Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy using augmented reality navigation plus ICG fluorescence imaging for hepatolithiasis: a retrospective single-arm cohort study (with video).

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) has been shown to be an effective and safe method for treating hepatolithiasis primarily affecting the left hemiliver. However, this procedure still presents challenges. Due to pathological changes in intrahepatic duct stones, safely dissecting the hilar vessels and determining precise resection boundaries remains difficult, even with fluorescent imaging. Our team proposed a new method of augmented reality navigation (ARN) combined with Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for LLH in hepatolithiasis cases. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of this combined approach in the procedure. METHODS: Between May 2021 and September 2023, 16 patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent LLH were included. All patients underwent preoperative 3D evaluation and were then guided using ARN and ICG fluorescence imaging during the procedure. Perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes were assessed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the method. RESULTS: All 16 patients successfully underwent LLH. The mean operation time was 380.31 ± 92.17 min, with a mean estimated blood loss of 116.25 ± 64.49 ml. ARN successfully aided in guiding hilar vessel dissection in all patients. ICG fluorescence imaging successfully identified liver resection boundaries in 11 patients (68.8%). In the remaining 5 patients (31.3%) where fluorescence imaging failed, virtual liver segment projection (VLSP) successfully identified their resection boundaries. No major complications occurred in any patients. Immediate stone residual rate, stone recurrence rate, and stone extraction rate through the T-tube sinus tract were 12.5%, 6.3%, and 6.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of ARN and ICG fluorescence imaging enhances the safety and precision of LLH for hepatolithiasis. Moreover, ARN may serve as a safe and effective tool for identifying precise resection boundaries in cases where ICG fluorescence imaging fails.

Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy guided by real-time indocyanine green fluorescence imaging using the arantius-first approach.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic hepatectomy approaches, including major hepatectomy, were rapidly developed in the past decade. However, standard laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) is still only performed in high-volume medical centres. In our series, we describe our technical details and surgical outcomes of LLH. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients who underwent LLH in our institute were enrolled in the study. Among these, 13 patients underwent LLH guided by real-time ICG fluorescence imaging using the Arantius-first approach (ICG-LLH group), and the other 26 underwent conventional LLH (conventional LLH group). Demographic characteristics and perioperative data were retrospectively collected and analysed. We compared the technical and postoperative short-term outcomes of the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the demographic or clinicopathological characteristics of the patients in the two groups. ICG-LLH required significantly fewer pringle manoeuvres (1 vs. 3 times, p < 0.0001), had a shorter parenchyma dissection time (26 vs. 78 min, p < 0.001), and required fewer vessel clips (18 vs. 28, p < 0.001). Although there was no significant difference, the ICG-LLH group had less bile leakage (0 vs. 5, p = 0.09) and less blood loss (120 vs. 165, p = 0.119). There were no significant differences in the overall complication or R0 resection rates between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy guided by real-time ICG fluorescence imaging using the Arantius-first approach is safe and feasible in selected patients, thus improving the fluency of the surgical procedure and postoperative short-term outcomes.

Comparison of pure laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy by multivariate analysis: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: To compare the outcomes of pure laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) versus open left hemihepatectomy (OLH) for benign and malignant conditions using multivariate analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive cases of LLH and OLH between October 2007 and December 2013 in a tertiary referral hospital were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. All surgical procedures were performed by one surgeon. The LLH and OLH groups were compared in terms of patient demographics, preoperative data, clinical perioperative outcomes, and tumor characteristics in patients with malignancy. Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors associated with severe complications was then performed. RESULTS: The LLH group (n = 62) had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay than the OLH group (n = 118) (9.53 ± 3.30 vs 14.88 ± 11.36 days, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the OLH group had >4 times the risk of the LLH group in terms of developing severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) (odds ratio 4.294, 95% confidence intervals 1.165-15.832, p = 0.029). DISCUSSION: LLH was a safe and feasible procedure for selected patients. LLH required shorter hospital stay and resulted in less operative blood loss. Multivariate analysis revealed that LLH was associated with a lower risk of severe complications compared to OLH. The authors suggest that LLH could be a reasonable treatment option for selected patients.

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open left-sided hepatectomy for intrahepatic duct stones.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatectomy for intrahepatic duct (IHD) stones is limited by technical difficulties caused by adhesion to adjacent tissue or distorted anatomy resulting from recurrent inflammation. This study compared perioperative and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for left IHD stones. METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2013, 40 patients underwent laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy [left hemihepatectomy (n = 7) or left lateral sectionectomy (n = 33)] and 54 patients without combined operations and previous operation histories underwent open left-sided hepatectomy [left hemihepatectomy (n = 24) or left lateral sectionectomy (n = 30)]. Their perioperative and clinical outcomes were compared, including stone clearance rates, stone recurrence rates, and median follow-up duration. RESULTS: There was no difference in age (56.8 ± 8.2 vs. 55.6 ± 9.6 years, p = 0.531), sex (1.0:4.0 vs. 1.0:1.8 male:female, p = 0.108), or BMI (22.8 ± 2.8 vs. 22.9 ± 3.0 kg/m(2), p = 0.802) between the laparoscopic and open hepatectomy groups. Lateral sectionectomy was more frequent in the laparoscopic group (33/40 vs. 30/54, p = 0.010). Operation time (174.2 ± 56.6 vs. 210.4 ± 51.6 min, p = 0.002) and postoperative hospital stay (7.9 ± 2.6 vs. 14.3 ± 5.5 days, p < 0.001) were shorter in the laparoscopic group, and complication rate (17.5 vs. 40.7%, p = 0.016), in particular surgical site infection rate (5.0 vs. 18.5%, p = 0.052), was lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open hepatectomy group. Similar results were observed in the hemihepatectomy and lateral sectionectomy subgroups. There was no operation-related mortality. There were no significant differences in follow-up periods (48 ± 33.6 vs. 59.2 ± 41.7 months, p = 0.235) and rates of initial stone clearance (87.5 vs. 75.9%, p = 0.159), final clearance (100 vs. 94.4%, p = 0.130), and stone recurrence (2.5 vs. 5.6%, p = 0.468). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hepatectomy is safe and effective for well-selected patients with left IHD stones, when performed by experienced surgeons. Laparoscopic hepatectomy resulted in shorter operation time and postoperative hospital stay, and a lower postoperative morbidity rate, than open hepatectomy.

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy for left-sided hepatolithiasis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of open versus laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (OLH vs. LLH) for left-sided hepatolithiasis. METHODS: Between October 2007 and June 2012, 149 patients with left-sided hepatolithiasis who underwent LLH (n = 37) or OLH (n = 112) were evaluated. The perioperative and long-term outcomes that were reviewed included the stone clearance rate, operative morbidity and mortality, and the stone recurrence rate. RESULTS: The mean operative time of the LLH group was significantly longer than that of the OLH group (257±50.4 minutes vs. 237±75.5 minutes, p = 0.022), but the mean hospital stay was significantly shorter (8.8±4.10 vs. 14.1±4.98 days, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were noted in four and twenty cases among LLH and OLH patients, respectively (p = 0.982). The initial clearance rate of intrahepatic duct (IHD) stones was 100% and 96.4% in the LLH and OLH groups, respectively, but all remnant stones (n = 4, OLH group) were resolved postoperatively. There were two cases of recurrence of IHD stones in OLH patients, but none in LLH patients (p = 0.281). CONCLUSIONS: In left-sided hepatolithiasis, LLH was safe and effective: it resulted in low postoperative morbidity, no mortality and a high stone clearance rate, and there were no incidences of recurrence in our study. The potential benefits of LLH include a shorter hospital stay and a faster return to oral intake. If consideration is given to the appropriate indication criteria, including the extent of hepatectomy and the location and distribution of lesions, LLH may be an excellent choice for treatment of left-sided hepatolithiasis.

Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy guided by indocyanine green fluorescence: A cranial-dorsal approach.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in laparoscopic technology and a deeper understanding of intrahepatic anatomy have led to the establishment of more precise laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) techniques. The indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation technique has emerged as the most effective method for identifying hepatic regions, potentially overcoming the limitations of LH. While laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) is a standardized procedure, there is a need for innovative strategies to enhance its outcomes. AIM: To investigate a standardized cranial-dorsal strategy for LLH, focusing on important anatomical markers, surgical skills, and ICG staining methods. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients who underwent ICG fluorescence-guided LLH at Qujing Second People's Hospital between January 2019 and February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The cranial-dorsal approach was performed which involves dissecting the left hepatic vein cephalad, isolating the Arantius ligament , exposing the middle hepatic vein, and dissecting the parenchyma from the dorsal to the foot in order to complete the anatomical LLH. The surgical methods, as well as intra- and post-surgical data, were recorded and analyzed. Our hospital's Medical Ethics Committee approved this study (Ethical review: 2022-019-01). RESULTS: Intraoperative blood loss during LLH was 335.68 ± 99.869 mL and the rates of transfusion and conversion to laparotomy were 13.5% and 0%, respectively. The overall incidence of complications throughout the follow-up (median of 18 months; range 1-36 months) was 21.6%. No mortality or severe complications (level IV) were reported. CONCLUSION: LLH has the potential to become a novel, standardized approach that can effectively, safely, and simply expose the middle hepatic vein and meet the requirements of precision surgery.

A novel Laennec's capsule tunnel approach for pure laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: a propensity score matching study.

Background: With the development of laparoscopic hepatectomy, there are different surgical approaches and pedicle anatomical methods for laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Combined with our practical experience, we proposed a method of transhepatic Laennec membrane tunnel for laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LT-LLH) and investigated the feasibility by comparison with the extrahepatic Glissonian approach for laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (GA-LLH). Patients and methods: The data of patients who underwent laparoscopic left hepatectomy in the Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic surgery of Fujian Provincial Hospital from December 2019 to March 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 45 cases underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy with an extrahepatic Glissonian approach, and 38 cases underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy via transhepatic Laennec membrane tunnel approach. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) method was performed to compare the perioperative indexes and long-term tumor prognosis between the two groups. Results: After 1:1 PSM, 33 patients in each group were selected for further analysis. Compared with the GA-LLH group, the operation time of the LT-LLH group was shorter. There was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications between the two groups. Moreover, no statistical differences were found in disease-free survival and overall survival between the two groups. Conclusion: It is safe, faster, and convenient for selective appropriate cases to carry out laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy through the hepatic Laennec membrane tunnel, which is suitable for clinical promotion.

Laparoscopic-specific procedure using dorsal approach to the middle hepatic vein in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Exposing the middle hepatic vein (MHV) is required in left hemihepatectomy [1]. Laparoscopy enables us to perform unique approach in performing hepatectomy [2,3]. Herein we show a video of dorsal approach in left hemihepatectomy and measure anatomical parameters useful for approaching to the MHV. PATIENT: A 79-year-old man with colorectal liver metastasis underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. TECHNIQUE: After mobilizing left lateral section and encircling left Glissonian trunk, we firstly flipped up left lateral section inside and began parenchymal transection from dorsal surface around the root of left hepatic vein (LHV). Immediately we touched the MHV and, by cutting the left Glissonian trunk, could extend complete MHV exposure in central-to-peripheral direction without split injuries of MHV branches [2]. Next, we flipped down the left lateral section and divided ventral remaining parenchyma in caudal-to-cranial direction without risk of MHV injury. As this is not one-way procedure [4], as if open a book, we adjusted the ventral cutting plane to match with the dorsal one. Finally, by cutting the LHV, we completed left hemihepatectomy. MEASURING ANATOMICAL PARAMETERS: We divided a sectional image into four zones (cranio-dorsal, caudal-dorsal, caudal-ventral, and cranio-ventral zones) and measured each anatomical parameter to expose the MHV. The area of cranio-dorsal zone was smallest to expose the MHV (3.5cm2). The distance from the Arantius' ligament to the MHV was also shortest (1.1cm). CONCLUSIONS: Dorsal approach might be the nearest and safe road way to the MHV. This approach might make it easy to complete laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy.

Laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing application of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) remains a relatively rare surgery and comparison of perioperative and oncological outcomes between LLH and open left hemihepatectomy (OLH) is lacking. METHODS: A total of 276 HCC patients who underwent either LLH or OLH between January 2008 and November 2019 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study and a 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between LLH and OLH groups. RESULTS: Patients in LLH group had smaller tumor size (P=0.001) and earlier TNM staging (P=0.022) before matching. Despite the similar transfusion rate after matching, patients undergoing LLH (n=27) experienced less intraoperative blood loss (100.0 versus 200.0 mL; P=0.034) and application of hepatic portal occlusion (11.1% versus 63.5%; P<0.001) compared to those in OLH group (n=52). There were no statistical differences of resection margin and incidence of complications between the groups. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients in LLH group were comparable to OLH group (3-year OS rate: 75.0% versus 84.9%; 1-year DFS rate: 92.3% versus 92.2%). CONCLUSIONS: LLH may be a feasible and safe alternative to OLH for selected HCC cases, providing potential short-term benefits without compromising oncologic adequacy and prognosis.

Useful technique for draining a large cystic tumor through the round ligament in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Some cystic liver tumors are huge when the diagnosis is made or surgery is needed. Although reducing tumor size by preoperative aspiration or drainage of the contents of the cystic tumor is helpful for liver resection, such procedures have a risk of tumor dissemination. MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: After the round ligament was dissected, a 12-Fr drainage catheter was inserted into the tumor via the round ligament under ultrasonography. At that time, close attention was paid to avoid having the catheter deviate outside the round ligament. Through the inserted catheter, fluid was drained from the cystic lesion, and the stump of the round ligament was clipped to avoid fluid leakage. The left Glissonian pedicle was then taped. Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy was performed under a good operative field because of tumor shrinkage. DISCUSSION: Three cases underwent these procedures without any spillage of the contents of the cystic tumor. This method is useful for the reduction of tumor size and has a low risk of intra-abdominal leakage of the contents, resulting in a secure and good operative field.