Glycolysis: An early marker for vancomycin-specific T-cell activation.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin, a glycopeptide antibiotic used for Gram-positive bacterial infections, has been linked with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) in HLA-A*32:01-expressing individuals. This is associated with activation of T lymphocytes, for which glycolysis has been isolated as a fuel pathway following antigenic stimulation. However, the metabolic processes that underpin drug-reactive T-cell activation are currently undefined and may shed light on the energetic conditions needed for the elicitation of drug hypersensitivity or tolerogenic pathways. Here, we sought to characterise the immunological and metabolic pathways involved in drug-specific T-cell activation within the context of DRESS pathogenesis using vancomycin as model compound and drug-reactive T-cell clones (TCCs) generated from healthy donors and vancomycin-hypersensitive patients. METHODS: CD4+ and CD8+ vancomycin-responsive TCCs were generated by serial dilution. The Seahorse XFe96 Analyzer was used to measure the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) as an indicator of glycolytic function. Additionally, T-cell proliferation and cytokine release (IFN-γ) assay were utilised to correlate the bioenergetic characteristics of T-cell activation with in vitro assays. RESULTS: Model T-cell stimulants induced non-specific T-cell activation, characterised by immediate augmentation of ECAR and rate of ATP production (JATPglyc). There was a dose-dependent and drug-specific glycolytic shift when vancomycin-reactive TCCs were exposed to the drug. Vancomycin-reactive TCCs did not exhibit T-cell cross-reactivity with structurally similar compounds within proliferative and cytokine readouts. However, cross-reactivity was observed when analysing energetic responses; TCCs with prior specificity for vancomycin were also found to exhibit glycolytic switching after exposure to teicoplanin. Glycolytic activation of TCC was HLA restricted, as exposure to HLA blockade attenuated the glycolytic induction. CONCLUSION: These studies describe the glycolytic shift of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells following vancomycin exposure. Since similar glycolytic switching is observed with teicoplanin, which did not activate T cells, it is possible the master switch for T-cell activation is located upstream of metabolic signalling.

Effects of titration speed, gender, obesity and concomitant medications on the risk and onset time of clozapine-associated fever among Japanese patients with schizophrenia: retrospective review of charts from 21 hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine-induced inflammation, such as myocarditis and pneumonia, can occur during initial titration and can be fatal. Fever is often the first sign of severe inflammation, and early detection and prevention are essential. Few studies have investigated the effects of clozapine titration speed and concomitant medication use on the risk of clozapine-induced inflammation. AIMS: We evaluated the risk factors for clozapine-associated fever, including titration speed, concomitant medication use, gender and obesity, and their impact on the risk of fever and the fever onset date. METHOD: We conducted a case-control study. The medical records of 539 Japanese participants with treatment-resistant schizophrenia at 21 hospitals in Japan who received clozapine for the first time between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively investigated. Of these, 512 individuals were included in the analysis. Individuals were divided into three groups according to the titration rate recommended by international guidelines for East Asians: the faster titration group, the slower titration group and the ultra-slower titration group. The use of concomitant medications (such as antipsychotics, mood stabilisers, hypnotics and anxiolytics) at clozapine initiation was comprehensively investigated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the explanatory variables for the risk of a fever of 37.5°C or higher lasting at least 2 days. RESULTS: Fever risk significantly increased with faster titration, male gender and concomitant use of valproic acid or quetiapine. No increased fever risk was detected with the use of other concomitant drugs, such as olanzapine, lithium or orexin receptor antagonists. Fever onset occurred significantly earlier with faster titration. Multivariate analysis identified obesity as being a factor that accelerated fever onset. CONCLUSION: A faster titration speed and concomitant treatment with valproic acid and quetiapine at clozapine initiation increased the risk of clozapine-associated fever. Clinicians should titrate clozapine with caution and consider both the titration speed and concomitant medications.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part II diagnosis and management.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. The differential diagnosis includes other cutaneous adverse reactions, infections, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and neoplastic disorders. Three sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed; however, consensus is lacking. The cornerstone of management is immediate discontinuation of the suspected drug culprit. Systemic corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, but the literature on steroid-sparing agents is expanding. Longitudinal evaluation for sequelae is recommended. Adjunctive tests for risk stratification and drug culprit identification remain under investigation. Part II of this continuing medical education activity begins by exploring the differential diagnosis and diagnosis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and concludes with an evidence-based overview of evaluation and treatment.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part I. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological features, and prognosis.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome to Hemodialysis Polysulfone Membrane.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe and potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction. Although commonly associated with specific drugs, there have been no reports of DRESS syndrome caused by medical devices. We report a unique case of DRESS syndrome linked to a particular hemodialysis membrane during treatment. An 83-year-old man on hemodialysis exhibited fever, rash, and elevated eosinophils. Despite medication changes and consultations with specialists, his condition persisted. A drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test revealed a positive response to the dialysis membrane. His symptoms and lab results met DRESS syndrome diagnostic criteria. After substituting the membrane and administering glucocorticoids, the patient displayed early improvement. Diagnosing DRESS syndrome is complex due to its varied presentation and lack of specific benchmarks. This instance underscores the need to consider medical devices as potential DRESS syndrome triggers. Enhanced physician awareness can facilitate prompt detection and proper management, ultimately refining patient outcomes.

Acute kidney injury in lamotrigine-induced DRESS syndrome.

We present a case of lamotrigine-triggered DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome with acute kidney injury stage 3. A 17-year-old girl with known epilepsy treated with lamotrigine presented with acute kidney injury as well as skin eruption, fever, and apathy. Extended diagnostics, considering infectious and autoimmune diseases, remained unremarkable. Lamotrigine blood levels were within the target range. Kidney biopsy showed acute interstitial nephritis with tubular necrosis. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy led to an improvement in kidney function; skin eruption and neurological symptoms resolved. During the hospital stay, the girl admitted to inconsistent and variable intake of lamotrigine, occasionally resulting in notable overdosing. This report demonstrates that acute kidney injury in lamotrigine-induced DRESS syndrome is an acute interstitial nephritis with tubular necrosis, an aspect that has not been deeply characterized so far. Additionally, we aim to elevate awareness towards non-adherence as cause of disease, especially among the adolescent population.

DRESS syndrome with multiorgan involvement and HHV-6 reactivation in the absence of a drug trigger.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe drug reaction where patients present with fever, morbilliform rash and multiorgan manifestations, which may include acute renal failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome and eosinophilic myocarditis. We present a case of a 60-year-old woman with acute heart failure, DRESS syndrome features and human herpesvirus 6 reactivation in the absence of a drug trigger. She was diagnosed with eosinophilic myocarditis and successfully treated with corticosteroid therapy.

Leukemoid reaction in minocycline-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: A brief report.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is an idiosyncratic drug reaction hallmarked by cutaneous eruption, fever, lymphadenopathy, multiorgan involvement, and hematological abnormalities, most often eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytosis. Leukemoid reactions have rarely been described in DRESS syndrome and here we describe a 16-year-old male who was admitted to the hospital with DRESS syndrome due to minocycline, who had a severe leukocytosis up to 52.08 K/µL. He improved with cessation of minocycline and initiation of systemic steroids. We report this case to add to the literature on hematological abnormalities in pediatric DRESS syndrome.

Operating Room Airborne Microbial Load: Nonscrubbed Staff Apparel Matters.

BACKGROUND: Infection is a leading cause of total joint arthroplasty failure. In previous studies, we found correlations between the level of contamination, concentrations of airborne particles, and the number of staff present. In this study, we focused on the apparel of nonscrubbed operating room (OR) staff to elucidate their contribution to the airborne microbial load. METHODS: We compared hospital-laundered scrubs to disposable coveralls using 2 methods. (1) Participants entered an isolation chamber with a controlled environment and completed tasks for 1 hour wearing both the approved and alternative OR attire. Settle plates collected viable contaminants that were shed by the participants during testing. (2) Lab members conducted standardized maneuvers in a functional OR that simulated typical movements of the nurse, anesthesiologist, implant representative, and entering/exiting staff. An airborne particle counter and settle plates were positioned throughout the OR. After 1 hour, the staff changed apparel and repeated the test. Each session of both phases consisted of 2 tests by the same individuals on the same day. RESULTS: There was approximately a 10-fold difference in the settlement rate of viable particles between groups when employing the isolation chamber. The settle rate for scrubs was 5,519 ± 1,381 colony forming units (CFUs)/m2/h, while the settle rate for coveralls was 505 ± 55 CFUs/m2/h (P = .008). During testing in the OR, 218.7 ± 35 CFUs/m2/h were captured for scrubs, compared with 50.5 ± 13 CFUs/m2/h for the coverall (P < .01). The concentration of airborne particles collected for scrubs was 4,952.1 ± 495 particles/m3 and 1,065 ± 53 particles/m3 for the coveralls (P < .01). This was a 77% and 79% reduction for both measures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The open nature of standard scrubs allows contaminated particles to escape into the OR environment, whereas the one-piece design of the coveralls restricts pathways of escape. The results of this study may be helpful when developing hospital infection prevention policies.

Updates on the immunopathology and genomics of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) cause significant morbidity and mortality and impede new drug development. HLA class I associations with SJS/TEN and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome have aided preventive efforts and provided insights into immunopathogenesis. In SJS/TEN, HLA class I-restricted oligoclonal CD8+ T-cell responses occur at the tissue level. However, specific HLA risk allele(s) and antigens driving this response have not been identified for most drugs. HLA risk alleles also have incomplete positive and negative predictive values, making truly comprehensive screening currently challenging. Although, there have been key paradigm shifts in knowledge regarding drug hypersensitivity, there are still many open and unanswered questions about SCAR immunopathogenesis, as well as genetic and environmental risk. In addition to understanding the cellular and molecular basis of SCAR at the single-cell level, identification of the MHC-restricted drug-reactive self- or viral peptides driving the hypersensitivity reaction will also be critical to advancing premarketing strategies to predict risk at an individual and drug level. This will also enable identification of biologic markers for earlier diagnosis and accurate prognosis, as well as drug causality and targeted therapeutics.

If not angioedema, what is it? Diagnostic approach to facial edema.

Facial edema is a relatively frequent clinical presentation encountered in patients seen in allergology and dermatology clinics. The differential diagnosis is broad, and sometimes the definitive diagnosis can be a challenge for the clinician. Facial angioedema itself encompasses different etiopathologies (histaminergic, bradykinergic, etc.) that must be distinguished from other causes of facial edema, such as allergic contact dermatitis, granulomatous conditions, inflammatory causes, infections, neoplasms or paraneoplastic syndromes, autoimmune diseases, among other entities hereby referred as miscellanea. A proper diagnostic approach is essential to order the appropriate tests, as well as to prescribe a targeted treatment. This review focuses on entities that present with facial edema and summarize their characteristic clinical features.

Empowering advanced clinical practitioners in managing acute dermatological emergencies.

Advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) encounter patients with acute dermatological presentations ranging from minor to life-threatening conditions in both primary and secondary care settings. However, ACPs often feel unprepared to assess and treat patients with dermatological emergencies. This article aims to provide guidance to trainee and qualified ACPs, whether in acute hospital settings or primary care, in understanding the essential aspects to consider when consulting with patients presenting with acute dermatological emergencies. It also emphasises appropriate referrals to relevant specialties for necessary inpatient or outpatient investigations and ensure prompt treatment.

Antituberculosis-Drugs Induced DRESS: A Multidrug Hypersensitivity or Drug Hypersensitivity Relapse? A Case Report.

DRESS related to first-line antituberculosis drugs (ATD) is a challenging diagnosis. With a long-lasting combined treatment of 4-concomitantly administrated drugs, identification of the culprit drug remains difficult and may expose patients to treatment interruption and affect their outcome. A 42-year-old female, treated with isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol for multifocal tuberculosis, developed, 40 days later, hyperthermia, facial edema, cervical lymphadenopathy and generalized exanthema. Biological test results revealed eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytes, and liver injury. DRESS was suspected, and ATD were withdrawn. As patch tests for the 4 ATD showed negative results, we decided to reintroduce pyrazinamide, ethambutol and rifampicin separately with a 3-day interval. Pyrazinamide and rifampicin were tolerated. However, after receiving ethambutol, she developed fever and generalized rash, with no biological abnormalities. Since ethambutol was claimed to be the culprit drug, isoniazid was added, and 10 hours later, the patient developed fever, facial edema, generalized rash, eosinophilia and liver injury. This clinical and biological pattern resolved 2 weeks later. This report suggests a hypersensitivity relapse to ethambutol after isoniazid-induced DRESS.

Association of antiviral drugs and their possible mechanisms with DRESS syndrome using data mining algorithms.

Antiviral drugs are not known for drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. The current study aims is to find out the association of antiviral drugs and their possible mechanism with DRESS. Data mining algorithms such as proportional reporting ratio that is, PRR (≥2) with associated χ2  value (>4), reporting odds ratio that is, ROR (≥2) with 95% confidence interval and case count (≥3) were calculated to identify a possible signal. Further, molecular docking studies were conducted to check the interaction of selected antiviral drugs with possible targets. The potential signal of DRESS was found to be associated with abacavir, acyclovir, ganciclovir, lamivudine, lopinavir, nevirapine, ribavirin, ritonavir, and zidovudine among all selected antiviral drugs. Further, subgroup analysis has also shown a potential signal in different age groups and gender. The sensitivity analysis results have shown a decrease in the strength of the signal, however, there was no significant impact on the outcome except for acyclovir. The docking results have indicated the possible involvement of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)*B1502 and HLA*B5801. The positive signal of DRESS was found with selected antiviral drugs except for acyclovir.

Cefotaxime-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom in a child with cross-reactivity to other cephalosporins and cosensitization to teicoplanin.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom (DRESS) is a severe adverse drug-induced reaction. Commonly related to anticonvulsant and allopurinol, DRESS can affect both adults and children. Cefotaxime is rarely associated with DRESS, especially with children. We report a cefotaxime-induced DRESS in a child and emphasize the role of allergological work-up to point out the culprit drug in exploring cross-reactivity and identifying a possible cosensitization. A 2-year-old boy was treated with cefotaxime, vancomycin and metronidazole for acute otomastoiditis. Metronidazole was withdrawn and vancomycin was changed by teicoplanin 10 and 15 days later, respectively. Nineteen days after ongoing cefotaxime and 4 days after teicoplanin intake, the patient developed hyperthermia, a widespread exanthema, facial oedema with neither mucosal involvement nor palpable lymphadenopathy. Biological tests revealed eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytes, mild cytolysis and a high lactate dehydrogenase level. Serological tests for viral and bacterial infections were negative. DRESS was suspected and the 2 antibiotics were withdrawn. Intradermal tests (IDT) were carried out 2 months later with cefotaxime and teicoplanin. They revealed a positive result at 48-hour reading. To assess cross-reactivity among ß-lactams, IDT to penicillins (benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin and oxacillin) was performed showing negative results at 48-hour reading. Nevertheless, IDT to cephalosporins (cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone) displayed positive results at 48-hour reading. As a result, IDT are of great interest and should be performed to confirm the role of cefotaxime and detect a potential cross-reactivity with chemically similar drugs and drugs taken before and during the episode of DRESS.

DRESS/DiHS syndrome induced by Propylthiouracil: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), is a severe adverse drug reaction. Propylthiouracil, a member of thiouracils group, is widely used in medical treatment of hyperthyroidism. Propylthiouracil is associated with multiple adverse effects such as rash, agranulocytosis hepatitis and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, but rarely triggers DRESS/DiHS syndrome. Here, we describe a severe case of propylthiouracil-induced DRESS/DiHS syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: A 38-year-old female was treated with methimazole for hyperthyroidism at first. 4 weeks later, the patient developed elevated liver transaminase so methimazole was stopped. After liver function improved in 2 weeks, medication was switched to propylthiouracil therapy. The patient subsequently developed nausea and rash followed by a high fever, acute toxic hepatitis and multiple organ dysfunction (liver, lung and heart), which lasted for 1 month after propylthiouracil was started. According to the diagnostic criteria, the patient was diagnosed of DRESS/DiHS syndrome which was induced by propylthiouracil. As a result, propylthiouracil was immediately withdrawn. And patient was then treated with adalimumab, systematic corticosteroids and plasmapheresis in sequence. Symptoms were finally resolved 4 weeks later. CONCLUSIONS: Propylthiouracil is a rare cause of the DRESS/DiHS syndrome, which typically consists of severe dermatitis and various degrees of internal organ involvement. We want to emphasize through this severe case that DRESS/DiHS syndrome should be promptly recognized to hasten recovery.

Clinical and Liver Biochemistry Phenotypes, and Outcome in 133 Patients with Anti-seizure Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: Anti-seizure drugs that cause idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals exposed to these drugs. The clinical and demographic characteristics, the liver injury pattern, the outcome, and the agents responsible for hepatotoxicity have not been thoroughly studied. We investigated the aforementioned characteristics in a large cohort of DILI registry patients. METHODS: Patients with anti-seizure DILI were studied from a large single-center DILI registry between 1998 and 2021. DILI was defined by international working group criteria with at least a probable relation with RUCAM. Immunoallergic features and organ-specific contribution to outcome were investigated. RESULTS: Anti-seizure drugs accounted for 133 patients (12.5%) among 1067 patients with idiosyncratic DILI. Compared to other agents, patients with anti-seizure DILI were younger (31 vs 41 years; p = 0.31), were more often females (52% vs 46%; p = 0.19) and had a lower frequency of jaundice (41% vs 59%, p = 0.001), MELD score (14.5 vs 16.5; p = 0.02) and mortality (9.8% vs 15.7%, p = 0.03). Anti-seizure DILI exhibited a greater frequency of hypersensitivity skin rashes (75% vs 22%, p < 0.001), including DRESS (51% vs 13%, p < 0.001) and SJS/TEN (19% vs1%, p < 0.001). A total of 18 different anti-seizure agents were responsible for DILI, largely contributed by carbamazepine (n = 36), phenytoin (n = 71), phenobarbitone (n = 8) and valproate (n = 14) which accounted for 89% of cases and 85% of 13 deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-seizure DILI are caused predominantly by first generation drugs. Newer agents account for < 10% of cases. Hypersensitivity reaction is the most common phenotypic presentation. Both severity and mortality are lower with anti-seizure DILI.

Gemcitabine-associated DRESS syndrome: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Gemcitabine is a well-tolerated pyrimidine antimetabolite chemotherapeutic that is increasingly utilized to treat non-small cell lung carcinoma, breast, pancreatic, and urogenital cancers. Myelosuppression is a common side effect and skin rashes can be observed. We discuss a case of the exceedingly rare DRESS syndrome, which appeared following Gemcitabine treatment. CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old patient with pancreatic cancer and liver metastases received therapy with Gemcitabine as a single agent. Fever, itching, and redness started to be reported on the third day of receiving Gemcitabine treatment. The patient's diffuse maculopapular rash steadily got worse, leading to hospitalization. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: In the patient's physical examination, a high fever, hepatomegaly, and a diffuse macular papular rash were detected, an increase in eosinophils in the complete blood count and peripheral blood. A skin biopsy was performed. It was determined that the patient had Gemcitabine-associated DRESS syndrome. Antihistamines and local steroids were administered. On the fifth day following treatment, skin lesions and eosinophilia decreased. DISCUSSION: The most common cause of DRESS syndrome, a disorder marked by extensive skin eruption, fever, eosinophilia, and systemic symptoms, is medication use. Infections including HHV-6, EBV, and CMV can occasionally be the reason. Gemcitabine is one of the medications that is frequently used in cancer, and a case was provided because the literature review did not mention Gemcitabine-related DRESS syndrome.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms in a paediatric population: Interest of skin tests.

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe adverse drug reaction. It is uncommon in the paediatric population and can be difficult to diagnose as its initial symptoms may mimic a viral infection. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the features of paediatric DRESS and to evaluate the interest of skin tests in identifying the causative drugs. METHODS: It is a retrospective analysis (2004-2021) of DRESS cases diagnosed in paediatric patients. The DRESS diagnosis was defined using the RegiSCAR scoring. The skin tests were performed according to the ENDA recommendations. RESULTS: We included 19 cases of DRESS occurred in 18 patients. Common clinical symptoms were exanthema and fever in 94.7% of cases each. The most commonly affected organ was the liver (84.2%). Among the implicated drugs, 16 were tested and skin tests were positive in 75%. To assess cross-reactivity and co-sensitization, skin tests with related and/or co-administered drugs were performed in eight patients. Among them, only one child had positive results. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis of DRESS and discontinuation of the incriminated drug might reduce the incidence of mortality in the paediatric population. Skin tests could be a safe and useful tool to identify the causative drug and assess cross-reactivity.

Reflectance Measurements from Aerial and Proximal Sensors Provide Similar Precision in Predicting the Rice Yield Response to Mid-Season N Applications.

Accurately detecting nitrogen (N) deficiency and determining the need for additional N fertilizer is a key challenge to achieving precise N management in many crops, including rice (Oryza sativa L.). Many remotely sensed vegetation indices (VIs) have shown promise in this regard; however, it is not well-known if VIs measured from different sensors can be used interchangeably. The objective of this study was to quantitatively test and compare the ability of VIs measured from an aerial and proximal sensor to predict the crop yield response to top-dress N fertilizer in rice. Nitrogen fertilizer response trials were established across two years (six site-years) throughout the Sacramento Valley rice-growing region of California. At panicle initiation (PI), unmanned aircraft system (UAS) Normalized Difference Red-Edge Index (NDREUAS) and GreenSeeker (GS) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVIGS) were measured and expressed as a sufficiency index (SI) (VI of N treatment divided by VI of adjacent N-enriched area). Following reflectance measurements, each plot was split into subplots with and without top-dress N fertilizer. All metrics evaluated in this study indicated that both NDREUAS and NDVIGS performed similarly with respect to predicting the rice yield response to top-dress N at PI. Utilizing SI measurements prior to top-dress N fertilizer application resulted in a 113% and 69% increase (for NDREUAS and NDVIGS, respectively) in the precision of the rice yield response differentiation compared to the effect of applying top-dress N without SI information considered. When the SI measured via NDREUAS and NDVIGS at PI was ≤0.97 and 0.96, top-dress N applications resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) increase in crop yield of 0.19 and 0.21 Mg ha-1, respectively. These results indicate that both aerial NDREUAS and proximal NDVIGS have the potential to accurately predict the rice yield response to PI top-dress N fertilizer in this system and could serve as the basis for developing a decision support tool for farmers that could potentially inform better N management and improve N use efficiency.