Value of perilesional biopsies in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: results of a prospective, non-randomized, surgeon-blinded study.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to address if detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) can be increased by additional perilesional biopsies (PB) in magnetic resonance (MR)/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized, surgeon-blinded study was conducted between February 2020 and July 2022. Patients were included with PSA levels < 20 ng/ml and ≥ one PI-RADS lesion (grades 3-5) per prostate lobe. Prostate biopsy was performed by two urologists. The first performed the MR-fusion biopsy with 3-5 targeted biopsies (TB) and 6 PB in a standardized pattern. The second performed the systematic (12-fold) biopsy (SB) without knowledge of the MR images. Primary outcome of this study is absence or presence of csPCa (≥ ISUP grade 2) comparing TB, PB and SB, using McNemar test. RESULTS: Analyses were performed for each PI-RADS lesion (n = 218). There was a statistically significant difference in csPC detection rate of TB + SB between PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions (18.0% vs. 42.5% vs. 82.6%, p < 0.001) and TB + PB (19.7% vs. 29.1% vs. 78.3%). Comparing only maximum ISUP grade per lesion, even SB plus TB plus PB did not detect more csPCa compared to SB plus TB (41.3% vs. 39.9%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We present prospective study data investigating the role of perilesional biopsy in detection of prostate cancer. We detected no statistically significant difference in the detection of csPCa by the addition of PB. Therefore, we recommend continuing 12-fold bilateral SB in addition to TB.

Evolution of anxiety management in prostate biopsy under local anesthesia: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION AND METHODS: Prostate biopsy (PB) is an essential step in the diagnosis and active surveillance of prostate cancer (PCa). Transperineal PB (TP-PB) is now the recommended approach and is mostly conducted under local anesthesia. However, this procedure can potentially cause anxiety for patients, given the oncological context and the fear of peri-procedural pain and complications. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the currently available tools for the management of peri-interventional anxiety during TP-PB, with a particular emphasis on the potential role of virtual reality (VR) in this setting. RESULTS: In TP-PB, preoperative anxiety can lead to increased pain perception, longer procedure time, and decreased patient satisfaction. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches have been explored to reduce anxiety, such as premedication, deep sedation, education, relaxation techniques, hypnosis, and music therapy, albeit with mixed results. VR has recently emerged in the technological armamentarium for managing pain and anxiety, and the efficiency of this technology has been evaluated in various medical fields, including pediatrics, gastroenterology, urology, gynecology, and psychiatry. CONCLUSION: Despite the paucity of available data, VR appears to be a safe and effective technique in reducing anxiety in many procedures, even in frail patients. No studies have evaluated the role of VR in TP-PB. Future research should thus explore the optimal way to implement VR technology and any potential benefits for TP-PB patients.

Tailoring biopsy strategy in the MRI-fusion prostate biopsy era: systematic, targeted or neither?

BACKGROUND: Magnetic  resonance imaging (MRI) followed by targeted biopsy (TBx) is utilized for prostate cancer (PCa) detection. However, the value of adding systematic biopsies (SBx) to targeted biopsy procedures (combined biopsy; CBx) in men with suspicious MRI findings has not been determined. METHODS: We analysed biopsy outcomes in 429 men with MRI lesions in the prospective multicenter STHLM3MRI pilot study, planned for prostate biopsy. Participants underwent 1.5T biparametric MRI without contrast enhancement, reported according to the PI-RADS v2, and with TBx plus SBx if the MRI lesion score was ≥ 3. The endpoints were clinically nonsignificant (nsPCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa), defined as ISUP grade groups 1 and ≥ 2, respectively. RESULTS: The median age was 65 years (59-70), and the median PSA 6.0 ng/ml (4.1-9.0). The detection rates of csPCa when using TBx or SBx combined were 18%, 46%, and 85% in men with PIRADS scores of 3 (n = 195), 4 (n = 121), and 5 (n = 113), respectively. This combined strategy detected csPCa in more men than TBx alone (43.6% vs 39.2%, p < 0.02), with similar detection of nsPCa (19.3% vs 17.7%, p = 0.2). In men with equivocal lesions (PI-RADS 3), the detection rates for csPCa were similar for the combined strategy and for TBx alone (17.9% and 15.4%, p = 0.06). However, there was an increase in the detection of nsPCa when using the combined strategy (21.0% vs 15.4%, p < 0.02). Men with equivocal lesions and a PSA density < 0.1 ng/ml2 or a Stockholm 3 test < 0.11 had a low risk of harboring csPCa. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementing targeted with systematic biopsies enhances clinically significant cancer detection. However, in men with equivocal lesions, this combination has potential for detecting nonsignificant disease. A subgroup of men with equivocal MRI findings may be identified as having a low risk for significant cancer and spared unnecessary biopsies.

External validation of the Rotterdam prostate cancer risk calculator within a high-risk Dutch clinical cohort.

PURPOSE: This study aims to externally validate the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator (RPCRC)-3/4 and RPCRC-MRI within a Dutch clinical cohort. METHODS: Men subjected to prostate biopsies, between 2018 and 2021, due to a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) were retrospectively included. The performance of the RPCRC-3/4 and RPCRC-MRI was analyzed in terms of discrimination, calibration and net benefit. In addition, the need for recalibration and adjustment of risk thresholds for referral was investigated. Clinically significant (cs) PCa was defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4. RESULTS: A total of 1575 men were included in the analysis. PCa was diagnosed in 63.2% (996/1575) of men and csPCa in 41.7% (656/1575) of men. Use of the RPCRC-3/4 could have prevented 37.3% (587/1575) of all MRIs within this cohort, thereby missing 18.3% (120/656) of csPCa diagnoses. After recalibration and adjustment of risk thresholds to 20% for PCa and 10% for csPCa, use of the recalibrated RPCRC-3/4 could have prevented 15.1% (238/1575) of all MRIs, resulting in 5.3% (35/656) of csPCa diagnoses being missed. The performance of the RPCRC-MRI was good; use of this risk calculator could have prevented 10.7% (169/1575) of all biopsies, resulting in 1.2% (8/656) of csPCa diagnoses being missed. CONCLUSION: The RPCRC-3/4 underestimates the probability of having csPCa within this Dutch clinical cohort, resulting in significant numbers of csPCa diagnoses being missed. For optimal performance of a risk calculator in a specific cohort, evaluation of its performance within the population under study is essential.

Clinical relevance of amyloid in prostate samples: a report on 40 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical findings in patients with incidental prostatic amyloidosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective search in the database of the Department of Pathology, Hospital de Bellvitge, for prostate specimens with amyloid. Congo red and immunohistochemical staining of the sections. Review of the patients' clinical charts for symptoms attributable to systemic amyloidosis. RESULTS: Amyloid deposition in the prostate was identified and reported in 40 patients between 2001 and 2022. Median age was 76.5 years (range = 62-90 years). Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 25 patients. Only four patients had a previous diagnosis of amyloidosis. In the remaining 36 the prostate sample (31 needle biopsies, two transurethral resections (TUR), two simple prostatectomies, one radical cystectomy for bladder cancer) provided the initial diagnosis. Amyloid deposits were mainly located in the wall of small vessels and rarely in the prostatic stroma. Immunohistochemistry was available in 32 cases, 26 of which were positive for TTR. All patients showed at least one symptom indicative of systemic amyloidosis, the most frequent being hearing loss (55%), carpal tunnel syndrome (42,5%) or other osteoarticular symptoms (tendinopathies, osteoarthritis), cataracts (37.5%) and cardiac symptoms (32.5%), among others. CONCLUSION: The prostate is a target tissue for amyloid deposition. The incidental finding of amyloid in prostate corresponds, in the majority of cases, to previously undiagnosed systemic TTR amyloidosis in patients lacking signs of heart involvement but having mainly osteoarticular symptoms, hearing and visual impairment.

[TMPRSS2-Erg/AR-V7: Prognostic value of tests in urine and biopsy rince material in prostate cancer]. / TMPRSS2-Erg/AR-V7 : valeur diagnostique des tests urinaires et sur liquides biopsiques dans le cancer prostatique.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, diagnostic biomarker research is oriented on a genomic characterisation of prostate cancer (PCa). This study evaluated diagnostic values of TMPRSS2-Erg fusion transcripts expression (TE) and androgen receptor variant 7 (AR-V7) on urine (tU) and biopsic rince material (tLRB) samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TE and AR-V7 have been tested by RT-PCR and RT-qPCR on urine and biopsies' rince liquid on 372 patients referred for prostate biopsies. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-three patients (62%) were diagnosed with PCa. tU.AR-V7 was positive for 15 healthy patients (28%) and 30 patients diagnosed with PCa (37%). tLRB.AR-V7 was positive for 66 patients (42%) diagnosed with PCa. Concerning TE for patients diagnosed with PCa, tU was positive for 59 patients (54%) and tLRB for 132 (55%). TE and TE/AR-V7 combination were significantly associated with PCa (P<0.001), as tLRB.AR-V7 (P<0.001). Sensitivity and specificity for TE/AR-V7 combination for PCa were respectively: tU.TE/AR-V7 67% and 70%, tLRB.TE/AR-V7 68.8% and 71%, and, tUtLRB.TE/AR-V7 83% and 60%. There was no benefit for AR-V7 and TE association versus TE alone when comparing AUC. CONCLUSION: AR-V7 is not specific of PCa because of detection on healthy patients. This study did not managed to show a sufficient diagnostic value for TE/AR-V7 combination on urine and biospic rince material tests. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Assessment of the influence of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies on erectile function: A prospective observational single-center study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy on erectile function. METHODS: This was a single-center, observational, prospective study of consecutive patients who underwent a prostate biopsy (transrectal or transperineal/fusion biopsy). Study participants completed the International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire before the procedure, and 3 and 6 months after. Prostatic biopsies were carried out following the standard procedure for both techniques. RESULTS: The study included 135 male patients with a mean age of 63.5 years. At baseline, 28 patients (21%) presented normal erectile function, whereas 107 patients (82%) presented erectile dysfunction, which was severe in four (3%), moderate in 49 (36%) and mild in 54 (40%), with an overall mean International Index of Erectile Function-5 score of 17.70. After 3 months, the rates were 29%, 3%, 27% and 38%, respectively (mean International Index of Erectile Function-5 score 17.95). At 6 months, the rates were 30%, 6%, 28% and 34%, respectively (mean International Index of Erectile Function-5 score of 17.77). No significant differences between pre- and post-biopsy International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores at 3 and 6 months were observed, even when analyzing transrectal and transperineal separately. The number of biopsy cores and number of previous biopsies did not influence the International Index of Erectile Function-5 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that prostate biopsy technique, number of biopsy cores and history of previous biopsy do not significantly impact erectile function in the medium term up to 6 months.

Antibiotic susceptibility of intestinal Escherichia coli in men undergoing transrectal prostate biopsies: a prospective, registered, multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine, in a prospective, multicentre setting, the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant (FQ-R) and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains in men undergoing transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) in Finland; and to survey the associated risk factors for having the previously mentioned strains. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a substudy of the trial investigating the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer diagnosis (Improved Prostate Cancer Diagnosis - Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsies and Biomarkers Multi-institutional Study [multi-IMPROD], NCT02241122). In all, 359 patients from four study centres were recruited to this prospective study. After having signed the informed consent form, these men with suspicion of prostate cancer completed a detailed questionnaire on their medical, smoking, and travelling history, as well as their recent use of antibiotics. After the bi-parametric MRI scan, TRUS-Bx was taken and a rectal swab sample was collected and cultured for determining the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of E. coli strains. The potential risk factors for having FQ-R or third-generation cephalosporin-resistant (3GC-R) E. coli strains were analysed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The percentage of FQ-R and 3GC-R E. coli strains amongst the study population was 13% and 8%, respectively. Amongst patients having E. coli strains, the rate of FQ-R and 3GC-R strains was 14% and 8%, respectively. Of the 3GC-R E. coli strains, 62% proved to be ESBL-producers and 88% were also FQ-R. In multivariate analysis, international travel during the preceding year significantly increased the risk of having a FQ-R E. coli strain (odds ratio [OR] 3.592, P = 0.001) and, unexpectedly, use of antibiotics during the previous year significantly decreased this risk (OR 0.442, P = 0.035). No significant risk factors for having 3GC-R E. coli were identified. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of intestinal FQ-R and/or 3GC-R (potentially ESBL-producing) E. coli strains in men undergoing TRUS-Bx in Finland is notable. The finding is consistent with the global increase in antimicrobial resistance. International travel appears to be an indisputable risk factor for having intestinal FQ-R E. coli strains. The contemporary antimicrobial resistance situation should be taken into account in the care of post-TRUS-Bx infections.

Quantity and quality of nucleic acids extracted from archival formalin fixed paraffin embedded prostate biopsies.

BACKGROUND: In Sweden, human tissue samples obtained from diagnostic and surgical procedures have for decades been routinely stored in a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, form. Through linkage with nationwide registers, these samples are available for molecular studies to identify biomarkers predicting mortality even in slow-progressing prostate cancer. However, tissue fixation causes modifications of nucleic acids, making it challenging to extract high-quality nucleic acids from formalin fixated tissues. METHODS: In this study, the efficiency of five commercial nucleic acid extraction kits was compared on 30 prostate biopsies with normal histology, and the quantity and quality of the products were compared using spectrophotometry and Agilent's BioAnalyzer. Student's t-test's and Bland-Altman analyses were performed in order to investigate differences in nucleic acid quantity and quality between the five kits. The best performing extraction kits were subsequently tested on an additional 84 prostate tumor tissues. A Spearman's correlation test and linear regression analyses were performed in order to investigate the impact of tissue age and amount of tissue on nucleic acid quantity and quality. RESULTS: Nucleic acids extracted with RNeasy® FFPE and QIAamp® DNA FFPE Tissue kit had the highest quantity and quality, and was used for extraction from 84 tumor tissues. Nucleic acids were successfully extracted from all biopsies, and the amount of tumor (in millimeter) was found to have the strongest association with quantity and quality of nucleic acids. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, this study shows that the choice of nucleic acid extraction kit affects the quantity and quality of extracted products. Furthermore, we show that extraction of nucleic acids from archival formalin-fixed prostate biopsies is possible, allowing molecular studies to be performed on this valuable sample collection.

Changes in the outcome of prostate biopsies after preventive task force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of PSA-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) are controversial. The Canadian and American Task Forces on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC & USPSTF) have released recommendations against the use of routine PSA-based screening for any men. We thought to assess the impact of these recommendations on the outcomes and trends of prostate needle biopsies. METHODS: A complete chart review was conducted for all men who received prostate needle biopsies at McGill University Health Center between 2010 and 2016. Of those, we included 1425 patients diagnosed with PCa for analysis. We Compared 2 groups of patients (pre and post recommendations' release date) using Welch's t-tests and Chi-square test. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze variables predicting worse pathological outcomes. RESULTS: When the release date of the USPSTF draft (October 2011) was used as a cut-off, we found an average annual decrease of 10.6% in the total number of biopsies. The median (IQR) baseline PSA levels were higher in post-recommendations group (n = 977) when compared to pre-recommendations group (n = 448) [8 ng/ml (5.7-12.9) versus 6.4 ng/ml (4.9-10.1), respectively. P = 0.0007]. Also, post-recommendations group's patients had higher Gleason score (G7: 35.4% versus 28.4% and G8-G10: 31.2% versus 18.1%, respectively. P < 0.0001). Moreover, they had higher intermediate and high-risk PCa classification (36.4% versus 32.8% and 35.5% versus 22.1%, respectively. P < 0.0001). The recommendations release date was an independent variable associated with higher Gleason score in prostate biopsies (OR: 2.006, 95%CI: 1.477-2.725). Using the CTFPHC recommendations release date (October 2014) as a cut-off in further analysis, revealed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed a reduction in the number of prostate needle biopsies performed over time after the recommendations of the preventive task forces. Furthermore, it showed a significant relative increase in the higher risk PCa diagnosis. The oncological outcomes associated with this trend need to be examined in further studies.

Are concurrent systematic cores needed at the time of targeted biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: MRI-guided targeted biopsies are advised in patients who have undergone an initial series of negative systematic biopsies, in whom prostate cancer (PCa) suspicion remains elevated. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether, in men with prior negative prostate biopsies, systematic cores are also warranted at the time of an MRI-targeted repeat biopsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with prior negative biopsy undergoing real time MRI/TRUS fusion guided prostate biopsy at our institute between 2014 and 2016. Patients with at least one index lesion on multiparametric MRI were included. All eligible patients underwent both systematic random biopsies (12-14 cores) and targeted biopsies (2-4 cores). RESULTS: The study included 74 men with a median age of 65 years, PSA level of 9.27ng/mL, and prostatic volume of 45ml. The overall PCa detection rate and the clinically significant cancer detection rate were 56.7% and 39.2%, respectively. Targeted cores demonstrated similar clinically significant PCa detection rate compared to systematic cores (33.8% vs. 28.4%, P=0.38) with significantly less tissue sampling. Indeed, a combination approach was significantly superior to a targeted-only in overall PCa detection (+16.7% overall detection rate, P=0.007). Although differences in clinically significant PCa detection were statistically non-significant (P=0.13), a combination approach did allow detecting 7 extra clinically significant PCas (+13.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with elevated PSA and prior negative biopsies, concurrent systematic sampling may be needed at the time of targeted biopsy in order to maximize PCa detection rate. Larger studies are needed to validate our findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients.

BACKGROUND: The current standard for Prostate Cancer (PCa) detection in biopsy-naïve men consists of 10-12 systematic biopsies under ultrasound guidance. This approach leads to underdiagnosis and undergrading of significant PCa while insignificant PCa may be overdiagnosed. The recent developments in MRI and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) imaging have sparked an increasing interest in PCa imaging with the ultimate goal of replacing these "blind" systematic biopsies with reliable imaging-based targeted biopsies. METHODS/DESIGN: In this trial, we evaluate and compare the PCa detection rates of multiparametric (mp)MRI-targeted biopsies, CEUS-targeted biopsies and systematic biopsies under ultrasound guidance in the same patients. After informed consent, 299 biopsy-naïve men will undergo mpMRI scanning and CEUS imaging 1 week prior to the prostate biopsy procedure. During the biopsy procedure, a systematic transrectal 12-core biopsy will be performed by one operator blinded for the imaging results and targeted biopsy procedure. Subsequently a maximum of 4 CEUS-targeted biopsies and/or 4 mpMRI-targeted biopsies of predefined locations determined by an expert CEUS reader using quantification techniques and an expert radiologist, respectively, will be taken by a second operator using an MRI-US fusion device. The primary outcome is the detection rate of PCa (all grades) and clinically significant PCa (defined as Gleason score ≥7) compared between the three biopsy protocols. DISCUSSION: This trial compares the detection rate of (clinically significant) PCa, between both traditional systematic biopsies and targeted biopsies based on predefined regions of interest identified by two promising imaging technologies. It follows published recommendations on study design for the evaluation of imaging guided prostate biopsy techniques, minimizing bias and allowing data pooling. It is the first trial to combine mpMRI imaging and advanced CEUS imaging with quantification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Dutch Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects registration number NL52851.018.15, registered on 3 Nov 2015. Clinicaltrials.gov database registration number NCT02831920 , retrospectively registered on 5 July 2016.

Clinical significance of proliferative inflammatory atrophy finding in prostatic biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) has been involved in prostatic carcinogenesis. However, little is known about the clinical significance of a PIA finding in prostatic biopsies (PBs). The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of prostate inflammatory atrophy (PIA) in prostate biopsies (PBs), its association to high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), prostate cancer (PCa), and tumor aggressiveness. METHODS: Prospective and observational study of PIA lesion in 528 extended PBs and 200 radical prostatectomy specimens (RPS). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: PIA, HGPIN, PCa incidence, Gleason score, clinical and pathologic tumor stage and insignificant tumor rate. Univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall incidence of PIA and HGPIN was 30.3% and 54%. In RPS, the incidence was 30.5% and 72%, respectively. No significant association was found between PIA and HGPIN. Overall PCa detection rate in PBs was 38.1%. PCa was found in 27.5% PBs with PIA and 42.7% of those without PIA, P < 0.001. In contrast, PCa was detected in 50.9% of PBs with HGPIN and 23% of those without HGPIN, P = 0.001. Multivariate analysis revealed that PIA decreased the risk of PCa, OR:0.59 (95%CI:0.37-0.95), P = 0.029, while HGPIN increased OR:3.16 (95%CI:2.04-4.90), P = 0.001. PIA was not related to Gleason grade and clinical stage, however it was associated to an insignificant tumors increase, OR:3.08 (95%CI:1.09-8.7), P = 0.033. The information in RPS suggests that PIA is associated with less aggressive tumors and a higher probability of insignificant tumors. CONCLUSIONS: PIA is present in one third of PBs, HGPIN in one half of them, and no association exists between both lesions. Contrary to HGPIN, PIA finding is associated to lower risk of PCa detection. Tumors accompanying PIA seem to be less aggressive and have a greater probability of being insignificant.

Urinary PCA3 to predict prostate cancer in a cohort of 1015 patients.

AIM: To evaluate the performance of urinary PCA3 test to predict prostate biopsy outcome in a large French cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A urine sample was prospectively obtained in 1015 patients undergoing prostate biopsies to determine the PCA3 score. The predictive value of PCA3 was explored using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC), multivariable logistic regression analysis and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: The median PCA3 score was significantly higher in patients with positive biopsies. The PCA3 score AUC was 0.76 (0.73-0.79), significantly higher than that of PSA (0.55; 0.51-0.58). At the cut-off of 35, sensitivity was 68 %, specificity 71 %, positive and negative predictive values 67 % and 71 %, and accuracy 69 %. Using multivariate analysis, PCA3 score appeared as an independent predictor of biopsy outcome and its addition to a base model including usual clinico-biological parameters resulted in a significant increase in predictive accuracy. At the cut-off of 20, about 1/2 of the eventual useless biopsies would have been avoided while ignoring 7 % of cancers with Gleason score ≥ 7. PCA3 score did not correlate to Gleason score but correlated to tumor volume (proportion of invaded cores). CONCLUSION: Urinary PCA3 is a useful test with high diagnostic performance for early prostate cancer diagnosis. Its correlation with cancer aggressiveness seems rather represented by a link to prostate volume than Gleason score.

The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations from a consensus panel.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a consensus on the utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to identify patients for focal therapy. METHODS: Urological surgeons, radiologists, and basic researchers, from Europe and North America participated in a consensus meeting about the use of mpMRI in focal therapy of prostate cancer. The consensus process was face-to-face and specific clinical issues were raised and discussed with agreement sought when possible. All participants are listed among the authors. Topics specifically did not include staging of prostate cancer, but rather identifying the optimal requirements for performing MRI, and the current status of optimally performed mpMRI to (i) determine focality of prostate cancer (e.g. localising small target lesions of ≥0.5 mL), (ii) to monitor and assess the outcome of focal ablation therapies, and (iii) to identify the diagnostic advantages of new MRI methods. In addition, the need for transperineal template saturation biopsies in selecting patients for focal therapy was discussed, if a high quality mpMRI is available. In other words, can mpMRI replace the role of transperineal saturation biopsies in patient selection for focal therapy? RESULTS: Consensus was reached on most key aspects of the meeting; however, on definition of the optimal requirements for mpMRI, there was one dissenting voice. mpMRI is the optimum approach to achieve the objectives needed for focal therapy, if made on a high quality machine (3T with/without endorectal coil or 1.5T with endorectal coil) and judged by an experienced radiologist. Structured and standardised reporting of prostate MRI is paramount. State of the art mpMRI is capable of localising small tumours for focal therapy. State of the art mpMRI is the technique of choice for follow-up of focal ablation. CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence for MRI in focal therapy is limited. mpMRI is not accurate enough to consistently grade tumour aggressiveness. Template-guided saturation biopsies are no longer necessary when a high quality state of the art mpMRI is available; however, suspicious lesions should always be confirmed by (targeted) biopsy.

Diagnostic Effects of Omitting Systematic Biopsies in Prostate Cancer Screening.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The optimal biopsy strategy in prostate cancer screening is unknown. This study aims to assess the diagnostic effects of omitting systematic biopsies in a screening cohort. METHODS: We used data from the STHLM3-MRI trial. A total of 7609 men aged 50-74 yr were randomised to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) if having an elevated risk of prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥3 ng/ml or Stockholm3 ≥11%). Participants with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 underwent targeted and systematic biopsies. Cancer detection rates from combined and targeted-only biopsies were presented as a risk ratio (RR). Subgroup analyses were stratified by age, PSA density (PSAd), and PI-RADS. Differences in reclassification rates at radical prostatectomy were calculated. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The median age of the participants was 66 yr (interquartile range: 61-71) and PSA 3.8 ng/ml (2.9-5.8). Out of 395 men undergoing combined biopsies, 52 (13.2%) had International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group (GG) 1 and 230 (58%) had ISUP GG ≥2 prostate cancer. Omission of systematic biopsies reduced cancer detection rates (RR of ISUP GG 1: 0.83 [95% confidence interval 0.64-1.07]; ISUP GG ≥2: 0.85 [0.81-0.90]; and ISUP GG ≥3: 0.86 [0.79-0.95]). Each case of averted ISUP GG 1 cancer was associated with 3.8 cases of missed ISUP GG ≥2 and 1.1 case of ISUP GG ≥3 cancer. Detection of fewer ISUP GG ≥2 cases than the number of avoided ISUP 1 cancer cases was observed in all subgroups when systematic biopsies were omitted. Using PSAd ≥0.05 ng/ml2 as a cut-off for a biopsy resulted in the same numbers of ISUP GG 1 tumours saved, with higher detection rates of ISUP GG ≥2 tumours. In 146 men undergoing radical prostatectomy, 46 (31.5%) versus 28 (19.2%) were upgraded following targeted biopsies versus a combined biopsy strategy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Complete omission of systematic biopsies in prostate cancer screening is associated with decreased detection of significant cancer, while reducing overdetection of insignificant cancer to a smaller extent. This strategy also increased the risk of histopathological misclassification. PATIENT SUMMARY: In a prostate cancer screening setting, we examined the diagnostic effects of systematic biopsies in addition to targeted biopsies in men with suspicious magnetic resonance imaging lesions. We found that exclusion of systematic biopsies led to reduced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Our findings emphasise the importance of incorporating systematic biopsies alongside targeted biopsies for improved diagnostic outcomes.

Optimal PSA density threshold and predictive factors for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in patient with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI.

INTRODUCTION: While Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 and 5 lesions usually justify prostate biopsy (PBx), the management of a PI-RADS 3 lesion can be discussed. The aim of our study was to determine the optimal prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) threshold and predictive factors of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with a PI-RADS 3 lesion on MRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using our prospectively maintained database, we conducted a monocentric retrospective study, including all patients with a clinical suspicious of prostate cancer (PCa), all of them had a PI-RADS 3 lesion on the mpMRI prior to PBx. Patients under active surveillance or displaying suspicious digital rectal examination were excluded. Clinically significant (csPCa) was defined as PCa with any ISUP grade group ≥ 2 (Gleason ≥ 3 + 4). RESULTS: We included 158 patients. The detection rate of csPCa was 22.2%. In case of PSAD ≤ 0.15 ng/ml/cm3, PBx would be omitted in 71.5% (113/158) of men at the cost of missing 15.0% (17/113) of csPCa. With a threshold of 0.15 ng/ml/cm3, the sensitivity and the specificity were 0.51 and 0.78 respectively. The positive predictive value was 0.40 and the negative predictive value was 0.85. According to multivariate analysis, age (OR = 1.10, CI95% 1.03-1.19, P = 0.007), and PSAD ≥ 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 (OR = 3.59, CI95% 1.41-9.47, P = 0.008) were independent predictive factors of csPCa. Previous negative PBx was negatively associated with csPCa (OR = 0.24, CI 95% 0.07-0.66, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our result suggests that the optimal PSAD threshold was 0.15 ng/ml/cm3. However, in this case omitting PBx in 71.5% of cases would be at the cost of missing 15.0% of csPCa. PSAD should not be used alone, other predictive factors as age and PBx history should also be considered in the discussion with the patient, to avoid PBx while missing few csPCa.

An Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Targeted-plus-perilesional Biopsy Approach for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: "Less Is More".

Background: Considering that most men benefit diagnostically from increased sampling of index lesions, limiting systematic biopsy (SBx) to the region around the index lesion could potentially minimize overdetection while maintaining the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a hypothetical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach. Design setting and participants: This single-center, retrospective analysis of prospectively generated data included all biopsy-naïve men with unilateral MRI-positive lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System category ≥3), undergoing both MRI-directed targeted biopsies and SBx. Grade group 2-5 cancers were considered csPCa. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The diagnostic performance of a targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach was compared with that of a targeted-plus-systematic biopsy approach. The primary outcome was the detection of csPCa. Secondary outcomes included the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ciPCa) and the number of total biopsy cores. Results and limitations: A total of 235 men were included in the analysis; csPCa and ciPCa were detected, respectively, in 95 (40.4%) and 86 (36.6%) of these 235 men. A targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach would have detected 92/95 (96.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 91.0-99.3%) csPCa cases. At the same time, detection of systematically found ciPCa would be reduced by 11/86 (12.8%; 95% CI 6.6-21.7%). If a targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach would have been performed, the number of biopsy cores per patient would have been reduced significantly (a mean difference of 5.2; 95% CI 4.9-5.6, p < 0.001). Conclusions: An MRI-directed targeted-plus-perilesional biopsy approach detected almost all csPCa cases, while limiting overdiagnosis and reducing the number of biopsy cores. Prospective clinical trials are needed to substantiate the withholding of nonperilesional SBx in men with unilateral lesion(s) on MRI. Patient summary: Limiting systematic biopsies to the proximity of the suspicious area on magnetic resonance imaging helps detect an equivalent number of aggressive cancers and fewer indolent cancers. These findings may help patients and physicians choose the best biopsy approach.

Determining the diagnostic value of PSMA-PET/CT imaging in patients with persistent high prostate specific antigen levels and negative prostate biopsies.

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of prostate specific membranous antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging to localize primary prostate cancer (PCa) in men with persistent elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous prostate biopsies that were negative for PCa. METHODS: In this study, 34 men with persistently elevated PSA-levels, previous negative for PCa biopsies and who subsequently underwent diagnostic PSMA-PET/CT imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Men were divided into 3 groups: 1. 12 men with a previous negative mpMRI scan (PI-RADS 1-2) 2. 17 men with a positive mpMRI scan (PI-RADS 3-5), but negative MRI-targeted biopsies and 3. Four men in whom mpMRI was contraindicated. If PSMA-avid lesions were seen, patients underwent 2-4 cognitive targeted biopsies in combination with systematic biopsies. The detection rate of PSMA-PET/CT for PCa, and the accuracy of (possible) targeted biopsies were calculated. RESULTS: Included men had a median PSA-level of 22.8 ng/mL (Interquartile Range 15.6-30.0) at the time of PSMA-PET/CT. Elevated PSMA-ligand uptake in the prostate suspicious for PCa was observed in 22/34 patients (64.7%). In 18/22 patients (54.5%), PSMA-targeted prostate biopsies were performed. In 3/18 patients (16.6%), the targeted biopsies showed International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score 1-2 PCa. The other men had inflammation or benign findings after histopathological examination of the biopsy cores. CONCLUSION: In this study, the clinical value of PSMA-PET/CT for patients with an elevated PSA-level, and negative for PCa biopsies was low. Only very few men were diagnosed with PCa, and no clinically significant PCa was found.

Recent Advances in Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies.

Prostate biopsy is the definitive investigation to diagnose prostate cancer. The ideal procedure would be one that offers fast and efficient results safely as an outpatient procedure. Historically, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy is considered the gold standard but transrectal biopsy can under-sample the anterior and apical regions of the prostate and is associated with a risk of prostate biopsy-related sepsis, which may require intensive care admission. Transperineal (TP) biopsy addresses the inefficient sampling of TRUS biopsy but historically has been done under general anaesthetic, which makes it difficult to incorporate into timed diagnostic pathways such as the National Health Service (NHS) 2-week cancer pathway. TRUS biopsy has remained the mainstay of clinical diagnosis because of its simplicity; however, the recent development of simpler local anaesthetic transperineal techniques has transformed outpatient biopsy practice. These techniques practically eliminate prostate biopsy-related sepsis, have a shallow learning curve and offer effective sampling of all areas of the prostate in an outpatient setting. The effectiveness of TP biopsy has been enhanced by the introduction of multiparametric MRI prior to biopsy, the use of PSA density for risk stratification in equivocal cases and combined with more efficient targeted and systematic biopsies techniques, such as the Ginsburg Protocol, has improved the tolerability and diagnostic yield of local anaesthetic TP biopsies, reducing the risk of complications from the oversampling associated with transperineal template mapping biopsies. Areas where the literature remains unclear is the optimum number of cores needed to detect clinically significant disease (CSD) in patients with a definable lesion on MRI, in particular, whether there is a need for systematic biopsy in the face of equivocal MRI findings to ensure no CSD is missed. The Covid-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on prostate cancer referrals and prostate biopsy techniques within the UK; prior to the pandemic 65% of all prostate biopsies were TRUS, since the pandemic the proportions have reversed such that now over 65% of all prostate biopsies in the NHS are transperineal.