Triple-Layer Plastic Bags Protect Dry Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) Against Damage by Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) During Storage.

Fumigated dry common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) that were artificially infested with Acanthoscelides obtectus Say, and others that were not artificially infested, were stored in hermetic triple-layer PICS (Lela Agro, Kano, Nigeria) or woven polypropylene (PP) bags for 6 mo at ambient laboratory temperature conditions of 22.6 ± 1.9°C and 60.1 ± 4.3% relative humidity. In an additional trial, beans contained in PP bags were treated with Actellic Super dust before introducing A. obtectus. Moisture content, number of live adult A. obtectus, seed damage, weight loss, and seed germination were determined at monthly intervals. At 6 mo, beans stored in PICS bags retained higher moisture than those stored in PP bags, but in all treatments the moisture level remained below that recommended for safe storage of beans. In the PICS bags, proliferation of A. obtectus did not proceed and at 6 mo, beans stored in these bags did not have insect-inflicted seed damage or weight loss. In contrast, seed damage and weight loss in PP bags exceeded economic threshold after 1 mo in the absence of Actellic Super dust (Syngenta Crop protection AG, Basle, Switzerland), and after 2 mo in the presence of it. Germination of beans stored in PP bags decreased greatly whereas the beans stored in PICS bags did not show reduced germination. Chemical free storage of common beans in PICS bags protects them against damage by A. obtectus.

Purdue improved crop storage bag for kocho fermentation; Ethiopian traditional fermented food from Enset (Ensete ventricosum).

Enset (Ensete ventricosm) is a multipurpose crop serving millions of Ethiopians as an alternative food source. However, the traditional kocho preparation is labor-intensive and results in poor quality. This study evaluated Purdue improved crop storage (PICS) bag as an alternative to an underground pit for kocho fermentation. The experiment was arranged in a factorial design with two fermentation systems (underground pit and PICS bag) and three fermentation times (30, 45 & 60 days) with 5 replications. Physico-chemical, proximate composition, microbial, and sensory evaluations of kocho were conducted following standard procedures. The results have revealed that protein and moisture contents were increased with fermentation time while crude fiber, carbohydrate, and total energy were decreased regardless of fermentation systems. The microbial results have demonstrated a reduction with extended fermentation but no significant difference between PICS and the underground pit. The sensory results have shown that PICS bag-fermented kocho has better overall sensory acceptability regardless of fermentation time. Generally, PICS bag-fermented kocho for 60 days has shown overall better kocho quality. The finding revealed that PICS bags could be used as an alternative to the traditional underground pit for better kocho quality. Further validation of the PICS bag as a fermentation container with various enset varieties and seasons with extended fermentation time is needed.

Cost Assessment of Five Different Maize Grain Handling Techniques to Reduce Postharvest Losses from Insect Contamination.

Farmers in developing nations encounter high postharvest losses mainly attributable to the lack of modern techniques for threshing, cleaning, grading, and grain storage. Mechanized handling of grain in developing countries is rare, although the technology is effective against insects and pest infestations. The objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five grain handling techniques that have the ability to reduce postharvest losses from insect infestation. The five methods were metal silo plus all accessories (m. silo + acc.), metal silo only (m. silo), woven polypropylene plus phosphine (w. PP. + Phos.), woven polypropylene only (w. PP.), and Purdue Improved Crop Storage bags only (PICS). The functional unit used was handling 1 kg of maize grain. The cost analysis of each technique was calculated based on equations using a spreadsheet. The annual capital and operational costs of handling using m. silo + acc. or m. silo were very high, unlike the PICS, w. PP. + Phos., or w. PP. The annual capital and operational costs decreased as production scale increased. Food security (due to reduced insects and pest infestations) and financial prospects of farmers can improve when the grain is mechanically handled with m. silo + acc. or m. silo.