HemoClear: A Practical and Cost-Effective Alternative to Conventional Convalescent Plasma Retrieval Methods.

Convalescent plasma has increasingly been used to treat various viral infections and confer post-exposure prophylactic protection during the last decade and has demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes in patients infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has highlighted the need for cost-effective, accessible, and easy-to-use alternatives to conventional blood plasmapheresis techniques, allowing hospitals to become more self-sufficient in harvesting and transfusing donor plasma into recipients in a single setting. To this end, the use of a membrane-based bedside plasmapheresis device (HemoClear) was evaluated in an open-label, non-randomized prospective trial in Suriname in 2021, demonstrating its practicality and efficacy in a low-to middle-income country. This paper will review the use of this method and its potential to expedite the process of obtaining convalescent plasma, especially during pandemics and in resource-constrained settings.

Post-transplant recurrence of focal segmental glomerular sclerosis: consensus statements.

Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) is 1 of the primary causes of nephrotic syndrome in both pediatric and adult patients, which can lead to end-stage kidney disease. Recurrence of FSGS after kidney transplantation significantly increases allograft loss, leading to morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no consensus guidelines for identifying those patients who are at risk for recurrence or for the management of recurrent FSGS. Our work group performed a literature search on PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, and recommendations were proposed and graded for strength of evidence. Of the 614 initially identified studies, 221 were found suitable to formulate consensus guidelines for recurrent FSGS. These guidelines focus on the definition, epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and management of recurrent FSGS. We conclude that additional studies are required to strengthen the recommendations proposed in this review.

Outcomes of therapeutic plasma exchange for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma cast nephropathy.

Current treatment guidelines of myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN) recommend the institution of plasma cell-directed therapy and consideration of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), with the goal of rapid reduction of the serum free light chain (sFLC). However, the role of TPE continues to remain a subject of debate. The goal of this retrospective bi-institutional study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of TPE in combination with systemic therapy. Eighty patients were included in this analysis, of whom 72.5% had ≥50% drop in their initial involved sFLC. At 3 months from TPE initiation, the overall hematologic response rate (ORR) was 67.5% with a very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) rate of 40%. At 6 months, ORR was 57.5%, with ≥VGPR rate of 49%. The renal response rate at 3 and 6 months was 47.5% and 43.75%, respectively; the overall renal response rate was 48.75%. On multivariable analysis, every one unit increase in baseline creatinine (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, p = 0.006), and achievement of ≥VGPR (OR 21.7 p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with renal response. Also, a ≥50% drop in sFLC was favorably associated with renal response (OR 3.39, p = 0.09). With a median follow-up of 36.4 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 11 months. On multivariable analysis, achievement of renal response (hazard ratio [HR] 0.3, p < 0.0001) and newly diagnosed disease (NDMM; HR 0.43, p = 0.0055) were associated with improved OS. Among NDMM patients, those treated with daratumumab-based regimens had a trend for better OS (p = 0.15), compared to other regimens, but the difference was not significant. At the end of follow-up, an estimated 40.4% of patients who were on dialysis were able to become dialysis independent. In conclusion, our study highlights the poor survival of patients with MCN. Achievement of early renal response is crucial for prolonged OS, with daratumumab-based therapies showing promise.

Clinical application of centrifugal-membrane hybrid plasmapheresis in the treatment of hyperlipidemia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clarify the clinical application of centrifugal-membrane hybrid plasmapheresis (CMHP) in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 48 patients who were diagnosed with hyperlipidemia and had received CMHP treatment. Serum total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were monitored, and adverse reactions to the treatment were observed. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with hyperlipidemia received CMHP over 59 sessions. The average age of the 48 patients with hyperlipidemia, including 32 males (66.67%) and 16 females (33.33%), was 44.23 ± 12.02 years. Twenty-nine outpatients (60.42%) and 19 inpatients (39.58%) were included. Hypertriglyceridemia was diagnosed in 16 cases (33.33%), mixed hyperlipidemia in 31 cases (64.58%), and hypercholesterolemia in one case (2.08%). The pretreatment blood lipid concentrations were significantly different after the 59 CMHP treatments (p < .001). The concentrations of TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C decreased significantly after the treatment, and the median ratios of reduction were 67.06% (range: 58.97%-71.87%), 63.33% (range: 55.20%-74.86%), 45.87% (range: 35.86%-52.95%), and 66.09% (range: 44.37%-73.94%), respectively. Three adverse reactions (5.08%) were recorded. No differences were detected in therapeutic parameters, effects, or adverse reactions between the two blood cell separators, there was no difference in Lipoprotein apheresis efficacy. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study demonstrated the clinical application of CMHP in patients in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. However, further studies are needed applying CMHP with hyperlipidemia.

A donor safety evidence literature review of the short- and long-term effects of plasmapheresis.

Many blood establishments are expanding plasmapheresis collection capacity to achieve increasing plasma for fractionation volume targets, driven by immunoglobulin product demand. Some adverse events occur in both apheresis and whole blood collection, such as venepuncture-related trauma and vasovagal reactions. Others are specifically related to the apheresis procedure, such as citrate reactions, haemolysis, infiltration and air embolism. Whilst plasmapheresis procedures are generally well tolerated, theoretical longer term donor health considerations, such as the effects on donor plasma protein levels, bone mineral density, iron deficiency and malignancy also require consideration. An evidence-based framework that supports a safe and sustainable increase in the collection of plasma is essential. Our review demonstrates a lack of high-quality evidence on risks and outcomes specifically in plasmapheresis. Whilst conservative procedural controls and donor harm minimization policies will mitigate risk, high-quality evidence is needed to facilitate practice change that is safe and sustainable and maximizes the potential of individual donor differences.

Safety and protection of plasma donors: A scoping review and evidence gap map.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As part of a large-scale project to safely increase plasma collection in Europe, the current scoping review identifies the existing evidence (gaps) on adverse events (AEs) and other health effects in plasmapheresis donors, as well as factors that may be associated with such events/effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched six databases and three registries. Study characteristics (publication type, language, study design, population, outcomes, associated factors, time of assessment, duration of follow-up, number and frequency of donations, convalescent plasma [y/n], setting and location) were synthesized narratively and in an interactive evidence gap map (EGM). RESULTS: Ninety-four research articles and five registrations were identified. Around 90% were observational studies (57 controlled and 33 uncontrolled), and most of them were performed in Europe (55%) or the United States (20%). Factors studied in association with donor health included donor characteristics (e.g., sex, age) (n = 27), cumulative number of donations (n = 21), donation frequency (n = 11), plasma collection device or programme (n = 11), donor status (first time vs. repeat) (n = 10), donation volume per session (n = 8), time in donation programme (n = 3), preventive measures (n = 2) or other (n = 9). CONCLUSION: The current scoping review provides an accessible tool for researchers and policymakers to identify the available evidence (gaps) concerning plasmapheresis donation safety. Controlled prospective studies with long-term donor follow-up are scarce. Furthermore, additional experimental studies comparing the health effects of different donation frequencies are required to inform a safe upper limit for donation frequency.

Repeated apheresis donations cause important iron deficiency in male Japanese donors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In Japan, apheresis donation of plasma is allowed to a maximum of 24 times a year, and plateletpheresis are counted as two plasmapheresis donations. Diversion of the initial blood flow is conducted for all donations, and additionally, blood remaining in apheresis machine circuit is lost. Here, we aimed to investigate on the health impact of frequent apheresis donations, as measured by the serum ferritin (sFer). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 538 male apheresis donors and 538 age-matched whole blood (WB) donors, who gave informed consent to join the study, were enrolled. sFer were compared, according to age. Another group of 19 apheresis donors were followed during four consecutive donations. RESULTS: About half (48%) of repeat male apheresis donors had iron deficiency (sFer < 26 ng/mL), compared with lower rates (13.9%) among male WB donors. It was evident in all age groups, except for teenagers, possibly because of the lower number of donations. Follow-up of the 19 donors for 4 months revealed a progressive decrease in sFer. CONCLUSION: Blood remaining in the apheresis machine circuit and diversion of the initial blood flow have been implicated in iron deficiency for many years. Taking the present results, the manufacturer of apheresis equipment was requested to improve it to allow rinseback of the remaining blood, which was achieved only for plateletpheresis. Until further improvement, plasmapheresis frequency was reduced to 12 times a year. Additional measures, such as oral supplementation of iron, need to be considered.

Risk prediction of iron deficiency for plasmapheresis donors in China: Development and validation of a prediction model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to evaluate the iron stores in plasmapheresis donors and develop and validate an iron deficiency (ID) risk prediction model for plasmapheresis donors with potential or existing ID. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed plasmapheresis donors' serum ferritin (SF) and haemoglobin (Hb) levels. The candidate factors showing significant differences in the multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to establish a risk prediction scoring system. The participants were divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. Additional plasmapheresis donors from a different station were recruited for external validation. RESULTS: The SF levels in both male and female donors in the high-frequency group were significantly lower than those of new donors (male: p < 0.001; female: p = 0.008). The prevalence of ID in female regular donors with a high frequency was significantly higher than that in new donors (33.1% vs. 24.6%; odds ratio = 1.209 [95% CI: 1.035-1.412]). Donation frequency, age, Hb, body mass index and being pre-menopausal were identified as independent risk factors for ID (p < 0.05). The developed model exhibited good discrimination ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.7) and calibration (p > 0.05) in development, internal validation cohorts and external validation cohorts. CONCLUSION: A higher donation frequency has been associated with reduced SF levels and an increased risk of ID in women. The developed ID risk prediction model demonstrates moderate discriminative power and good model fitting, suggesting its potential clinical utility.

Does bortezomib influence pre-transplant desensitization therapy or benefit post-heart transplant outcomes for highly sensitized patients?

BACKGROUND: The use of bortezomib which is a proteasome inhibitor has been demonstrated to be efficacious in small number of patients as a desensitization strategy in heart transplant. We reviewed our single center's experience using Bortezomib along with plasmapheresis as desensitization therapy for highly sensitized patients to assess pre- and post-transplant outcomes. METHOD: We assessed 43 highly sensitized patients awaiting HTx (defined as cPRA > 50%) between 2010 and 2021 who underwent desensitization therapy with bortezomib. Only those patients who subsequently underwent HTx were included in this study. Enrolled patients received up to four doses of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 ) over 2 weeks in conjunction with plasmapheresis. The efficacy of PP/BTZ was assessed by comparing the calculated panel reactive antibodies to HLA class I or class II antigens. Post-transplant outcomes including overall survival and incidence of rejection were compared to those of non-sensitized patients (PRA < 10%, n = 649) from the same center. RESULTS: The average cPRA prior to PP/BTZ was 94.5%. Post-PP/BTZ there was no statistically significant decline in mean cPRA, class I cPRA, or class II cPRA, though the average percentage decrease in class I cPRA (8.7 ± 17.0%) was higher than the change in class II cPRA (4.4 ± 13.3%). Resulted were also replicated with C1q-binding antibodies showing more effect on I class compared to class II (15.0 ± 37.4% vs. 6.8 ± 33.6%) as well as with 1:8 dilutional assay (14.0 ± 23.0% vs. 9.1 ± 34.9%). Additionally, PP/BTZ treated patients and the control group of non-sensitized patients had similar overall 1 year survival (95.4 vs. 92.5%) but patients with PP/BTZ had increased incidence of AMR (79.1% vs. 97.1%, p = < .001), any treated rejection (62.8% vs. 86.7%, p = < .001) and de novo DSA development (81.4% vs. 92.5%, p = .007). Major side effects of PP/BTZ included thrombocytopenia (42%), infection requiring antibiotics (28%), and neuropathy (12%). CONCLUSION: The use of bortezomib in highly sensitized patients does not significantly lower circulating antibodies prior to heart transplantation. However, its use may improve the chances of obtaining an immuno-compatible donor heart and contribute to acceptable post-transplant outcomes.

A Randomized Trial Comparing Imlifidase to Plasmapheresis in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) poses a barrier to long-term graft survival and is one of the most challenging events after kidney transplantation. Removing donor specific antibodies (DSA) through therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) is a cornerstone of antibody depletion but has inconsistent effects. Imlifidase is a treatment currently utilized for desensitization with near-complete inactivation of DSA both in the intra- and extravascular space. METHODS: This was a 6-month, randomized, open-label, multicenter, multinational trial conducted at 14 transplant centers. Thirty patients were randomized to either imlifidase or PLEX treatment. The primary endpoint was reduction in DSA level during the 5 days following the start of treatment. RESULTS: Despite considerable heterogeneity in the trial population, DSA reduction as defined by the primary endpoint was 97% for imlifidase compared to 42% for PLEX. Additionally, imlifidase reduced DSA to noncomplement fixing levels, whereas PLEX failed to do so. After antibody rebound in the imlifidase arm (circa days 6-12), both arms had similar reductions in DSA. Five allograft losses occurred during the 6 months following the start of ABMR treatment-four within the imlifidase arm (18 patients treated) and one in the PLEX arm (10 patients treated). In terms of clinical efficacy, the Kaplan-Meier estimated graft survival was 78% for imlifidase and 89% for PLEX, with a slightly higher eGFR in the PLEX arm at the end of the trial. The observed adverse events in the trial were as expected, and there were no apparent differences between the arms. CONCLUSION: Imlifidase was safe and well-tolerated in the ABMR population. Despite meeting the primary endpoint of maximum DSA reduction compared to PLEX, the trial was unsuccessful in demonstrating a clinical benefit of imlifidase in this heterogenous ABMR population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number: 2018-000022-66, 2020-004777-49; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03897205, NCT04711850.

Lipoprotein apheresis: an established therapeutic modality for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients refractory to PCSK9 inhibitors: a case report and literature review.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), is a rare genetic disorder characterized by dual mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene, leading to dysfunctional or absent LDLRs, often accompanied by severe premature Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) and exhibiting refractoriness to aggressive pharmacological interventions. Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), a form of lipoprotein apheresis (LA), has been effectively utilized as an adjunctive treatment modality to reduce serum LDL-C levels in refractory cases of HoFH. Here, we report a case of a 36-year-old female with HoFH who developed xanthomas on her limbs and waist at age 7. Despite maximum-tolerated doses of statins from age 32, combined with ezetimibe and evolocumab, her LDL-C levels remained critically elevated at 12-14 mmol/L. Her genetic testing confirmed a homozygous LDLR mutation. At 35 years old, she experienced exertional chest pain, and percutaneous coronary intervention revealed severe calcific left main stenosis, necessitating stent implantation. Subsequently, she initiated once every 1-2 months DFPP. Pre-DFPP, her LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) levels were 13.82 ± 3.28 and 15.45 ± 0.78 mmol/L, respectively. Post-DFPP, her LDL-C and TC levels significantly decreased to 2.43 ± 0.33 mmol/L (81.76 ± 4.11% reduction) and 3.59 ± 0.41 mmol/L (76.76 ± 2.75% reduction), respectively. Lipoprotein (a) and triglycerides also decreased by 89.10 ± 1.39% and 42.29 ± 15.68%,respectively. Two years later, there was no progression of coronary artery disease, and her symptoms and xanthomas regressed significantly. Collectively, DFPP effectively reduces LDL-C levels in refractory cases of HoFH and contributes to delaying ASCVD progression, representing an efficacious adjunctive therapeutic modality.

Outcome of rituximab treatment in children with non-dialysis-dependent anti-GBM disease.

BACKGROUND: Anti-GBM disease is a rare vasculitis mediated by pathogenic antibodies against collagen IV. Anti-GBM disease presents with rapid progressive glomerulonephritis and leads to kidney failure if untreated. KDIGO recommends plasma exchanges (PEX) for antibody elimination and steroids plus cyclophosphamide (CTX) to suppress antibody production. CTX is associated with severe side effects including gonadal toxicity. Rituximab (RTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) might be a less toxic but equally efficient alternative to CTX. Studies in pediatric anti-GBM disease patients receiving RTX and MMF instead of CTX are lacking. METHODS: A retrospective survey in 8 tertiary German centers was performed. The clinical data of patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2022 were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Five adolescent patients treated with PEX and RTX and/or MMF due to anti-GBM disease were analyzed. All patients had anti-GBM antibodies, hematuria, glomerular proteinuria, and pulmonary hemorrhage. eGFR was 124 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 47-162), and all patients were non-dialysis-dependent but with relevant histological kidney affection (mean crescents on kidney biopsy 77%). Antibody clearance was achieved after 13 PEX cycles (range 6-31). Four out of 5 patients received methylprednisolone pulses. All patients received oral prednisolone and MMF, and four patients received a median of 4 RTX doses (range 2-4). After a mean follow-up of 27 months, 4/5 patients had conserved or improved kidney function, while one patient (20%) developed kidney failure. CONCLUSIONS: In this small series of pediatric non-dialysis-dependent anti-GBM disease patients, first-line treatment with RTX and MMF showed a favorable kidney outcome in 4/5 cases and had an acceptable side effect profile.

Divide et Vinces, Therapeutic Apheresis in Nephrological Clinical Practice.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) or plasmapheresis has been used in various life-threatening diseases as a primary treatment or in combination with other therapies. It was first successfully employed in the 1960s for diseases like Waldenström's disease and myeloma. Since then, TPE techniques using apheresis membranes have been introduced. Apheresis therapies separate plasma components from blood using membrane screening or centrifugation methods. TPE aims to remove substances involved in the pathophysiology of diseases. It selectively removes high-molecular-weight molecules, substances with prolonged half-life, and those associated with disease pathogenesis. TPE can be performed using membranes or centrifugation, with replacement of extracted plasma volume using albumin or fresh frozen plasma. TPE requires specific competencies in nephrology and can be prescribed and monitored by nephrologists and performed by dialysis nursing staff. TPE can be combined with adsorption-based therapies to enhance its effect, and this approach is called plasma filtration adsorption. Another variation is double plasma filtration, which selectively removes substances based on molecular size. TPE can also be combined with lipoprotein removal strategies for managing familial hypercholesterolemia. TPE is an affordable extracorporeal therapy that benefits patients with life-threatening diseases. It requires collaboration between nephrologists and other specialists, and our results demonstrate successful TPE without anticoagulation in general hospitalization or outpatient settings.

Efficacy of Therapeutic Apheresis for Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis Patients with Renal Involvement: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic apheresis (TA) is commonly used for cryoglobulinemic vasculitis (CV) patients, but its efficacy remains uncertain. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of different TA modalities, such as plasma exchange (PE), plasmapheresis (PP), and cryofiltration (CF), in treating CV patients with renal involvement. METHODS: Literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases was conducted up to December 2022. Studies that reported the outcomes of TA in adult CV patients with renal involvement were assessed. The protocol for this systematic review has been registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42023417727). The quality of each study was evaluated by the investigators using the validated methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors) quality score. RESULTS: 154 patients who encountered 170 episodes of serious events necessitating TA were evaluated across 76 studies. Among them, 51% were males, with a mean age ranging from 49 to 58 years. The CV types included 15 type I, 97 type II, and 13 type III, while the remaining patients exhibited mixed (n = 17) or undetermined CV types (n = 12). Among the treatment modalities, PE, PP, and CF were performed in 85 (56%), 52 (34%), and 17 patients (11%), respectively, with no identical protocol for TA treatment. The overall response rate for TA was 78%, with response rates of 84%, 77%, and 75% observed in type I, II, and III patients respectively. Most patients received steroids, immunosuppressants, and treatment targeting the underlying causative disease. The overall long-term renal outcome rate was 77%, with type I, II, and III patients experiencing response rates of 89%, 76%, and 90%, respectively. The renal outcomes in patients receiving PE, PP, and CF were comparable, with rates of 78%, 76%, and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents compelling evidence that combination of TA with other treatments, especially immunosuppressive therapy, is a successful strategy for effectively managing severe renal involvement in CV patients. Among the TA modalities studied, including PE, PP, and CF, all demonstrated efficacy, with PE being the most frequently employed approach.

Application of Lipid Apheresis in Acute Lipogenic Pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia-associated pancreatitis (HTG-AP) has been increasing. The pathogenesis of lipogenic pancreatitis is not fully understood. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the laboratory data, clinical manifestations, and prognosis of patients with lipid-derived pancreatitis who received lipid purification, to explore whether lipid purification is a better treatment for acute hyperlipidemic pancreatitis. METHODS: In this study, we enrolled five subjects diagnosed with HTG-AP at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between 2021 and 2022. We collected demographic data, medical histories, clinical manifestations, and laboratory data. All patients received routine therapy. Blood lipid purification was conducted using the double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) method. Plasma was separated from blood cells and purified to remove cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). SPSS was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Following a single lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment, significant improvements in serum lipid levels were observed. Three patients achieved triglyceride levels below 5.65 mmol/L within 24 h, while the remaining 2 patients experienced reductions of 82% and 78%, respectively. The average triglyceride level decreased from 36.82 to 7.27 mmol/L, representing an 80% reduction from baseline. Total cholesterol decreased by 59% on average, and LDL levels decreased by 69%. Statistically significant differences were observed in triglyceride and cholesterol levels before and after treatment. Four patients exhibited increased HDL levels posttreatment, while 1 patient showed a decrease. The average HDL/TC level was 21% higher after treatment. CONCLUSION: LA in HTG-AP effectively improves clinical symptoms, rapidly lowers lipid levels, and achieves good therapeutic outcomes.

To bite the hand that feeds you: A case of thrombotic microangiopathy due to Tiger snake bite.

This report details the case of a 51-year-old man with a Tiger snake bite who developed systemic envenomation, coagulopathy and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) requiring renal replacement therapy. He received plasma exchange as additional therapy while awaiting confirmation of the cause of the TMA. We discuss clinical decision making in detection of systemic envenomation and management of the rare complication of TMA, as well as current Australian guidelines around antivenom administration. This is the fourth known documented case of TMA from a Tiger snake bite in Australia.

Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients treated with chronic double filtration plasmapheresis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of chronic therapeutic plasmapheresis on humoral response following COVID-19 vaccination is poorly documented, especially among patients treated with double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP). OBJECTIVES: This retrospective single-center study evaluated the humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and studied anti-SPIKE seropositivity and antibody dynamics in patients with chronic DFPP at our institution. METHOD: All patients undergoing chronic DFPP at a tertiary center in France from December 2020 to November 2022 were included. We defined one patient subgroup as Group 1 to evaluate anti-SPIKE seropositivity after vaccination, with three groups based on their anti-SPIKE titers: (Group 1A) nonresponders (<0.8 UI/mL), (Group 1B) weak responders (0.8 to <250 binding antibody unit [BAU]/mL), and (Group 1C) strong responders (>250 BAU/mL). Group 2 served to evaluate antibody dynamics with anti-SPIKE levels measured 3 months after initial vaccination, Group 2A having a sustained level and Group 2B a declining pattern. RESULTS: The 21 patients included had a median age of 63 years, and 13 (56%) were male. The indications for chronic DFPP mainly included dysimmune pathologies (15; 71%) and familial dyslipidemia (6; 29%). For the humoral response to vaccination in Patient Group 1, the only nonresponder was a patient who had undergone kidney transplantation 30 months earlier and was on immunosuppressive medication. For Patient Group 2, the median follow-up of antibody titers was 13 months [12-13]. Two distinct patterns of anti-SPIKE dynamics were observed: a rapid decline in anti-SPIKE antibody titers within 6 months following the initial vaccination or booster dose (n = 10 [71.4%] Group 2A) and stable anti-SPIKE levels above 250 BAU/mL over >6 months (n = 4 [28.6%] Group 2B) with more patients with familial dyslipidemia in the former. CONCLUSIONS: Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination appears robust in patients undergoing chronic DFPP and may be linked to patients' immune status rather than DFPTP itself. Our results support current recommendations for administering three doses of vaccine with a booster every 6 months.

Therapeutic plasmapheresis in idiopathic membranous nephropathy anti-PLA2R-related: A case series.

Membranous nephropathy is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in non-diabetic adults; in 80% of patients it is idiopathic (PMN). PMN has an autoimmune pathogenesis, 70%-85% of patients have increased titer of antibodies to the podocyte membrane antigen PLA2R. The etiological, prognostic and predictive role of the Ab anti-PLA2R is demonstrated. Standard therapy consists in anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (RTX) combined with steroids or immunosuppressants according to the risk of progressive loss of kidney function. The immunosuppressive therapies are potentially associated to severe adverse events that lead to protocol suspension. Given their pivotal pathogenetic role, serum clearance of anti-PLA2R with plasmapheresis could have a beneficial impact on NS, particularly in patients not requiring or tolerating standard therapies. In this series, we present three cases of PMN anti-PLA2R related treated with a RTX plus plasmapheresis approach and demonstrate its overall effective role on anti-PLA2R titer and clinical outcomes.

Therapeutic plasma exchange provides native liver survival benefit in children with acute liver failure: A propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in pediatric acute liver failure (PALF). METHODS: All children aged 2-18 years with PALF were included. The intervention cohort included a subset of PALF patients undergoing complete three sessions of TPE, whereas the matching controls were derived by propensity score matching from the patient cohort who did not receive any TPE. Propensity matching was performed based on the international normalized ratio (INR), grade of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), age, bilirubin, and ammonia levels. The primary outcome measure was native liver survival (NLS) in the two arms on day 28. RESULTS: Of the total cohort of 403 patients with PALF, 65 patients who received TPE and 65 propensity-matched controls were included in analysis. The 2 groups were well balanced with comparable baseline parameters. On day 4, patients in the TPE group had significantly lower INR (P = 0.001), lower bilirubin (P = 0.008), and higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P = 0.033) than controls. The NLS was 46.15% in the TPE arm and 26.15% in the control arm. The overall survival (OS) was 50.8% in the TPE arm and 35.4% in the control arm. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a significantly higher NLS in patients receiving TPE than controls (P = 0.001). On subgroup analysis, NLS benefit was predominantly seen in hepatitis A-related and indeterminate PALF. CONCLUSION: TPE improved NLS and OS in a propensity-matched cohort of patients with PALF. Patients receiving TPE had lower INR and bilirubin levels and higher MAP on day 4.

Effects of Rheopheresis in dialysis patients with peripheral artery disease and diabetic foot ulcers: A multicentric Italian study.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) in hemodialysis (HD) patients has a significant social impact due to its prevalence, poor response to standard therapy and dismal prognosis. Rheopheresis is indicated by guidelines for PAD treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five HD patients affected by PAD stage IV Lerichè-Fontaine and ischemic ulcer 1C or 2C according to the University of Texas Wound Classification System (UTWCS), without amelioration after traditional medical therapy and/or revascularization, were selected and underwent 12 Rheopheresis sessions in 10 weeks. Improvements in pain symptoms using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), healing ulcers and laboratory hemorheological parameters have been evaluated. RESULTS: A clinically and statistically significant mean value reduction and of relative percentage differences between estimated marginal means (Δ), calculated at each visits, of NRS was observed, with a maximum value (-48.5%) between the first and last visit. At the end of the treatment period 14.3% of ulcers were completely healed, 46.4% downgraded, 53.6% were stable. Overall, no ulcers upgraded. A statistically significant reduction of the Δ, between the first and last visit, for fibrinogen (-16%) was also observed. CONCLUSION: Rheopheresis reduced overall painful symptoms; data suggest that it could heal or improve ulcers and hemorheological laboratory parameters in HD patients with PAD and ischemic ulcers resistant to standard therapies.