Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 63
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 69(4): 350-357, 2019.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31362882

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The administration of ketamine as nebulized inhalation is relatively new and studies on nebulized ketamine are scarce. We aimed to investigate the analgesic efficacy of nebulized ketamine (1 and 2mg.kg-1) administered 30min before general anesthesia in children undergoing elective tonsillectomy in comparison with intravenous ketamine (0.5mg.kg-1) and saline placebo. METHODS: One hundred children aged (7-12) years were randomly allocated in four groups (n=25) receive; Saline Placebo (Group C), Intravenous Ketamine 0.5mg.kg-1 (Group K-IV), Nebulized Ketamine 1mg.kg-1 (Group K-N1) or 2mg.kg-1 (Group K-N2). The primary endpoint was the total consumption of rescue analgesics in the first 24h postoperative. RESULTS: The mean time to first request for rescue analgesics was prolonged in K-N1 (400.9±60.5min, 95% CI 375.9-425.87) and K-N2 (455.5±44.6min, 95% CI 437.1-473.9) groups compared with Group K-IV (318.5±86.1min, 95% CI 282.9-354.1) and Group C (68.3±21.9min, 95% CI 59.5-77.1; p<0.001), with a significant difference between K-N1 and K-N2 Groups (p<0.001). The total consumption of IV paracetamol in the first 24h postoperative was reduced in Group K-IV (672.6±272.8mg, 95% CI 559.9-785.2), Group K-N1 (715.6±103.2mg, 95% CI 590.4-840.8) and Group K-N2 (696.6±133.3mg, 95% CI 558.8-834.4) compared with Control Group (1153.8±312.4mg, 95% CI 1024.8-1282.8; p<0.001). With no difference between intravenous and Nebulized Ketamine Groups (p=0.312). Patients in intravenous and Nebulized Ketamine Groups showed lower postoperative VRS scores compared with Group C (p<0.001), no differences between K-IV, K-N1 or K-N2 group and without significant adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Preemptive nebulized ketamine was effective for post-tonsillectomy pain relief. It can be considered as an effective alternative route to IV ketamine.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Tonsilectomia/métodos , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Administração Intravenosa , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Criança , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores
2.
BrJP ; 7: e20240017, 2024. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1557196

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bone fractures constitute a frequent cause of emergency care in the pediatric population. Opioid drugs are routinely used for analgesia during the hospitalization of children victims of trauma. Few studies have evaluated the importance of a multimodal approach to analgesia in this context. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effect and possible side effects of fentanyl compared to those of ketamine. METHODS: The study analyzed 50 children and adolescents, aged between 24 and 192 months, submitted to surgical treatment of upper limb fractures in a tertiary trauma care hospital. The participants were randomized into two groups: one that received Ketamine and the other Fentanyl. In the post-anesthetic recovery room (PARR), pain intensity and the occurrence of delirium were measured for a period of 30 minutes. The incidence of respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and other side effects during the surgical procedure were assessed. RESULTS: The sample consisted mostly of male individuals (76.0%). The mean age of the participants was 90.1 months. The use of a low-flow oxygen cannula was necessary in 30.0% of the participants. The incidence of vomiting and laryngospasm was 2.0% among the participants, and 6.0% presented increased salivary secretion. The occurrence of pain, delirium and respiratory depression was not different between the two assessed groups, as well as the occurrence of nausea and laryngospasm. CONCLUSION: Ketamine is not an effective and safe option to opioids for analgesia in children undergoing surgical procedures to treat upper limb fractures.


RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: As fraturas ósseas constituem causa frequente de atendimento de emergência na população pediátrica. Fármacos opioides são rotineiramente utilizados para analgesia durante a hospitalização de crianças vítimas de trauma. Poucos estudos avaliaram a importância de uma abordagem multimodal para analgesia nesse contexto. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o efeito analgésico e possíveis efeitos adversos do fentanil em relação aos da cetamina. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados 50 crianças e adolescentes, com idade entre 24 e 192 meses, submetidos ao tratamento cirúrgico das fraturas de membros superiores em um hospital terciário de atendimento ao trauma. Os participantes foram aleatorizados em dois grupos: um recebeu cetamina e outro fentanil. Na sala de recuperação pós-anestésica (SRPA), a intensidade da dor e a ocorrência de delirium foram mensuradas por um período de 30 minutos. A incidência de depressão respiratória, náuseas, vômitos e outros efeitos adversos durante o procedimento cirúrgico foram avaliados. RESULTADOS: A amostra foi composta, em sua maioria, por indivíduos do sexo masculino (76,0%). A média de idade dos participantes foi de 90,1 meses. O uso de cânula de oxigênio de baixo fluxo foi necessário em 30,0% dos participantes. A incidência de vômitos e laringoespasmo foi de 2,0% entre os participantes, sendo que 6,0% apresentaram aumento da secreção salivar. A ocorrência de dor, delirium e depressão respiratória não foi diferente entre os dois grupos avaliados, assim como a ocorrência de náuseas e laringoespasmo. CONCLUSAO: Acetamina não se mostrou uma opção eficaz e segura aos opioides para analgesia em crianças submetidas a procedimentos cirúrgicos para tratamento de fraturas de membros superiores.

3.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 69(1): 35-41, 2019.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30409408

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pain control is important in terms of early recovery and rehabilitation in arthroscopic meniscectomy. For this purpose, we aimed to compare the effects of intraarticular tramadol, magnesium, and ketamine with combinations of pericapsular bupivacaine on postoperative pain and recovery in arthroscopic meniscectomy. METHODS: Ninety patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy were enrolled in the study. Group T was given tramadol, Group K was given ketamine, and Group M was given magnesium reconstituted intraarticularly, and all groups received periarticular bupivacaine. Comparisons were made in terms of the patients' postoperative Visual Analogue Scale scores with and without movement, need for additional analgesics, first analgesic time, mobilization times, adverse effects, and satisfaction with the analgesics. RESULTS: The Visual Analogue Scale scores were lowest in Group T at 0 minutes, and were higher in the 15th and 30th minutes and 1st, 2nd, and 6th hours. Visual Analogue Scale values with movement were found to be high in Group M at 0 and 15 minutes, but they were found to be higher in group T in the 30th minute, 1st, 2nd and 6th hour. The groups were similar in terms of postoperative additional analgesic use, number of analgesic use, and satisfaction with analgesics; however, the first analgesic time was earlier in Group M, and the first mobilization time was earlier in Group K. CONCLUSION: Intraarticular ketamine enables early mobilization and less need for additional analgesics, it also provides a better analgesic effect in comparison with intraarticular tramadol and magnesium.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Artroscopia , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Meniscectomia/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Tramadol/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
4.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 68(6): 597-604, 2018.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30205906

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric patients frequently require deep sedation or general anesthesia for colonoscopy. This study was designed to compare the sedative efficacy of remifentanil-ketamine combination with propofol-ketamine combination in children undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: Seventy patients, between 2 and 16 years of age, scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups. Remifentanil-ketamine group received intravenous ketamine 2mg.kg-1 and remifentanil 0.25µg.kg-1 combination, followed by 0.1µg.kg-1.min-1 remifentanil infusion. Propofol-ketamine group received intravenous propofol 1 and 2mg.kg-1 ketamine combination, followed by 1mg.kg-1.h-1 propofol infusion. In the case of children discomfort (cry, movement, and cough), remifentanil 0.1µg.kg-1 in the remifentanil-ketamine group or propofol 0.5mg.kg-1 in the propofol-ketamine group were administered to improve children discomfort. Despite the therapy given above, if children still experience discomfort, 1mg.kg-1 of ketamine was administered as a rescue drug, regardless of the group. Ramsay sedation score, hemodynamic variables, drug requirements, gastroenterologists' satisfaction, colonoscopy duration, recovery time, and side effects were recorded throughout the procedure and the recovery period. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with a Ramsay sedation score of 4 or higher during the procedure was 73.5 and 37.1% in remifentanil-ketamine and propofol-ketamine groups, respectively (p=0.02). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure variables were significantly higher only after induction in the remifentanil-ketamine group than in the propofol-ketamine group (p=0.015). CONCLUSION: Coadministration of ketamine with either remifentanil or propofol effectively and safely provides sedation and analgesia in children undergoing colonoscopy. Sedation scores were significantly better in remifentanil-ketamine group than in propofol-ketamine group.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Colonoscopia , Sedação Profunda/métodos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Remifentanil/administração & dosagem , Criança , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 68(3): 266-273, 2018.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29609881

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We conducted this study to investigate the safety and analgesic efficacy of the addition of Ketamine to Bupivacaine in bilateral extra-oral infra-orbital nerve block in children undergoing cleft lip surgeries. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly allocated into two groups (n=30), Group B received infra-orbital nerve block with 2mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine and Group BK received 0.5mg.kg-1 Ketamine for each side added to 1mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine solution diluted up to 2mL solution to 0.25% Bupivacaine concentration. Assessment parameters included; hemodynamics, recovery time, time to first oral intake, postoperative Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) scores, Four-point Agitation scores, analgesic consumption and adverse effects. RESULTS: Patients in Group BK showed lower postoperative FLACC scores during all recorded time points (p<0.0001). Two patients in Group BK versus 12 in Group B requested for postoperative rescue analgesia (p<0.001). There were no differences between groups in time, minutes (min), to first request for rescue analgesia. Patients in Group BK reported lower analgesic consumption (366.67±45.67 vs. 240.0±0.0mg, p<0.04). The time to first oral intake was significantly reduced in Group BK (87.67±15.41 vs. 27.33±8.68min, p<0.001). Lower postoperative Agitation scores were recorded in Group BK patients that reached a statistical significance at 45min (0.86±0.11 vs. 0.46±0.16, p<0.04) and in the first hour (h) postoperatively (1.40±0.17 vs. 0.67±0.14, p<0.003). Higher parent satisfaction scores were recorded in Group BK (p<0.04) without significant adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of Ketamine to Bupivacaine has accentuated the analgesic efficacy of infra-orbital nerve block in children undergoing cleft lip repair surgeries.

6.
BrJP ; 5(3): 294-297, July-Sept. 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1403661

RESUMO

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain and depression are two comorbidities that correlate at the molecular level in the central nervous system and cause sufering to the patient, being dificult to be managed. In recent years, several studies have shown significant analgesic and antidepressant efects from intravascular infusion of ketamine, being a promising alternative option for refractory patients. Tus, the aim of the study was to report the case of a patient with refractory chronic pain and depression submitted to serial ketamine single dose infusions. CASE REPORT: Female patient, 33 years old, diagnosed with interstitial cystitis 13 years ago with refractory chronic pain and depression, submitted to serial infusions of intravascular ketamine. Tree serial infusions were performed, providing a significant improvement in pain and mood. However, the patient could not tolerate the adverse efects, particularly, the transient sensation of impending death and panic attack, and abandoned the treatment. CONCLUSION: Ketamine is a safe and promising treatment option for chronic pain and depression and can promote significant, albeit transient, pain and mood relief using subanesthetic dosage. However, its adverse efects can be an important limitation for therapeutic success. Standardized clinical studies are needed to better understand the relationship between chronic pain and depression and to establish the best therapeutic approach.


RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A dor crônica e a depressão são duas comorbidades que se correlacionam em nível molecular no sistema nervoso central e promovem sofrimento ao paciente, sendo de difícil manejo. Nos últimos anos, diversos estudos demonstraram efeitos analgésicos e antidepressivos significativos a partir da infusão intravascular de cetamina, sendo uma opção alternativa para pacientes refratários ao tratamento convencional. Assim, o objetivo do estudo foi relatar o caso de uma paciente com dor crônica e depressão refratária submetida a infusões seriadas de doses únicas de cetamina. RELATO DO CASO: Paciente do sexo feminino, 33 anos, diagnosticada com cistite intersticial há 13 anos com refratariedade no manejo da dor e da depressão, submetida a infusões seriadas de cetamina intravascular. Foram realizadas 3 infusões seriadas que proporcionaram uma melhora significativa na dor e no humor. Entretanto, a paciente não tolerou os efeitos adversos, particularmente, de sensação de morte iminente e ataque de pânico, e abandonou o tratamento. CONCLUSÃO: A cetamina é uma opção de tratamento promissora para dor crônica e depressão e pode promover alívio significativo, embora transitório, da dor e humor utilizando dose subanestésica. No entanto, seus efeitos adversos podem ser uma limitação para o sucesso terapêutico. Estudos clínicos padronizados são necessários para compreender melhor a relação entre dor crônica e depressão e para estabelecer a melhor abordagem terapêutica.

7.
Rev Bras Anestesiol ; 67(3): 246-250, 2017.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27842707

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the preventive effects of propofol and ketamine as small dose sedation during spinal anesthesia on tourniquet-induced ischemia-reperfusion injury. METHODS: 30 patients were randomly assigned into two groups of 15 patients. In the propofol group, sedation was performed with propofol 0.2mg.kg-1 followed by infusion at a rate of 2mg.kg-1.h-1. In the ketamine group, a continuous infusion of ketamine 0.5mg.kg-1.h-1 was used until the end of surgery. Intravenous administration of midazolam was not used in any patients. Ramsay sedation scale was used for assessing the sedation level. Venous blood samples were obtained before propofol and ketamine infusion (T1), at 30minutes (min) of tourniquet ischemia (T2), and 5min after tourniquet deflation (T3) for malondialdehyde (MDA) measurements. RESULTS: No differences were noted between the groups in hemodynamic (p>0.05) and demographic data (p>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of T1, T2 and T3 periods (p>0.05). There was a statistically increase observed in MDA values respectively both in Group P and Group K between the reperfusion period (1.95±0.59, 2.31±0.48) and pre-ischemia (1.41±0.38, 1.54±0.45), and ischemia (1.76±0.70, 1.71±0.38) (µmoL-1) periods (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Small-dose propofol and ketamine has similar potential to reduce the oxidative stress caused by tourniquet-induced ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery under spinal anesthesia.


Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/etiologia , Traumatismo por Reperfusão/prevenção & controle , Torniquetes/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Raquianestesia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos
8.
J. bras. psiquiatr ; J. bras. psiquiatr;71(3): 247-252, July-set. 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Português | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1405458

RESUMO

RESUMO Objetivo A cetamina apresenta-se como uma alternativa promissora contra a depressão resistente ao tratamento (DRT), no entanto o conhecimento de sua aplicação como antidepressivo ainda é restrito. Diante disso, objetivou-se investigar sua eficácia em pacientes com DRT. Métodos A busca da literatura foi efetuada na base de dados MedLine. Os critérios de inclusão foram: estudos clínicos controlados e randomizados dos últimos cinco anos e em inglês. Excluímos os artigos que não responderam à pergunta PICO e aqueles com tamanho de amostra e metodologia de estudo destoantes, quando comparados aos ensaios que basearam esta revisão. Resultados Considerando uma amostra final de seis artigos, observou-se uma melhor resposta à cetamina (principalmente em ganho de humor), quando comparada ao tratamento convencional contra a DRT. Já com sua primeira infusão, na dose de 0,5 mg/kg, foi possível perceber seus efeitos antidepressivos. A manutenção desses efeitos parece ser obtida com a administração de 0,5 mg/kg do medicamento, três vezes por semana. Por outro lado, a redução de tal dosagem pode diminuir ou anular os efeitos. Conclusões O uso da cetamina apresentou resultados efetivos na melhora do quadro de DRT, com efeitos adversos de pequena gravidade e de fácil controle. Entretanto, outros estudos, com amostras maiores e métodos diferentes, são necessários, para uma conclusão de maior consistência.


ABSTRACT Objective Ketamine presents itself as a promising alternative against treatment-resistant depression (TRD), however, the knowledge of its application as an antidepressant is still restricted. Therefore, the objective was to investigate its effectiveness in patients with TRD. Methods The literature search was carried out in the MedLine database. Inclusion criteria were: controlled and randomized clinical studies from the last five years and in English. We excluded articles that did not answer the PICO question and those with different sample size and study methodology, when compared to the tests that based this review. Results Considering a final sample of six articles, a better response to ketamine was observed (mainly in mood gain), when compared to conventional treatment against TRD. With its first infusion, at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg, it was possible to notice its antidepressant effects. The maintenance of these effects seems to be achieved with the administration of 0.5 mg/kg of the drug, three times a week. On the other hand, the reduction of such a dosage can diminish or cancel the effects. Conclusions The use of ketamine showed effective results improving the condition of TRD, with adverse effects of small severity and easy control. However, further studies, with larger samples and different methods, are needed, for a more consistent conclusion.

9.
Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec. (Online) ; 73(1): 62-72, Jan.-Feb. 2021. tab
Artigo em Português | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1153037

RESUMO

Objetivou-se com este estudo comparar a associação de detomidina e cetamina ou dextrocetamina, por via intravenosa contínua, em oito cadelas submetidas a dois protocolos: GCD - indução anestésica com 5mg/kg e infusão intravenosa contínua de 20mg/kg/h de cetamina; e GDD - indução com 3,5mg/kg e infusão de 14mg/kg/h de dextrocetamina. Associou-se detomidina, 30µg/kg/h, em ambos os grupos. Registraram-se frequência cardíaca (FC), pressão arterial (PA), frequência respiratória (f), temperatura (TC), miorrelaxamento, analgesia, hemogasometria e eletrocardiograma, antes e 15 minutos após a MPA (Mbasal e Mmpa); após o início da infusão (Mic); a cada 10 minutos até 90 minutos (M10, M20, M30, M40, M50, M60, M70, M80 e M90); e 30 minutos após o fim da infusão (M120). Foi observada bradicardia em Mmpa no GCD e de Mmpa a M10 no GDD. Ocorreu hipotensão em Mmpa e hipertensão a partir de Mic. A f diminuiu de M10 a M30. Foram observados: onda T de alta amplitude, bloqueios atrioventriculares e parada sinusal. Ocorreu acidose respiratória. O período de recuperação foi de 219,6±72,3 minutos no GCD e de 234,1±96,8 minutos no GDD. A cetamina e a dextrocetamina, associadas à detomidina por infusão contínua, causam efeitos cardiorrespiratórios e anestésicos similares.(AU)


The combination of detomidine and ketamine or dextrocetamine for continuous intravenous infusion was compared in eight female dogs submitted to two protocols: GCD - 5mg/kg of anesthetic induction and continuous intravenous infusion of ketamine 20mg/kg/h; and GDD - induction with 3.5mg/kg and infusion of 14mg/kg/h of dextrocetamine. Detomidine, 30µg/kg/h was associated in both groups. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), respiratory rate (RR), temperature (CT), myorelaxation, analgesia, blood gas analysis and electrocardiogram were recorded before and 15 minutes after MPA (Mbasal and Mmpa); after the start of infusion (Mic); every 10 minutes to 90 minutes (M10, M20, M30, M40, M50, M60, M70, M80 and M90); and 30 minutes after the end of infusion (M120). Bradycardia was observed in Mmpa in GCD and from Mmpa to M10 in GDD. There was hypotension in Mmpa and hypertension from Mic. The RR decreased from M10 to M30. High amplitude T wave, atrioventricular blocks and sinus arrest were observed. Respiratory acidosis occurred. The recovery period was 219.6±72.3 minutes in GCD and 234.1±96.8 minutes in GDD. Ketamine and S+ ketamine associated with detomidine for continuous infusion cause cardiorespiratory and similar anesthetic effects.(AU)


Assuntos
Animais , Feminino , Cães , N-Metilaspartato/agonistas , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/análise , Anestésicos Combinados/análise , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Acidose Respiratória/veterinária , Taxa Respiratória , Frequência Cardíaca , Anestesia Intravenosa/veterinária
10.
Rev Bras Anestesiol ; 65(5): 367-70, 2015.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26363694

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: to compare the therapeutic effects of ketamine alone or ketamine plus propofol on analgesia, sedation, recovery time, side effects in premedicated children with midazolam-ketamine-atropin who are prepared circumcision operation. METHODS: 60 American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I-II children, aged between 3 and 9 years, undergoing circumcision operations under sedation were recruited according to a randomize and double-blind institutional review board-approved protocol. Patients were randomized into two groups via sealed envelope assignment. Both groups were administered a mixture of midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ketamine 3mg/kg+atropine 0.02mg/kg intramuscularly in the presence of parents in the pre-operative holding area. Patients were induced with propofol-ketamine in Group I or ketamine alone in Group II. RESULTS: in the between-group comparisons, age, weight, initial systolic blood pressure, a difference in terms of the initial pulse rate was observed (p>0.050). Initial diastolic blood pressure and subsequent serial measurements of 5, 10, 15, 20thmin, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate in ketamine group were significantly higher (p<0.050). CONCLUSION: propofol-ketamine (Ketofol) provided better sedation quality and hemodynamy than ketamine alone in pediatric circumcision operations. We did not observe significant complications during sedation in these two groups. Therefore, ketofol appears to be an effective and safe sedation method for circumcision operation.

11.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 65(5): 367-70, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26323735

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effects of ketamine alone or ketamine plus propofol on analgesia, sedation, recovery time, side effects in premedicated children with midazolam-ketamine-atropin who are prepared circumcision operation. METHODS: 60 American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I-II children, aged between 3 and 9 years, undergoing circumcision operations under sedation were recruited according to a randomize and double-blind institutional review board-approved protocol. Patients were randomized into two groups via sealed envelope assignment. Both groups were administered a mixture of midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ketamine 3mg/kg+atropine 0.02mg/kg intramuscularly in the presence of parents in the pre-operative holding area. Patients were induced with propofol-ketamine in Group I or ketamine alone in Group II. RESULTS: In the between-group comparisons, age, weight, initial systolic blood pressure, a difference in terms of the initial pulse rate was observed (p>0.050). Initial diastolic blood pressure and subsequent serial measurements of 5, 10, 15, 20thmin, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate in ketamine group were significantly higher (p<0.050). CONCLUSION: Propofol-ketamine (Ketofol) provided better sedation quality and hemodynamy than ketamine alone in pediatric circumcision operations. We did not observe significant complications during sedation in these two groups. Therefore, ketofol appears to be an effective and safe sedation method for circumcision operation.


Assuntos
Circuncisão Masculina , Sedação Consciente , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Sedação Consciente/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacologia , Ketamina/farmacologia , Masculino , Propofol/farmacologia
12.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; Rev. bras. anestesiol;69(4): 350-357, July-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1041999

RESUMO

Abstract Objectives The administration of ketamine as nebulized inhalation is relatively new and studies on nebulized ketamine are scarce. We aimed to investigate the analgesic efficacy of nebulized ketamine (1 and 2 mg.kg-1) administered 30 min before general anesthesia in children undergoing elective tonsillectomy in comparison with intravenous ketamine (0.5 mg.kg-1) and saline placebo. Methods One hundred children aged (7-12) years were randomly allocated in four groups (n = 25) receive; Saline Placebo (Group C), Intravenous Ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1 (Group K-IV), Nebulized Ketamine 1 mg.kg-1 (Group K-N1) or 2 mg.kg-1 (Group K-N2). The primary endpoint was the total consumption of rescue analgesics in the first 24 h postoperative. Results The mean time to first request for rescue analgesics was prolonged in K-N1 (400.9 ± 60.5 min, 95% CI 375.9-425.87) and K-N2 (455.5 ± 44.6 min, 95% CI 437.1-473.9) groups compared with Group K-IV (318.5 ± 86.1 min, 95% CI 282.9-354.1) and Group C (68.3 ± 21.9 min, 95% CI 59.5-77.1; p < 0.001), with a significant difference between K-N1 and K-N2 Groups (p < 0.001). The total consumption of IV paracetamol in the first 24 h postoperative was reduced in Group K-IV (672.6 ± 272.8 mg, 95% CI 559.9-785.2), Group K-N1 (715.6 ± 103.2 mg, 95% CI 590.4-840.8) and Group K-N2 (696.6 ± 133.3 mg, 95% CI 558.8-834.4) compared with Control Group (1153.8 ± 312.4 mg, 95% CI 1024.8-1282.8; p < 0.001). With no difference between intravenous and Nebulized Ketamine Groups (p = 0.312). Patients in intravenous and Nebulized Ketamine Groups showed lower postoperative VRS scores compared with Group C (p < 0.001), no differences between K-IV, K-N1 or K-N2 group and without significant adverse effects. Conclusion Preemptive nebulized ketamine was effective for post-tonsillectomy pain relief. It can be considered as an effective alternative route to IV ketamine.


Resumo Objetivos A administração de cetamina por via inalatória através de nebulizador é relativamente nova e os estudos sobre este assunto são escassos. Nosso objetivo foi investigar a eficácia analgésica da cetamina nebulizada (1 e 2 mg.kg-1) administrada 30 minutos antes da anestesia geral em crianças submetidas à amigdalectomia eletiva, em comparação com cetamina intravenosa (0,5 mg.kg-1) e placebo (soro fisiológico). Métodos Cem crianças entre 7-12 anos foram randomicamente alocadas em quatro grupos (n = 25) e receberam: soro fisiológico para controle (Grupo C); 0,5 mg.kg-1 de cetamina intravenosa (Grupo C-IV); 1 mg.kg-1 de cetamina nebulizada (Grupo C-N1); 2 mg.kg-1 de cetamina nebulizada (Grupo C-N2). O desfecho primário foi o consumo total de analgésicos de resgate nas primeiras 24 horas de pós-operatório. Resultados O tempo médio para a primeira solicitação de analgésicos de resgate foi prolongado nos grupos C-N1 (400,9 ± 60,5 min, IC 95% 375,9-425,87) e C-N2 (455,5 ± 44,6 min, IC 95% 437,1-473,9) em comparação com o Grupo C-IV (318,5 ± 86,1 min, IC 95% 282,9-354,1) e o Grupo C (68,3 ± 21,9 min, IC 95% 59,5-77,1; p < 0,001), com uma diferença significativa entre os grupos C-N1 e C-N2 (p < 0,001). O consumo total de paracetamol IV nas primeiras 24 horas de pós-operatório foi reduzido no Grupo C-IV (672,6 ± 272,8 mg, IC 95% 559,9-785,2), Grupo C-N1 (715,6 ± 103,2 mg, IC 95% 590,4-840,8) e Grupo C-N2 (696,6 ± 133,3 mg, IC 95% 558,8-834,4) em comparação com o Grupo C (1153,8 ± 312,4 mg, IC 95% 1024,8-1282,8; p < 0,001). Não houve diferença entre os grupos de cetamina intravenosa e nebulizada (p = 0,312). Os pacientes dos grupos de cetamina intravenosa e nebulizada apresentaram escores VRS pós-operatórios menores, em comparação com o Grupo C (p < 0,001), sem diferenças entre os grupos C-IV, C-N1 ou C-N2 e sem efeitos adversos significativos. Conclusão A administração preventiva de cetamina nebulizada foi eficaz no alívio da dor pós-amigdalectomia. Cetamina nebulizada pode ser considerada como uma via alternativa eficaz à cetamina IV.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Tonsilectomia/métodos , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Administração por Inalação , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Método Duplo-Cego , Administração Intravenosa , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem
13.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 64(4): 227-35, 2014.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25096766

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: S-(+)-ketamine is an intravenous anaesthetic and sympathomimetic with properties of local anaesthetic. It has an effect of an analgetic and local anaesthetic when administered epidurally, but there are no data whether low doses of S-(+)-ketamine have sympathomimetic effects. The aim of this study was to determine whether low doses of S-(+)-ketamine, given epidurally together with local anaesthetic, have any effect on sympathetic nervous system, both systemic and below the level of anaesthetic block. METHODS: The study was conducted on two groups of patients to whom epidural anaesthesia was administered to. Local anaesthesia (0.5% bupivacaine) was given to one group (control group) while local anaesthesia and S-(+)-ketamine were given to other group. Age, height, weight, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure were measured. Non-competitive enzyme immunochemistry method (Cat Combi ELISA) was used to determine the concentrations of catecholamines (adrenaline and noradrenaline). Immunoenzymometric determination with luminescent substrate on a machine called Vitros Eci was used to determine the concentration of cortisol. Pulse transit time was measured using photoplethysmography. Mann-Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon test and Friedman ANOVA were the statistical tests. Blood pressure, pulse, adrenaline, noradrenaline and cortisol concentrations were measured in order to estimate systemic sympathetic effects. RESULTS: 40 patients in the control group were given 0.5% bupivacaine and 40 patients in the test group were given 0.5% bupivacaine with S-(+)-ketamine. Value p<0.05 has been taken as a limit of statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose of S-(+)-ketamine administered epidurally had no sympathomimetic effects; it did not change blood pressure, pulse, serum hormones or pulse transit time. Low dose of S-(+)-ketamine administered epidurally did not deepen sympathetic block. Adding 25mg of S-(+)-ketamine to 0.5% bupivacaine does not deprive sympathetic tonus below the level of epidural block at the moment of most expressed sympathetic block and has no effect on sympathetic tonus above the block level.

14.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 64(4): 227-35, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24998105

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: S-(+)-ketamine is an intravenous anaesthetic and sympathomimetic with properties of local anaesthetic. It has an effect of an analgetic and local anaesthetic when administered epidurally, but there are no data whether low doses of S-(+)-ketamine have sympathomimetic effects. The aim of this study was to determine whether low doses of S-(+)-ketamine, given epidurally together with local anaesthetic, have any effect on sympathetic nervous system, both systemic and below the level of anaesthetic block. METHODS: The study was conducted on two groups of patients to whom epidural anaesthesia was administered to. Local anaesthesia (0.5% bupivacaine) was given to one group (control group) while local anaesthesia and S-(+)-ketamine were given to other group. Age, height, weight, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure were measured. Non-competitive enzyme immunochemistry method (Cat Combi ELISA) was used to determine the concentrations of catecholamines (adrenaline and noradrenaline). Immunoenzymometric determination with luminescent substrate on a machine called Vitros Eci was used to determine the concentration of cortisol. Pulse transit time was measured using photoplethysmography. Mann-Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon test and Friedman ANOVA were the statistical tests. Blood pressure, pulse, adrenaline, noradrenaline and cortisol concentrations were measured in order to estimate systemic sympathetic effects. RESULTS: 40 patients in the control group were given 0.5% bupivacaine and 40 patients in the test group were given 0.5% bupivacaine with S-(+)-ketamine. Value p<0.05 has been taken as a limit of statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose of S-(+)-ketamine administered epidurally had no sympathomimetic effects; it did not change blood pressure, pulse, serum hormones or pulse transit time. Low dose of S-(+)-ketamine administered epidurally did not deepen sympathetic block. Adding 25mg of S-(+)-ketamine to 0.5% bupivacaine does not deprive sympathetic tonus below the level of epidural block at the moment of most expressed sympathetic block and has no effect on sympathetic tonus above the block level.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo/métodos , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Anestesia Epidural/métodos , Anestésicos Dissociativos/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Espaço Epidural , Humanos , Ketamina/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pletismografia , Adulto Jovem
15.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; Rev. bras. anestesiol;69(1): 35-41, Jan.-Feb. 2019. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-977411

RESUMO

Abstract Objective: Postoperative pain control is important in terms of early recovery and rehabilitation in arthroscopic meniscectomy. For this purpose, we aimed to compare the effects of intraarticular tramadol, magnesium, and ketamine with combinations of pericapsular bupivacaine on postoperative pain and recovery in arthroscopic meniscectomy. Methods: Ninety patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy were enrolled in the study. Group T was given tramadol, Group K was given ketamine, and Group M was given magnesium reconstituted intraarticularly, and all groups received periarticular bupivacaine. Comparisons were made in terms of the patients' postoperative Visual Analogue Scale scores with and without movement, need for additional analgesics, first analgesic time, mobilization times, adverse effects, and satisfaction with the analgesics. Results: The Visual Analogue Scale scores were lowest in Group T at 0 minutes, and were higher in the 15th and 30th minutes and 1st, 2nd, and 6th hours. Visual Analogue Scale values with movement were found to be high in Group M at 0 and 15 minutes, but they were found to be higher in group T in the 30th minute, 1st, 2nd and 6th hour. The groups were similar in terms of postoperative additional analgesic use, number of analgesic use, and satisfaction with analgesics; however, the first analgesic time was earlier in Group M, and the first mobilization time was earlier in Group K. Conclusion: Intraarticular ketamine enables early mobilization and less need for additional analgesics, it also provides a better analgesic effect in comparison with intraarticular tramadol and magnesium.


Resumo Objetivo: O controle da dor pós-operatória é importante para recuperação e reabilitação precoces em meniscectomia artroscópica. Portanto, nosso objetivo foi comparar os efeitos de tramadol, magnésio e cetamina administrados por via intra-articular em associação com bupivacaína pericapsular sobre a dor e a recuperação após meniscectomia artroscópica. Métodos: Noventa pacientes submetidos à meniscectomia artroscópica foram incluídos no estudo. O Grupo T recebeu tramadol, o Grupo K recebeu cetamina e o Grupo M recebeu magnésio em doses reconstituídas por via intra-articular e todos os grupos receberam bupivacaína por via periarticular. As avaliações foram feitas mediante comparação dos escores em escala visual analógica no pós-operatório dos pacientes em movimento e em repouso, necessidade de analgésicos adicionais, tempo até a primeira necessidade de analgésico, tempo de mobilização, efeitos adversos e satisfação com os analgésicos. Resultados: Os escores da escala visual analógica foram menores no minuto zero e maiores nos minutos 15 e 30 e nas horas 1, 2 e 6 no Grupo T. Os escores da escala visual analógica em movimento foram maiores nos minutos zero e 15 no Grupo M e maiores no minuto 30 e nas horas 1, 2 e 6 no Grupo T. Os escores dos grupos foram semelhantes em relação à necessidade de analgésico adicional no pós-operatório, ao consumo de analgésico e à satisfação com os analgésicos, mas os tempos até a primeira necessidade de analgesia e até a primeira mobilização foram mais curtos nos grupos M e K, respectivamente. Conclusão: A administração intra-articular de cetamina permite mobilização precoce e diminui a necessidade de analgésicos adicionais, além de proporcionar um melhor efeito analgésico em comparação com tramadol e magnésio por via intra-articular.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Idoso , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Artroscopia , Tramadol/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Meniscectomia/métodos , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
16.
Rev Bras Anestesiol ; 64(6): 377-81, 2014.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25437692

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Emergence agitation is a common postanaesthetic problem in children after sevoflurane anaesthesia. We aimed to compare the effects of ketamine and midazolam administered intravenously, before the end of surgery, for prevention of emergence agitation in children who received caudal block for pain relief under sevoflurane anaesthesia. METHODS: 62 American Society of Anesthesiologists patient classification status I children, aged 2-7 years, scheduled for inguinal hernia repair, circumcision or orchidopexy were enrolled to the study. Anaesthesia was induced with sevoflurane 8% in a mixture of 50% oxygen and nitrous oxide. After achieving adequate depth of anaesthesia, a laryngeal mask was placed and then caudal block was performed with 0.75mLkg(-1), 0.25% bupivacaine. At the end of the surgery, ketamine 0.25mgkg(-1), midazolam 0.03mgkg(-1) and saline were given to ketamine, midazolam and control groups, respectively. Agitation was assessed using Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium scale and postoperative pain was evaluated with modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale scores were found higher in control group than in ketamine and midazolam groups. Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium scores were similar between groups. Modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale and Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium scores showed a significant decrease by time in all groups during follow-up in postanaesthesia care unit. The present study resulted in satisfactory Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium scores which are below 10 in all groups. As a conclusion, neither ketamine nor midazolam added to caudal block under sevoflurane anaesthesia did show further effect on emergence agitation. In addition, pain relief still seems to be the major factor in preventing emergence agitation after sevoflurane anaesthesia.

17.
Rev. méd. Paraná ; 76(2): 39-43, 2018.
Artigo em Português | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1343243

RESUMO

Introdução: A utilização de cetamina em baixas doses apresenta perspectivas promissoras na analgesia pós-operatória. Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito analgésico, poupador de opioide e a ocorrência de efeitos colaterais do uso de baixas doses de cetamina S (+) no pós-operatório de artrodese coluna lombar. Materiais e Métodos: Houve dois grupos de estudo - grupo 1 recebeu analgesia regular no pós-operatório e o grupo 2 recebeu a mesma medicação acrescida da infusão de cetamina S (+), 0,5 mg/kg/min, nas primeiras 48h. Resultados: 51 pacientes completaram o estudo (26 no grupo 1, 25 grupo no 2). Não houve diferença significativa em relação a quantidade média de morfina utilizada e ocorrência de efeitos colaterais. O valor médio de EVA foi de 4.1 no grupo 1 e 3.2 no grupo 2. Conclusão: O uso de baixas doses de cetamina S(+) no pós-operatório de artrodese lombar promove melhora da analgesia sem aumentar a incidência de efeitos adversos


Introduction: Low doses of ketamine or isomers are promising possibilities for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Objectives: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing effect and occurrence of side effect of low dose ketamine (+) in patients undergoing lumbar arthrodesis. MaterialandMethod: There was two groups, group 1 received regular analgesia, group 2 received regular analgesia plus IV ketamine S(+) infusion (0,5mg/kg/min) in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Results: Fifty-one patients completed the study (25 ketamine group, 26 control group). No difference in side effects was noted between the groups. Patients in ketamine group received at median 25.9 mg IV morphine versus 26.8 in control group (P > 0.05). Pain report in VAS was 3.2 in ketamine group and 4.1 in control group (P < 00.5). Conclusion: The addition of IV low dose ketamine S(+) infusion regimen improve postoperative analgesia without increase of side effects

18.
Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec. (Online) ; 70(6): 1671-1679, nov.-dez. 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-969563

RESUMO

The present study was composed by two experiments aiming to develop a cervical dilation technique for non-surgical access to Santa Inês ewe's uterus. In Experiment 1, thirty ewes underwent four epidural treatments. The three experimental treatments used 2.0mg/kg ketamine. The group receiving this drug alone was denominated KG, whereas other group had ketamine associated with 0.1mg/kg morphine (KM) and KX a third group had ketamine associated with 0.05mg/kg xylazine (KX). Control treatment was 1mL/7.5kg saline solution epidurally (CON). Cervical dilation was evaluated in both experiments by attempting to pass a metal rod through the cervix. In Experiment 2, three different hormonal protocols for cervical dilation were tested in thirty ewes. Epidural anesthesia with 2.0mg/kg ketamine was the control treatment (KG) and was combined with hormonal treatments: Misoprostol (MI); Oxytocin + Estradiol (OE); Misoprostol + Oxytocin + Estradiol (MOE). In Experiment 1 transposition rate was not different among groups. In Experiment 2, OE presented the highest rate (90%) while MOE presented 86.2%, MI 68.9% and CON 62.1%. The study developed a pharmacological protocol that increased cervical transposition making the non-surgical access to the uterus feasible in Santa Inês ewes.(AU)


O presente estudo teve como objetivo desenvolver uma técnica para acesso não cirúrgico ao útero de ovelhas Santa Inês e foi realizado em duas etapas. No experimento 1, 30 ovelhas foram submetidas a quatro tratamentos epidurais. Os três tratamentos teste usaram 2,0mg/kg de cetamina. O grupo que recebeu apenas cetamina foi denominado KG, enquanto no segundo grupo a cetamina foi combinada com morfina (0,1mg/kg - KM) e um terceiro grupo recebeu cetamina associada com xilazina 0,05mg/kg - KX). No grupo controle (CON), usou-se solução salina (1mL/7,5kg de peso). A dilatação cervical foi avaliada em ambos os experimentos pela tentativa de transposição cervical com uma haste metálica. No experimento 2, três protocolos hormonais de dilatação cervical foram testados em 30 ovelhas. Anestesia epidural com 2,0mg/kg de cetamina foi o tratamento controle (CON), combinada com tratamentos hormonais nos grupos: misoprostol (MI); ocitocina + estradiol (OE); misoprostol + ocitocina + estradiol (MOE). No experimento 1, a taxa de transposição não variou entre os grupos. No experimento 2, OE teve a maior taxa (90%), enquanto MOE apresentou 86,2%, MIi 68,9% e CON 62,1%. O estudo desenvolveu um protocolo farmacológico que aumentou a taxa de transposição cervical, tornando o acesso uterino não cirúrgico viável em ovelhas Santa Inês.(AU)


Assuntos
Animais , Feminino , Útero/anormalidades , Ovinos/anatomia & histologia , Relaxamento Muscular , Misoprostol , Estradiol
19.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; Rev. bras. anestesiol;68(6): 597-604, Nov.-Dec. 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-977404

RESUMO

Abstract Background and objectives: Pediatric patients frequently require deep sedation or general anesthesia for colonoscopy. This study was designed to compare the sedative efficacy of remifentanil-ketamine combination with propofol-ketamine combination in children undergoing colonoscopy. Methods: Seventy patients, between 2 and 16 years of age, scheduled for diagnostic colonoscopy were randomly allocated into two groups. Remifentanil-ketamine group received intravenous ketamine 2 mg.kg−1 and remifentanil 0.25 µg.kg−1 combination, followed by 0.1 µg.kg−1.min−1 remifentanil infusion. Propofol-ketamine group received intravenous propofol 1 and 2 mg.kg−1 ketamine combination, followed by 1 mg.kg−1.h−1 propofol infusion. In the case of children discomfort (cry, movement, and cough), remifentanil 0.1 µg.kg−1 in the remifentanil-ketamine group or propofol 0.5 mg.kg−1 in the propofol-ketamine group were administered to improve children discomfort. Despite the therapy given above, if children still experience discomfort, 1 mg.kg−1 of ketamine was administered as a rescue drug, regardless of the group. Ramsay sedation score, hemodynamic variables, drug requirements, gastroenterologists' satisfaction, colonoscopy duration, recovery time, and side effects were recorded throughout the procedure and the recovery period. Results: The percentage of patients with a Ramsay sedation score of 4 or higher during the procedure was 73.5 and 37.1% in remifentanil-ketamine and propofol-ketamine groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure variables were significantly higher only after induction in the remifentanil-ketamine group than in the propofol-ketamine group (p = 0.015). Conclusion: Coadministration of ketamine with either remifentanil or propofol effectively and safely provides sedation and analgesia in children undergoing colonoscopy. Sedation scores were significantly better in remifentanil-ketamine group than in propofol-ketamine group.


Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Os pacientes pediátricos com frequência precisam de sedação profunda ou anestesia geral para colonoscopia. Este estudo foi desenhado para comparar a eficácia sedativa da combinação de remifentanil-cetamina e de propofol-cetamina em crianças submetidas à colonoscopia. Métodos: Setenta pacientes, entre 2-16 anos, programados para colonoscopia diagnóstica foram alocados randomicamente em dois grupos. O grupo remifentanil-cetamina recebeu a combinação de 2 mg.kg−1 de cetamina por via intravenosa e 0,25 µg.kg−1 de remifentanil; seguido de infusão de remifentanil (0,1 µg.kg−1.min−1). O grupo propofol-cetamina recebeu a combinação de 1 mg.kg−1 de propofol e 2 mg.kg−1 de cetamina; seguido de infusão de propofol (1 mg.kg−1.h−1). Em caso de desconforto das crianças (choro, movimento e tosse), remifentanil (0,1 µg.kg−1) seria administrado ao grupo remifentanil-cetamina ou propofol (0,5 mg.kg−1) ao grupo propofol-cetamina. A despeito da terapia acima citada, caso as crianças ainda sentissem desconforto, cetamina (1 mg.kg−1) seria administrada como fármaco de resgate, independentemente do grupo. Escore de sedação de Ramsay, variáveis hemodinâmicas, necessidade de medicamentos, satisfação dos gastroenterologistas, duração da colonoscopia, tempo de recuperação e efeitos colaterais foram registrados durante o procedimento e o período de recuperação. Resultados: O percentual de pacientes com escore 4 ou mais na escala de sedação de Ramsay durante o procedimento foi de 73,5% e 37,1% nos grupos remifentanil-cetamina e propofol-cetamina, respectivamente, (p = 0,02). As variáveis, pressão arterial sistólica e diastólica, foram significativamente maiores no grupo remifentanil-cetamina do que no grupo propofol-cetamina, mas somente após a indução (p = 0,015). Conclusão: A coadministração de cetamina com remifentanil ou propofol fornece sedação e analgesia de forma eficaz e segura em crianças submetidas à colonoscopia. Os escores de sedação foram significativamente melhores no grupo remifentanil-cetamina do que no grupo propofol-cetamina.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Colonoscopia , Sedação Profunda/métodos , Remifentanil/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Estudos Prospectivos , Combinação de Medicamentos
20.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; Rev. bras. anestesiol;68(3): 266-273, May-June 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-958301

RESUMO

Abstract Objectives: We conducted this study to investigate the safety and analgesic efficacy of the addition of Ketamine to Bupivacaine in bilateral extra-oral infra-orbital nerve block in children undergoing cleft lip surgeries. Methods: Sixty patients were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 30), Group B received infra-orbital nerve block with 2 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine and Group BK received 0.5 mg.kg-1 Ketamine for each side added to 1 mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine solution diluted up to 2 mL solution to 0.25% Bupivacaine concentration. Assessment parameters included; hemodynamics, recovery time, time to first oral intake, postoperative Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability (FLACC) scores, Four-point Agitation scores, analgesic consumption and adverse effects. Results: Patients in Group BK showed lower postoperative FLACC scores during all recorded time points (p < 0.0001). Two patients in Group BK versus 12 in Group B requested for postoperative rescue analgesia (p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups in time, minutes (min), to first request for rescue analgesia. Patients in Group BK reported lower analgesic consumption (366.67 ± 45.67 vs. 240.0 ± 0.0 mg, p < 0.04). The time to first oral intake was significantly reduced in Group BK (87.67 ± 15.41 vs. 27.33 ± 8.68 min, p < 0.001). Lower postoperative Agitation scores were recorded in Group BK patients that reached a statistical significance at 45 min (0.86 ± 0.11 vs. 0.46 ± 0.16, p < 0.04) and in the first hour (h) postoperatively (1.40 ± 0.17 vs. 0.67 ± 0.14, p < 0.003). Higher parent satisfaction scores were recorded in Group BK (p < 0.04) without significant adverse effects. Conclusions: The addition of Ketamine to Bupivacaine has accentuated the analgesic efficacy of infra-orbital nerve block in children undergoing cleft lip repair surgeries.


Resumo Objetivos: Realizamos este estudo para avaliar a segurança e eficácia da analgesia com a adição de cetamina à bupivacaína em bloqueio do nervo infraorbitário, bilateral e extraoral, em crianças submetidas à cirurgia de lábio leporino. Métodos: Foram randomicamente alocados 60 pacientes em dois grupos (n = 30): o Grupo B recebeu bloqueio do nervo infraorbitário com bupivacaína a 0,25% (2 mL) e o Grupo BC recebeu bloqueio com cetamina (0,5 mg.kg-1) em cada lado, mais a adição de 1 mL de solução de bupivacaína a 0,5% diluída até 2 mL da concentração a 0,25%. Os parâmetros de avaliação incluíram: hemodinâmica, tempo de recuperação, tempo até a primeira ingestão oral, escores da escala FLACC (que avalia a expressão facial [Face], os movimentos das pernas [Legs], a atividade [Activity], o choro [Cry] e a consolabilidade [Consolability]), escores de agitação em escala de quatro pontos, consumo de analgésicos e efeitos adversos no pós-operatório. Resultados: Os pacientes do Grupo BC apresentaram escores FLACC mais baixos em todos os momentos mensurados no pós-operatório (p < 0,0001). Dois pacientes do Grupo BC versus 12 do Grupo B solicitaram analgesia de resgate no pós-operatório (p < 0,001). Não houve diferenças entre os grupos em relação ao tempo até a primeira solicitação de analgesia de resgate. Os pacientes do Grupo BC relataram consumo menor de analgésicos (366,67 ± 45,67 vs. 240,0 ± 0,0 mg, p < 0,04). O tempo em minutos (min) até a primeira ingestão oral foi significativamente reduzido no Grupo BC (87,67 ± 15,41 vs. 27,33 ± 8,68 min, p < 0,001). Escores mais baixos de agitação no pós-operatório foram registrados para os pacientes do Grupo BC, com significância estatística no tempo de 45 min (0,86 ± 0,11 vs. 0,46 ± 0,16; p < 0,04) e na primeira hora de pós-operatório (1,40 ± 0,17 vs. 0,67 ± 0,14; p < 0,003). Índices mais altos de satisfação dos pais foram registrados no Grupo BC (p < 0,04), sem efeitos adversos significativos. Conclusões: A adição de cetamina à bupivacaína acentuou a eficácia analgésica do bloqueio do nervo infraorbitário em crianças submetidas à cirurgia de correção de lábio leporino.


Assuntos
Humanos , Fenda Labial/cirurgia , Anestesia Local/instrumentação , Dor Pós-Operatória , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA