Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(4): 1011-1021, 2024 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37889515

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Identification of bloodstream infection (BSI) in transplant recipients may be difficult due to immunosuppression. Accordingly, we aimed to compare responses to BSI in critically ill transplant and non-transplant recipients and to modify systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for transplant recipients. METHODS: We analyzed univariate risks and developed multivariable models of BSI with 27 clinical variables from adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients at the University of Virginia (UVA) and at the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt). We used Bayesian inference to adjust SIRS criteria for transplant recipients. RESULTS: We analyzed 38.7 million hourly measurements from 41 725 patients at UVA, including 1897 transplant recipients with 193 episodes of BSI and 53 608 patients at Pitt, including 1614 transplant recipients with 768 episodes of BSI. The univariate responses to BSI were comparable in transplant and non-transplant recipients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], .80-.83) for the model using all UVA patient data and 0.80 (95% CI, .76-.83) when using only transplant recipient data. The UVA all-patient model had an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, .76-.79) in non-transplant recipients and 0.75 (95% CI, .71-.79) in transplant recipients at Pitt. The relative importance of the 27 predictors was similar in transplant and non-transplant models. An upper temperature of 37.5°C in SIRS criteria improved reclassification performance in transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill transplant and non-transplant recipients had similar responses to BSI. An upper temperature of 37.5°C in SIRS criteria improved BSI screening in transplant recipients.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Sepse , Adulto , Humanos , Transplantados , Estado Terminal , Teorema de Bayes , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 217, 2023 Apr 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37024821

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cryptococcosis is an increasingly common infection given the growing immunocompromised population worldwide. Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing demonstrates excellent sensitivity and specificity and is the mainstay of diagnosis. However, there may be rare instances in which false-negative CrAg results can delay diagnosis and early treatment, which are critical to ensure positive outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old man living with HIV/AIDS who was not taking antiretroviral therapy was hospitalized with fever, diarrhea, and headaches. CD4 count on presentation was 71 cells/uL, and HIV viral load was 3,194,949 copies/mL. Serum CrAg testing was initially negative, however CSF CrAg performed several days later was positive at 1:40 and blood and CSF cultures grew Cryptococcus neoformans. Colonoscopy revealed mucosal papules throughout the sigmoid colon, and tissue biopsy showed yeast within the lamina propria consistent with GI cryptococcosis. Given the high burden of disease, the original serum CrAg specimen was serially diluted and subsequently found to be positive at 1:2,560, confirming the postzone phenomenon. CONCLUSION: Cryptococcosis has a wide array of presentations including intraluminal GI disease, as seen in this patient. While serum CrAg testing displays excellent test characteristics, it is important for clinicians to be aware of the rare instances in which false-negative results may occur in the presence of excess antigen, as in this case.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida , Criptococose , Cryptococcus neoformans , Infecções por HIV , Meningite Criptocócica , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Testes Imunológicos , Antígenos de Fungos
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 61(6): e0175422, 2023 06 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37338230
5.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(3): ofae119, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38533270

RESUMO

Asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection in renal transplant are important antimicrobial stewardship targets but are difficult to identify within electronic medical records. We validated an "electronic phenotype" of antibacterials prescribed for these indications. This may be more useful than billing data in assessing antibiotic indication in this outpatient setting.

6.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(2): 241-243, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37746805

RESUMO

We used a strand-specific RT-qPCR to evaluate viral replication as a surrogate for infectiousness among 242 asymptomatic inpatients with a positive severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) admission test. Only 21 patients (9%) had detectable SARS-CoV-2 minus-strand RNA. Because most patients were found to be noninfectious, our findings support the suspension of asymptomatic admission testing.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Teste para COVID-19 , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , RNA Viral/genética
7.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 44(12): 2078-2080, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37381726

RESUMO

Severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) strand-specific assay can be used to identify active SARS-CoV-2 viral replication. We describe the characteristics of 337 hospitalized patients with at least 1 minus-strand SARS-CoV-2 assay performed >20 days after illness onset. This test is a novel tool to identify high-risk hospitalized patients with prolonged SARS-CoV-2 replication.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Replicação Viral , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa
8.
Crit Care Explor ; 2(10): e0191, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33063017

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Bloodstream infection is associated with high mortality rates in critically ill patients but is difficult to identify clinically. This results in frequent blood culture testing, exposing patients to additional costs as well as the potential harms of unnecessary antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the analysis of bedside physiologic monitoring data could accurately describe a pathophysiologic signature of bloodstream infection in patients admitted to the ICU. DESIGN: Development of a statistical model using physiologic data from a retrospective observational cohort. SETTING: University of Virginia Medical Center (Charlottesville, VA), a tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Critically ill patients consecutively admitted to either the medical or surgical/trauma ICUs with available physiologic monitoring data between February 2011 and June 2015. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed 9,954 ICU admissions with 144 patient-years of vital sign and electrocardiography waveform data, totaling 1.3 million hourly measurements. There were 15,577 blood culture instances, with 1,184 instances of bloodstream infection (8%). The multivariate pathophysiologic signature of bloodstream infection was characterized by abnormalities in 15 different physiologic features. The cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.69-0.85). We also identified distinct signatures of Gram-negative and fungal bloodstream infections, but not Gram-positive bloodstream infection. CONCLUSIONS: Signatures of bloodstream infection can be identified in the routine physiologic monitoring data of critically ill adults. This may assist in identifying infected patients, maximizing diagnostic stewardship, and measuring the effect of new therapeutic modalities for sepsis.

9.
Crit Care Explor ; 2(10): e0199, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33063019

RESUMO

The Sepsis-3 taskforce defined sepsis as suspicion of infection and an acute rise in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score by 2 points over the preinfection baseline. Sepsis-3 studies, though, have not distinguished between acute and chronic organ failure, and may not accurately reflect the epidemiology, natural history, or impact of sepsis. Our objective was to determine the extent to which the predictive validity of Sepsis-3 is attributable to chronic rather than acute organ failure. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: General medicine inpatient service at a tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 3,755 adult medical acute-care encounters (1,864 confirmed acute infections) over 1 year. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We measured the total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at the onset of infection and separated its components (baseline and acute rise) using case-by-case chart reviews. We compared the predictive validities of acuity-focused (acute rise in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ≥ 2) and conventional (total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ≥ 2) implementations of Sepsis-3 criteria. Measures of predictive validity were change in the rate of outcomes and change in the area under receiver operating characteristic curves after adding sepsis criteria to multivariate logistic regression models of baseline risk (age, sex, race, and Charlson comorbidity index). Outcomes were inhospital mortality (primary) and ICU transfer or inhospital mortality (secondary). Acuity-focused implementations of Sepsis-3 were associated with neither a change in mortality (2.2% vs 1.2%; p = 0.18) nor a rise in area under receiver operating characteristic curves compared with baseline models (0.67 vs 0.66; p = 0.75). In contrast, conventional implementations were associated with a six-fold change in mortality (2.4% vs 0.4%; p = 0.01) and a rise in area under receiver operating characteristic curves compared with baseline models (0.70 vs 0.66; p = 0.04). Results were similar for the secondary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of the validity of organ dysfunction-based clinical sepsis criteria is prone to bias, because acute organ dysfunction consequent to infection is difficult to separate from preexisting organ failure in large retrospective cohorts.

10.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 9(3): 140, 2018 Mar 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29511162

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) appears to be particularly prothrombotic. We investigated hospitalized patients with NASH cirrhosis to determine if they are at increased risk for VTE. METHODS: Data on adult hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and VTE (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) between November 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015 were obtained. Cases with VTE were matched by age, gender, and model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score to corresponding controls without VTE. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety subjects (145 matched pairs) with mean age of 58.4 ± 11.8 years and MELD score of 16.0 ± 7.2 were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between cases and controls. Independent adjusted risk factors for VTE included NASH (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.07-5.65, p = 0.034), prior VTE (OR: 7.12, 95% CI: 1.99-25.5, p = 0.003), and presence of PVT (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.03-4.58, p = 0.041). Thrombocytopenia was associated with decreased risk (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26-0.95, p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: NASH is an independent risk factor for VTE among cirrhosis patients and provides further evidence that NASH is a hypercoagulable state. While all hospitalized patients with cirrhosis at risk for VTE should be considered for medical thromboprophylaxis, those with NASH cirrhosis are at particularly increased risk and therefore a high index of suspicion for VTE should be maintained even in the presence of thromboprophylaxis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA