Floating Knee Arthrodesis After Prosthetic Knee Infection: A Report of 48 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Knee arthrodesis is a means of avoiding above-knee amputation after a prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The objective of this study was to analyze the results of floating knee arthrodesis in patients who had a history of aprosthetic knee infection. The analysis consisted of determining reinfection rates, functional results, and the survival of arthrodesis. METHODS: There were 48 patients who underwent a cemented floating knee arthrodesis in cases of PJI retrospectively included in the study, having been operated on between 2012 and 2020. In addition to being evaluated clinically, analytically, and radiographically, the patients were assessed functionally by means of a newly-created scale. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 4 years (1 year to 9 years), 7 patients suffered reinfection (14.6%). The recurrence of infection was not observed to be significantly affected by sex (P = .16), age(P = .09), or the type of surgery previously undergone (P = .18), nor was the McPherson Host Grade (P = .4) observed to have a significant effect. Patients who had a McPherson Limb Grade 3 were more likely to suffer reinfection than those with a McPherson Limb Grade 2 (P = .034). There were 26 patients (54%)fully evaluated and scored on the Knee Arthrodesis Functional Scale(BAOR). For 11 patients (42%), the results were evaluated as excellent, for 11 (42%) acceptable, for 3 (12%) low, and for 1(4%) poor. CONCLUSION: The arthrodesis nail is an effective and safe procedure for patients who have a recurrent PJI, providing an effective alternative when the criteria for a new revision total knee arthroplasty are not met.

Knee fusion versus above knee amputation as two options to deal with knee periprosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) poses a significant challenge in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with recurrence rates as high as 14-28%, leading to substantial morbidity and treatment costs. When conventional treatments fail, knee fusion and above-the-knee amputation (AKA) emerge as alternative options. Existing literature offers conflicting views on the efficacy and impact of knee fusion versus AKA with varied outcomes and limitations. METHODS: This retrospective national study spanning 2010-2022 investigates Knee Fusion and AKA as options for addressing Knee PJI. Utilizing PearlDiver Patient Records Database, procedural, and reimbursement data on over 100 million individuals from all the US was evaluated. Readmission rates, costs, and complications of the mentioned procedures were assessed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes within a 90-day period and one-year post-operation. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and regression models, were conducted using integrated R software. RESULTS: The study reveals a substantial escalation (p < 0.0001) in the proportion of patients opting for AKA compared to arthrodesis. While age as a demographic factor showed no significant difference, arthrodesis patients exhibited lower comorbidity scores (3.6 ± 2.9 vs. 4.6 ± 3.4, p < 0.001). Arthrodesis correlated with higher 90-day thromboembolism rates (9.2% vs. 7.3%, p < 0.001), blood transfusion requirements (23.2% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001), and acute renal failure incidence (p = 0.008) but demonstrated lower rates of urinary tract infections (p = 0.047) and cerebrovascular accidents (p < 0.001). At 1 year, arthrodesis was associated with higher infection rates (38.7% vs. 36.4%, p < 0.001). Arthrodesis patients had significant increased 90-day and 1-year readmission rates and hospitalization costs ($12,732 vs. $18,826, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found higher rates of 1-year thromboembolism, infection, acute renal failure, and readmission in the arthrodesis group. AKA patients had more sepsis and cerebrovascular accidents. A patient-centered conversation is best for persistent infections and failed revision TKA. Considering the patient's quality of life, goals, and health status, this discussion should cover each procedure's risks and complications.

Early results of a novel modular knee arthrodesis implant after uncontrolled periprosthetic knee joint infection.

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications after non-fusion knee arthrodesis with a modular segmental intramedullary implant used for infected total knee arthroplasty revisions. METHODS: A retrospective review of the patients who had been surgically treated with a modular intramedullary arthrodesis implant for recurrent infection after revision TKA between January 2016 and February 2020 were included. The indications for arthrodesis were failed infected TKA with massive bone loss, deficient extensor mechanism and poor soft tissue coverage that precluded joint reconstruction with revision TKA implants. Clinical outcomes were assesed with visual analogue scale for pain (pVAS), Oxford knee score (OKS) and 12-item short form survey (SF-12). Full-length radiographs were used to verify limb length discrepancies (LLD). RESULTS: Fourteen patients (4 male and 10 female) patients with a mean age of 69.3 (range, 59 to 81) years at time of surgery were available for final follow-up at a mean of 28.8 months (range, 24-35 months). All clinical outcome scores improved at the final follow-up (pVAS, 8.5 to 2.6, p = .01; OKS, 12.6 to 33.8, p = .02; SF-12 physical, 22.9 to 32.1, p = .01 and SF-12 mental, 27.7 to 40.2, p = .01). The mean LLD was 1.0 cm (range, + 15 - 2.3 cm). Re-infection was detected in three patients (21.4%). Two patients were managed with suppressive antibiotic treatment and a third patient required repeat 2-stage revision procedure. In one patient, a periprosthetic femur fracture was observed and treated with plate osteosynthesis. CONCLUSION: Uncontrolled infection after total knee arthroplasty can be effectively treated with arthrodesis using a modular intramedullary nail and satisfactory functional results can be obtained. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Retrospective cohort study.

Fusion rate of 89% after knee arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail: a mono-centric retrospective review of 48 cases.

PURPOSE: Knee arthrodesis is an established procedure for limb salvage in cases of recurrent infection, total knee arthroplasty soft tissue defect, poor bone stock or a deficient extensor mechanism. Surgical options include compression plate, external fixator and arthrodesis nail. Different types of nail exist: long fusion nail, short modular nail and bridging nail. This study presents the results on knee arthrodesis using different types of intramedullary nails. The aim is to assess if a specific type of nail has a better fusion rate, clinical outcome and lower complication rate. METHODS: A mono-centric retrospective study of 48 knees arthrodesis was performed between 2000 and 2018. 15 T2™ Arthrodesis Nail, 6 OsteoBridge® Knee Arthrodesis and 27 Wichita® fusion nail were used. The mean clinic and radiological follow-up was 9.8 ± 3.8 years (2.6-18 years). RESULTS: Fusion rate was 89.6%. Time to fusion was 6.9 months. Mean Parker score was 6.9/9 points. Visual Analogic Scale was 1.9. The Wichita® fusion nail showed better results in terms of fusion, time to fusion and clinical outcome measured by Parker score and VAS but without statistical significance. The early revision rate was 10.4% and 20.8% presented a late complication requiring a surgery, due to nonunion or infection. 93.3% of infection was cured. Two patients live with a fistula (4.2%) and 1 was amputated (2.1%). CONCLUSION: Although burdened by a big complication rate, knee arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail provides satisfactory results and is a good alternative to above-knee-amputation. The Wichita® fusion nail shows a tendency to better results compared to the two other nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, level IV.

Novel, static, permanent spacers to treat chronic knee periprosthetic joint infections.

PURPOSE: To discuss a static and permanent spacer in the treatment of chronic periprosthetic knee infection. Methods In this study, patients who were diagonised with chronic periprosthetic knee infection and not appropriate to undergo revision operations were included and were treated with static and permanent spacers. Infection recurrence rate was recorded, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Knee Society Score (KSS) were used to record patients' pain and knee function before the operation and at the final follow-up (minimum 24 months). RESULTS: Fifteen patients were identified for this study. Pain and function were significantly improved at the latest follow-up evaluation. One patient had a recurrent infection and underwent amputation. No patients had signs of residual instability at the final follow-up evaluation, and no breakage or subsidence of the antibiotic spacer were identified at the final radiographic follow-up evaluation. CONCLUSION: Our study provided evidence that the static and permanent spacer was a reliable salvage procedure to treat periprosthetic knee infection in compromised patients.

Knee Arthrodesis Affects Gait Kinematics More in the Ankle Than in the Hip Joint.

Background and Objectives: No gold standard exists for treating persistent periprosthetic knee infections. Knee arthrodesis represents one treatment concept for extensive bone defects and extensor system insufficiencies. It has already been shown that knee arthrodesis leads to a significant reduction in one's quality of life. The aim of this survey was to assess the influence of knee arthrodesis on the neighboring joints on the basis of gait analysis data. Our hypothesis is that the hip and ankle joints are negatively influenced by knee arthrodesis in the process of walking. Materials and methods: We performed six pedobarographic and four gait analytical measurements in six patients 2.4 ± 1.6 years after receiving knee arthrodesis at the operating ages of 69.1 ± 9.2 years. Gait analysis consisted of time-distance parameters/minute (number of steps, double support, cycle time, standing phase, step length, gait speed). A healthy group of test subjects (n = 52) was included as the control cohort. Gait analysis was conducted using a three-dimensional movement system and three force-measuring platforms to determine the ground reaction force. Foot pressure was measured using a pedography platform. Results: Five of six patients presented an incomplete rolling movement over the toes on the side that was operated on, presenting with a gait line ending in the forefoot area. All of the patients bore less weight on the side that was operated on. Three of six patients demonstrated a pathological gait line with a healthy opposite side ending in the forefoot area. All of the patients exhibited a reduction in gait speed and step length and a lower number of steps. All of the patients had a prolonged double support/cycle time. Conclusions: Isolated knee arthrodesis is associated with reduced forefoot repulsion, restricted movement on the side receiving the operation, and reduced movement in the ankle/knee joint. The hip showed norm deviations in the hip moment/angle. Knee arthrodesis causes reduced gait kinetics/kinematics. Our survey shows that the relative joint moments of the ankle joint and hip are often reduced. The ankle joint is more affected compared to the hip.

Knee Joint Bone Defects: Reconstruction With Bone Transport and Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: The increasing in primary total knee arthroplasty has led to an increase in infectious complications, revision surgery, and bone loss. Knee joint bone defects (KJBD) may be managed using bone transport and arthrodesis with Ilizarov or bone transport over nail (BTON) techniques. The aim of this study is to compare both techniques in the reconstruction of KJBDs. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 29 patients with extensive KJBD. All patients underwent reconstruction of the KJBD using bone transport (either Ilizarov or BTON techniques). The primary outcome variables for comparison between the two groups included time in frame (days), external fixation index (EFI, days/cm), residual limb length discrepancy (cm), and complications (Caton classification). RESULTS: Gender and age profiles were comparable. Mean time spent in frame for bone transport was 566 days (σ = 236, 95% CI 429-702) for the Ilizarov cohort and 191 days (σ = 162, 95% CI 101-280) for BTON (P < .0001). EFI for the period of bone transport was 75.1 d/cm (σ = 41.5, 95% CI 51.1- 99.1) for the Ilizarov cohort and 24.7 d/cm (σ = 24.0, 95% CI 11.4-38) for BTON (P = .0004). Union, limb length discrepancy and complication rates were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSION: For the management of KJBD after failed total knee arthroplasty, BTON is preferred due to significantly less time spent in frame, lower EFI, and higher rates of normal mechanical alignment. The Ilizarov method may be useful when there is a contraindication to BTON.

Low complication rate and better results for intramedullary nail - arthrodesis for infected knee joints compared to external fixator-a series of one hundred fifty two patients.

PURPOSE: Arthrodesis of the knee joint is still a salvage procedure after recurrent prosthetic joint infections (PJI) of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) with substantial bone loss and seems to be a good solution to avoid amputation. Until now, intramedullary arthrodesis has increasingly been performed; no study has yet been published to compare these techniques after septic removal of TKA in terms of functional assessment and quality of daily life. METHODS: In a single-centre retrospective setting, clinical and radiographic evaluation of consecutive patients after knee arthrodesis using intramedullary and external fixation for infected knee joints was performed. All patients were evaluated clinically, with x-ray and questionnaire including analysis regarding any complications at latest follow-up of a minimum 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: We included 152 patients (75 females, 77 males) in this study. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 63.6 years (range 12 to 90 years). The minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean 3.1 years, range 12 to 49 months). Arthrodesis with external fixator (83 patients, 52.2%) showed less blood loss and less peri-operative complications (1.6%) but a high rate of post-operative, pin-track infections (35.5%); loose pins (12.7%); and pin fractures (4.8%), and therefore risk factors for instability and nonunion (30.9%). Revision rate was 22.6% for arthrodesis with external fixator, and the primary union rate was 65.6%. Intramedullary arthrodesis (69 patients, 43.4%) showed a similar re-infection rate to external fixation (16.1% and 15.9%, respectively) but a significantly lower revision rate (5.4%, p < 0.001). Eighty percent of patients with intramedullary arthrodesis showed very good patient-related outcomes regarding pain, function and daily life activities in the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Despite similar results regarding patient satisfaction and everyday competences in questionnaires, intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee is superior to the external fixator, as it results in fewer complications, lower revision rate, and union rates/loosening.

Modular knee arthrodesis secures limb, mobility, improves quality of life, and leads to high infection control in periprosthetic knee infection, when revision knee arthroplasty is not an option.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the outcome of knee arthrodesis versus hinged total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients suffering from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS: 104 patients with PJI were treated using a two-stage exchange of failed TKA. In case of non reconstructable bone loss or loss of extension mechanism, a modular intramedullary arthrodesis nail was used for reimplantation [Knee Arthrodesis Module (KAM); n = 52]. The control group was retrospectively matched treated using a hinged revision TKA [Rotating Hinge Knee (RHK); n = 52]. PJI remission rates, functional outcome (WOMAC; KSS) and quality of life (SF-12), as well as comorbidities and pain were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean age was 72.5 years. Charlson Comorbidity Index was higher in the KAM group (3.3 vs. 2.8). PJI remission rate was 89.4% (88.5% vs. 90.4%, respectively). In case of reinfection, implant retention was mostly possible in the RHK group (7.7%), whereas amputations were mostly performed in the KAM group (9.6%). Significant pain reduction (VAS 7.9-2.8) was achieved in both groups. Walking distance was significantly reduced in the KAM groups versus the RHK group (504 vs. 1064 m). WOMAC and KSS function scores were significantly reduced in the KAM group (25 vs. 40 and 35 vs. 64). Only moderate reduction in quality of life in the KAM group was observed (SF-12 physical: 34 vs. 40; SF-12 mental: 51 vs. 56) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Arthrodesis using a modular intramedullary nail is an alternative for limb salvage, pain reduction, and preservation of quality of life and everyday mobility, when revision TKA is not an option. This study presents the largest number of case, comparing the outcome after performing an arthrodesis versus hinged TKA after septic failed TKA.

Knee Arthrodesis Is a Durable Option for the Salvage of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Knee arthrodesis (KA) and above-knee amputation (AKA) have been used for salvage of failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, few studies have assessed the outcomes of KA after TKA PJI, as it remains an uncommon procedure. We investigated rates of AKA, control of infection, and ambulatory status after KA for TKA PJI treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective and single-surgeon series of 51 failed TKAs due to PJI treated with two-stage KA between 2000 and 2016 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, radiographic data, and outcomes of KA treatment were recorded. RESULTS: Infection was successfully controlled in 48 of 51 patients (94.1%); of these, 24 knees (50.0%) required no reoperation subsequent to the index KA, whereas the remaining 24 (50.0%) patients required a median of 1 additional operation. Nonunion, malunion, or delayed union was noted in 10 patients (19.6%). Of the 48 patients who were successfully treated with KA, 41 patients (85.4%) remained ambulatory after KA and 9 of these patients (18.8%) did not require assistive devices. Three of 51 patients (5.9%) progressed to AKA after KA. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing KA for TKA PJI had high rates of infection control and preservation of ambulatory status, with low rates of progression to AKA in our study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

Uniplanar versus biplanar monolateral external fixator knee arthrodesis after end-stage failed infected total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: External fixator knee arthrodesis is a salvage procedure used primarily in cases of end-stage infected total knee replacement (iTKR). Stable fixation combined with bone-end compression is essential to achieve knee fusion, but providing sufficient stability can be challenging in the presence of severe bone loss. Our hypothesis is that using an external fixation biplanar configuration would bring about a fusion rate superior to that of a monolateral frame. METHODS: This study compares outcomes of biplanar external fixator knee fusion due to non-revisable iTKR with those of a historical cohort control study with patients managed with a monoplanar configuration. Primary endpoints were fusion rate, time to achieve bone fusion and infection eradication rate. Limb-length discrepancy, pain level, patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 29 knee fusion cases were included. In the biplanar group, infection was eradicated in 100% of the patients and fusion was achieved in all cases within an average of 5.24 months. In comparison, in the monolateral group, infection was eradicated in 86% of the cases and fusion was achieved in 81% of the patients after a mean of 10.3 months (p < 0.05). In both groups, postoperative pain was mild and patients expressed a high degree of satisfaction once fusion was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, external fixation knee fusion is a useful limb-salvage procedure in end-stage cases of knee PJI. We conclude that a biplanar configuration can halve the time required to achieve solid bone fusion in such a complex scenario.

Re-infection rates and clinical outcomes following arthrodesis with intramedullary nail and external fixator for infected knee prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Knee arthrodesis with intramedullary (IM) nail or external fixator (EF) is the most reliable therapeutic option to achieve definitive infection control in patients with septic failure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The first aim of this study was to compare re-infection rates following knee arthrodesis for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with IM nail or EF. The second aim was to compare rates of radiographic union, complication, and re-operation as well as clinical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in electronic databases for longitudinal studies of PJIs (minimum ten patients; minimum follow-up = 1 year) treated by knee arthrodesis with IM nail or EF. Studies were also required to report the rate of re-infection as an outcome measure. Eligible studies were meta-analyzed using random-effect models. RESULTS: The rate (95% confidence intervals) of re-infection was 10.6% (95% CI 7.3 to 14.0) in IM nail arthrodesis studies. The corresponding re-infection rate for EF was 5.4% (95% CI 1.7 to 9.1). This difference was significant (p = 0.009). The use of IM nail resulted in more advantages than EF for frequency of major complications and limb shortening. Other postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes were similar for both surgical strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence from the aggregate published data suggests that knee arthrodesis with EF in the specific context of PJI has a reduced risk of re-infection in comparison with the IM nail strategy. The use of IM nail is more effective for the complication rate and shortening of the affected limb.

Knee arthrodesis versus above-the-knee amputation after septic failure of revision total knee arthroplasty: comparison of functional outcome and complication rates.

BACKGROUND: After septic failure of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and multiple revision operations resulting in impaired function, bone and/or soft-tissue damage a reconstruction with a revision arthroplasty might be impossible. Salvage procedures to regain mobility and quality of life are an above-the-knee amputation or knee arthrodesis. The decision process for the patient and surgeon is difficult and data comparing arthrodesis versus amputation in terms of function and quality of life are scarce. The purpose of this study was to analyse and compare the specific complications, functional outcome and quality of life of above-the-knee amputation (AKA) and modular knee-arthrodesis (MKA) after septic failure of total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Eighty-one patients treated with MKA and 32 patients treated with AKA after septic failure of TKA between 2003 and 2012 were included in this cohort study. Demographic data, comorbidities, pathogens and complications such as re-infection, implant-failure or revision surgeries were recorded in 55MKA and 20AKA patients. Functional outcome with use of the Lower-Extremity-Functional-Score (LEFS) and the patients reported general health status (SF-12-questionnaire) was recorded after a mean interval of 55 months. RESULTS: A major complication occurred in more than one-third of the cases after MKA and AKA, whereas recurrence of infection was with 22% after MKA and 35% after AKA the most common complication. Patients with AKA and MKA showed a comparable functional outcome with a mean LEFS score of 37 and 28 respectively (p = 0.181). Correspondingly, a comparable physical quality of life with a mean physical SF-12 of 36 for AKA patients and a mean score of 30 for MKA patients was observed (p = 0.080). Notably, ten AKA patients that could be fitted with a microprocessor-controlled-knee-joint demonstrated with a mean LEFS of 56 a significantly better functional outcome than other amputee patients (p < 0.01) or MKA patients (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Naturally, the decision process for the treatment of desolate situations of septic failures following revision knee arthroplasty is depending on various factors. Nevertheless, the amputation should be considered as an option in patients with a good physical and mental condition.

Conversion of a Surgically Arthrodesed Knee to a Total Knee Arthroplasty-Is it Worth it? A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conversion of a surgically arthrodesed knee to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an option for a select group of patients who are not satisfied with their results. However, there is a paucity of literature on this topic. A systematic review of literature was performed to (1) describe the overall demographic characteristics; (2) evaluate the clinical outcomes; (3) determine the overall rate of complications; and (4) evaluate the overall satisfaction of patients who underwent conversion of an arthrodesed knee to TKA. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was systematically performed to evaluate all studies included in the literature until July 2015. The specific search terms used were "fusion knee" and "arthrodesis knee," which revealed a total of 2206 studies. A review and selection of these abstracts were then performed based on inclusion and/or exclusion criteria; a total of 10 articles were used for final review. RESULTS: There were a total of 98 surgically arthrodesed knees that subsequently underwent TKA. Patients had a mean age of 55 years and were followed up for a mean of 5 years. Using a random effects model, there was an overall complication rate of 47%, an overall revision rate of 25%, and an overall failure rate of 11%. However, most patients were overall satisfied with the procedure. CONCLUSION: Fusion takedown is a challenging procedure that should only be performed by experienced surgeons after extensive discussion with the patients. The clinical outcomes are good with overall patient satisfaction, but complication rates are high including risk of repeat fusion or amputation.

Trends and Outcomes in the Treatment of Failed Septic Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparing Arthrodesis and Above-Knee Amputation.

BACKGROUND: Options for treatment of a failed septic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include arthrodesis and above-knee amputation (AKA). Little comparative data exist to help clinicians when considering these alternatives. METHODS: A national database was queried for patients who underwent either knee arthrodesis or AKA for an infected TKA between 2005 and 2012. Procedure volumes, postoperative complications, hospital charges, length of stay, and 90-day readmission rates were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 2634 patients underwent arthrodesis and 5001 patients underwent AKA for septic TKA. The percentage of total patients who underwent AKA increased significantly throughout the study period compared to knee arthrodesis. Patients who underwent AKA tended to be older and have more medical comorbidities. Arthrodesis patients had a significantly higher rate of postoperative infection (14.5% vs 8.3%, P < .0001) and transfusion (55.1% vs 46.8%, P < .0001), whereas AKA patients had a higher rate of systemic complications (31.5% vs 25.9%, P < .0001) and in-hospital mortality (3.7% vs 2.1%, P < .0001). The AKA cohort had lower hospital charges ($79,686 vs $84,747, P = .004), longer length of stay (11 vs 7 days, P < .0001), and higher 90-day readmission rate (19.4% vs 16.9%). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that there is an increasing trend toward AKA for the treatment of a failed infected TKA when compared to arthrodesis. Comparative analysis of the outcomes of these procedures should help the clinician when weighing these alternatives.

Knee arthrodesis with modular nail after failed TKA due to infection.

INTRODUCTION: Knee arthrodesis is an established procedure for limb salvage after failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in cases of recurrent infection, soft tissue damage, reduced bone stock or with a deficient extensor mechanism. Walking with an arthrodesis is more efficient and less costly in terms of energy expenditure than above-knee amputation. Surgical options include an arthrodesis nail, external fixator or compression plate. We present our results of knee arthrodesis using the modular Wichita Fusion Nail(®) in patients after infected TKA. METHODS: Fifteen patients with irretrievably failed TKA, due to infection, who underwent arthrodesis with the Wichita Fusion Nail(®) from 2004 to 2012 were retrospectively reviewed to assess fusion rate, time to fusion, complication rate, including new infections, and ambulatory status. RESULTS: Three patients were lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up was 33 months (6-132 months). At their most recent follow-up, all patients were walking with full weight bearing on a fused arthrodesis. Mean time to union was 9 months (3-29 months). Three patients necessitated a revision arthrodesis to achieve union after a mean of 5 months after the last procedure. CONCLUSION: Arthrodesis with the Wichita Fusion Nail(®) provides satisfactory results in patients with failure after infected TKA, with 75 % primary union rate and no new or persistent infection at last follow-up visit. Although burdened with a high complication rate, it represents an acceptable option for limb salvage in this particular pathology.

Knee arthrodesis as limb salvage for complex failures of total knee arthroplasty.

Patients with multiple failures of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are challenging limb salvage cases. Twenty one patients over the last 10 years were referred to our service for knee fusion by arthroplasty surgeons who felt they were not candidates for revision TKA. Active infection was present in 76.2% and total bone loss averaged 6.6 cm. Lengthening was performed in 7/22 patients. Total time in Ilizarov frames was 9 months, with 93.3% union. Patients treated with IM fusion nails had 100% union. Average LLD increased from 3.6 to 4.5 cm following intervention, while those with concurrent lengthening improved to 1.6 cm. Findings suggest that bone loss and the soft-tissue envelope dictate knee fusion method, and multiple techniques may be needed. A treatment algorithm is presented.

Knee Arthrodesis Using Dual-Plate Construct is Following Failed Distal Femur Megaprosthesis-A Case Report.

Introduction: Knee arthrodesis following failed total knee arthroplasty is a viable limb salvage option, and this procedure is reserved for failed two-stage revision surgery in severe comorbid patients with irreparable extensor mechanism disruption, severe instability, and extensive soft tissue loss. Knee arthrodesis using a dual-plate construct has been scarcely reported. We report a case of knee arthrodesis using a dual-plate construct in a male in his 20s who presented to us with a broken distal femur megaprosthesis. Case Report: An anterior midline incision was given. The cement mantle and broken prosthetic components were removed. The bone surfaces were freshened up and fixed using two orthogonal locking plates. After 4 months, there was a solid fusion in the knee, and the patient started walking independently with a short limb gait. The patient was advised limb lengthening for a shortening of 3 cm, but he denied it and managed with a shoe raise. After 4 years, he was pain free, and radiographs revealed a solid knee fusion. The patient was fully satisfied with the procedure, and he resumed manual work. Conclusion: This case report revealed that knee arthrodesis using a dual-plate construct is an economically viable salvage option for failed distal femur megaprosthesis.

Bilateral Knee Arthrodesis and Total Hip Arthroplasty for Knee and Hip Dysplasia Secondary to Spina Bifida: A Case Report.

Introduction: Spina bifida is a rare neurological condition that, if uncorrected, may cause chronic valgus knee stress difficulty with independent ambulation and significant pain. Current literature lacks comprehensive guidance on surgically correcting progressive hip and knee deformities in spina bifida patients, which include osteotomy and primary. When these options are contraindicated, alternative approaches such as arthrodesis may be indicated, although they remain understudied in this population. Case Report: A 47-year-old man presented with bilateral hip and knee pain. Radiographs demonstrated valgus knee deformities with severe arthrosis and bilateral femoral head subluxation. The patient had a history of spina bifida with chronic lower extremity weakness and neurogenic bladder. He underwent staged bilateral instrumented knee arthrodesis and staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). Conclusion: This is the first reported case of bilateral instrumented knee arthrodesis in a patient with spina bifida. Orthopedic care of these patients is complex. Surgical correction of symptomatic knee and hip deformities through instrumented arthrodesis and THA may permit an improved functional outcome.