Peritoneal patch in vascular reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a single Centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant venous resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with mesenterico-portal vein involvement is increasingly performed to achieve oncological resection. This study aims to report a single centre experience in peritoneal patch (PP) as autologous graft for vascular reconstruction (VR) during PD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent PD + VR with PP between December 2019 and September 2020 was performed, using a prospective collected database. Postoperative outcome and pathological margins were evaluated. Venous patency was assessed by computed tomography at day 7 and week 12 post surgery. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent PD + VR with PP reconstruction for pancreatic cancer, including one total pancreatectomy. VR consisted of lateral (n = 14) or tubular (n = 1) patch. The median PP length was 30 mm [26.3-33.8] and venous clamping time 30 min [27.5-39.0]. Computed tomography showed a patent VR in 93.3% and 53.3% after 7 days and 12 weeks, respectively; venous patency loss was always asymptomatic. The only postoperative VR-related complication was one mesenteric venous thrombosis. Five other patients experienced VR-unrelated complications: septic shock (n = 3), biliary fistula (n = 1) and post-traumatic subdural hematoma (n = 1). Mortality was nihil. At pathology, R0 resection (≥1 mm) was observed in 40.0% (6/15), venous margin was free in 46.7% (7/15), and venous wall was involved in 40.0% (6/15). CONCLUSIONS: Use of PP as venous substitute during PD + VR is safe and feasible with an acceptable postoperative morbidity, and a decreased but asymptomatic venous patency after 12 weeks which should question the role of anticoagulation therapy.

Protective peritoneal patch for arteries during pancreatoduodenectomy: good value for money.

PURPOSE: This study proposes and details a simple and inexpensive protective technique of wrapping the hepatic and gastroduodenal artery stumps with a peritoneal patch during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in order to decrease post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH). METHODS: Among the 85 patients who underwent PD between July 2020 and March 2021, 16 patients with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis received a peritoneal patch. The Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) was calculated. Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and PPH were diagnosed and graded according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. The mortality rate was calculated up to 90 days after PD. RESULTS: The mean ua-FRS of the 16 patients was 43% (range: 21-63%). Among them, 6 (38%) experienced clinically relevant-POPF, and a PPH was observed in two patients (13%). In these two patients who required re-intervention, the peritoneal patch was remarkably intact, and neither the gastroduodenal stump nor hepatic artery was involved. None of the patients experienced 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Although the outcomes are encouraging, the evaluation of a larger series to assess the effectiveness of the peritoneal protective patch for arteries in a high-risk pancreatic anastomosis is ongoing.

Staged Double Hepatectomy, Double Total Vascular Exclusion, and Double Venous Reconstruction by Peritoneal Patches in One Patient with Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the best treatment for colorectal liver metastases with good response to chemotherapy and in the absence of extrahepatic disease.1 With the amelioration of surgical technique, primary and recurrent colorectal liver metastases with venous invasion can be resected safely under short total vascular exclusion (TVE), and associated right thoracotomy can have a major benefit if resection at the hepato-caval junction is planned.2 The availability of the peritoneum as an autologous graft for venous reconstruction considerably facilitates the task of the surgeon.3 In this video, we present a patient who had staged double liver resection, double TVE, and double venous reconstruction by a peritoneal graft on the vena cava and the hepatic vein. METHODS: In March 2017, a 47-year-old female was diagnosed with rectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases, microsatellite stability, and Kras mutation. The patient received folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) chemotherapy, with good response and a decrease in tumor markers. After chemotherapy, a computed tomography (CT) scan showed one lesion located on the right liver with lateral invasion of the vena cava, and another lesion located in segment I. A liver-first strategy was decided and, in October 2017, the patient had a right hepatectomy extended to segment I and partially on the diaphragm, with lateral resection of the vena cava under isolated clampage of the vena cava and reconstruction with a peritoneal graft (60 mm). The patient received FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy for 3 months, and, while under radiotherapy for the rectal cancer, recurrence was diagnosed on the left liver lobe (two lesions), with lateral invasion of the left hepatic vein. Chemotherapy was shifted to folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI)-Avastin, with good response, allowing resection of the primary (T3N0M1), followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. In May 2019, the patient underwent two large resections on the left liver, including one under TVE, with opening of the diaphragm and intrathoracic control of the vena cava. The left hepatic vein was reconstructed laterally with a peritoneal graft (30 mm). RESULTS: Postoperative outcome was uneventful and the two hospital stays were 12 and 15 days, respectively. For the first hepatectomy, pathological examination showed two lesions (80 and 50 mm) with a residual tumor at 10% and R0 resection, and, for the second resection, pathological examination showed two lesions (18 and 20 mm) with residual tumor at 40-60% and R0 resection. In both cases, the tumor was in contact with the resected vein without wall infiltration. The reconstructed vena cava and hepatic vein were patent without stenosis. The patient is disease-free 3 years after the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Improvements in surgical technique combined with short TVE and associated thoracotomy allow some complicated liver resections to be performed safely. The use of the peritoneum for venous reconstruction is of great benefit in relation to safety and availability, especially in 'redo' liver surgery where intense adhesions can be encountered.

Inferior vena cava resection and reconstruction with a peritoneal patch for a leiomyosarcoma: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Leiomyosarcomas (LMs) of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are very rare neoplasms seldom reported in the literature. The majority of patients does not present with specific abdominal pain and IVC LMs are used to become symptomatic with the increase of tumor volume. The role of chemotherapy or radiotherapy is not yet defined and surgical resection seems to be the only chance to improve survival rates. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present a case of a 58-year-old female with a recent diagnosis of IVC LM who underwent surgery with a partial resection of the anterior wall of the vein using a lateral and partial vein clamping. The primary repair of the defect could result in stricture of the vein, so a parietal peritoneum patch was used for the vein reconstruction. The postoperative course was uneventful. DISCUSSION: Actual evidence suggests that vascular sarcomas have limited responsiveness to cytotoxic chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, so surgery is the treatment of choice. Major surgery entailing multivisceral and complex vascular resection is usually necessary to achieve negative margins and accurate vascular reconstruction techniques are mandatory to avoid serious circulatory complications. Different kinds of graft (biological or synthetics) are available for the reconstruction, with intrinsic advantages and limitations. The use of peritoneal patches seems a valid and cheap option for vascular reconstruction and it is gaining great attention in recent years. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that peritoneal graft could be a safe option to manage IVC defects in expert hands. A brief review of literature is also included.

Case series of extended liver resection associated with inferior vena cava reconstruction using peritoneal patch.

INTRODUCTION: Among various reported techniques for inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction, the superiority of one technique over another has not been clearly established. This study aimed at reporting the technical aspects of caval reconstruction using peritoneal patch during extended liver resections. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent extended liver resection associated with anterolateral caval reconstruction using a peritoneal patch from 2016 to 2019 were included in this study. Technical insights, intra-operative details, short and long-term results were reported. RESULTS: Overall six patients underwent caval reconstruction using peritoneal patch under total vascular exclusion. Half of them required veno-venous bypass. Caval involvement ranged from 30 to 50% of the circumference and from 5 to 7 cm of the length of the IVC. Caval reconstructions was performed using a peritoneal patch harvested from the falciform ligament in four cases and from the right pre-renal peritoneum and right part of the diaphragm in one Case each. Three cases underwent associated reimplantation the remnant hepatic vein. Median intra-operative blood loss and TVE duration were 500 ml and 41 min, respectively. One case experienced a severe complication (liver failure leading to death). R0 resection was achieved in all patients. All patients had patent IVC and remnant hepatic vein at last follow-up and none was on long-term therapeutic anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Caval reconstruction using a peritoneal patch in patients undergoing extended liver resection is feasible and cost-effective and associated with excellent long-term results.

Autologous peritoneal graft for venous vascular reconstruction after tumor resection in abdominal surgery: a systematic review.

Radical surgical resection (R0) is the only option to cure patients with borderline resectable or multivisceral intraabdominal malignancies involving major vessels. Autologous peritoneal flap has been described as a safe and versatile option for vascular reconstruction, but still limited experience exists regarding its use. An extensive literature review was performed to analyze results of vascular reconstruction with an autologous peritoneal graft. Fifteen reports were found for a total of 94 patients. No cases of arterial vascular reconstruction were found. Two different types of peritoneal patch have been described, backed (APFG, 30 patients) or not backed (ANFP, 64 patients) by posterior rectus sheath. A patch type of reconstruction was adopted in 70 patients (74.5%), while a tubular reconstruction in 24 (25.5%). Postoperative mortality was 5.3% (5 cases). Graft outcomes with very heterogeneous follow-ups (7 days-47 months) were available only in 85 patients (90.4%). Among them, a graft patency was documented in 80 patients (94.1%), while a stenotic graft was reported in 5 patients (5.9%). No differences in graft outcomes were observed between the patch and tubular groups (p = 0.103), nor between the ANFP and APFG groups (p = 0.625). In reported experiences, autologous peritoneal graft seems to represent a safe and versatile option for functional restoration of venous vascular anatomy after resection, especially in operations with high risk of contamination, trauma, liver transplantation and unplanned vascular resection. Unfortunately, the data available in the literature do not make it possible to draw any evidence-based conclusions on these considerations.