in China. For clinical isolates, the ratio of gram-negative bacilli to gram-positive cocci is approximately 7 to 3. In general, gram-negative bacilli have higher antimicrobial resistance profiles in China. Regarding different bacterial species, antimicrobial resistance is multifaceted. The prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases is high; Acinetobacter baumannii has a high antimicrobial resistance profile; and, notably, the prevalence of CRKP has been showing a marked increase since 2005. In addition, the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus is low, and the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed decreasing trends from 2005 to 2017.

A Case-Control Study: Clinical Characteristics of Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections Versus Non-bloodstream Infections of Acinetobacter spp.

Background: Acinetobacter spp. are among the most common causes of bacterial nosocomial infections, including pneumonia and bloodstream infections. Previous studies on the risk factors of bloodstream Acinetobacter spp. infections (BSAcIs) primarily compared uninfected patients to those with BSAcIs. However, the identified risk factors contribute to either BSIs or Acinetobacter spp. infections. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to analyze the risk factors of BSAcIs in comparison to non-bloodstream Acinetobacter infections (non-BSAcIs). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 10 years of medical records of BSAcIs from a teaching hospital in Shanghai. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between BSAcIs and non-BSAcIs. Treatment outcomes of carbapenem- and sulbactam-based regimens were also evaluated. Results: Respiratory tract infections (43.1%, 44/102) were the most common source of BSAcIs. The in-hospital mortality rate of BSAcIs (22.5%, 23/102) was significantly higher than that of non-BSAcIs (10.8%, 24/204). Compared with non-BSAcIs, the previous use of corticoids, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage, and the implementation of intracranial drainage were independent risk factors for BSAcIs. The clinical efficacy rate of antimicrobial treatment of carbapenem-susceptible BSAcIs was significantly higher than that of carbapenem-non-susceptible (CNS) BSAcIs (74.0% vs 44.3%). Sulbactam-based regimens had similar clinical efficacy rates as carbapenem-based regimens for treating CNS-BSAcIs (50.0% vs 45.8%). Conclusions: The in-hospital mortality rate of BSAcIs was significantly higher than that of non-BSAcIs. Glucocorticoids, PPI usage, and intracranial drainage were independent risk factors for BSAcIs. Sulbactam-based regimens had similar clinical efficacy rates as carbapenem-based regimens for treating CNS-BSAcIs.

High Prevalence of vanM in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Isolates from Shanghai, China.

The vanM gene was first found in a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREm) isolate in Shanghai in 2006. In this study, we found that, in 70 VREm strains isolated in nine Shanghai hospitals from 2006 to 2014, vanM was more prevalent than the vanA gene (64.3% [45/70] versus 35.7% [25/70]). The vanM-type isolates showed similar antimicrobial susceptibility patterns with the vanA types. The vanM-type VREm emerged and disseminated in Shanghai.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of multiple-dose intravenous nemonoxacin in healthy Chinese volunteers.

This study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of nemonoxacin in healthy Chinese volunteers following multiple-dose intravenous infusion once daily for 10 consecutive days. The study was composed of two stages. In the open-label stage, 500 mg or 750 mg of nemonoxacin (n = 12 each) was administered at an infusion rate of 5.56 mg/min. In the second stage, with a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design, 500, 650, or 750 mg of nemonoxacin (n = 16 in each cohort; 12 subjects received the drug and the other 4 subjects received the placebo) was given at an infusion rate of 4.17 mg/min. The results showed that, in the first stage, the maximal nemonoxacin concentrations (mean ± SD) at steady state (Cmax_ss) were 9.60 ± 1.84 and 11.04 ± 2.18 µg/ml in the 500-mg and 750-mg cohorts, respectively; the areas under the concentration-time curve at steady state (AUC0-24_ss) were 44.03 ± 8.62 and 65.82 ± 10.78 µg · h/ml in the 500-mg and 750-mg cohorts, respectively. In the second stage, the nemonoxacin Cmax_ss values were 7.13 ± 1.47, 8.17 ± 1.76, and 9.96 ± 2.23 µg/ml in the 500-mg, 650-mg, and 750-mg cohorts, respectively; the AUC0-24_ss values were 40.46 ± 9.52, 54.17 ± 12.10, and 71.34 ± 17.79 µg · h/ml in the 500-mg, 650-mg, and 750-mg cohorts, respectively. No accumulation was found after the 10-day infusion with any regimen. The drug was well tolerated. A Monte Carlo simulation indicated that the cumulative fraction of response of any dosing regimen was nearly 100% against Streptococcus pneumoniae. The probability of target attainment of nemonoxacin therapy was >98% when the MIC of nemonoxacin against S. pneumoniae was ≤1 mg/liter. It is suggested that all of the studied intravenous nemonoxacin dosing regimens should have favorable clinical and microbiological efficacies in future clinical studies. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01944774.).

Mechanisms of tigecycline resistance among Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates.

Of 26 tigecycline-nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae (TNSKP) clinical isolates, 25 had nonsynonymous mutations in ramR and/or acrR (23 in ramR and 10 in acrR). Eight TNSKP isolates possessed overexpression of ramA, acrB, rarA, and oqxB simultaneously, while 8 and 1 TNSKP strains had upregulation of ramA and acrB and of rarA and oqxB, respectively. Thus, resistance mechanisms of 9 TNSKP isolates cannot be explained by the present pathways. This study underscores the role of RamA in TNSKP and suggests the presence of novel tigecycline resistance mechanisms.

Complex evolutionary trajectories in vivo of two novel KPC variants conferring ceftazidime-avibactam resistance.

More and more ceftazidime-avibactam resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae have been reported with its widespread use, and the detection rate of KPC variants has increased dramatically. However, the evolutionary mechanism and fitness effects during KPC mutation remained unknown. Here, we report the complex in vivo evolutionary trajectories of two novel KPC variants, KPC-155 (L169P/GT242A) and KPC-185 (D179Y/GT242A), from Klebsiella pneumoniae in the same patient. The novel variants were shown to confer ceftazidime-avibactam resistance but restore carbapenem susceptibility based on the results of plasmid transformation assays, cloning experiments, and enzyme kinetic measurements. In vitro competition experiments highlighted the adaptive advantage conferred by strains carrying these KPC variants, which could lead to the rapid spread of these ceftazidime-avibactam resistant strains. The growth curve indicated that blaKPC-185 had better growth conditions at lower avibactam concentration compared to blaKPC-155, which was consistent with ceftazidime-avibactam use in vivo. In addition, replicative transposition of the IS26-flanked translocatable unit (IS26-ISKpn6-blaKPC-ISKpn27-IS26) also contributes to the blaKPC amplification and formation of two copies (blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-185), conferring both carbapenem and ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. However, strains with double copies showed reduced competitive advantage and configuration stability. The comparative plasmid analysis of IS26 group (IS26-blaKPC-IS26) and Tn1721 group (Tn1721-blaKPC-IS26) revealed that IS26-insertion could influence the distribution of resistance genes and ability of self-conjugation. The dynamic changes in blaKPC configuration highlight the need for consistent monitoring including antimicrobial susceptibility testing and determination of blaKPC subtypes-during clinical treatment, especially when ceftazidime-avibactam is administered.

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of intravenous nemonoxacin malate vs. levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Nemonoxacin malate is a novel non-fluorinated quinolone for oral and intravenous (IV) administration. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled clinical trial (NCT02205112) evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV nemonoxacin vs. levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomised to receive 500 mg nemonoxacin or levofloxacin via IV infusion, once daily for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Secondary efficacy and safety were also compared between nemonoxacin and levofloxacin. RESULTS: Overall, 525 patients were randomised and treated with nemonoxacin (n = 349) or levofloxacin (n = 176). The clinical cure rate was 91.8% (279/304) for nemonoxacin and 85.7% (138/161) for levofloxacin in the mITT population (P > 0.05). The clinical efficacy of nemonoxacin was non-inferior to levofloxacin for treatment of CAP. Microbiological success rate with nemonoxacin was 88.8% (95/107) and with levofloxacin was 87.8% (43/49) (P > 0.05) at the TOC visit in the bacteriological mITT population. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 37.1% in the nemonoxacin group and 22.2% in the levofloxacin group. These AEs were mostly local reactions at the infusion site, nausea, elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), and QT interval prolongation. The nemonoxacin-related AEs were mostly mild and resolved after discontinuation of nemonoxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Nemonoxacin 500 mg IV once daily for 7-14 days is effective and safe and non-inferior to levofloxacin for treating CAP in adult patients.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nemonoxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro infection model.

The aim of this paper was to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of nemonoxacin, a novel nonfluorinated quinolone, against Streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro. A modified infection model was used to simulate the pharmacokinetics of nemonoxacin following scaling of single oral doses and multiple oral dosing. Four S. pneumoniae strains with different penicillin sensitivities were selected, and the drug efficacy was quantified by the change in log colony counts within 24 h. A sigmoid maximum-effect (Emax) model was used to analyze the relationship between PK/PD parameters and drug effect. Analysis indicated that the killing pattern of nemonoxacin shows a dualism which is mainly concentration dependent when the MIC is low and that the better PK/PD index should be the area under the concentration-time curve for the free, unbound fraction of the drug divided by the MIC (fAUC0-24/MIC), which means that giving the total daily amount of drug as one dose is appropriate under those conditions. When the MIC is high, the time (T) dependency is important and the valid PK/PD index should be the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period in which the drug concentration exceeds the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions (f%T>MIC), which means that to split the maximum daily dose into several separate doses will benefit the eradication of the bacteria. To obtain a 3-log10-unit decrease, the target values of fAUC0-24/MIC and f%T>MIC are 47.05 and 53.4%, respectively.

A modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (mKB) method for accurately testing tigecycline susceptibility: a nation-wide multicenter comparative study.

Introduction. Tigecycline is one of the important antibiotics available for treating infection caused by multiple-drug resistant pathogens. However, the conventional AST methods which are commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories usually lead to false intermediate or resistant results in testing tigecycline susceptibility, and further mislead clinical antimicrobial therapies.Hypothesis. The modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (mKB) method was performed based on the traditional standard Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (sKB) method.Aim. To evaluate a modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (mKB) method for tigecycline susceptibility testing, for the purpose of providing accurate tigecycline susceptibility results in clinical practice.Methodology. A total of 4271 nonduplicate clinical strains were isolated from 37 hospitals across China to perform the mKB method, standard Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (sKB) method, comparing with the reference broth microdilution (BMD) according to the CLSI. Parameters of categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (mE), major errors (ME), and very major errors (VME) were used in this methodological evaluation research.Results. BMD testing showed that 91.3-98.9 % of the A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, E. coli, E. cloacae, S. marcescens, and C. freundii strains were susceptible, while 0-3.1% strains were resistant to tigecycline. When testing A. baumannii, mKB demonstrated higher CA than sKB (90.6 % vs 44.8 %) compared to reference BMD. The mE (9.0 % vs 45.2 %), ME (0.5 % vs 10.6 %) and VME (both 0 %) all satisfied the acceptability criteria. mKB also showed higher CA (87.2 % vs 52.0 %) than sKB in comparison with BMD when testing Enterobacterales (mainly K. pneumonia). The ME (0.45 % vs 8.1 %) and VME (both 0 %) but not mE (12.4 % vs 40.4 %) met the acceptability criteria.Conclusion. The mKB method can test bacterial susceptibility to tigecycline more accurately than sKB. For the tigecycline-intermediate or -resistant strains by sKB method, BMD or mKB method should be used to verify the results and report reliable tigecycline susceptibility results.

Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance of Clinical Isolates from Major Hospitals - China, 2022.

What is already known about this topic?: Bacterial resistance surveillance is crucial for monitoring and understanding the trends and spread of drug-resistant bacteria. What is added by this report?: The number of strains collected in 2022 increased compared to 2021. The top five bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii, remained largely unchanged. The detection rate of methicillin-resistant strains continued to decrease. Among clinical Enterobacterales isolates, the resistance rate to carbapenems was generally below 13%, except for Klebsiellaspp., which had a resistance range of 20.4% to 21.9%. Most clinical Enterobacterales isolates were highly susceptible to tigecycline, colistin, and polymyxin B, with resistance rates ranging from 0.1% to 12.6%. The detection rate of meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and meropenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii showed a decreasing trend for the fourth consecutive year. What are the implications for public health practice?: Multidrug-resistant bacteria remain a significant public health challenge in clinical antimicrobial treatment. To effectively address bacterial resistance, it is essential to enhance both bacterial resistance surveillance and the prudent use of antimicrobial agents.

Performance of Ceftazidime-Avibactam 30/20-µg and 10/4-µg Disks for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Ceftazidime-avibactam, a new ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, is active against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and has became available for clinical use in China in the latter half of 2019. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the disk diffusion test with ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-µg and 30/20-µg disks, compared with the reference broth microdilution method, with a collection of 467 Enterobacterales and 182 P. aeruginosa nonduplicate clinical isolates. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicated that the categorical agreement (CA) of ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-µg disk testing for all tested Enterobacterales isolates was 99.8%, with 0.5% very major errors (VMEs) and no major error (ME). The CA of ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-µg disk testing for all tested P. aeruginosa isolates was 87.9%, with 15.5% MEs and no VME. The CA of ceftazidime-avibactam 30/20-µg disk testing for all tested Enterobacterales isolates was 99.4%, with 1.5% VMEs and no ME. The CA of ceftazidime-avibactam 30/20-µg disk testing for all tested P. aeruginosa isolates was 91.8%, with 2.5% VMEs and 9.9% MEs. Overall, ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-µg disk testing showed superior performance and was more suitable for assessment of the susceptibility of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates. IMPORTANCE Multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa strains have become a global public threat, with the emergence and prevalence of plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC cephalosporinases, and carbapenemases disseminated worldwide. Ceftazidime-avibactam, which is commercially available, has shown excellent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates. Moreover, ceftazidime-avibactam has shown promise in treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant isolates. The disk diffusion test for ceftazidime-avibactam is the most common antimicrobial susceptibility testing method in most laboratories in China. The accurate detection of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility is of great significance for the rational clinical application of drugs. Here, we evaluated the performance of the ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-µg and 30/20-µg disk diffusion tests, compared with the reference broth microdilution method, with clinical Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates.

Integrative population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of nemonoxacin capsule in Chinese patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Introduction: Nemonoxacin is an innovative quinolone antibiotic for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). As more data are available from clinical studies, it is necessary to perform an integrative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis to support and justify the optimal dosing regimen of nemonoxacin in clinical practice. Methods and Results: We developed a population PK model using non-linear mixed effect model based on the data of 195 Chinese subjects receiving nemonoxacin in phase I to III clinical trials. The base model was a standard two-compartment PK model defined by clearance (12 L/h) and central volume of distribution (86 L). Covariates included creatinine clearance (CLcr), body weight (BW), sex, disease status and food. Compared to the subject with BW 60 kg, Cmax and A U C 0 - 24 , ss reduced by 24% and 19% in the subject with BW 80 kg, respectively. Compared to the subject with CLcr 150 ml/min, A U C 0 - 24 , ss and T1/2 increased by 28% and 24%, respectively in the subject with CLcr 30 ml/min. Compared to the fasted status, Tmax of nemonoxacin increased by 1.2 h in the subject with fed status. Effects of sex and disease status on PK parameters were small (change of PK parameters ≤19%). AUC0-24/MIC and %T > MIC were identified as the optimal PK/PD indices for predicting clinical efficacy. The AUC0-24/MIC target was 63.3, 97.8, and 115.7 against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Haemophilus influenzae, respectively. The %T > MIC target was 7.96% against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Monte Carlo simulation showed that treatment with nemonoxacin 500 mg q24 h could attain a PK/PD cutoff value higher than the MIC90 against S. pneumoniae and S. aureus. The corresponding cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was greater than 93%, while nemonoxacin 750 mg q24 h would provide higher PK/PD cutoff value against Haemophilus parainfluenzae, and higher CFR (83%) than 500 mg q24 h. Conclusion: Integrative PK/PD analysis justifies the reliable clinical and microbiological efficacy of nemonoxacin 500 mg q24 h in treating CAP caused by S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, and K. pneumoniae, irrespective of patient sex, mild renal impairment, empty stomach or not. However, nemonoxacin 750 mg q24 h would provide better efficacy than 500 mg q24 h for the CAP caused by H. parainfluenzae in terms of CFR.