RESUMO
Tumor spread is a continuous process and metastases can further disseminate. Currently, metastatic disease from most primary tumors is subcategorized as M0 if absent and M1 if present. However, metastatic disease in different locations may have different prognostic implications, even if it is from the same primary tumor. The current staging systems for metastatic disease have not evolved to match our understanding of the disease's evolution or the evolving treatment paradigms. Primary tumor-specific subcategorization of metastatic disease is currently available for a few tumors, but not all of them imply further remote spread of tumor, similar to tumor (T) and N (node) subcategorizations of the TNM staging, nor are they applicable to wide spectrum of other tumors. In this era of precision medicine, tumor-type agnostic therapies based on common biomarkers rather than primary tumor sites are emerging, but a subcategorization system applicable to metastatic disease from diverse primary tumor locations and with diverse histologies is not available. In this article, we discuss the need to further classify the metastatic disease and present a subcategorization applicable to metastatic disease from non-neural solid tumors from different primary tumor sites and with different histologies, which is based on the temporal spread of metastatic disease. Our proposed subcategorization scheme for metastatic disease into M0, M1, M2 and M3, is universally applicable to a diverse spectrum of non-neural solid tumors, and increasing M subcategorization represents further remote spread of tumor.