A novel adapted MRI-based scheme for Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia.

PURPOSE: To elaborate an optimized scheme for the Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia based on axial and sagittal MR images and to evaluate its intra- and inter-reader reliability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over a period of 20 months patients with a knee MRI and the diagnosis of trochlear dysplasia were retrospectively included. Exclusion criteria were incomplete examination, qualitatively non-diagnostic examination, post trochlear surgery, missing informed consent for research purposes. Three independent evaluations were performed by two radiologists: first using an established description of the Dejour classification (types A-D) and then two evaluations using a new adapted scheme (types A-D). The adapted scheme includes a shallow trochlea, in type A no spur/no cliff, in type B with spur/no cliff, in type C no spur/with cliff, and in type D with spur/with cliff. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one knee MRIs (female:65.5%; left side:52.6%) were included with a median age of 34.3 years (range:11.3-79.2). Inter-reader reliability using the established description was fair for the four-type-classification (kappa(k) = 0.23; 95%CI:0.11-0.34), fair for differentiation low-grade versus high-grade dysplasia (k = 0.28;0.13-0.43), slight for differentiation spur versus no-spur types (k = 0.20;0.05-0.34). Inter-reader reliability using the adapted scheme was substantial (k = 0.79;0.75-0.83) for the four-type-classification, substantial for differentiation low-grade versus high-grade dysplasia (k = 0.80;0.75-0.85), substantial for differentiation spur versus no-spur presence (k = 0.76;0.71-0.81). Intra-reader reliability was almost perfect for the adapted scheme (k-values: 0.88-0.95; 95%CIs: 0.84-0.98). CONCLUSION: The novel adapted scheme for Dejour classification shows an almost perfect intra-reader reliability and a substantially higher inter-reader reliability. It may become a helpful tool in the daily diagnostic work of radiologists.

The role of the most cranial trochlear orientation in patellar maltracking to better characterise trochlear morphology.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study is to describe a magnetic resonance imaging quantitative parameter to assess the morphology of the trochlea that could be measurable from normal to high-grade trochlear dysplasia while evaluating the most proximal slice with trochlear cartilage. METHODS: Two groups of patients have been compared: patients with no patellofemoral pain, no previous trauma and undergoing surgery for a suspected isolated meniscal tears (group A) and patients with objective patellar instability (group B). The cranial trochlear orientation (CTO) angle is defined as the angle between the posterior bicondylar line and the most lateral and most medial points on the subchondral bone covered by cartilage digitised on the first and most cranial image with the trochlear cartilage clearly visible. RESULTS: The final cohort included 253 patients (109 in group A and 144 in group B). CTO was significantly higher in group B (-2.5 ± 8.4 vs. -10.8 ± 5,1; p < .001). Moreover, 75% of knees in group B had a CTO > -7°, while 75% of knees in group A had a CTO < -7°. CTO was measurable in all 253 knees, whereas the lateral trochlear inclination and the sulcus angle were measurable in only 202 knees. The entire cohort was also divided into knees with CTO ≤ 0° and CTO > 0°. All knees with a CTO > 0 were in group B, and 49% of knees with CTO < 0 were in group B. CTO was positively correlated with lateral patellar tilt. CONCLUSIONS: CTO is the only parameter that can be measured on the most cranial slice, in every patient, even in high-grade trochlear dysplasia. According to this new system, the axial trochlear shape may be divided into two types: a positive CTO and a negative CTO, with the trochlea serving, respectively, as a medial and lateral barrier. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Inconsistent repeatability of the Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia due to the variability of imaging modalities: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically assess the quality of papers that report on the intra- and inter-observer repeatability of the Dejour classification for trochlear dysplasia, and to identify the possible causes for poor repeatability. METHODS: Two authors independently conducted an electronic search (four databases) on 8 February 2023 for studies (English or French) that assessed trochlear dysplasia classifications on imaging of skeletally mature participants. Exclusion criteria were reviews of clinical studies, conference proceedings, or editorials. After title, abstract, and full-text screening, characteristics of eligible studies were tabulated (author, year, journal, study design, cohort characteristics, and intra- and/or inter-observer agreement coefficients). The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies. Authors analysed three components of the included studies: (1) classifications based on true lateral radiographs and slice imaging; (2) dysplasia graded into Type A vs B vs C vs D and 3) coefficients of intra- and/or inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: The electronic search returned 3,178 references, and after removal of duplicates and irrelevant studies, ten were eligible for data extraction. A second search (31 July 2023) yielded one additional study. Eight studies did not include lateral radiographs, two studies did not explicitly state if radiographs were true lateral views, and one used true lateral radiographs in isolation. Classification of trochlear dysplasia into A vs B vs C vs D using different imaging modalities resulted in moderate to near-perfect intra-observer agreement, and slight to near-perfect inter-observer agreement. Studies distinguished between moderate and severe dysplasia using a variety of combinations: A vs B/C/D, A/B vs C/D and A/C vs B/D. CONCLUSION: This systematic review revealed that the Dejour classification remains the most widely used to assess trochlear dysplasia and that the majority of studies that assessed the reliability of the Dejour classification, reported moderate to near-perfect inter-observer agreement; however, pooling of results for comparison among the included studies was inappropriate due to substantial variation in imaging protocols and non-standardised criteria to distinguish severe from moderate dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. TRIAL REGISTRY: The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42023386731.

Reconstruction of High-Grade Trochlea Dysplasia in a Young Female with Recurrent Patella Dislocation: A Case Report.

The patellofemoral joint involves a combination of bony structures and soft tissues to maintain stability. Patella instability is a disabling condition, and the cause is multifactorial. The main risk factors include patella alta, trochlea dysplasia, excessive tibial tuberosity to trochlea grove (TT-TG) distance, and excessive lateral patella tilt. In this case report, we highlight the thinking process of diagnosis and method for selecting the optimal treatment in accordance with the guidelines by Dejour et al. when we are presented with a patient with patella instability. A 20-year-old Asian woman without underlying medical conditions, presented with recurrent (>3 episodes) right patella dislocation for 7 years. Investigations revealed a type D trochlea dysplasia, increased TT-TG distance, and excessive lateral tilt angle. She underwent trochlea sulcus deepening, sulcus lateralization and lateral facet elevation, lateral retinacular release, and medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) reconstruction. Due to the complexity behind the anatomy and biomechanics of patella instability, an easy-to-follow treatment algorithm is essential for the treating surgeon to provide effective and efficient treatment. MQTFL reconstruction is recommended for recurrent patella dislocation due to satisfactory clinical and patient reported outcomes and a reduced risk of iatrogenic patella fracture. Controversies for surgical indication in lateral retinacular release, and whether the sulcus angle is an accurate parameter for diagnosis of trochlea dysplasia, remain, and further research is required.

Interobserver reliability is higher for assessments with 3D software-generated models than with conventional MRI images in the classification of trochlear dysplasia.

PURPOSE: Trochlear dysplasia is a significant risk factor for patellofemoral instability. The severity of trochlear dysplasia is commonly evaluated based on the Dejour classification in axial MRI slices. However, this often leads to heterogeneous assessments. A software to generate MRI-based 3D models of the knee was developed to ensure more standardized visualization of knee structures. The purpose of this study was to assess the intra- and interobserver agreements of 2D axial MRI slices and an MRI-based 3D software generated model in classification of trochlear dysplasia as described by Dejour. METHODS: Four investigators independently assessed 38 axial MRI scans for trochlear dysplasia. Analysis was made according to Dejour's 4 grade classification as well as differentiating between 2 grades: low-grade (types A + B) and high-grade trochlear dysplasia (types C + D). Assessments were repeated following a one-week interval. The inter- and intraobserver agreement was determined using Cohen's kappa (κ) and Fleiss kappa statistic (κ). In addition, the proportion of observed agreement (po) was calculated for assessment of intraobserver agreement. RESULTS: The assessment of the intraobserver reliability with regard to the Dejour-classification showed moderate agreement values both in the 2D (κ = 0.59 ± 0.08 SD) and in the 3D analysis (κ = 0.57 ± 0.08 SD). Considering the 2-grade classification, the 2D (κ = 0.62 ± 0.12 SD) and 3D analysis (κ = 0.61 ± 0.19 SD) each showed good intraobserver matches. The analysis of the interobserver reliability also showed moderate agreement values with differences in the subgroups (2D vs. 3D). The 2D evaluation showed correspondences of κ = 0.48 (Dejour) and κ = 0.46 (high / low). In the assessment based on the 3D models, correspondence values of κ = 0.53 (Dejour) and κ = 0.59 (high / low) were documented. CONCLUSION: Overall, moderate-to-good agreement values were found in all groups. The analysis of the intraobserver reliability showed no relevant differences between 2 and 3D representation, but better agreement values were found in the 2-degree classification. In the analysis of interobserver reliability, better agreement values were found in the 3D compared to the 2D representation. The clinical relevance of this study lies in the superiority of the 3D representation in the assessment of trochlear dysplasia, which is relevant for future analytical procedures as well as surgical planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Correlation of Femoral Trochlear Dysplasia With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Skeletally Immature Patients.

BACKGROUND: Reports of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in patients with skeletal immaturity have been increasing. Variations in knee joint anatomy have been linked to ACL injury risk factors. PURPOSE: To identify associations between ACL injury, patella alta, and femoral trochlear dysplasia in patients with skeletal immaturity by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: This retrospective study included 231 patients with skeletal immaturity-116 with acute complete noncontact ACL injury and 115 without ACL injury (controls)-who underwent knee MRI. Cases of femoral trochlear dysplasia were divided into 4 types according to the Dejour classification scheme. Patellar height and patellar tendon length were measured via sagittal MRI, and the Insall-Salvati ratio (ISR) was calculated. RESULTS: In the ACL injury group, 56 (48.3%) knees exhibited trochlear dysplasia, including 51 (91.1%) that were Dejour type A; and in the control group, 12 (10.4%) knees exhibited trochlear dysplasia, 12 (100%) Dejour type A. The prevalence of femoral trochlear dysplasia was significantly higher in the ACL injury group than in the control group (P < .001). The ISR was not significantly different between the ACL injury and control groups (0.9 ± 0.2 vs 1 ± 0.2 mm; P = .16). The correlation between ISR >1.2 and presence of ACL injury was not significant. CONCLUSION: Femoral trochlear dysplasia was associated with ACL injury in patients with skeletal immaturity. In particular, Dejour type A femoral trochlear dysplasia was correlated with ACL injury patients with skeletal immaturity. Also, the possibility of ACL damage exists in patients with skeletal immaturity and femoral trochlear dysplasia.

Clinical validation of the Oswestry-Bristol Classification as part of a decision algorithm for trochlear dysplasia surgery.

AIMS: The Oswestry-Bristol Classification (OBC) is an MRI-specific assessment tool to grade trochlear dysplasia. The aim of this study is to validate clinically the OBC by demonstrating its use in selecting treatments that are safe and effective. METHODS: The OBC and the patellotrochlear index were used as part of the Oswestry Patellotrochlear Algorithm (OPTA) to guide the surgical treatment of patients with patellar instability. Patients were assigned to one of four treatment groups: medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr); MPFLr + tibial tubercle distalization (TTD); trochleoplasty; or trochleoplasty + TTD. A prospective analysis of a longitudinal patellofemoral database was performed. Between 2012 and 2018, 202 patients (233 knees) with a mean age of 24.2 years (SD 8.1), with recurrent patellar instability were treated by two fellowship-trained consultant sports/knee surgeons at The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital. Clinical efficacy of each treatment group was assessed by Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) scores at baseline, and up to 60 months postoperatively. Their safety was assessed by complication rate and requirement for further surgery. The pattern of clinical outcome over time was analyzed using mixed regression modelling. RESULTS: In all, 135 knees (mean age 24.9 years (SD 9.4)) were treated using a MPFLr. Ten knees (7.4%) required additional surgery. A total of 50 knees (mean age 24.4 years (SD 6.3)) were treated using MPFLr + TTD. Ten (20%) required additional surgery. A total of 20 knees (mean age 19.5 years (SD 3.0)) were treated using trochleoplasty + TTD. Three patients (15%) required additional surgery. In each treatment group, there was a significant improvement in Kujala, IKDC, and EQ-5D at one year postoperatively (p < 0.001) with a recognized level of overall complication rate. CONCLUSION: The OBC is a valid assessment tool to grade patients with trochlear dysplasia and, when used as part of the OPTA, helps to determine treatments that are safe and effective. This fulfils the requirements for its application in mainstream clinical practice. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(10):1586-1594.

The Oswestry-Bristol Classification.

AIMS: Trochlear dysplasia is a significant risk factor for patellofemoral instability. The Dejour classification is currently considered the standard for classifying trochlear dysplasia, but numerous studies have reported poor reliability on both plain radiography and MRI. The severity of trochlear dysplasia is important to establish in order to guide surgical management. We have developed an MRI-specific classification system to assess the severity of trochlear dysplasia, the Oswestry-Bristol Classification (OBC). This is a four-part classification system comprising normal, mild, moderate, and severe to represent a normal, shallow, flat, and convex trochlear, respectively. The purpose of this study was to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the OBC and compare it with that of the Dejour classification. METHODS: Four observers (two senior and two junior orthopaedic surgeons) independently assessed 32 CT and axial MRI scans for trochlear dysplasia and classified each according to the OBC and the Dejour classification systems. Assessments were repeated following a four-week interval. The inter- and intraobserver agreement was determined by using Fleiss' generalization of Cohen's kappa statistic and S-statistic nominal and linear weights. RESULTS: The OBC showed fair-to-good interobserver agreement and good-to-excellent intraobserver agreement (mean kappa 0.68). The Dejour classification showed poor interobserver agreement and fair-to-good intraobserver agreement (mean kappa 0.52). CONCLUSION: The OBC can be used to assess the severity of trochlear dysplasia. It can be applied in clinical practice to simplify and standardize surgical decision-making in patients with recurrent patella instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):102-107.

Conventional Radiographs and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Analysis of Trochlear Dysplasia: The Influence of Selected Levels on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Trochlear dysplasia is one of the most important risk factors for recurrent patellar instability. It is defined on true lateral conventional radiographs (CR) and axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The type of trochlear dysplasia is decisive for surgical treatment; however, low agreement between CR and MRI has been reported. PURPOSE: To compare the Dejour classification of trochlear dysplasia on CR and axial MRI using differing levels defined in the literature. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: The 4-type classification of trochlear dysplasia by Dejour was used to analyze 228 knees with recurrent patellar dislocations on true lateral CR and axial MRI. The 2-type modification of the Dejour classification was also similarly analyzed. Measurements on axial MRI were performed at 3 different levels: MR1, the most proximal level where the intercondylar notch forms a "Roman arch"; MR2, 3 cm above the joint line; and MR3, the midpatellar height. RESULTS: MR1 was measured at a mean distance of 29 ± 3.5 mm and MR3 at a mean of 38 ± 5.8 mm above the joint line. MR1 and MR2 were always measured on the cartilaginous trochlea, whereas 52% of MR3 was found more proximally. Overall agreement was fair between CR and MR1/MR2 (31.1%/25.4%, respectively) and highest for MR3 (45.2%; P < .01). The highest agreement (81.8%) was found for MR3 with the 2-type trochlear dysplasia classification (low-grade trochlear dysplasia: type A vs high-grade trochlear dysplasia: types B, C, and D) and lower for MR1 (67.5%) and MR2 (62.0%). CONCLUSION: Trochlear dysplasia measured on CR and MRI shows only fair agreement, especially when the supratrochlear region of the distal femur is not analyzed on axial MRI. MRI analysis that considers the cartilaginous trochlea only tends to underestimate the severity of dysplasia according to Dejour. For a more precise evaluation of trochlear dysplasia, the entire distal femur should be analyzed on axial MRI.

Inestabilidad patelofemoral / Patellofemoral instability

La inestabilidad patelofemoral es una de las enfermedades más frecuentes que afecta esta articulación, especialmente en los pacientes jóvenes. Por esta razón se realizó una revisión del tema con el objetivo de brindar un enfoque general que parte de las características anatómicas de esta articulación. Se muestran los elementos más importantes de la biomecánica conformada por geometría articular, alineación y comportamiento de ligamentos y músculos. Se muestran los signos radiológicos clásicos mediante el uso de la radiografía convencional, divididos en 4 grupos o modalidades según la clasificación de Dejour, además de la importancia de la tomografía axial computarizada y la resonancia magnética nuclear. Para concluir se mencionan algunas modalidades de tratamiento, comenzando por el conservador, y se analizan algunas modalidades de tratamiento quirúrgico y sus indicaciones, entre las que se encuentran la liberación del retináculo lateral, imbricación medial, realineación distal, plastia de la tróclea y traslado de la tuberosidad tibial hacia una zona más medial y anterior

Patellofemoral instability is one of the more frequent diseases affecting this joint, specially in young patients. Thus, a review on this subject was carried out to offer a general approach from the anatomical features of this joint. The more significant elements of the biomechanics are showed including the articular geometry, alignment and behavior of ligaments and muscles. The classic radiological signs are showed using the conventional X-rays divided into four groups or modalities according to the Dejour's classification as well as the significance of computerized axial tomography and the nuclear magnetic resonance. To conclude, some treatment modalities are mentioned including the conservative one and those of surgical treatment are analyzed as well as its indications including the lateral retinaculum release, the medial imbrication, the distal re-alignment, trochlea plastic surgery and movement of tibial tuberosity towards a more medial and anterior zone

L'instabilitÚ fÚmoro-patellaire est l'une des affections affectant le plus souvent cette articulation, spÚcialement chez les jeunes patients. À ce sujet, une rÚvision a ÚtÚ rÚalisÚe afin de donner une approche gÚnÚrale Ó partir des caractÚristiques anatomiques de cette articulation. Les ÚlÚments les plus importants de la biomÚcanique comprenant la gÚomÚtrie articulaire, l'alignement et le comportement des ligaments et muscles, sont montrÚs. Les signes radiologiques classiques sont Úgalement montrÚs, avec l'usage de la radiographie conventionnelle, et divisÚs en 4 groupes ou modalitÚs d'aprÞs la classification de Dejour; l'importance de la tomographie axiale informatisÚe et de la rÚsonance magnÚtique nuclÚaire est aussi mise en relief. Pour conclure, quelques modalitÚs du traitement chirurgical et ses indications, telles que la libÚration du rÚticulum latÚral, imbrication mÚdial, rÚalignement distal, plastie de la trochlÚe, et dÚplacement de la tubÚrositÚ tibiale vers une aire plus mÚdiale et antÚrieure, sont analysÚes