Effect of esketamine on the ED50 of propofol for successful insertion of ureteroscope in elderly male patients: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is effective and used as a kind of routine anesthetics in procedure sedative anesthesia (PSA) for ureteroscopy. However, respiratory depression and unconscious physical activity always occur during propofol-based PSA, especially in elderly patients. Esketamine has sedative and analgesic effects but without risk of cardiorespiratory depression. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether esketamine can reduce the propofol median effective dose (ED50) for successful ureteroscope insertion in elderly male patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 49 elderly male patients undergoing elective rigid ureteroscopy were randomly divided into two groups: SK Group (0.25 mg/kg esketamine+propofol) and SF Group (0.1 µg/kg sufentanil+propofol). Patients in both two groups received propofol with initial bolus dose of 1.5 mg/kg after sufentanil or esketamine was administered intravenously. The effective dose of propofol was assessed by a modified Dixon's up-and-down method and then was adjusted with 0.1 mg/kg according to the previous patient response. Patients' response to ureteroscope insertion was classified as "movement" or "no movement". The primary outcome was the ED50 of propofol for successful ureteroscope insertion with esketamine or sufentanil. The secondary outcomes were the induction time, adverse events such as hemodynamic changes, hypoxemia and body movement were also measured. RESULT: 49 patients were enrolled and completed this study. The ED50 of propofol for successful ureteroscope insertion in SK Group was 1.356 ± 0.11 mg/kg, which was decreased compared with that in SF Group, 1.442 ± 0.08 mg/kg (P = 0.003). The induction time in SK Group was significantly shorter than in SF Group (P = 0.001). In SK Group, more stable hemodynamic variables were observed than in SF Group. The incidence of AEs between the two groups was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The ED50 of propofol with esketamine administration for ureteroscope insertion in elderly male patients is 1.356 ± 0.11 mg/kg, significantly decreased in comparsion with sufentanil. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No: ChiCTR2300077170. Registered on 1 November 2023. Prospective registration. http://www.chictr.org.cn .

ED50 of ciprofol combined with sufentanil for fiberoptic bronchoscopy of different patient populations with pulmonary tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Ciprofol is a promising sedative. This study aims to explore the median effective dose (ED50) of ciprofol in inhibiting responses to fiberoptic bronchoscopy in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) of different genders and ages when combined with 0.15 µg/kg sufentanil, and to evaluate its efficacy and safety, providing a reference for the rational use of ciprofol in clinical practice. METHODS: PTB patients who underwent bronchoscopy examination and treatment at The Third People's Hospital of Changzhou between May 2023 and June 2023 were selected and divided into four groups using a stratified random method. All patients received intravenous injection of 0.15 µg/kg sufentanil followed by injection of the test dose of ciprofol according to Dixon's up-and-down method. The initial dose of ciprofol in all four groups was 0.4 mg/kg, with an adjacent ratio of 1:1.1. The next patient received a 10% increase in the dose of ciprofol if the previous patient in the same group experienced positive reactions such as choking cough, frowning, and body movements during the endoscopy. Otherwise, it was judged as a negative reaction, and the next patient received a 10% decrease in the dose of ciprofol. The transition from a positive reaction to a negative reaction was defined as a turning point, and the study of the group was terminated when seven turning points occurred. Hemodynamic parameters, oxygen saturation and adverse reactions were recorded at different time points in all groups. The Probit regression analysis method was used to calculate the ED50 of ciprofol in the four groups and compare between the groups. RESULTS: The ED50 of ciprofol combined with 0.15 µg/kg sufentanil for bronchoscopy in the four groups were 0.465 mg/kg, 0.433 mg/kg, 0.420 mg/kg and 0.396 mg/kg, respectively. CONCLUSION: The ED50 of ciprofol used for fiberoptic bronchoscopy varied among PTB patients of different genders and ages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300071508, Registered on 17 May 2023.

The 50% effective dose of hydromorphone and morphine for epidural analgesia in the hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind, sequential dose-finding study.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have showed that epidural morphine can be used as a complement to local anesthetics for analgesia after postcesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, there is little known about the analgesic dosage of epidural morphine and hydromorphone for hemorrhoidectomy. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the potency ratio of hydromorphone to epidural morphine as well as effective analgesic dose for 50% patients (ED50) undergoing elective hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: 80 patients under elective hemorrhoidectomy with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia(CSEA) in department of anesthesia, Dongguan Tungwah hospital. To assess the ED50, patients were treated with epidural morphine or epidural hydromorphone randomly using a biased coin method-determined dose with a sequential allocation procedure. Following surgery, standardized multimodal analgesia was administered to all patients. A pain response score of ≤ 3 (on a scale of 0-10) was determined to be the effective dose after 24 h following CSEA. The ED50 in both groups were determined using the probit regression and isotonic regression method. We also measured pain intensity by patient interview using a 10 point verbal numeric rating scale prospectively at 6, 12 and 24 h after CSEA, and adverse effects were also noted. RESULTS: The ED50 was 0.350 mg (95% CI, 0.259-0.376 mg) in hydromorphone group and 1.129 mg (95% CI, 0.903-1.187 mg) in morphine group, respectively, estimated by isotonic regression method. Regression analysis with the probit, the ED50 of epidural hydromorphone was 0.366 mg (95% CI, 0.276-0.388 mg) and epidural morphine was 1.138 mg (95% CI, 0.910-1.201 mg). Exploratory findings showed that there was no difference between the most frequent dosages of epidural hydromorphone or epidural morphine in the occurrence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus. When administered with epidural opioids at ED50 doses or higher, 97.5% (39/40) of epidural morphine patients and 97.5% (39/40) epidural hydromorphone of patients were satisfied with their analgesia. CONCLUSION: Effective hemorrhoidectomy analgesia requires a 3:1 ratio of epidural morphine to epidural hydromorphone. Both drugs provide excellent patient satisfaction.

Optimizing nicardipine dosage for effective control of pituitrin-induced hypertension in laparoscopic myomectomy undergoing total intravenous anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) of nicardipine for treating pituitrin-induced hypertension during laparoscopic myomectomy, providing guidance for the management of intraoperative blood pressure in such patients. METHODS: Among the initial 40 participants assessed, 24 underwent elective laparoscopic myomectomy. A sequential up-and-down method was employed to ascertain the ED50 of nicardipine based on its antihypertensive efficacy. Nicardipine was initially administered at 6 µg/kg following the diagnosis of pituitrin-induced hypertension in the first patient. Dosing adjustments were made to achieve the desired antihypertensive effect, restoring systolic blood pressure and heart rate to within ± 20% of baseline within 120 s. The dosing increment or reduction was set at 0.5 µg/kg for effective or ineffective responses, respectively. The ED50 and ED95 of nicardipine were calculated using Probit regression by Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) to establish dose-response curves and confidence intervals. RESULTS: 24 patients were included for analysis finally. The ED50 and ED95 of nicardipine for blood pressure control after pituitrin injection were determined. The study found that the ED50 of nicardipine for treating pituitrin-induced hypertension was 4.839 µg/kg (95% CI: 4.569-5.099 µg/kg), and the ED95 was estimated at 5.308 µg/kg (95% CI: 5.065-6.496 µg/kg). Nicardipine effectively mitigated the hypertensive response caused by pituitrin without inducing significant tachycardia or hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Nicardipine effectively controlled blood pressure after pituitrin injection during laparoscopic myomectomy, with ED50 and ED95 values established. This research highlights the potential utility of nicardipine in addressing hypertensive responses induced by pituitrin, particularly in clinical settings where pituitrin is routinely administered.

Minimum effective dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean section with and without prophylactic norepinephrine infusion: Randomized triple-blinded trial.

Background and Aims: Vasopressor usage can affect the rostral spread of intrathecal drug and, hence, its requirement during cesarean delivery. Although a decreased spread is evidenced with phenylephrine, there is no data for norepinephrine usage. The present study aimed to evaluate the minimum effective dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean section with and without prophylactic norepinephrine infusion. Material and Methods: Patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural block were randomized to receive intravenous infusion of norepinephrine (0.05 µg/kg/min) or normal saline (placebo), initiated immediately after intrathecal injection. Postspinal hypotension in either group (systolic arterial pressure ≤0.8 baseline) was treated with norepinephrine 4 µg rescue. Dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) was decided for individual patients using up-and-down sequential allocation method. Primary outcome measure was the minimum effective dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) defined as ED50, while secondary observations included spinal block characteristics and neonatal outcomes. Results: Demographic parameters were statistically similar between both groups (P > 0.05). ED50 of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine was 7.8 mg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7-8.8) and 7.4 mg (95% CI: 6.1-8.7) for normal saline and norepinephrine group respectively (P = 0.810). Block characteristics were similar between both groups as was neonatal APGAR score, but umbilical artery base excess was greater for norepinephrine versus normal saline group (-4.4 ± 3.6 vs. -6.5 ± 2.4, P = 0.038). Conclusion: Use of prophylactic norepinephrine (0.05 µg/kg/min) during cesarean delivery does not require adjustment of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine.

The ED50 and ED95 of esketamine for preventing early postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, double-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to estimate the safety, efficacy, and median effective dose (ED50) of esketamine for preventing early postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: 54 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were prospectively randomized into two groups (group C and group E). Different doses of esketamine were intravenously administered before the skin incision in Group E. The patients in group C received the same dose of saline at the same time. General population characteristics were recorded. The median effective dose (ED50) and 95% effective dose (ED95) were calculated using Dixon's up-and-down method. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored, and pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale. We also recorded the condition of anesthesia recovery period and postoperative adverse reactions. RESULTS: The ED50 of esketamine for preventing early postoperative pain was 0.301 mg/kg (95%CI: 0.265-0.342 mg/kg), and the ED95 was 0.379 mg/kg (95%CI: 0.340-0.618 mg/kg), calculated by probability unit regression. Heart rate (HR) was significantly lower in the esketamine group compared to the control at the skin incision (p < 0.05). The total VAS score at resting was significantly lower in the esketamine group compared to the control group during the awakening period (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the incidence of adverse reactions (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, esketamine can prevent early postoperative pain effectively. The ED50 and ED95 of esketamine for controlling early postoperative pain were 0.301 mg/kg and 0.379 mg/kg, respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2200066663, 13/12/2022.

Median effective dose of esketamine for intranasal premedication in children with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Esketamine is commonly used as a premedication for its sedation effect. However, the proper dosage for intranasal use in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) has not been determined. This study aimed to estimate the median effective dose (ED50) of esketamine for intranasal premedication in children with CHD. METHODS: Thirty-four children with CHD who needed premedication in March 2021 were enrolled. Intranasal esketamine was initiated at a dose of 1 mg/kg. Based on the outcome of sedation in the previous patient, the dose for the subsequent patient was either increased or reduced by 0.1 mg/kg, which was adjusted between each child. Successful sedation was defined as a Ramsay Sedation Scale score ≥ 3 and Parental Separation Anxiety Scale score ≤ 2. The required ED50 of esketamine was calculated using the modified sequential method. Non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate, saturation of peripheral oxygen, sedation onset time, and adverse reactions were recorded at 5 min intervals after drug administration. RESULTS: The 34 children enrolled had a mean age of 22.5 ± 16.4 (4-54) months and a mean weight of 11.2 ± 3.6 (5.5-20.5) kg; American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I-III. The ED50 of intranasal S(+)-ketamine (esketamine) required for preoperative sedation in pediatric patients with CHD was 0.7 (95% confidence interval: 0.54-0.86) mg/kg, and the mean sedation onset time was 16.39 ± 7.24 min. No serious adverse events, such as respiratory distress, nausea, and vomiting were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The ED50 of intranasal esketamine was 0.7 mg/kg, which was safe and effective for preoperative sedation in pediatric patients with CHD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Network (ChiCTR2100044551) on 24/03/2021.

Effect of pre-use of Dexmedetomidine on the effective inhibitory dose of remimazolam tosilate on positive cardiovascular response in double-lumen endobronchial intubation: a clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Herein, the effect of pre-use of Dexmedetomidine(Dex) on the half-effective dose (ED50) and 95%-effective dose (ED95) of Remimazolam tosilate(RT) in inhibiting the positive cardiovascular response(CR) which means blood pressure or heart rate rises above a critical threshold induced by double-lumen bronchial intubation was evaluated. METHODS: Patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery were divided into groups A (0), B (0.5 µg/kg), and C (1 µg/kg) based on different Dex doses. Group A included subgroups comprising young (A-Y) and elderly (A-O) patients. Neither groups B nor C included elderly patients due of the sedative effect of Dex. Based on the previous subject's CR, the dose of RT was increased or decreased in the next patient using the sequential method. This trial would be terminated when the seventh crossover occurred, at which point the sample size met the stable estimate of the target dose. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored throughout the trial, and sedation was assessed using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale. HR and MAP were recorded at baseline (T1), the end of Dex (T2), and the end of RT (T3), the maximum HR and MAP were recorded within 3 min of intubation from beginning to end (T4). There was a positive CR when the T4 levels rose above 15% of the baseline. The ED50/ED95 and corresponding confidence interval were calculated using probability regression. RESULTS: In total, 114 patients completed the trial. Without the use of Dex, the ED50/ED95 of TR inhibiting the positive CR caused by double-lumen bronchial intubation was 0.198/0.227 and 0.155/0.181 mg/kg in groups A-Y and A-O, respectively. The changes in vital signs from T1 to T3 were similar in the subgroups, indicating that the elderly patients were more sensitive to the dose of RT. The ED50/ED95 of RT inhibiting the positive CR caused by double-lumen endobronchial intubation was 0.122/0.150 and 0.068/0.084 mg/kg in groups B and C, respectively. And, the fluctuation of blood pressure from T3 to T4 was reduced by using Dex. RT was 100% effective in sedation with no significant inhibition of circulation. Apart from one case of hypotension occurred in group A-Y, two cases of low HR in group B, and one case of low HR in group C, no other adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal dose of RT to inhibit positive CR induced by double-lumen bronchial intubation in elderly patients was 0.18 mg/kg and 0.23 mg/kg in younger patients. When the pre-use dose of Dex was 0.5 µg/kg, the optimal dose to inhibit positive CR of RT was 0.15 mg/kg. And, when the pre-use dose of Dex was 1 µg/kg, the optimal dose of RT was 0.9 mg/kg. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05631028.

Effect of intravenous lidocaine on the ED50 of propofol for inserting gastroscope without body movement in adult patients: a randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Circulatory and respiratory depression are common problems that occur in propofol alone sedation during gastroscopy. As a widely used analgesic adjuvant, intravenous lidocaine can reduce the consumption of propofol during Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or colonoscopy. However, it is still unknown the median effective dose (ED50) of propofol when combined with lidocaine intravenously. This study aimed to compare the ED50 of propofol with or without intravenous lidocaine for inserting gastrointestinal endoscope successfully. METHODS: Fifty nine patients undergoing gastroscopy or gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy were randomly divided into control group (Group C, normal saline + propofol) or lidocaine group (Group L, lidocaine + propofol). Patients were initially injected a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine in Group L, whereas equivalent volume of 0.9% saline in Group C. Anaesthesia was then induced with a single bolus of propofol in all subjects. The induction dose of propofol was determined by the modified Dixon's up-and-down method, and the initial dose was 1.5 mg/kg in both groups. The primary outcome was the ED50 of propofol induction dose with or without intravenous lidocaine. The secondary outcomes were the induction time, the first propofol bolus time (FPBT: from MOAA/S score ≤ 1 to first rescue bolus propofol), and adverse events (AEs: hypoxemia, bradycardia, hypotension, and body movements). RESULTS: Totally, 59 patients were enrolled and completed this study. The ED50 of propofol combined with lidocaine was 1.68 ± 0.11 mg/kg, significantly reduced compared with the normal saline group, 1.88 ± 0.13 mg/kg (P = 0.002). There was no statistical difference in induction time (P = 0.115) and the FPBT (P = 0.655) between the two groups. There was no significantly difference about the AEs between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The ED50 of propofol combined with intravenous lidocaine for successful endoscope insertion in adult patients, was 1.68 ± 0.11 mg/kg significantly reduced compared with the control group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No: ChiCTR2200059450. Registered on 29 April 2022. Prospective registration. http://www.chictr.org.cn .

Median Effective Dose of Lidocaine for the Prevention of Pain Caused by the Injection of Propofol Formulated with Medium- and Long-Chain Triglycerides Based on Lean Body Weight.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the median effective dose (ED50) of prophylactic intravenous lidocaine for the prevention of propofol medium-chain triglyceride/long-chain triglyceride (MCT/LCT) emulsion injection pain. DESIGN: Prospective trial, Dixon up-and-down sequential method. SETTING: Operating room of a single hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty patients aged 18-65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I or II who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia (GA) were included. INTERVENTIONS: The initial dose of prophylactic lidocaine before propofol MCT/LCT emulsion injection was set at 0.5 mg/kg lean body weight (LBW). The lidocaine dose was adjusted according to the degree of patients' injection pain using the Dixon up-and-down sequential method. MEASUREMENTS: The ED50 and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of lidocaine were calculated using the Dixon-Massey formula. Vital signs and adverse effects were recorded. In the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), patients were asked if they recalled feeling any injection pain with visual analog scale (VAS) evaluation. RESULTS: The ED50 of lidocaine for the prevention of propofol MCT/LCT emulsion injection pain was 0.306 mg/kg LBW (95% CI, 0.262-0.357 mg/kg LBW). No adverse reactions to lidocaine occurred. In the PACU, 90.9% of patients who experienced injection pain recalled this pain (VAS score, 2.8±1.8). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic intravenous lidocaine (0.306 mg/kg LBW) effectively prevented propofol MCT/LCT emulsion injection pain in 50% of patients scheduled for elective surgery under GA with no adverse reaction occurring.

Effect of intravenous administration of lidocaine on the ED50 of propofol induction dose during gastroscopy in adult patients: A randomized, controlled study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Propofol provides a prominent sedation effect in gastroscopy. However, sedation with propofol alone during gastroscopy might result in circulatory and respiratory depression. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the addition of intravenous lidocaine to propofol-based sedation could decrease the ED50 of propofol induction dose during gastroscopy in adult patients while the respiratory and haemodynamic stability were not compromised. METHODS: Patients undergoing gastroscopy were randomly enrolled into lidocaine + propofol (L + P) group or normal saline + propofol (NS + P) group. Subjects were initially administered intravenous bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine in L + P group or equivalent volume of 0.9% saline in NS + P group. Anaesthesia was then induced with a single bolus of 1.0 µg sufentanil followed by injection of propofol in all patients. The induction dose of propofol for each individual patient was determined by the protocol of Dixon "up-and-down" method for both groups. The primary end point was the ED50 of propofol induction dose. RESULTS: Totally, 48 patients were enrolled and completed this study. Compared with the NS + P group, the ED50 of propofol induction dose was significantly reduced in the L + P group (2.01 mg/kg vs. 1.69 mg/kg) (U = 61.5, p < 0.001). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The addition of intravenous lidocaine significantly reduced the ED50 of propofol induction dose during gastroscopy in adult patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The present clinical trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn/ (registration No. ChiCTR1900024025, 23 June 2019).

The median effective dose (ED50) of cis-Atracurium for laryngeal mask airway insertion during general Anaesthesia for patients undergoing urinary surgery.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, the laryngeal mask airway is an easy-to-use supraglottic airway device. However, the cis-atracurium dosage for laryngeal mask insertion has not been standardised. We aimed to determine the optimal dose of cis-atracurium using a sequential method for successful laryngeal mask insertion. METHODS: The cohort study protocol is registered at clinicaltrial.gov (NCT-03668262). Twenty-three patients undergoing elective urinary surgery were sequentially administered cis-atracurium doses as follows: 150, 100, 70, 50, 30, and 20 µg·kg- 1. The main outcome involved the determination of the response to laryngeal mask airway insertion: ≥16 points and < 16 points indicated "satisfactory" and "unsatisfactory" responses, respectively. The median effective dose was estimated using the mean of the seven crossovers from "satisfactory" and "unsatisfactory" responses. The primary outcome involved the determination of the median effective dose (ED50) of cis-atracurium for laryngeal mask airway insertion. RESULTS: The median effective dose of cis-atracurium was 26.5 µg·kg- 1 (95% CI 23.6-29.8) using the sequential method. Heart rate was decreased in the 50 µg·kg- 1 group compared to that in the 30 µg·kg- 1 group at timepoints T7, T8, and T10 (P = 0.0482, P = 0.0460, and P = 0.0236, respectively), but no difference was observed in the 20 µg·kg- 1 group. Systolic blood pressure was decreased in the 50 µg·kg- 1 group compared to that in the 20 µg·kg- 1 group at timepoints T2, T3, and T4 (P = 0.0159, P = 0.0233, and P = 0.0428, respectively). The train-of-four value was significantly lower in the 50 µg·kg- 1 group than in the 30 µg·kg- 1 group at timepoint T3 (P = 0.0326). CONCLUSIONS: The ED50 of cis-atracurium was 26.5 µg·kg- 1 for laryngeal mask airway insertion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov Registry, NCT03668262, Registered on 11 September 2018.

Effect and mechanism of citral against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Citral is an active component of many plant extracts, and it is a safe additive used in food and cosmetics. A previous study showed that citral has a good antibacterial effect against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro, but its in vivo anti-infective activity has not been studied. Anti-MRSA activity and the preliminary mechanism of citral against MRSA were investigated in MRSA-infected KM mice. The ED50 was calculated using Karber's method. Groups were selected for inflammatory and oxidative stress level tests, and lung and liver tissues were counterstained with HE for detection of pathological changes. Cytokines and oxidative factors were evaluated using the ELISA method (one-way ANOVA computed using SPSS 19.0.). RESULTS: With the increase in the concentration of citral, the survival rate of MRSA-infected mice increased accordingly. The ED50 values of citral for intramuscular injection and intragastric administration were 0.09 and 0.26 g kg-1 respectively. Citral significantly reduced cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α) and oxidative factors (malondialdehyde and hydroxyl radicals) of MRSA-infected mice, whereas it increased gluthtione and superoxide dismutase levels. Citral can reduce the lung inflammatory infiltrates infected by MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: Citral exerted a dose-dependent anti-MRSA effect and ameliorated MRSA-induced abnormal changes in inflammation and oxidative stress. This indicates that citral has the potential for development as a new anti-MRSA drug. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.

The pharmacodynamic and clinical trial evidence for statin dose.

Statin doses around estimated effective dose 50 (ED50) can reduce myocardial infarction by over 25% and mortality by around 10%. Being a competitive enzyme inhibitor, statin efficacy plateaus at doses that are multiples above the ED50, whilst on- and off-target adverse events increase in number and severity with increasing dose. For example, myopathy has been shown to increase by up to 29-fold and liver dysfunction by up to nine-fold as statin dose is increased. Doses of up to 40-fold ED50 have been promoted, but above five-fold ED50, for example 10 mg of atorvastatin, there is no randomized controlled clinical trial evidence that coronary mortality is lowered, or that survival is increased.

Ligustrazine Enhances the Hypnotic and Analgesic Effect of Ketamine in Mice.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of different concentrations of ligustrazine, an extract from Chinese herb, on ketamine requirement for hypnosis and analgesia in mice. In the hypnotic response study, mice were randomly allocated to receive saline or ligustrazine at 10, 20, 40, 80 or 160 mg·kg-1 by intraperitoneal injection. Ketamine was administrated 15 min after ligustrazine injection. The hypnotic response was determined by assessing loss of the righting reflex (LORR) after ketamine injection. The dose of ketamine was determined by modified Dixon's up-and-down method in each group. In the analgesia study, different doses of ligustrazine were administrated 15 min before 50 mg·kg-1 ketamine injection. The analgesia effects (pain threshold) were determined by heat radiation-induced tail-flick latency and evaluated before ligustrazine administration or 5, 15, 30 and 60 min after ketamine administration. The ED50 [95% confidence interval (CI)] for hypnosis induced by ketamine was 54.1 (44.8, 65.3) mg·kg-1. Ligustrazine dose-dependently decreased the ED50 for ketamine to induce hypnosis, which was [31.6 (26.2, 38.1)] mg·kg-1 with the addition of 80 mg·kg-1 ligustrazine and [27.7 (22.6, 33.7)] mg·kg-1 with the addition of 160 mg·kg-1 ligustrazine, respectively (p<0.05). Ligustrazine at 160 mg·kg-1 also increased pain threshold in the presence of ketamine. Ligustrazine enhanced the hypnotic effect of ketamine in a dose-dependent manner. Ligustrazine at a large dose also increased the analgesic effect of ketamine.

Evaluation of Mentha arvensis essential oil and its major constituents for fungitoxicity.

Essential oil and major constituents of menthe were evaluated for fungicidal activities. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) of essential oil from leaves of Mentha arvensis cv. CIM-Saryu revealed that menthol was found in highest amount (77.94%) followed by isomenthone (5.24%), neomenthyl acetate (5.18%) and menthone (5.00%). Menthol and menthone were extracted from the essential oil by column chromatography. Essential oil, menthol and menthone were screened for their fungicidal activity against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium moniliforme. Menthol was highly effective as compared to essential oil as well as menthone. All of them exhibited less activity than standard bavistin at all the tested concentrations.

Effects of chlorpyrifos on soil carboxylesterase activity at an aggregate-size scale.

The impact of pesticides on extracellular enzyme activity has been mostly studied on the bulk soil scale, and our understanding of the impact on an aggregate-size scale remains limited. Because microbial processes, and their extracellular enzyme production, are dependent on the size of soil aggregates, we hypothesized that the effect of pesticides on enzyme activities is aggregate-size specific. We performed three experiments using an Andisol to test the interaction between carboxylesterase (CbE) activity and the organophosphorus (OP) chlorpyrifos. First, we compared esterase activity among aggregates of different size spiked with chlorpyrifos (10mgkg-1 wet soil). Next, we examined the inhibition of CbE activity by chlorpyrifos and its metabolite chlorpyrifos-oxon in vitro to explore the aggregate size-dependent affinity of the pesticides for the active site of the enzyme. Lastly, we assessed the capability of CbEs to alleviate chlorpyrifos toxicity upon soil microorganisms. Our principal findings were: 1) CbE activity was significantly inhibited (30-67% of controls) in the microaggregates (<0.25mm size) and smallest macroaggregates (<1.0 - 0.25mm), but did not change in the largest macroaggregates (>1.0mm) compared with the corresponding controls (i.e., pesticide-free aggregates), 2) chlorpyrifos-oxon was a more potent CbE inhibitor than chlorpyrifos; however, no significant differences in the CbE inhibition were found between micro- and macroaggregates, and 3) dose-response relationships between CbE activity and chlorpyrifos concentrations revealed the capability of the enzyme to bind chlorpyrifos-oxon, which was dependent on the time of exposure. This chemical interaction resulted in a safeguarding mechanism against chlorpyrifos-oxon toxicity on soil microbial activity, as evidenced by the unchanged activity of dehydrogenase and related extracellular enzymes in the pesticide-treated aggregates. Taken together, these results suggest that environmental risk assessments of OP-polluted soils should consider the fractionation of soil in aggregates of different size to measure the CbE activity, and other potential soil enzyme activities.

Identifying a rapid bolus dose of dexmedetomidine (ED50) with acceptable hemodynamic outcomes in children.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is a highly sensitive, specific α2 adrenoceptor agonist with anxiolytic, sedative, and analgesic effects. Administration is recommended as a loading dose infused over 10 min. Clinical experience and a previous study suggested a shorter time frame might be used without causing adverse hemodynamic effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine the dexmedetomidine dose that can be given as a rapid 5 s bolus to healthy children during total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) without causing significant hemodynamic effects. METHODS: ASA I-II children, aged 5-9 years, having elective surgery under TIVA were recruited. The up-and-down sequential study design was employed to determine the effective dose of dexmedetomidine, starting at 0.3 mcg·kg(-1) with 0.1 mcg·kg(-1) intervals, which caused no hemodynamic response in half the subjects (ED50). Positive responses were defined as mean blood pressure (MAP) and/or heart rate (HR) changes ≥30% from baseline. Three parametric estimators and one nonparametric estimator were used to determine the ED50. RESULTS: Twenty-one subjects with median age 7.1 (range 5.4-9.5) years and median weight 23.6 (range 16.2-36.7) kg were recruited. A maximum median HR decrease of 20 b·min(-1) occurred at 50 s and a maximum median MAP increase of 12.5 mmHg occurred at 100 s after bolus dose administration. Fifteen subjects (71%) had a HR <60 b·min(-1) while one subject had a HR <40 b·min(-1) (minimum 35 b·min(-1)) for 60 s following the dexmedetomidine bolus. Four estimators led to an ED50 estimate for dexmedetomidine of 0.49 mcg·kg(-1) [95% CI 0.26-0.80 mcg·kg(-1)]. CONCLUSION: The ED50 of dexmedetomidine administered over 5 s without significant hemodynamic compromise is 0.49 mcg·kg(-1). Further work is needed to determine the 'safe' (ED5 or less) and effective dose for desired perioperative clinical outcomes.

Dose requirements of remifentanil for intubation in nonparalyzed Chinese children.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for intubation combined with propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children. METHODS: Forty-seven American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I children aged 4-11 years weighing 14-33.5 kg underwent general anesthesia with 2.5 mg·kg(-1) of intravenous propofol followed by remifentanil in Wenzhou, China. The initial dose of remifentanil was 2.5 µg·kg(-1) injected over 60 s. Intubation was attempted 30 s after the completion of remifentanil injection. Level of difficulty to intubate was graded on a scoring system. If the initial intubation condition was deemed satisfactory, subsequent remifentanil doses were decreased by 0.25 µg·kg(-1). If the intubating condition was deemed unsatisfactory, subsequent remifentanil doses were increased by 0.25 µg·kg(-1). Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and pulse oximetry were documented before and after induction, immediately after intubation, and 1 min after intubation. RESULTS: The ED50 of remifentanil used to render a satisfactory intubating condition used in combination with 2.5 mg·kg(-1) of propofol in nonparalyzed Chinese children was 2.30 µg·kg(-1) (95% confidence interval: 2.28-2.31 µg·kg(-1)), and the ED95 is 2.75 µg·kg(-1) (95% confidence interval: 2.59-3.35 µg·kg(-1)). These doses were lower than previously reported. CONCLUSION: When used in combination with 2.5 mg·kg(-1) of intravenous propofol, ED50 and ED95 of remifentanil for adequate intubation in nonparalyzed children were lower than previously reported, at 2.30 and 2.75 µg·kg(-1), respectively.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on sevoflurane requirement for 50% excellent tracheal intubation in children: a randomized, double-blind comparison.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of two dexmedetomidine bolus and infusion combinations on the amount of sevoflurane required to produce 50% excellent tracheal intubation conditions (ED50 TI). METHODS: In a prospective, double-blinded parallel, randomized manner, 60 children (ASA I or II, age 3-8 years) undergoing elective surgery were allocated to one of three groups: saline only (group D0 ), a bolus dose of 1.0 µg·kg(-1) dexmedetomidine followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 µg·kg(-1) ·h(-1) (group D1 ), or a bolus dose of 2.0 µg·kg(-1) dexmedetomidine followed by a continuous infusion of 1.0 µg·kg(-1) ·h(-1) (group D2 ). Each bolus dose of dexmedetomidine was infused over 10 min, after which a dexmedetomidine infusion and 5% sevoflurane were immediately begun, with sevoflurane subsequently adjusted to target specific values determined according to Dixon's up-and-down method. After the target concentration of sevoflurane was maintained stable for 15 min, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were performed. Intubation was considered excellent only if all subcomponents of the intubation score were rated excellent. Patient enrollment continued until there were six pairs of consecutive patients in which not excellent tracheal intubation conditions were followed by excellent conditions. RESULTS: The ED50 TI of sevoflurane in group D2 (1.41 ± 0.07%) was significantly lower than in group D1 (2.36 ± 0.16%; P < 0.001), the latter being significantly lower than in group D0 (3.52 ± 0.21%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine infusion produced a dose-dependent decrease in the ED50 TI of sevoflurane in children.