Asymmetric Expression of LincGET Biases Cell Fate in Two-Cell Mouse Embryos.

In early mammalian embryos, it remains unclear how the first cell fate bias is initially triggered and amplified toward cell fate segregation. Here, we report that a long noncoding RNA, LincGET, is transiently and asymmetrically expressed in the nucleus of two- to four-cell mouse embryos. Overexpression of LincGET in one of the two-cell blastomeres biases its progeny predominantly toward the inner cell mass (ICM) fate. Mechanistically, LincGET physically binds to CARM1 and promotes the nuclear localization of CARM1, which can further increase the level of H3 methylation at Arginine 26 (H3R26me), activate ICM-specific gene expression, upregulate transposons, and increase global chromatin accessibility. Simultaneous overexpression of LincGET and depletion of Carm1 no longer biased embryonic fate, indicating that the effect of LincGET in directing ICM lineage depends on CARM1. Thus, our data identify LincGET as one of the earliest known lineage regulators to bias cell fate in mammalian 2-cell embryos.

CARM1 and Paraspeckles Regulate Pre-implantation Mouse Embryo Development.

Nuclear architecture has never been carefully examined during early mammalian development at the stages leading to establishment of the embryonic and extra-embryonic lineages. Heterogeneous activity of the methyltransferase CARM1 during these stages results in differential methylation of histone H3R26 to modulate establishment of these two lineages. Here we show that CARM1 accumulates in nuclear granules at the 2- to 4-cell stage transition in the mouse embryo, with the majority corresponding to paraspeckles. The paraspeckle component Neat1 and its partner p54nrb are required for CARM1's association with paraspeckles and for H3R26 methylation. Conversely, CARM1 also influences paraspeckle organization. Depletion of Neat1 or p54nrb results in arrest at the 16- to 32-cell stage, with elevated expression of transcription factor Cdx2, promoting differentiation into the extra-embryonic lineage. This developmental arrest occurs at an earlier stage than following CARM1 depletion, indicating that paraspeckles act upstream of CARM1 but also have additional earlier roles in fate choice.

CARM1 regulates replication fork speed and stress response by stimulating PARP1.

DNA replication forks use multiple mechanisms to deal with replication stress, but how the choice of mechanisms is made is still poorly understood. Here, we show that CARM1 associates with replication forks and reduces fork speed independently of its methyltransferase activity. The speeding of replication forks in CARM1-deficient cells requires RECQ1, which resolves reversed forks, and RAD18, which promotes translesion synthesis. Loss of CARM1 reduces fork reversal and increases single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps but allows cells to tolerate higher replication stress. Mechanistically, CARM1 interacts with PARP1 and promotes PARylation at replication forks. In vitro, CARM1 stimulates PARP1 activity by enhancing its DNA binding and acts jointly with HPF1 to activate PARP1. Thus, by stimulating PARP1, CARM1 slows replication forks and promotes the use of fork reversal in the stress response, revealing that CARM1 and PARP1 function as a regulatory module at forks to control fork speed and the choice of stress response mechanisms.

A C9orf72-CARM1 axis regulates lipid metabolism under glucose starvation-induced nutrient stress.

Cells undergo metabolic adaptation during environmental changes by using evolutionarily conserved stress response programs. This metabolic homeostasis is exquisitely regulated, and its imbalance could underlie human pathological conditions. We report here that C9orf72, which is linked to the most common forms of the neurodegenerative diseases amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), is a key regulator of lipid metabolism under stress. Loss of C9orf72 leads to an overactivation of starvation-induced lipid metabolism that is mediated by dysregulated autophagic digestion of lipids and increased de novo fatty acid synthesis. C9orf72 acts by promoting the lysosomal degradation of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1), which in turn regulates autophagy-lysosomal functions and lipid metabolism. In ALS/FTD patient-derived neurons or tissues, a reduction in C9orf72 function is associated with dysregulation in the levels of CARM1, fatty acids, and NADPH oxidase NOX2. These results reveal a C9orf72-CARM1 axis in the control of stress-induced lipid metabolism and implicates epigenetic dysregulation in relevant human diseases.

Structural and Functional Impacts of ER Coactivator Sequential Recruitment.

Nuclear receptors recruit multiple coactivators sequentially to activate transcription. This "ordered" recruitment allows different coactivator activities to engage the nuclear receptor complex at different steps of transcription. Estrogen receptor (ER) recruits steroid receptor coactivator-3 (SRC-3) primary coactivator and secondary coactivators, p300/CBP and CARM1. CARM1 recruitment lags behind the binding of SRC-3 and p300 to ER. Combining cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure analysis and biochemical approaches, we demonstrate that there is a close crosstalk between early- and late-recruited coactivators. The sequential recruitment of CARM1 not only adds a protein arginine methyltransferase activity to the ER-coactivator complex, it also alters the structural organization of the pre-existing ERE/ERα/SRC-3/p300 complex. It induces a p300 conformational change and significantly increases p300 HAT activity on histone H3K18 residues, which, in turn, promotes CARM1 methylation activity on H3R17 residues to enhance transcriptional activity. This study reveals a structural role for a coactivator sequential recruitment and biochemical process in ER-mediated transcription.

LYL1 facilitates AETFC assembly and gene activation by recruiting CARM1 in t(8;21) AML.

Transcription factors (TFs) play critical roles in hematopoiesis, and their aberrant expression can lead to various types of leukemia. The t(8;21) leukemogenic fusion protein AML1-ETO (AE) is the most common fusion protein in acute myeloid leukemia and can enhance hematopoietic stem cell renewal while blocking differentiation. A key question in understanding AE-mediated leukemia is what determines the choice of AE to activate self-renewal genes or repress differentiation genes. Toward the resolution of this problem, we earlier showed that AE resides in the stable AETFC complex and that its components colocalize on up- or down-regulated target genes and are essential for leukemogenesis. In the current study, using biochemical and genomic approaches, we show that AE-containing complexes are heterogeneous, and that assembly of the larger AETFC (containing AE, CBFß, HEB, E2A, LYL1, LMO2, and LDB1) requires LYL1. Furthermore, we provide strong evidence that the LYL1-containing AETFC preferentially binds to active enhancers and promotes AE-dependent gene activation. Moreover, we show that coactivator CARM1 interacts with AETFC and facilitates gene activation by AETFC. Collectively, this study describes a role of oncoprotein LYL1 in AETFC assembly and gene activation by recruiting CARM1 to chromatin for AML cell survival.

CARM1 arginine methyltransferase as a therapeutic target for cancer.

Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is an arginine methyltransferase that posttranslationally modifies proteins that regulate multiple levels of RNA production and processing. Its substrates include histones, transcription factors, coregulators of transcription, and splicing factors. CARM1 is overexpressed in many different cancer types, and often promotes transcription factor programs that are co-opted as drivers of the transformed cell state, a process known as transcription factor addiction. Targeting these oncogenic transcription factor pathways is difficult but could be addressed by removing the activity of the key coactivators on which they rely. CARM1 is ubiquitously expressed, and its KO is less detrimental in embryonic development than deletion of the arginine methyltransferases protein arginine methyltransferase 1 and protein arginine methyltransferase 5, suggesting that therapeutic targeting of CARM1 may be well tolerated. Here, we will summarize the normal in vivo functions of CARM1 that have been gleaned from mouse studies, expand on the transcriptional pathways that are regulated by CARM1, and finally highlight recent studies that have identified oncogenic properties of CARM1 in different biological settings. This review is meant to kindle an interest in the development of human drug therapies targeting CARM1, as there are currently no CARM1 inhibitors available for use in clinical trials.

Blocking CXCR4-CARM1-YAP axis overcomes osteosarcoma doxorubicin resistance by suppressing aerobic glycolysis.

Osteosarcoma, recognized for its aggressiveness and resistance to chemotherapy, notably doxorubicin, poses significant treatment challenges. This comprehensive study investigated the CXCR4-CARM1-YAP signaling axis and its pivotal function in controlling aerobic glycolysis, which plays a crucial role in doxorubicin resistance. Detailed analysis of Dox-resistant 143b/MG63-DoxR cells has uncovered the overexpression of CXCR4. Utilizing a combination of molecular biology techniques including gene silencing, aerobic glycolysis assays such as Seahorse experiments, RNA sequencing, and immunofluorescence staining. The study provides insight into the mechanistic pathways involved. Results demonstrated that disrupting CXCR4 expression sensitizes cells to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis and alters glycolytic activity. Further RNA sequencing revealed that CARM1 modulated this effect through its influence on glycolysis, with immunofluorescence of clinical samples confirming the overexpression of CXCR4 and CARM1 in drug-resistant tumors. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies further highlighted the role of CARM1, showing it to be regulated by methylation at the H3R17 site, which in turn affected YAP expression. Crucially, in vivo experiments illustrated that CARM1 overexpression could counteract the tumor growth suppression that resulted from CXCR4 inhibition. These insights revealed the intricate mechanisms at play in osteosarcoma resistance to doxorubicin and pointed toward potential new therapeutic strategies that could target this metabolic and signaling network to overcome drug resistance and improve patient outcomes.

Research Progress on CARM1 and its Relationship with Colorectal Cancer.

Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is significant as a key member of the PRMT family, crucial for regulating arginine methylation, and its association with colorectal cancer underscores its potential as a therapeutic target. Consequently, CARM1 inhibitors have emerged as potential therapeutic agents in cancer treatment and valuable chemical tools for cancer research. Despite steady progress in CARM1 inhibitor research, challenges persist in discovering effective, isoform-selective, cell-permeable, and in vivo-active CARM1 inhibitors for colorectal cancer. This review summarizes the research progress on CARM1 and its relationship with colorectal cancer, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for the radiotherapy of colorectal cancer.

Arginine Methylation of MDH1 by CARM1 Inhibits Glutamine Metabolism and Suppresses Pancreatic Cancer.

Distinctive from their normal counterparts, cancer cells exhibit unique metabolic dependencies on glutamine to fuel anabolic processes. Specifically, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells rely on an unconventional metabolic pathway catalyzed by aspartate aminotransferase, malate dehydrogenase 1 (MDH1), and malic enzyme 1 to rewire glutamine metabolism and support nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) production. Here, we report that methylation on arginine 248 (R248) negatively regulates MDH1. Protein arginine methyltransferase 4 (PRMT4/CARM1) methylates and inhibits MDH1 by disrupting its dimerization. Knockdown of MDH1 represses mitochondria respiration and inhibits glutamine metabolism, which sensitizes PDAC cells to oxidative stress and suppresses cell proliferation. Meanwhile, re-expression of wild-type MDH1, but not its methylation-mimetic mutant, protects cells from oxidative injury and restores cell growth and clonogenic activity. Importantly, MDH1 is hypomethylated at R248 in clinical PDAC samples. Our study reveals that arginine methylation of MDH1 by CARM1 regulates cellular redox homeostasis and suppresses glutamine metabolism of pancreatic cancer.

A Proteomic Approach Identifies Isoform-Specific and Nucleotide-Dependent RAS Interactions.

Active mutations in the RAS genes are found in ∼30% of human cancers. Although thought to have overlapping functions, RAS isoforms show preferential activation in human tumors, which prompted us to employ a comparative and quantitative proteomics approach to generate isoform-specific and nucleotide-dependent interactomes of the four RAS isoforms, KRAS4A, KRAS4B, HRAS, and NRAS. Many isoform-specific interacting proteins were identified, including HRAS-specific CARM1 and CHK1 and KRAS-specific PIP4K2C and IPO7. Comparing the interactomes of WT and constitutively active G12D mutant of RAS isoforms, we identified several potential previously unknown effector proteins of RAS, one of which was recently reported while this article was in preparation, RADIL. These interacting proteins play important roles as knockdown or pharmacological inhibition leads to potent inhibition of cancer cells. The HRAS-specific interacting protein CARM1 plays a role in HRAS-induced senescence, with CARM1 knockdown or inhibition selectively increasing senescence in HRAS-transformed cells but not in KRAS4B-transformed cells. By revealing new isoform-specific and nucleotide-dependent RAS interactors, the study here provides insights to help understand the overlapping functions of the RAS isoforms.

Inhibition of CARM1 suppresses proliferation of multiple myeloma cells through activation of p53 signaling pathway.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant proliferative disease of plasma cells, the incidence of which is increasing every year and remains incurable. The enzyme co-activator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is highly expressed in a variety of cancers, such as Hodgkin's lymphoma and acute myeloid leukemia, and CARM1 is closely associated with tumor cell proliferation. However, the role of CARM1 in MM has not been elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we found that CARM1 is overexpressed in MM and closely associated with poor prognosis in MM. CCK-8 and colony formation assays showed that the proliferation of MM cell lines was downregulated when CARM1 expression was knockdown by specific shRNA. Knockdown of CARM1 reduced the proportion of MM cell lines in the S phase and increased the proportion in G0/G1 phase. RNA-seq analysis of the CARM1-KD cell line revealed that it was closely associated with apoptosis and activated the p53 pathway. CCK-8 and apoptosis results showed that CARM1 knockdown made MM cells more sensitive to standard-of-care drugs. CONCLUSION: This study provides an experimental basis for elucidating the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma and searching for potential therapeutic targets.

Discovery and biological evaluation of novel CARM1/HDAC2 dual-targeting inhibitors with anti-prostate cancer agents.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with a progressively increasing incidence. Concurrent inhibition of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) and histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) could potentially be a novel strategy against PCa. Herein, we identified seven compounds simultaneously targeting CARM1 and HDAC2 through structure-based virtual screening. These compounds possessed potent inhibitory activities at the nanomolar level in vitro. Among them, CH-1 was the most active inhibitor which exhibited excellent and balanced inhibitory effects against both CARM1 (IC50 = 3.71 ± 0.11 nM) and HDAC2 (IC50 = 4.07 ± 0.25 nM). MD simulations presented that CH-1 could stably bind the active pockets of CARM1 and HDAC2. Notably, CH-1 exhibited strong anti-proliferative activity against multiple prostate-related tumour cells (IC50 < 1 µM). In vivo, assessment indicated that CH-1 significantly inhibited tumour growth in a DU145 xenograft model. Collectively, CH-1 could be a promising drug candidate for PCa treatment.

Protein arginine methyltransferase CARM1 attenuates the paraspeckle-mediated nuclear retention of mRNAs containing IRAlus.

In many cells, mRNAs containing inverted repeated Alu elements (IRAlus) in their 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) are inefficiently exported to the cytoplasm. Such nuclear retention correlates with paraspeckle-associated protein complexes containing p54(nrb). However, nuclear retention of mRNAs containing IRAlus is variable, and how regulation of retention and export is achieved is poorly understood. Here we show one mechanism of such regulation via the arginine methyltransferase CARM1 (coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1). We demonstrate that disruption of CARM1 enhances the nuclear retention of mRNAs containing IRAlus. CARM1 regulates this nuclear retention pathway at two levels: CARM1 methylates the coiled-coil domain of p54(nrb), resulting in reduced binding of p54(nrb) to mRNAs containing IRAlus, and also acts as a transcription regulator to suppress NEAT1 transcription, leading to reduced paraspeckle formation. These actions of CARM1 work together synergistically to regulate the export of transcripts containing IRAlus from paraspeckles under certain cellular stresses, such as poly(I:C) treatment. This work demonstrates how a post-translational modification of an RNA-binding protein affects protein-RNA interaction and also uncovers a mechanism of transcriptional regulation of the long noncoding RNA NEAT1.

CARMing down the SINEs of anarchy: two paths to freedom from paraspeckle detention.

A subset of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) that contain inverted Alu elements in their 3' untranslated region are inefficiently exported to the cytoplasm and retained in subnuclear bodies called paraspeckles. The arginine methyltransferase CARM1 (coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1) promotes the nuclear export of these mRNAs by methylating the paraspeckle component p54(nrb), which reduces the binding of p54(nrb) to the inverted Alu elements, and down-regulating synthesis of another paraspeckle component, the long noncoding RNA NEAT1, which inhibits paraspeckle formation.

The circular RNA circHMGB2 drives immunosuppression and anti-PD-1 resistance in lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas via the miR-181a-5p/CARM1 axis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have confirmed the oncogenic role of HMGB2 in various cancers, but the biological functions of HMGB2-derived circRNAs remain unknown. Thus, we intended to investigate the potential role of HMGB2-derived circRNAs in lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinomas (LUSC). METHODS: The expression profiles of HMGB2-derived circRNAs in LUAD and LUSC tissues and matched normal tissues were assessed using qRT-PCR. The role of circHMGB2 in the progression of the LUAD and LUSC was determined in vitro by Transwell, CCK-8, flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry assays, as well as in vivo in an immunocompetent mouse model and a humanized mouse model. In addition, in vivo circRNA precipitation assays, luciferase reporter assays and RNA pulldown assays were performed to explore the underlying mechanism by which circHMGB2 promotes anti-PD-1 resistance in the LUAD and LUSC. RESULTS: The expression of circHMGB2 (hsa_circ_0071452) was significantly upregulated in NSCLC tissues, and survival analysis identified circHMGB2 as an independent indicator of poor prognosis in the LUAD and LUSC patients. We found that circHMGB2 exerted a mild effect on the proliferation of the LUAD and LUSC cells, but circHMGB2 substantially reshaped the tumor microenvironment by contributing to the exhaustion of antitumor immunity in an immunocompetent mouse model and a humanized mouse model. Mechanistically, circHMGB2 relieves the inhibition of downstream CARM1 by sponging miR-181a-5p, thus inactivating the type 1 interferon response in the LUAD and LUSC. Moreover, we found that the upregulation of circHMGB2 expression decreased the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy, and we revealed that the combination of the CARM1 inhibitor EZM2302 and an anti-PD-1 antibody exerted promising synergistic effects in a preclinical model. CONCLUSION: circHMGB2 overexpression promotes the LUAD and LUSC progression mainly by reshaping the tumor microenvironment and regulating anti-PD-1 resistance in the LUAD and LUSC patients. This study provides a new strategy for the LUAD and LUSC treatment.

Histone arginine methyltransferase CARM1 selective inhibitor TP-064 induces apoptosis in endometrial cancer.

Histone modification is the key epigenetic mechanism that regulates gene expression. Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is an arginine methyltransferase that catalyzes dimethylation of histone H3 (H3R17) at arginine 17. Lately, it has been suggested that CARM1 is associated with human carcinogenesis, and the CARM1-selective inhibitor, TP-064, has been shown to be a potential therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma. However, the physiological significance of CARM1 in endometrial cancer remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to explore the role of CARM1 and the effect of TP-064 in endometrial cancer. To this end, we analyzed CARM1 expression in endometrial cancer using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and examined the antitumor mechanism with CARM1 knockdown endometrial cancer cells. Moreover, we evaluated the therapeutic capability of TP-064 in endometrial cancer cells. CARM1 was remarkably overexpressed in 52 endometrial cancer tissues compared to normal endometrial tissues. The growth of CARM1 knockdown endometrial cancer cells was suppressed and CARM1 knockdown induced apoptosis. TP-064 also inhibited endometrial cancer cell growth and declined the number of endometrial cancer cell colonies. These data suggest that CARM1 may be a powerful therapeutic target for endometrial cancer.

Ribavirin inhibits the growth and ascites formation of hepatocellular carcinoma through downregulation of type I CARM1 and type II PRMT5.

Type I co-activator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) and type II protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) are highly expressed in multiple cancers including liver cancer and their overexpression contributes to poor prognosis, thus making them promising therapeutic targets. Here, we evaluated anti-tumor activity of ribavirin in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We found that ribavirin significantly inhibited the proliferation of HCC cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, ribavirin suppressed the growth of subcutaneous and orthotopic xenograft of HCC in mice, decreased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and peritoneal permeability to reduce ascites production, and prolonged the survival of mice in HCC ascites tumor models. Mechanistically, ribavirin potently down-regulated global protein expression of CARM1 and PRMT5, and concurrently decreased accumulation of H3R17me2a and H3R8me2s/H4R3me2s. However, ribavirin did not affect the activity and mRNA levels of both CARM1 and PRMT5 in vivo and in vitro HCC cells. In addition, our ChIP results shown that ribavirin inhibited CARM1 which in turn decreased the H3R17me2a, binds to the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and VEGF promoter region, and reduced the relative mRNA expression level of eIF4E and VEGF in HCC cells. Our findings suggested a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with HCC through inhibition of the abnormal activation/expression of both CARM1 and PRMT5.

CARM1 promotes gastric cancer progression by regulating TFE3 mediated autophagy enhancement through the cytoplasmic AMPK-mTOR and nuclear AMPK-CARM1-TFE3 signaling pathways.

BACKGROUND: The role of CARM1 in tumors is inconsistent. It acts as an oncogene in most cancers but it inhibits the progression of liver and pancreatic cancers. CARM1 has recently been reported to regulate autophagy, but this function is also context-dependent. However, the effect of CARM1 on gastric cancer (GC) has not been studied. We aimed to explore whether CARM1 was involved in the progression of GC by regulating autophagy. METHODS: The clinical values of CARM1 and autophagy in GC were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR. Transmission electron microscopy, immunofluorescence and western blotting were employed to identify autophagy. The role of CARM1 in GC was investigated by CCK-8, colony formation and flow cytometry assays in vitro and a xenograft model in vivo. Immunoprecipitation assays were performed to determine the interaction of CARM1 and TFE3. RESULTS: CARM1 was upregulated in clinical GC tissues and cell lines, and higher CARM1 expression predicted worse prognosis. CARM1 enhanced GC cell proliferation, facilitated G1-S transition and inhibited ER stress-induced apoptosis by regulating autophagy. Importantly, treatment with a CARM1 inhibitor rescued the tumor-promoting effects of CARM1 both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we demonstrated that CARM1 promoted TFE3 nuclear translocation to induce autophagy through the cytoplasmic AMPK-mTOR and nuclear AMPK-CARM1-TFE3 signaling pathways. CONCLUSION: CARM1 promoted GC cell proliferation, accelerated G1-S transition and reduced ER stress-induced apoptosis by regulating autophagy. Mechanistically, CARM1 triggered autophagy by facilitating TFE3 nuclear translocation through the AMPK-mTOR and AMPK-CARM1-TFE3 signaling pathways.

Arginine methylation-dependent LSD1 stability promotes invasion and metastasis of breast cancer.

Histone lysine demethylase 1 (LSD1), the first identified histone demethylase, is overexpressed in multiple tumor types, including breast cancer. However, the mechanisms that cause LSD1 dysregulation in breast cancer remain largely unclear. Here, we report that protein arginine methyltransferase 4 (PRMT4 or CARM1) dimethylates LSD1 at R838, which promotes the binding of the deubiquitinase USP7, resulting in the deubiquitination and stabilization of LSD1. Moreover, CARM1- and USP7-dependent LSD1 stabilization plays a key role in repressing E-cadherin and activating vimentin transcription through promoter H3K4me2 and H3K9me2 demethylation, respectively, which promotes invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells. Consistently, LSD1 arginine methylation levels correlate with tumor grade in human malignant breast carcinoma samples. Our findings unveil a unique mechanism controlling LSD1 stability by arginine methylation, also highlighting the role of the CARM1-USP7-LSD1 axis in breast cancer progression.