[Identifying barriers to screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in general practice: Qualitative study of 14 general practitioners in Paris]. / Identification des freins au dépistage de l'anévrisme de l'aorte abdominale en médecine générale : étude qualitative auprès de 14 médecins généralistes exerçant à Paris.

INTRODUCTION: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a silent pathology with often fatal consequences in case of rupture. AAA screening, recommended in France and many other countries, has shown its effectiveness in reducing specific mortality. However, AAA screening rate remains insufficient. OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers to AAA screening in general practice. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Qualitative study carried out during 2016 among general practitioners based in Paris. RESULTS: Fourteen physicians were included. Most of the barriers were related to the physician: unawareness about AAA and screening recommendations, considering AAA as a secondary question not discussed with the patient, abdominal aorta not included in cardiovascular assessment, no search for a familial history of AAA, AAA considered a question for the specialist, lack of time, lack of training, numerous screenings to propose, oversight. Some barriers are related to the patient: unawareness of the pathology and family history of AAA, refusal, questioning the pertinence of the doctor's comments, failure to respect the care pathway. Others are related to AAA: source of anxiety, low prevalence, rarity of complications. The remaining barriers are related to screening: cost-benefit and risk-benefit ratios, sonographer unavailability, constraint for the patient, overmedicalization. CONCLUSION: Information and training of general practitioners about AAA must be strengthened in order to optimize AAA screening and reduce specific mortality.

[Barriers to referral to pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients from the perspective of general practitioners]. / Identification des freins à la prescription de la réhabilitation respiratoire pour les patients atteints de BPCO en médecine générale.

INTRODUCTION: In spite of recommendations of the highest level of proof (rank A), the respiratory rehabilitation remains very widely sub-prescribed by general practitioners, who are nevertheless in the front line in the care and the follow-up of the patients affected by BPCO. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Semi-qualitative study with the general practitioners installed in the city of Montauban (Tarn-et-Garonne). RESULTS: The rate of answer was 57%. Eighty-six percent of the patients BPCO followed in general medicine have never participated in a respiratory rehabilitation program. Eighty percent of the questioned general practitioners declared not to know the last recommendations of the HAS. A total of 66.7% of the questioned general practitioners considered that prescription of respiratory rehabilitation comes within their remit. Eighty seven percent of the general practitioners declare not to know the existing respiratory programs of rehabilitation in their region. CONCLUSION: The main barrier for prescription of respiratory rehabilitation for patients BPCO in general medicine could be the misunderstanding of the local existing programs. The distribution of existing tools such as the map of the programs of respiratory rehabilitation established by the group Alvéole of the Society of Pneumology of French language (SPLF) could so be a facilitating factor.

Determinants of plasma donation: A review of the literature.

The major contribution of Human Sciences in the understanding of the whole blood donation behavior has been through the study of individuals' motivations and deterrents to donate. However, if whole blood donation has been very widely studied in the last sixty years, we still know very little about plasma donation in voluntary non-remunerated environments. Yet, the need for plasma-derived products has been strongly increasing for some years, and blood collection agencies have to adapt if they want to meet this demand. This article aims to review the main motivations and deterrents to whole blood donation, and to compare them with those that we already know concerning plasma donation. Current evidence shows similarities between both behaviors, but also differences that indicate a need for further research regarding plasma donation.