RESUMO
Reconstructing images from multi-view projections is a crucial task both in the computer vision community and in the medical imaging community, and dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) is no exception. Unfortunately, image quality is inevitably degraded by the limitations of photon emissions and the trade-off between temporal and spatial resolution. In this paper, we develop a novel tensor based nonlocal low-rank framework for dynamic PET reconstruction. Spatial structures are effectively enhanced not only by nonlocal and sparse features, but momentarily by tensor-formed low-rank approximations in the temporal realm. Moreover, the total variation is well regularized as a complementation for denoising. These regularizations are efficiently combined into a Poisson PET model and jointly solved by distributed optimization. The experiments demonstrated in this paper validate the excellent performance of the proposed method in dynamic PET.
RESUMO
Dynamic positron emission tomography and kinetic modeling play a critical role in tracer development research using small animals. Kinetic modeling from dynamic PET imaging requires accurate knowledge of an input function, ideally determined through arterial blood sampling. Arterial cannulation in mice, however, requires complex, time-consuming and terminal surgery, meaning that longitudinal studies are impossible. The aim of the current work was to develop and evaluate a non-invasive, deep-learning-based prediction model (DLIF) that directly takes the PET data as input to predict a usable input function. We first trained and evaluated the DLIF model on 68 [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose mouse scans with image-derived targets using cross validation. Subsequently, we evaluated the performance of a trained DLIF model on an external dataset consisting of 8 mouse scans where the input function was measured by continuous arterial blood sampling. The results showed that the predicted DLIF and image-derived targets were similar, and the net influx rate constants following from Patlak modeling using DLIF as input function were strongly correlated to the corresponding values obtained using the image-derived input function. There were somewhat larger discrepancies when evaluating the model on the external dataset, which could be attributed to systematic differences in the experimental setup between the two datasets. In conclusion, our non-invasive DLIF prediction method may be a viable alternative to arterial blood sampling in small animal [18F]FDG imaging. With further validation, DLIF could overcome the need for arterial cannulation and allow fully quantitative and longitudinal experiments in PET imaging studies of mice.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Identification of the dominant intraprostatic lesion(s) (DILs) can facilitate diagnosis and treatment by targeting biologically significant intra-prostatic foci. A PSMA ligand, [18F]DCFPyL (2-(3-{1-carboxy-5-[(6-[18F]fluoro-pyridine-3-carbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid), is better than choline-based [18F]FCH (fluorocholine) in detecting and localizing DIL because of higher tumour contrast, particularly when imaging is delayed to 1 h post-injection. The goal of this study was to investigate whether the different imaging performance of [18F]FCH and [18F]DCFPyL can be explained by their kinetic behaviour in prostate cancer (PCa) and to evaluate whether DIL can be accurately detected and localized using a short duration dynamic positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: 19 and 23 PCa patients were evaluated with dynamic [18F]DCFPyL and [18F]FCH PET, respectively. The dynamic imaging protocol with each tracer had a total imaging time of 22 min and consisted of multiple frames with acquisition times from 10 to 180 s. Tumour and benign tissue regions identified by sextant biopsy were compared using standardized uptake value (SUV) and tracer kinetic parameters from kinetic analysis of time-activity curves. RESULTS: For [18F]DCFPyL, logistic regression identified Ki and k4 as the optimal model to discriminate tumour from benign tissue (84.2% sensitivity and 94.7% specificity), while only SUV was predictive for [18F]FCH (82.6% sensitivity and 87.0% specificity). The higher k3 (binding) of [18F]FCH than [18F]DCFPyL explains why [18F]FCH SUV can differentiate tumour from benign tissue within minutes of injection. Superior [18F]DCFPyL tumour contrast was due to the higher k4/k3 (more rapid washout) in benign tissue compared to tumour tissue. CONCLUSIONS: DIL was detected with good sensitivity and specificity using 22-min dynamic [18F]DCFPyL PET and avoids the need for delayed post-injection imaging timepoints. The dissimilar in vivo kinetic behaviour of [18F]DCFPyL and [18F]FCH could explain their different SUV images. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04009174 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) is effective in treating inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but imaging assessment of response after SABR is difficult. This prospective study aimed to develop a predictive model for true pathologic complete response (pCR) to SABR using imaging-based biomarkers from dynamic [18F]FDG-PET and CT Perfusion (CTP). METHODS: Twenty-six patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SABR followed by surgical resection were included, as a pre-specified secondary analysis of a larger study. Dynamic [18F]FDG-PET and CTP were performed pre-SABR and 8-week post. Dynamic [18F]FDG-PET provided maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUV) and kinetic parameters estimated using a previously developed flow-modified two-tissue compartment model while CTP measured blood flow, blood volume and vessel permeability surface product. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to establish a predictive model with the measured PET and CTP imaging biomarkers for predicting pCR. The model was compared to current RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1) and PERCIST (PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.0) criteria. RESULTS: RPA identified three response groups based on tumour blood volume before SABR (BVpre-SABR) and change in SUVmax (ΔSUVmax), the thresholds being BVpre-SABR = 9.3 mL/100 g and ΔSUVmax = - 48.9%. The highest true pCR rate of 92% was observed in the group with BVpre-SABR < 9.3 mL/100 g and ΔSUVmax < - 48.9% after SABR while the worst was observed in the group with BVpre-SABR ≥ 9.3 mL/100 g (0%). RPA model achieved excellent pCR prediction (Concordance: 0.92; P = 0.03). RECIST and PERCIST showed poor pCR prediction (Concordance: 0.54 and 0.58, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed a predictive model based on dynamic [18F]FDG-PET and CT Perfusion imaging that was significantly better than RECIST and PERCIST criteria to predict pCR of NSCLC to SABR. The model used BVpre-SABR and ΔSUVmax which correlates to tumour microvessel density and cell proliferation, respectively and warrants validation with larger sample size studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: MISSILE-NSCLC, NCT02136355 (ClinicalTrials.gov). Registered May 8, 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02136355.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Imagem de Perfusão/métodos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the diagnostic capacity of dynamic fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and dual-time-point (DTP) PET/CT to explore the optimal scan timing for nodal staging in lung cancer. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with lung cancer underwent dynamic and consecutive DTP PET/CT scans. Two readers visually evaluated FDG uptake within each lymph node (LN) and pulmonary artery (metastatic LN: n = 10; nonmetastatic LN: n = 121). For each dynamic and DTP scan, we compared the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the retention index of the SUVmax (RI-SUVmax) between metastatic and nonmetastatic LNs. We compared the diagnostic capacity of the dynamic and DTP scans using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. RESULTS: In the visual analyses of LN metastases, a sensitivity of 20.0-60.0% and specificity of 97.5-100.0% were identified for the first to third dynamic scans. The sensitivity of the 1-h early and 2-h delayed scans was 80.0% and 90.0%, respectively, whereas the specificity was 66.9% and 47.9%, respectively. The visual analysis of the dynamic second phase had the highest accuracy. Semiquantitative analyses revealed that the SUVmax was significantly higher for metastatic LNs than for nonmetastatic LNs in the dynamic second and third phases and the 1-h early and 2-h delayed phases (p < 0.05 for all). The RI-SUVmax was higher in metastatic LNs than in nonmetastatic LNs for the dynamic scan (p = 0.004) and the DTP scan (p = 0.002). The ROC analyses showed that SUV2 and SUV3 had higher performances with high specificity, high negative predictive value, and high accuracy than the other parameters. The area under the ROC curve of the RI-SUV-dual-time-point had the highest value (0.794) without any significant differences between the area under the ROC curves for all parameters (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the visual and semiquantitative analyses, 18F-FDG dynamic PET/CT exhibited excellent performance with extremely high specificity in the dynamic second phase.