Spatial tertiary lymphoid structures imply response to anti-PD-1 plus anlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Despite breakthroughs of immunotherapy synergistically combined with blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, several patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience non-response or followed relapse. Organized lymphoid aggregates, termed tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs), are found to be associated with improved response to immunotherapy. Here, we explore the landscapes of TLSs in tumour tissues from a real-world retrospective study. Our investigation showed that with a median follow-up of 11.2 months, the ORR was 28.6% (18/63, 95% CI 17.9-41.3) and the median PFS was 6.1 (95% CI 5.5-6.6) months in NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade combined with anlotinib. By multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) analysis, spatially, more TLSs and high CD20+ B-cell ratio in TLSs were associated with higher ORR. High density of intratumoral CD8+ T cells showed better ORR and PFS. The numbers of CD8+ T cells with a distance within 20 µm and 20-50 µm between tumour cells were higher in responders than non-responders. But responders had significantly higher TLSs within 20 µm rather than within 20-50 µm of tumour cells than non-responders. The inflamed immunophenotyping occupied higher proportions in responders and was associated with better PFS. Besides, tumour cells in non-responders were found more temporal cell-in-cell structures than responders, which could protect inner cells from T-cell attacks. Taken together, landscape of TLSs and proximity architecture may imply superior responses to PD-1 blockade combined with anlotinib for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

CircHAS2 activates CCNE2 to promote cell proliferation and sensitizes the response of colorectal cancer to anlotinib.

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are crucial in the targeted treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Anlotinib, a multi-target TKI, has previously been demonstrated to offer therapeutic benefits in previous studies. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been implicated in CRC progression and their unique structural stability serves as promising biomarkers. The detailed molecular mechanisms and specific biomarkers related to circRNAs in the era of targeted therapies, however, remain obscure. METHODS: The whole transcriptome RNA sequencing and function experiments were conducted to identify candidate anlotinib-regulated circRNAs, whose mechanism was confirmed by molecular biology experiments. CircHAS2 was profiled in a library of patient-derived CRC organoids (n = 22) and patient-derived CRC tumors in mice. Furthermore, a prospective phase II clinical study of 14 advanced CRC patients with anlotinib-based therapy was commenced to verify drug sensitivity (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05262335). RESULTS: Anlotinib inhibits tumor growth in vitro and in vivo by downregulating circHAS2. CircHAS2 modulates CCNE2 activation by acting as a sponge for miR-1244, and binding to USP10 to facilitate p53 nuclear export as well as degradation. In parallel, circHAS2 serves as a potent biomarker predictive of anlotinib sensitivity, both in patient-derived organoids and xenograft models. Moreover, the efficacy of anlotinib inclusion into the treatment regimen yields meaningful clinical responses in patients with high levels of circHAS2. Our findings offer a promising targeted strategy for approximately 52.9% of advanced CRC patients who have high circHAS2 levels. CONCLUSIONS: CircHAS2 promotes cell proliferation via the miR-1244/CCNE2 and USP10/p53/CCNE2 bidirectional axes. Patient-derived organoids and xenograft models are employed to validate the sensitivity to anlotinib. Furthermore, our preliminary Phase II clinical study, involving advanced CRC patients treated with anlotinib, confirmed circHAS2 as a potential sensitivity marker.

Feasibility and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades as rechallenge immunotherapy in previously treated advanced ESCC: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) seemed favorable in several tumors, but clinical experience on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was scanty. This real-world study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of anlotinib plus ICI for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified advanced ESCC patients who received anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting for evaluation of clinical outcomes and safety. Totally 110 ICI-pretreated patients, of which 89 (80.9%) received prior first- or second-line treatment, were included from September 9, 2019, to November 30, 2022. Most patients (63.6%) discontinued initial ICI due to disease progression. RESULTS: After rechallenge, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.1 (95% CI, 8.6-13.7) and 5.6 (95% CI, 4.4-6.8) months, respectively; estimated OS and PFS rates at 12 months were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.8%-57.7%) and 21.4% (95% CI, 10.9%-34.2%), respectively. No complete response was reported and 21 (19.1%) patients attained partial response; the objective response rate was 19.1%. Fifty-five (50.0%) had stable disease for a disease control rate of 69.1%. Of the 21 responders, median duration of response was 6.4 months. Tendencies for longer OS were observed in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance of 0 (P = .056). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 10.0%. CONCLUSION: Anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting was promising and resulted in encouraging benefits for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC. Our findings provided preliminary but unique evidence to help select ESCC patients benefiting from this strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: chictr.org.cn; number ChiCTR2300070777.

Aurora-A inhibitor synergistically enhances the inhibitory effect of anlotinib on hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly malignant tumor with a global prevalence. In addition to the existing clinical guidelines, the effectiveness of anlotinib and Aurora-A inhibitors in treating HCC has also been demonstrated. However, Anlotinib, as an anti-angiogenesis therapy, has shown significant benefits in clinical trials but is limited by its single-agent treatment and the development of drug resistance. Aurora-A inhibitors are currently being tested in clinical trials but have limited efficacy. Combination therapy may offer clear advantages over monotherapy in this context. METHODS: In this study, we used HCC cell lines to investigate whether the combination of the two drugs could enhance their individual strengths and mitigate their weaknesses, thereby providing greater clinical benefits both in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: Our findings confirmed that the Aurora-A inhibitor alisertib and anlotinib exhibited a time-dose-dependent inhibitory effect on HCC cells. In vitro cytological experiments demonstrated that the combination of the two drugs synergistically inhibited cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, while promoting cell apoptosis. Furthermore, we identified the underlying molecular mechanism by which the combination of the Aurora-A inhibitor alisertib and anlotinib inhibited HCC through the inhibition of the NF-ĸB signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of combining anlotinib with an Aurora-A inhibitor, which expands the potential applications of anlotinib in the clinical treatment of HCC in the future.

Anlotinib reversed resistance to PD-1 inhibitors in recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancers: a real-world retrospective study.

Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancers (R/M HNCs) are prone to developing resistance after immunotherapy. This retrospective real-world study aims to investigate whether the addition of anlotinib can reverse resistance to PD-1 inhibitors (PD-1i) and evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination in R/M HNCs. Main outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and safety. Potential biomarkers included PD-L1 expression, lipid index, and genomic profiling. Twenty-one patients with R/M HNCs were included, including 11 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), five head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), three salivary gland cancers (SGC), and two nasal cavity or paranasal sinus cancers (NC/PNC). Among all patients, ORR was 47.6% (95% CI: 28.6-66.7), with 2 (9.5%) complete response; DCR was 100%. At the median follow-up of 17.1 months, the median PFS and OS were 14.3 months (95% CI: 5.9-NR) and 16.7 months (95% CI:8.4-NR), respectively. The median DOR was 11.2 months (95% CI: 10.1-NR). As per different diseases, the ORR was 45.5% for NPC, 60.0% for HNSCC, 66.7% for SGC, and 50.0% for NC/PNC. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1 or 2 (88.9%). The most common grades 3-4 TRAE was hypertension (28.6%), and two treatment-related deaths occurred due to bleeding. Therefore, adding anlotinib to the original PD-1i could reverse PD-1 blockade resistance, with a favorable response rate, prolonged survival, and acceptable toxicity, indicating the potential as a second-line and subsequent therapy choice in R/M HNCs.

The later-line efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib in EGFR-mutant patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment after EGFR-TKI resistance is of great clinical concern. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in later-line therapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients after TKI treatment failure and to explore the independent predictive factors of therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: A total of 71 patients with confirmed advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed after previous standard EGFR-TKI therapy but still failed after multiline treatments were included retrospectively in this study. Most of the patients had previously received at least three lines of treatment. All were treated with anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy. The safety of this combined treatment was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. The efficacy of the regimens was evaluated by survival analysis (OS, PFS, ORR, DCR). RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 28.6 months (range: 2.3-54.0 months), and the median number of treatment lines was 4. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 19.7% and 77.5%, respectively. The median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.2-7.4 months), and the median OS was 17.1 months (95% CI 12.0-22.3 months). Patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib had an encouraging intracranial ORR of 38.5% and a DCR of 80.8%. ECOG performance status < 2 at baseline was independent protective factors of PFS. Metastatic organs and ECOG performance status were independent parameters in predicting OS. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66 (93.0%) patients; most of the adverse events were Grade 1-2, and no increase in adverse events was observed compared to monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Anlotinib combined with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based regimen exhibited promising efficacy and tolerance in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations after previous TKI failure. The efficacy of this combined regimen in patients with EGFR mutations should be further evaluated.

Anlotinib induces neuronal-like differentiation of neuroblastoma by downregulating CRMP5.

The therapeutic effect of anlotinib on neuroblastoma is still not fully understood. This study aims to explore the differentiation therapeutic effects of anlotinib on neuroblastoma and its potential association with the neural development regulatory protein collapsin response mediator protein 5 (CRMP5), both in vivo and in vitro. A patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model was established to observe the therapeutic effect of anlotinib. Neuroblastoma cell lines SK-N-SH and SK-N-AS were cultured to observe the morphological impact of anlotinib. Transwell assay was used to evaluate the cell invasion, and Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry were employed to detect the expressions of neuronal differentiation-related proteins. Results indicate that anlotinib effectively inhibited tumor growth in the PDX model, modulated the expressions of neuronal differentiation markers. In vitro, anlotinib treatment induced neurite outgrowth in neuroblastoma cells and inhibited their invasive ability, reflecting a change in neuronal marker expression patterns consistent with the PDX model. Similarly, in the SK-N-AS mouse xenograft model, anlotinib demonstrated comparable tumor-suppressing effects and promoted neuronal-like differentiation. Additionally, anlotinib significantly downregulated CRMP5 expression in neuroblastoma both in vivo and in vitro. Overexpression of CRMP5 significantly reversed the differentiation therapy effect of anlotinib, exacerbating the aggressiveness and reducing the differentiation level of neuroblastoma. These findings highlight the potential of anlotinib as an anti-neuroblastoma agent. It may suppress tumor proliferation and invasion by promoting the differentiation of tumor cells towards a neuronal-like state, and this differentiation therapy effect involves the inhibition of CRMP5 signaling.

Safety and efficacy of multi-target TKI combined with nivolumab in check-point inhibitor-refractory patients with advanced NSCLC: a prospective, single-arm, two-stage study.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents a major unmet medical need in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition may reverse a suppressive microenvironment and recover sensitivity to subsequent ICIs. METHODS: This phase Ib/IIa, single-arm study, comprised dose-finding (Part A) and expansion (Part B) cohorts. Patients with ICIs-refractory NSCLC were enrolled to receive anlotinib (a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor) orally (from days 1 to 14 in a 21-day cycle) and nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks, intravenously) on a 21-day treatment cycle. The first 21-day treatment cycle was a safety observation period (phase Ib) followed by a phase II expansion cohort. The primary objectives were recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D, part A), safety (part B), and objective response rate (ORR, part B), respectively. RESULTS: Between November 2020 and March 2022, 34 patients were screened, and 21 eligible patients were enrolled (6 patients in Part A). The RP2D of anlotinib is 12 mg/day orally (14 days on and 7 days off) and nivolumab (360 mg every 3 weeks). Adverse events (AEs) of any cause and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in all treated patients. Two patients (9.5%) experienced grade 3 TRAE. No grade 4 or higher AEs were observed. Serious AEs were reported in 4 patients. Six patients experienced anlotinib interruption and 4 patients experienced nivolumab interruption due to TRAEs. ORR and disease control rate (DCR) was 19.0% and 76.2%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.3-NE) and 15.2 months (95% CI, 12.1-NE), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that anlotinib combined with nivolumab shows manageable safety and promising efficacy signals. Further studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04507906 August 11, 2020.

Efficacy and safety of Anlotinib based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

BACKGROUND: Anlotinib, an oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown the ability to inhibit tumor angiogenesis. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib plus docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TEC) as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced TNBC. METHODS: Locally advanced TNBC patients who had received no prior systemic treatment were eligible for this study. The enrolled patients were scheduled to undergo six cycles of anlotinib (12 mg, d1-14, q3w) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2, d1, q3w), epirubicin (75 mg/m2, d1, q3w) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2, d1, q3w) prior to surgery, unless there was disease progression or severe toxicity. The primary objective of this study was the safety of this therapeutic regimen, and the secondary objective was the tumor response. The safety of this regimen was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 and the efficacy of this treatment was measured using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were included in this study. Participants completed an average of 5.56 neoadjuvant treatment cycles. The objective response rate (ORR) was 83.33%, and the disease control rate was 100%, respectively. The pCR was 55.6%. No patients discontinued therapy because of Adverse effects (AEs). Grade 3 or 4 AEs were observed in 5 cases (27.8%), with neutropenia and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome being the most common. CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib combined with TEC as neoadjuvant therapy demonstrated manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity for locally advanced TNBC. Further investigation of this combination regimen is warranted.

Anlotinib alone or in combination with bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a prospective single-arm, open-label phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and c-Kit. This phase II study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, either alone or in combination with bevacizumab (Bev) for recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) (NCT04822805, 30/03/2021). METHODS: Eligible patients had a histological diagnosis of rHGG with first or subsequent recurrences. All patients received oral anlotinib 12 mg or 10 mg on days 1-14 (repeated every 21 days). In cases where brain magnetic resonance imaging examination revealed an increase in peritumoral edema without worsening of symptoms, patients received a temporary treatment of intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg to alleviate edema. The primary endpoint was the median progression-free survival (mPFS), and the secondary endpoints included median overall survival (mOS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with rHGG were included in the efficacy and safety assessments. Eighteen patients received anlotinib alone, and seven patients received anlotinib in combination with Bev. For all patients, the mPFS and mOS were 5.0 months and 13.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 32%, and the DCR was 96%. It is noteworthy that the survival and response data of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) exhibit similarities to those of rHGG. For rGBM patients, there were no significant differences in mPFS, mOS, ORR, or DCR between the anlotinib alone and anlotinib + Bev groups. However, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events of any grade was higher in the anlotinib + Bev group compared to the anlotinib alone group (100% vs. 78%, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Both anlotinib alone and its combination with Bev demonstrated good efficacy and safety in the treatment of rHGG.

Anlotinib suppresses the DNA damage response by disrupting SETD1A and inducing p53-dependent apoptosis in Transformed Follicular Lymphoma.

Purpose: The high tumor mutational burden (TMB) of transformed follicular lymphoma (tFL) leads to tumor heterogeneity and poor prognosis in follicular lymphoma, in which endogenous DNA damage and epigenetic modification are the key factors. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of anlotinib in tFL and to investigate its potential therapeutic mechanism. Methods: Cell viability and apoptosis were tested with CCK-8 and annexin V/PI staining kits, respectively. The tumorigenicity test in mice was utilized to further confirm the efficacy of anlotinib in vivo. Western blotting was utilized to explore the molecular mechanisms. Results: Anlotinib induced G2/M phase arrest in tFL cells, inhibited the proliferation of tFL cells and promoted the apoptosis of tFL cells in a dose-dependent manner. Administration of anlotinib markedly reduced tumor mass and weight in an FL xenograft mouse model. The western blot and immunohistochemistry staining results confirmed that the mechanism by which anlotinib promoted tumor cell apoptosis was DNA damage. Further results showed that anlotinib significantly downregulated the expression of SETD1A, leading to its destruction. Anlotinib administration resulted in a significant dose-dependent increase in the level of p-p53. Furthermore, anlotinib greatly downregulated the antiapoptotic proteins Mcl-1 and in parallel upregulated the proapoptotic element BAX and Bak, accompanied by caspase-3 activation and PARP degradation. Conclusion: Anlotinib has a good proapoptotic effect on tumor cells in vitro and in vivo, and its possible mechanism is related to the inhibition of the DNA damage response by disrupting SETD1A.

Early Structural, Biochemical, and Metabolic Responses to Anlotinib in Patients With Progressive Radioactive Iodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the early efficacy of anlotinib in patients with progressive radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer at the structural, biochemical, and metabolic levels. METHODS: Ten eligible patients were prospectively enrolled to receive anlotinib. Their responses were assessed at 6 weeks. Apart from the structural response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, the biochemical response was assessed by serum thyroglobulin (Tg), and the metabolic response was assessed by 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. A safety profile was recorded. RESULTS: Structurally controlled disease (20% partial response + 80% stable disease) was observed in all patients. The median longest diameter of target lesions shrank from 20.8 mm (IQR, 14.9-27.5) to 17.0 mm (IQR, 14.1-23.7) (P < .001), and the average shrinkage rate was -15.1 ± 14.1%. Sharp serum Tg reduction by 72.8 ± 16.4% was observed in 8 measurable patients. The 18F-FDG PET/CT-mapped glucose metabolic response was not quite comparable to the structural response, with 90% of the patients having controlled disease (30% partial metabolic response + 60% stable metabolic disease), whereas 10% presented progressive metabolic disease. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (100%) and proteinuria (70%). Most AEs were grade 1 or 2, whereas grade 3 AEs occurred only in hypertension. CONCLUSION: Anlotinib is generally well tolerated and can bring early disease control within the initial 6 weeks of treatment. The sharp biochemical response suggests Tg to be an early sensitive biomarker to anlotinib, whereas the heterogeneous metabolic response might play a complementary role.

Lipid alterations play a role in the integration of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and anlotinib for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that integrating anlotinib with programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors enhances survival rates among progressive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients lacking driver mutations. However, not all individuals experience clinical benefits from this therapy. As a result, it is critical to investigate the factors that contribute to the inconsistent response of patients. Recent investigations have emphasized the importance of lipid metabolic reprogramming in the development and progression of NSCLC. METHODS: The objective of this investigation was to examine the correlation between lipid variations and observed treatment outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients who were administered PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alongside anlotinib. A cohort composed of 30 individuals diagnosed with advanced NSCLC without any driver mutations was divided into three distinct groups based on the clinical response to the combination treatment, namely, a group exhibiting partial responses, a group manifesting progressive disease, and a group demonstrating stable disease. The lipid composition of patients in these groups was assessed both before and after treatment. RESULTS: Significant differences in lipid composition among the three groups were observed. Further analysis revealed 19 differential lipids, including 2 phosphatidylglycerols and 17 phosphoinositides. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study aimed to explore the specific impact of anlotinib in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors on lipid metabolism in patients with advanced NSCLC. By investigating the effects of using both anlotinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, this study enhances our understanding of lipid metabolism in lung cancer treatment. The findings from this research provide valuable insights into potential therapeutic approaches and the identification of new therapeutic biomarkers.

METTL3 inhibitor STM2457 impairs tumor progression and enhances sensitivity to anlotinib in OSCC.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the inhibitory effects of STM2457, which is a novel METTL3 (m6A writer) inhibitor, both as a monotherapy and in combination with anlotinib, in the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) both in vitro and in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacy of STM2457 or STM2457 plus anlotinib was evaluated using two OSCC cell lines by CCK8, transwell, colony formation, would-healing, sphere formation, cell cycle, apoptosis assays, and nude mice tumor xenograft techniques. The molecular mechanism study was carried out by western blotting, qRT-PCR, MeRIP-qPCR, immunofluorescence, and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: STM2457 combined with anlotinib enhanced inhibition of cellular survival/proliferation and promotion of apoptosis in vitro. Moreover, this combinatorial approach exerted a notable reduction in stemness properties and EMT (epithelial-mesenchymal transition) features of OSCC cells. Remarkably, in vivo studies validated the efficacy of the combination treatment. Mechanistically, our investigations revealed that the combined action of STM2457 and anlotinib exerted downregulatory effects on EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) expression in OSCC cells. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of STM2457 and anlotinib targeting EGFR exerted a multiple anti-tumor effect. In near future, anlotinib combined with STM2457 may provide a novel insight for the treatment of OSCC.

Efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with anlotinib for advanced cholangiocarcinoma after first-line chemotherapy and the variations in efficacy based on different neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of anlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma following first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 154 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer admitted to the hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. All patients received first-line intravenous chemotherapy with gemcitabine combined with cisplatin, oxaliplatin, or tegafur. Among the 106 patients who achieved disease control, 47 received oral anlotinib hydrochloride (12 mg daily, 2 weeks on/1 week off) as maintenance therapy. Clinical efficacy, including ORR, DCR, DOR, PFS, and OS, was compared between the anlotinib maintenance and non-maintenance groups. Subgroup analysis based on NLR levels was also performed. RESULTS: Among the 47 anlotinib maintenance patients, the ORR was 21.28% and the DCR was 51.06%. The median DOR was 36 weeks, and the median PFS was 43 weeks in the anlotinib group, versus 28 weeks and 38 weeks in the non-maintenance group, respectively. The median OS was not reached in the anlotinib group but was 48 weeks in the non-maintenance group. Patients receiving anlotinib maintenance had significantly longer DOR, PFS, and OS (all p < 0.05). Patients with low NLR levels had better survival benefits from anlotinib. CONCLUSION: Maintenance therapy with anlotinib demonstrates potential efficacy and a reliable safety profile in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma following first-line treatment. The efficacy of anlotinib therapy appears to be influenced by NLR levels. Further validation with larger sample sizes is warranted to strengthen the robustness and reliability of the results.

Combination of anlotinib and second-line chemotherapy as surrogate to reduce immunosuppression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Objective: To study the clinical effects of anlotinib combined with second-line chemotherapy (SLC) on immunosuppression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: In this retrospective study, the medical records of 106 patients with advanced NSCLC admitted to the Lianyungang First People's Hospital from November 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Amongst 106 patients, 53 patients received second-line single-agent chemotherapy regimens (SLC group), and 53 patients received anlotinib combined with SLC (ASLC group). Prognosis, levels of immune cells and inflammatory cytokine, and adverse reactions were analyzed. Results: Clinical efficacy of the ASLC group was significantly higher than the SLC group (p<0.05). After treatment, patients in the ASLC group exhibited significantly higher levels of CD4+/CD8+ and CD4+ compared to those in the SLC group (p<0.05), while the difference in CD8+ level between the two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). After treatment, levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the ASLC group were lower compared to the SLC group (p<0.05). Conclusion: In patients with advanced NSCLC, anlotinib combined with SLC is associated with higher levels of immune cells and reduced inflammatory factors. This treatment regimen, thus, can reduce immunosuppression and improve the prognosis of NSCLC patients.

Efficacy of anlotinib in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer: A retrospective observational study.

Anlotinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can inhibit tumour angiogenesis proliferation, metastasis, promote vascular normalization, increase T cell and NK cell activity and infiltration, remodel tumour microenvironment and synergistic immune enhancement. Our study aimes to evaluate the efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of advanced metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after multiple lines of therapy. Patients included were treated with anlotinib for advanced MBC in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from 1 January 2019 to 30 June 2023. The objective remission rate, disease-free progression survival and adverse reactions were analysed. We compared and analysed the efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of advanced metastatic breast cancer, which showed that ORR was 23.6% and DCR was 69.1%. The DCR of monotherapy was 66.7% and that of combination therapy was 69.6% in MBC patients. The combination therapy, combined with chemotherapy had the best effect (79.3%), combined with immunotherapy came second. In addition, the DCR (88.9%) was higher in MBC patients having received prior antiangiogenic therapy. According to the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival estimate analysis, the mPFS was 4.17 months (95% CI, 1.758-6.582 months) in Her-2 positive MBC patients, and 7.83 months (95% CI, 2.416-9.104) in Her-2 negative MBC patients. The mPFS was 5.76 months (95% CI, 3.231-8.298 m) in HR positive MBC patients, 7.83 months (95% CI, 3.182-12.478 m) in TNBC patients. Fatigue (20.0%), hypertension (21.8%) and liver dysfunction (18.2%) were common adverse reactions, followed by bone marrow suppression (16.4%), anorexia (14.5%), hypothyroidism (14.5%) and diarrhoea (14.5%). Altogether, Anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy provides a viable third (or above)-line therapeutic strategy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The adverse reactions of anlotinib are well tolerated and controllable.

Anlotinib plus icotinib as a potential treatment option for EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with concurrent mutations: final analysis of the prospective phase 2, multicenter ALTER-L004 study.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and concurrent mutations have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to examine anlotinib plus icotinib as a first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutation with or without concurrent mutations. METHODS: This phase 2, single-arm, multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03736837) was performed at five hospitals in China from December 2018 to November 2020. Non-squamous NSCLC cases with EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with anlotinib and icotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Sixty participants were enrolled, including 31 (52%) and 29 (48%) with concurrent mutations and pathogenic concurrent mutations, respectively. The median follow-up was 26.9 (range, 15.0-38.9) months. ORR and DCR were 68.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Median PFS was 15.1 (95%CI: 12.6-17.6) months which met the primary endpoint, median DoR was 13.5 (95%CI: 10.0-17.1) months, and median OS was 30.0 (95%CI: 25.5-34.5) months. Median PFS and OS in patients with pathogenic concurrent mutations were 15.6 (95%CI: 12.5-18.7) months and not reached (95%CI: 17.46 months to not reached), respectively. All patients experienced TRAEs, including 26 (43%) and 1 (1.7%) who had grade ≥ 3 and serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib combined with icotinib was effective and well-tolerated as a first-line treatment option for EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC with or without concurrent mutations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03736837.

Feasibility and tolerability of sintilimab plus anlotinib as the second-line therapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers: An open-label, single-arm, phase II clinical trial.

Patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) were associated with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options after first-line therapy currently. In this study, we sought to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of sintilimab plus anlotinib as the second-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BTC and failed after the first-line treatment were recruited. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Simultaneously, association between clinical outcomes and genomic profiling and gut microbiome were explored to identify the potential biomarkers for this regimen. Twenty patients were consecutively enrolled and received study therapy. The trail met its primary endpoint with a median OS of 12.3 months (95% CI: 10.1-14.5). Only four (20%) patients were observed of the grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and no grade 4 or 5 TRAEs were detected. Mutation of AGO2 was correlated with a significantly longer OS. Abundance of Proteobacteria was associated with inferior clinical response. Therefore, sintilimab plus anlotinib demonstrated encouraging anti-tumor activity with a tolerable safety profile and deserved to be investigated in larger randomized trials for patients with advanced BTC subsequently.

Pan-cancer efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in refractory solid tumor: A single-arm, open-label, phase II trial.

The combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of refractory solid tumor has not been well investigated. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new regimen of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor to treat refractory solid tumor. APICAL-RST is an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial in patients with heavily treated, refractory, metastatic solid tumor. Eligible patients experienced disease progression during prior therapy without further effective regimen. All patients received anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitor. The primary endpoints were objective response and disease control rates. The secondary endpoints included the ratio of progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)/PFS1, overall survival (OS) and safety. Forty-one patients were recruited in our study; 9 patients achieved a confirmed partial response and 21 patients had stable disease. Objective response rate and disease control rate were 22.0% and 73.2% in the intention-to-treat cohort, and 24.3% and 81.1% in the efficacy-evaluable cohort, respectively. A total of 63.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46.9%-77.4%) of the patients (26/41) presented PFS2/PFS1 >1.3. The median OS was 16.8 months (range: 8.23-24.4), and the 12- and 36-month OS rates were 62.8% and 28.9%, respectively. No significant association was observed between concomitant mutation and efficacy. Thirty-one (75.6%) patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event. The most common adverse events were hypothyroidism, hand-foot syndrome and malaise. This phase II trial showed that anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor exhibits favorable efficacy and tolerability in patients with refractory solid tumor.