Tethered agonist exposure in intact adhesion/class B2 GPCRs through intrinsic structural flexibility of the GAIN domain.

Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs)/family B2 GPCRs execute critical tasks during development and the operation of organs, and their genetic lesions are associated with human disorders, including cancers. Exceptional structural aGPCR features are the presence of a tethered agonist (TA) concealed within a GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing (GAIN) domain and their non-covalent heteromeric two-subunit layout. How the TA is poised for activation while maintaining this delicate receptor architecture is central to conflicting signaling paradigms that either involve or exclude aGPCR heterodimer separation. We investigated this matter in five mammalian aGPCR homologs (ADGRB3, ADGRE2, ADGRE5, ADGRG1, and ADGRL1) and demonstrate that intact aGPCR heterodimers exist at the cell surface, that the core TA region becomes unmasked in the cleaved GAIN domain, and that intra-GAIN domain movements regulate the level of tethered agonist exposure, thereby likely controlling aGPCR activity. Collectively, these findings delineate a unifying mechanism for TA-dependent signaling of intact aGPCRs.

7TM domain structures of adhesion GPCRs: what's new and what's missing?

Adhesion-type G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs) have long resisted approaches to resolve the structural details of their heptahelical transmembrane (7TM) domains. Single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has recently produced aGPCR 7TM domain structures for ADGRD1, ADGRG1, ADGRG2, ADGRG3, ADGRG4, ADGRG5, ADGRF1, and ADGRL3. We review the unique properties, including the position and conformation of their activating tethered agonist (TA) and signaling motifs within the 7TM bundle, that the novel structures have helped to identify. We also discuss questions that the kaleidoscope of novel aGPCR 7TM domain structures have left unanswered. These concern the relative positions, orientations, and interactions of the 7TM and GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing (GAIN) domains with one another. Clarifying their interplay remains an important goal of future structural studies on aGPCRs.

GPR114/ADGRG5 is activated by its tethered peptide agonist because it is a cleaved adhesion GPCR.

Family B2 or adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (AGPCRs) are distinguished by variable extracellular regions that contain a modular protease, termed the GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing domain that self-cleaves the receptor into an N-terminal fragment (NTF) and a C-terminal fragment (CTF), or seven transmembrane domain (7TM). The NTF and CTF remain bound after cleavage through noncovalent interactions. NTF binding to a ligand(s) presented by nearby cells, or the extracellular matrix anchors the NTF, such that cell movement generates force to induce NTF/CTF dissociation and expose the AGPCR tethered peptide agonist. The released tethered agonist (TA) binds rapidly to the 7TM orthosteric site to activate signaling. The orphan AGPCR, GPR114 was reported to be uncleaved, yet paradoxically capable of activation by its TA. GPR114 has an identical cleavage site and TA to efficiently cleave GPR56. Here, we used immunoblotting and biochemical assays to demonstrate that GPR114 is a cleaved receptor, and the self-cleavage is required for GPR114 TA-activation of Gs and no other classes of G proteins. Mutagenesis studies defined features of the GPR114 and GPR56 GAINA subdomains that influenced self-cleavage efficiency. Thrombin treatment of protease-activated receptor 1 leader/AGPCR fusion proteins demonstrated that acute decryption of the GPR114/56 TAs activated signaling. GPR114 was found to be expressed in an eosinophilic-like cancer cell line (EoL-1 cells) and endogenous GPR114 was efficiently self-cleaved. Application of GPR114 TA peptidomimetics to EoL-1 cells stimulated cAMP production. Our findings may aid future delineation of GPR114 function in eosinophil cAMP signaling related to migration, chemotaxis, or degranulation.

Unveiling Mechanical Activation: GAIN Domain Unfolding and Dissociation in Adhesion GPCRs.

Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs) have extracellular regions (ECRs) containing GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing (GAIN) domains. The GAIN domain enables the ECR to self-cleave into N- and C-terminal fragments. However, the impact of force on the GAIN domain's conformation, critical for mechanosensitive aGPCR activation, remains unclear. Our study investigated the mechanical stability of GAIN domains in three aGPCRs (B, G, and L subfamilies) at a loading rate of 1 pN/s. We discovered that forces of a few piconewtons can destabilize the GAIN domains. In autocleaved aGPCRs ADGRG1/GPR56 and ADGRL1/LPHN1, these forces cause the GAIN domain detachment from the membrane-proximal Stachel sequence, preceded by partial unfolding. In noncleavable aGPCR ADGRB3/BAI3 and cleavage-deficient mutant ADGRG1/GPR56-T383G, complex mechanical unfolding of the GAIN domain occurs. Additionally, GAIN domain detachment happens during cell migration. Our findings support the mechanical activation hypothesis of aGPCRs, emphasizing the sensitivity of the GAIN domain structure and detachment to physiological force ranges.

GPR125 (ADGRA3) is an autocleavable adhesion GPCR that traffics with Dlg1 to the basolateral membrane and regulates epithelial apicobasal polarity.

The adhesion family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is defined by an N-terminal large extracellular region that contains various adhesion-related domains and a highly-conserved GPCR-autoproteolysis-inducing (GAIN) domain, the latter of which is located immediately before a canonical seven-transmembrane domain. These receptors are expressed widely and involved in various functions including development, angiogenesis, synapse formation, and tumorigenesis. GPR125 (ADGRA3), an orphan adhesion GPCR, has been shown to modulate planar cell polarity in gastrulating zebrafish, but its biochemical properties and role in mammalian cells have remained largely unknown. Here, we show that human GPR125 likely undergoes cis-autoproteolysis when expressed in canine kidney epithelial MDCK cells and human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells. The cleavage appears to occur at an atypical GPCR proteolysis site within the GAIN domain during an early stage of receptor biosynthesis. The products, i.e., the N-terminal and C-terminal fragments, seem to remain associated after self-proteolysis, as observed in other adhesion GPCRs. Furthermore, in polarized MDCK cells, GPR125 is exclusively recruited to the basolateral domain of the plasma membrane. The recruitment likely requires the C-terminal PDZ-domain-binding motif of GPR125 and its interaction with the cell polarity protein Dlg1. Knockdown of GPR125 as well as that of Dlg1 results in formation of aberrant cysts with multiple lumens in Matrigel 3D culture of MDCK cells. Consistent with the multilumen phenotype, mitotic spindles are incorrectly oriented during cystogenesis in GPR125-KO MDCK cells. Thus, the basolateral protein GPR125, an autocleavable adhesion GPCR, appears to play a crucial role in apicobasal polarization in epithelial cells.

Mechanisms of adhesion G protein-coupled receptor activation.

Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (AGPCRs) are a thirty-three-member subfamily of Class B GPCRs that control a wide array of physiological processes and are implicated in disease. AGPCRs uniquely contain large, self-proteolyzing extracellular regions that range from hundreds to thousands of residues in length. AGPCR autoproteolysis occurs within the extracellular GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing (GAIN) domain that is proximal to the N terminus of the G protein-coupling seven-transmembrane-spanning bundle. GAIN domain-mediated self-cleavage is constitutive and produces two-fragment holoreceptors that remain bound at the cell surface. It has been of recent interest to understand how AGPCRs are activated in relation to their two-fragment topologies. Dissociation of the AGPCR fragments stimulates G protein signaling through the action of the tethered-peptide agonist stalk that is occluded within the GAIN domain in the holoreceptor form. AGPCRs can also signal independently of fragment dissociation, and a few receptors possess GAIN domains incapable of self-proteolysis. This has resulted in complex theories as to how these receptors are activated in vivo, complicating pharmacological advances. Currently, there is no existing structure of an activated AGPCR to support any of the theories. Further confounding AGPCR research is that many of the receptors remain orphans and lack identified activating ligands. In this review, we provide a detailed layout of the current theorized modes of AGPCR activation with discussion of potential parallels to mechanisms used by other GPCR classes. We provide a classification means for the ligands that have been identified and discuss how these ligands may activate AGPCRs in physiological contexts.

GAIN domain-mediated cleavage is required for activation of G protein-coupled receptor 56 (GPR56) by its natural ligands and a small-molecule agonist.

Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs) represent a distinct family of GPCRs that regulate several developmental and physiological processes. Most aGPCRs undergo GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing domain-mediated protein cleavage, which produces a cryptic tethered agonist (termed Stachel (stinger)), and cleavage-dependent and -independent aGPCR signaling mechanisms have been described. aGPCR G1 (ADGRG1 or G protein-coupled receptor 56 (GPR56)) has pleiotropic functions in the development of multiple organ systems, which has broad implications for human diseases. To date, two natural GPR56 ligands, collagen III and tissue transglutaminase (TG2), and one small-molecule agonist, 3-α-acetoxydihydrodeoxygedunin (3-α-DOG), have been identified, in addition to a synthetic peptide, P19, that contains seven amino acids of the native Stachel sequence. However, the mechanisms by which these natural and small-molecule agonists signal through GPR56 remain unknown. Here we engineered a noncleavable receptor variant that retains signaling competence via the P19 peptide. We demonstrate that both natural and small-molecule agonists can activate only cleaved GPR56. Interestingly, TG2 required both receptor cleavage and the presence of a matrix protein, laminin, to activate GPR56, whereas collagen III and 3-α-DOG signaled without any cofactors. On the other hand, both TG2/laminin and collagen III activate the receptor by dissociating the N-terminal fragment from its C-terminal fragment, enabling activation by the Stachel sequence, whereas P19 and 3-α-DOG initiate downstream signaling without disengaging the N-terminal fragment from its C-terminal fragment. These findings deepen our understanding of how GPR56 signals via natural ligands, and a small-molecule agonist may be broadly applicable to other aGPCR family members.

Control of Adhesion GPCR Function Through Proteolytic Processing.

Proteolytic processing events in adhesion GPCRs. aGPCRs can undergo multiple autoproteolytic (red asterisks) and proteolytic processing events by exogenous proteases (yellow asterisks) that may be involved in signaling events of the receptors. Proteolytic processing is an unusual property of adhesion family G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs) that was observed upon their cloning and biochemical characterization.Ever since, much effort has been dedicated to delineate the mechanisms and requirements for cleavage events in the control of aGPCR function. Most notably, all aGPCRs possess a juxtamembrane protein fold, the GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing (GAIN) domain, which operates as an autoprotease for many aGPCR homologs investigated thus far. Analysis of its autoproteolytic reaction, the consequences for receptor fate and function, and the allocation of physiological effects to this peculiar feature of aGPCRs has occupied the experimental agenda of the aGPCR field and shaped our current understanding of the signaling properties and cell biological effects of aGPCRs. Interestingly, individual aGPCRs may undergo additional proteolytic steps, one of them resulting in shedding of the entire ectodomain that is secreted and can function independently. Here, we summarize the current state of knowledge on GAIN domain-mediated and GAIN domain-independent aGPCR cleavage events and their significance for the pharmacological and cellular actions of aGPCRs. Further, we compare and contrast the proteolytic profile of aGPCRs with known signaling routes that are governed through proteolysis of surface molecules such as the Notch and ephrin pathways.

Classification, Nomenclature, and Structural Aspects of Adhesion GPCRs.

Representation of the nine distinct aGPCR subfamilies and their unique N-terminal domain architecture. The illustration also shows the extracellular structural feature shared by all aGPCRs (except ADGRA1), known as the GPCR autoproteolysis-inducing (GAIN) domain, that mediates autoproteolysis and subsequent attachment of the cleaved NTF and CTF fragments The adhesion family of G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs) is unique among all GPCR families with long N-termini and multiple domains that are implicated in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Initially, aGPCRs in the human genome were phylogenetically classified into nine distinct subfamilies based on their 7TM sequence similarity. This phylogenetic grouping of genes into subfamilies was found to be in congruence in closely related mammals and other vertebrates as well. Over the years, aGPCR repertoires have been mapped in many species including model organisms, and, currently, there is a growing interest in exploring the pharmacological aspects of aGPCRs. Nonetheless, the aGPCR nomenclature has been highly diverse because experts in the field have used different names for different family members based on their characteristics (e.g., epidermal growth factor-seven-span transmembrane (EGF-TM7)), but without harmonization with regard to nomenclature efforts. In order to facilitate naming of orthologs and other genetic variants in different species in the future, the Adhesion-GPCR Consortium, together with the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification, proposed a unified nomenclature for aGPCRs. Here, we review the classification and the most recent/current nomenclature of aGPCRs and as well discuss the structural topology of the extracellular domain (ECD)/N-terminal fragment (NTF) that is comparable with this 7TM subfamily classification. Of note, we systematically describe the structural domains in the ECD of aGPCR subfamilies and highlight their role in aGPCR-protein interactions.

The adhesion G-protein-coupled receptor mayo/CG11318 controls midgut development in Drosophila.

Adhesion G-protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs) form a large family of cell surface molecules with versatile tasks in organ development. Many aGPCRs still await their functional and pharmacological deorphanization. Here, we characterized the orphan aGPCR CG11318/mayo of Drosophila melanogaster and found it expressed in specific regions of the gastrointestinal canal and anal plates, epithelial specializations that control ion homeostasis. Genetic removal of mayo results in tachycardia, which is caused by hyperkalemia of the larval hemolymph. The hyperkalemic effect can be mimicked by a raise in ambient potassium concentration, while normal potassium levels in mayoKO mutants can be restored by pharmacological inhibition of potassium channels. Intriguingly, hyperkalemia and tachycardia are caused non-cell autonomously through mayo-dependent control of enterocyte proliferation in the larval midgut, which is the primary function of this aGPCR. These findings characterize the ancestral aGPCR Mayo as a homeostatic regulator of gut development.

Structural clarity is brought to adhesion G protein-coupled receptor tethered agonism.

An elusive problem in the adhesion G protein-coupled receptor (AGPCR) field is full understanding of the activation mechanisms of the 33-member receptor class. With the recent solution of active-state structures of nearly one quarter of AGPCRs, clarity has been brought to how AGPCRs are activated in response to endogenous full agonists. AGPCRs are self-activated via a tethered peptide agonist (TA) that transitions from a concealed or encrypted location to a decrypted state that binds to a typical GPCR orthosteric binding pocket. Here, we summarize the key milestones that led to the discovery of the AGPCR TA activation mechanism and discuss how extracellular shear forces may initiate TA decryption in physiological contexts. We compare the new active-state AGPCR structures and note that the orthosteric site-engaged TAs adopt a remarkably similar partial α-helical hook-like conformation, despite divergence of overall receptor similarity. Further, we contrast the TA-bound AGPCR structures to a partially active AGPCR structure to highlight the transitions AGPCRs may undergo during activation. Finally, we provide commentary on the validity of alternative AGPCR activation mechanisms.

Adhesion G protein-coupled receptor gluing action guides tissue development and disease.

Phylogenetic analysis of human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) divides these transmembrane signaling proteins into five groups: glutamate, rhodopsin, adhesion, frizzled, and secretin families, commonly abbreviated as the GRAFS classification system. The adhesion GPCR (aGPCR) sub-family comprises 33 different receptors in humans. Majority of the aGPCRs are orphan receptors with unknown ligands, structures, and tissue expression profiles. They have a long N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD) with several adhesion sites similar to integrin receptors. Many aGPCRs undergo autoproteolysis at the GPCR proteolysis site (GPS), enclosed within the larger GPCR autoproteolysis inducing (GAIN) domain. Recent breakthroughs in aGPCR research have created new paradigms for understanding their roles in organogenesis. They play crucial roles in multiple aspects of organ development through cell signaling, intercellular adhesion, and cell-matrix associations. They are involved in essential physiological processes like regulation of cell polarity, mitotic spindle orientation, cell adhesion, and migration. Multiple aGPCRs have been associated with the development of the brain, musculoskeletal system, kidneys, cardiovascular system, hormone secretion, and regulation of immune functions. Since aGPCRs have crucial roles in tissue patterning and organogenesis, mutations in these receptors are often associated with diseases with loss of tissue integrity. Thus, aGPCRs include a group of enigmatic receptors with untapped potential for elucidating novel signaling pathways leading to drug discovery. We summarized the current knowledge on how aGPCRs play critical roles in organ development and discussed how aGPCR mutations/genetic variants cause diseases.

The Impact of Childhood Socioeconomic Status on Adolescents' Risk Behaviors: The Role of Physiological and Psychological Threats.

Adolescence is a period of high levels of risk behavior. The present research aims to examine the influences of childhood socioeconomic status (SES) on risk behaviors in gain or loss domains among adolescents and the roles of threats in this effect. In experiment 1, a total of 107 adolescents (Mage = 14.80; SDage = 1.15) were asked to complete the childhood socioeconomic status scale before they took part in a risk behavior task under the gain and loss situation. A total of 149 adolescents (Mage = 14.24; SDage = 1.11) in experiment 2a and 139 adolescents (Mage = 13.88; SDage = 1.09) in experiment 2b completed the childhood socioeconomic status scale before they took part in a risk behavior task under the gain and loss situation under physiological threats and psychological threats, respectively. The results showed that high-childhood-SES adolescents tend to take more risks than low-childhood-SES adolescents in the gain domain, while low-childhood-SES adolescents tend to take more risks than high-childhood-SES adolescents in the loss domain. Threats amplified the impact of childhood socioeconomic status on adolescents' risk behaviors in the gain and loss domains. When a physiological threat or psychological threat was primed, compared to the control group, in the gain situation, the extent to which high-childhood-SES adolescents showed greater risk seeking than low-childhood-SES adolescents became larger; in the loss domain, the extent to which low-childhood-SES adolescents showed greater risk seeking than high-childhood-SES adolescents became larger.

Thwarting of Lphn3 Functions in Cell Motility and Signaling by Cancer-Related GAIN Domain Somatic Mutations.

Cancer progression relies on cellular transition states accompanied by changes in the functionality of adhesion molecules. The gene for adhesion G protein-coupled receptor latrophilin-3 (aGPCR Lphn3 or ADGRL3) is targeted by tumor-specific somatic mutations predominantly affecting the conserved GAIN domain where most aGPCRs are cleaved. However, it is unclear how these GAIN domain-altering mutations impact Lphn3 function. Here, we studied Lphn3 cancer-related mutations as a proxy for revealing unknown GAIN domain functions. We found that while intra-GAIN cleavage efficiency was unaltered, most mutations produced a ligand-specific impairment of Lphn3 intercellular adhesion profile paralleled by an increase in cell-matrix actin-dependent contact structures for cells expressing the select S810L mutation. Aberrant remodeling of the intermediate filament vimentin, which was found to coincide with Lphn3-induced modification of nuclear morphology, had less impact on the nuclei of S810L expressing cells. Notoriously, receptor signaling through G13 protein was deficient for all variants bearing non-homologous amino acid substitutions, including the S810L variant. Analysis of cell migration paradigms revealed a non-cell-autonomous impairment in collective cell migration indistinctly of Lphn3 or its cancer-related variants expression, while cell-autonomous motility was potentiated in the presence of Lphn3, but this effect was abolished in S810L GAIN mutant-expressing cells. These data identify the GAIN domain as an important regulator of Lphn3-dependent cell motility, thus furthering our understanding of cellular and molecular events linking Lphn3 genetic somatic mutations to cancer-relevant pathogenesis mechanisms.

Adhesion GPCRs as a paradigm for understanding polycystin-1 G protein regulation.

Polycystin-1, whose mutation is the most frequent cause of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, is an extremely large and multi-faceted membrane protein whose primary or proximal cyst-preventing function remains undetermined. Accumulating evidence supports the idea that modulation of cellular signaling by heterotrimeric G proteins is a critical function of polycystin-1. The presence of a cis-autocatalyzed, G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) proteolytic cleavage site, or GPS, in its extracellular N-terminal domain immediately preceding the first transmembrane domain is one of the notable conserved features of the polycystin-1-like protein family, and also of the family of cell adhesion GPCRs. Adhesion GPCRs are one of five families within the GPCR superfamily and are distinguished by a large N-terminal extracellular region consisting of multiple adhesion modules with a GPS-containing GAIN domain and bimodal functions in cell adhesion and signal transduction. Recent advances from studies of adhesion GPCRs provide a new paradigm for unraveling the mechanisms by which polycystin-1-associated G protein signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of polycystic kidney disease. This review highlights the structural and functional features shared by polycystin-1 and the adhesion GPCRs and discusses the implications of such similarities for our further understanding of the functions of this complicated protein.

Adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptors as Drug Targets for Neurological Diseases.

The family of adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs) consists of 33 members in humans. Although the majority are orphan receptors with unknown functions, many reports have demonstrated critical functions for some members of this family in organogenesis, neurodevelopment, myelination, angiogenesis, and cancer progression. Importantly, mutations in several aGPCRs have been linked to human diseases. The crystal structure of a shared protein domain, the GPCR Autoproteolysis INducing (GAIN) domain, has enabled the discovery of a common signaling mechanism - a tethered agonist - for this class of receptors. A series of recent reports has shed new light on their biological functions and disease relevance. This review focuses on these recent advances in our understanding of aGPCR biology in the nervous system and the untapped potential of aGPCRs as novel therapeutic targets for neurological disease.

The Role of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Proteolysis Site Cleavage of Polycystin-1 in Renal Physiology and Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Polycystin-1 (PC1) plays an essential role in renal tubular morphogenesis, and PC1 dysfunction causes human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. A fundamental characteristic of PC1 is post-translational modification via cleavage at the juxtamembrane GPCR proteolysis site (GPS) motif that is part of the larger GAIN domain. Given the considerable biochemical complexity of PC1 molecules generated in vivo by this process, GPS cleavage has several profound implications on the intracellular trafficking and localization in association with their particular function. The critical nature of GPS cleavage is further emphasized by the increasing numbers of PKD1 mutations that significantly affect this cleavage process. The GAIN domain with the GPS motif therefore represents the key structural element with fundamental importance for PC1 and might be polycystic kidney disease's (PKD) Achilles' heel in a large spectrum of PKD1 missense mutations. We highlight the central roles of PC1 cleavage for the regulation of its biogenesis, intracellular trafficking and function, as well as its significance in polycystic kidney disease.