Real-time venography-guided extrathoracic puncture technique for cardiovascular implantable electronic device implantation.

Central venous access is an essential technique for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, and the use of axillary vein approach has recently been increasing. This study sought to examine whether real-time venography-guided extrathoracic puncture facilitates the procedure. We retrospectively analyzed 179 consecutive patients who underwent CIED implantation using the axillary vein puncture method. Patients were divided into two groups: the conventional method group (CG, n = 107) and the real-time venography-guided group (RG, n = 82). The application of real-time venography was at the discretion of individual operators. Operators with experience of less than 50 CIED implantations were defined as inexperienced operators in this study. Puncture duration and number of attempts were significantly less in the RG group than in the CG group (283 ± 198 vs. 421 ± 361 s, p < 0.01, and 3.19 ± 2.00 vs. 4.18 ± 2.85, p < 0.01). These benefits of real-time venography were observed in inexperienced operators, but not in experienced operators. In addition, the success rate without extra attempts at puncture was higher in the RG group (54% vs. 32%, p < 0.01). Although the total amount of contrast medium was higher in the RG group (16.3 ± 4.1 mL vs. 11.9 ± 6.6 mL, p < 0.01), serum levels of creatinine pre- and post-operation were not different in the two groups (p = NS). We concluded that real-time venography is a safe and effective method for axillary vein puncture, especially in inexperienced operators.

Long-term reliability of the defibrillator lead inserted by the extrathoracic subclavian puncture.

BACKGROUND: As the transvenous defibrillator lead is fragile and its failure may cause a life-threatening event, reliable insertion techniques are required. While the extrathoracic puncture has been introduced to avoid subclavian crush syndrome, the reports on the long-term defibrillator lead survival using this approach, especially the comparison with the cephalic cutdown (CD), remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate the long-term survival of the transvenous defibrillator lead inserted by the extrathoracic subclavian puncture (ESCP) compared with CD. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2011, 324 consecutive patients who underwent an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in Hokkaido University Hospital were included. ICD leads were inserted by CD from 1998 to 2003 and by contrast venography-guided ESCP thereafter. Lead failure was defined as a nonphysiologic high-rate oversensing with abnormal lead impedance or highly elevated sensing and pacing threshold. RESULTS: Of 324 patients, CD was used in 37 (11%) and ESCP in 287 patients (89%). During the median follow-up of 6.2 years (IQR:3.2-8.3), 7 leads (2 in CD and 5 leads in ESCP group) failed. All patients with lead failure in ESCP group were implanted with either SJM Riata (n = 1) or Medtronic Fidelis lead (n = 4). Five-year lead survival was 93.8% (CI95%:77.3-98.4%) in CD compared with 99.1% (CI95%:96.6-99.8%) in ESCP group (P = 0.903). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that the use of Fidelis or Riata lead was the strong predictor of the ICD lead failure (HR 13.8, CI95%:2.9-96.5; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast venography-guided extrathoracic puncture ensures the reliable long-term survival in the transvenous defibrillator leads.