Robotic-assisted vs. open ureteral reimplantation: a multicentre comparison.

PURPOSE: Open ureteral reimplantation is considered the standard surgical approach to treat distal ureteral strictures or injuries. These procedures are increasingly performed in a minimally invasive and robotic-assisted manner. Notably, no series comparing perioperative outcomes and safety of the open vs. robotic approach are available so far. METHODS: In this retrospective multi-center study, we compared data from 51 robotic ureteral reimplantations (RUR) with 79 open ureteral reimplantations (OUR). Both cohorts were comparatively assessed using different baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes. Moreover, a multivariate logistic regression for independent predictors was performed. RESULTS: Surgery time, length of hospital stay and dwell time of bladder catheter were shorter in the robotic cohort, whereas estimated blood loss, postoperative blood transfusion rate and postoperative complications were lower than in the open cohort. In the multivariate linear regression analysis, robotic approach was an independent predictor for a shorter operation time (coefficient - 0.254, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.342 to - 0.166; p < 0.001), a lower estimated blood loss (coefficient - 0.390, 95% CI - 0.549 to - 0.231, p < 0.001) and a shorter length of hospital stay (coefficient - 0.455, 95% CI - 0.552 to - 0.358, p < 0.001). Moreover, robotic surgery was an independent predictor for a shorter dwell time of bladder catheter (coefficient - 0.210, 95% CI - 0.278 to - 0.142, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: RUR represents a safe alternative to OUR, with a shorter operative time, decreased blood loss and length of hospital stay. Prospective research are needed to further define the extent of the advantages of the robotic approach over open surgery.

Perioperative and functionnal outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open ureterovesical reimplantation for benign lower ureteral pathologies: a single-center comparative study.

PURPOSE: The robot-assisted laparoscopic (RALUVR) and open (OUVR) approaches have both been described for ureterovesical reimplantation to treat benign lower ureteral pathologies. Thus, we aimed to compare the perioperative and functional outcomes of RALUVR vs. OUVR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparative study including all consecutive patients treated with RALUVR or OUVR for benign lower ureteral pathologies between January 2013 and December 2022 at our center. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the predictors of complication ≥ Clavien-Dindo (CD) III within 90 days, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and 90-day overall success. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses were used to assess vesicoureteral reflux-free (VU-RFS) and stenosis-free (SFS) survivals. RESULTS: Overall, 44 patients underwent RALUVR (n = 19; 43%) and OUVR (n = 25; 57%). In univariable logistic regression analyses, the use of RALUVR vs. OUVR was not significantly associated with postoperative complications ≥ CDIII (OR = 0.98; 95% CI=[0.17-5.09]; p = 0.98), and 90-day overall success (OR = 1.43; 95% CI=[0.24-11.28]; p = 0.7). Despite a shorter median LOS after RALUVR vs. OUVR (4 vs. 10 days, respectively; p < 0.001), multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no impact of the surgical approach on prolonged LOS (OR = 0.51, 95% CI=[0.03-13.86]; p = 0.65). No significant difference was observed in 2-year VU-RFS (72.9% vs. 100%, respectively; p = 0.2) and 2-year SFS between the RALUVR and OUVR groups (85.7% vs. 87.7%, respectively; p = 0.8). In Cox regression analysis, the use of RALUVR vs. OUVR was not significantly associated with VU-RFS (HR = 4.26; 95% CI=[0.38-47.84]; p = 0.24) or SFS (HR = 1.32; 95% CI=[0.22-8.01]; p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: We observed that RALUVR provides similar perioperative and functional outcomes as compared to OUVR, except for potentially shorter LOS.

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir versus transvesicoscopic Cohen reimplantation for ureterobladder junction malformations in children.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir (LLG) and transvesicoscopic Cohen reimplantation (TCR) in the treatment of vesicoureteral junction obstruction (VUJO) and vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 66 pediatric patients with VUJO and VUR. They were classified into two groups, undergoing either the laparoscopic Lich-Gregoir operation (LLGO) (n = 35) or transvesicoscopic Cohen reimplantation operation (TCRO) (n = 31). The surgeries were performed between April 2018 and September 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, China. General characteristics, preoperative attributes, postoperative complications, renal function recovery, and improvement of hydronephrosis were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: All surgical procedures were successful with no requirement for reoperation. Both groups were comparable with respect to gender, affected side, weight, and postoperative complications. Nonetheless, the LLGO group contained a greater number of children younger than 12 months. The LLGO group demonstrated superiority over the TCRO group regarding the duration of the operation, intraoperative blood loss, and length of postoperative hospital stay. In contrast, postoperative complications, recovery of renal function, and hydronephrosis improvement did not exhibit statistically significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Both LLGO and TCRO were demonstrated to be precise, safe, and reliable surgical methods for treating pediatric VUJO and VUR. LLGO ureteral reimplantation offers particular advantages in selecting cases and appears more suitable for children younger than 12 months who have a small bladder capacity.

Transcatheter non-acute retrieval of the tine-based leadless ventricular pacemaker.

AIMS: We report our single-centre experience of mid-term to long-term retrieval and reimplantation of a tine-based leadless pacemaker [Micra transcatheter pacing system (TPS)]. The TPS is a clinically effective alternative to transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemakers. Whereas it is currently recommended to abandon the TPS at the end of device life, catheter-based retrieval may be favourable in specific scenarios. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report on nine consecutive patients with the implanted TPS who subsequently underwent transcatheter retrieval attempts. The retrieval system consists of the original TPS delivery catheter and an off-the-shelf single-loop 7 mm snare. The procedure was guided by fluoroscopy and intracardiac echocardiography. After an implantation duration of 3.1 ± 2.8 years (range 0.4-9.0), the overall retrieval success rate was 88.9% (8 of 9 patients). The mean procedure time was 89 ± 16 min, and the fluoroscopy time was 18.0 ± 6.6 min. No procedure-related adverse device events occurred. In the one unsuccessful retrieval, intracardiac echocardiography revealed that the TPS was partially embedded in the ventricular tissue surrounding the leadless pacemaker body in the right ventricle. After retrieval, three patients were reimplanted with a new TPS device. All implantations were successful without complications. CONCLUSION: A series of transvenous late retrievals of implanted TPS devices demonstrated safety and feasibility, followed by elective replacement with a new leadless pacing device or conventional transvenous pacing system. This provides a viable end-of-life management alternative to simple abandonment of this leadless pacemaker.

Single-port plus one in pediatric robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux, a comparative analysis with short-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To observe the safety and short-term outcomes of a new way of laparoscopic trocar placement in pediatric robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux. METHODS: The retrospective study included 32 patients under 14 years diagnosed with primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). All these patients underwent robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation in our department from December 2020 to August 2022. These patients were divided into the following groups according to the different ways of trocar placement: 13 patients in group single-port plus one (SR) and 19 patients in group multiple-port (MR). Patients' characteristics as well as their perioperative and follow-up data were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the data regarding patients' characteristics and preoperative data. These data included the grade of vesicoureteral reflux according to the voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), and the differential degree of renal function (DRF) at the following time points: preoperative, postoperative, and comparison of preoperative and postoperative. There was no difference between the two groups. During surgery, the time of artificial pneumoperitoneum establishment, ureteral reimplantation time, and total operative time in the SR group were longer than those in the MR group. Yet only the time of artificial pneumoperitoneum establishment shows a statistical difference (P < 0.0001). Also, the peri-operative data, including the volume of blood loss, fasting time, hospitalization, and length of time that a ureteral catheter remained in place, and the number of postoperative complications demonstrate no difference. In addition, the SFU grade and VCUG grade at the following time point also show no difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that SR in robotic-assisted Lich-Gregoir ureteral reimplantation has reached the same surgical effects as MR. In addition, the single-port plus one trocar placement receives a higher cosmetic satisfaction score from parents and did not increase the surgical time and complexity.

Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian population.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing for reimplantation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not been established and varies from a few weeks to several months. The aim of this study was to assess the commendable time between implant removal and reimplantation in patients who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 361 patients who were treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee chronic PJI at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, surgical variables, microbiology data, and time to reimplantation were recorded. All patients were followed for a minimum of one year. Treatment failure was defined by Delphi criteria. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate survival rates and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of treatment failure. RESULTS: In final analysis, 27 (7.5%) had treatment failure. Factors related to treatment failure including interim spacer exchange (OR, 3.13; confidence interval (CI), 1.04-9.09, p = 0.036), higher ESR level at reimplantation (OR, 1.85; CI, 1.05-3.57; p = 0.04), and time to reimplantation (OR, 1.00; CI, 1.003-1.005, p = 0.04). Performing revision arthroplasty surgery from 16 to 20 weeks had highest successful rate. The reimplantation over 24 weeks had a lower successful rate. However, no statistical significance in comparing each interval group. CONCLUSION: Our study emphasized the importance of timely reimplantation in achieving successful outcomes. Factors such as ESR levels, spacer exchange, and the duration of time to reimplantation influenced the likelihood of treatment failure in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee PJI.

Hearing outcomes following reimplantation of functional legacy cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, patients with certain legacy cochlear implants (CIs) have sought out reimplantation to enjoy the benefits offered by newer processor technology. This decision can be difficult, especially when the individual relies exclusively on the device for communication and scores at the ceiling of performance metrics. To date, most outcome data is derived from reimplantation of a non-functioning CI-a relatively easy decision. The aim of this study is to report hearing outcomes following reimplantation of legacy implants to guide surgeons and patients approaching this high-stakes clinical situation. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Four patients implanted with Advanced Bionics Clarion C1 devices over 20 years ago underwent reimplantation. RESULTS: Three reimplanted patients demonstrated a maintenance or improvement in their audiometric performance with one patient experiencing only a 5 % decrease in AzBioQ score. Each patient expressed satisfaction with the expansion of technological capabilities including improved battery life, and device connectivity. There were no failed reimplantations or other adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Reimplantation of a functioning legacy CI result in stability or improvement in auditory performance. All individuals in this series report that they enjoy the new connectivity and programming technologies. As the rate advancement in CI technology continues to increase and newer device architectures emerge, these data will help to inform the decision to reimplant functioning devices.

Cochlear reimplantation outcomes over 20 years: Expertise in reimplantation surgery and auditory-speech rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present an institution's experience with cochlear reimplantation (CRI), to assess surgical challenges and post-operative outcomes and to increase the success rate of CRI. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective single-institution study. SETTING: Tertiary medical center. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from 76 reimplantation cases treated in a tertiary center between 2001 and 2022. Clinical features including etiology of hearing loss, type of failure, surgical issues, and auditory speech performance were analyzed. Categorical Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores were used to evaluate pre- and post-CRI outcomes. RESULTS: The CRI population comprises of 7 patients from our institute,69 referred patients from other centers. Device failure was the most common reason (68/76, 89.5 %) for CRI; in addition, there were 7 medical failures and 1 had both soft device failure. Medical failures included flap rupture and device extrusion, magnet migration, auditory neuropathy, leukoencephalopathy, foreign-body residue and meningitis. In 21/76 patients, the electrode technology was upgraded. The mean time to failure was 0.58-13 years, with a mean of 4.97 years. The mean (± SD) CAP and SIR scores before and after CRI were 5.2 ± 1.2 versus 5.5 ± 1.1 and 3.4 ± 1.1 versus 3.5 ± 1.1, respectively. Performance was poor in six patients with severe cochlear malformation, auditory nerve dysplasia, leukoencephalopathy, and epilepsy. CONCLUSION: CRI surgery is a challenging but relatively safe procedure, and most reimplanted patients experience favorable postoperative outcomes. Medical complications and intracochlear damage are the main causes of poor postoperative results. Therefore, adequate preoperative preparation and atraumatic CRI should be carried out for optimal results.

Surgical and audiologic outcomes following revision cochlear implantation in children.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of cochlear implantation failure is rare; however, complications can arise in which revision surgery becomes necessary. The purpose of this study is to review our institutional experience with revision cochlear implantation to further understand the surgical and audiological outcomes after cochlear implant failure. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent revision cochlear implantation from 2014 to 2022 at a single institution. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients required reimplantation within the 8-year study period. During this time frame, a total of 202 cochlear implants were implanted in 171 pediatric patients, resulting in a reimplantation rate of 5.9 %. Our reimplantation patient population were majority white (61.9 %), female (52.4 %), and insured by Medicaid (61.9 %). The average age at implantation was 54.8 months ±47.5 months and the average age at reimplantation was 100.1 months ±55.9 months. The average time between initial implantation and reimplantation was 46.2 months ±30.2 months. The most common sign of failure was abnormal impedances (47.6 %). Reimplantation was required more often for hard failure (76.2 %), which occurred secondary to trauma in 56.3 % of patients, and occurred more frequently in those ages 5-7. Operative findings were unremarkable in 81 % of patients. Those with audiologic data were noted to have stable or improved thresholds after their revision surgery. Three of the 21 patients discontinued use of their processor on the revised ear. Of these, two had known trauma associated with implant failure that was not immediately addressed. CONCLUSION: We noted increased rates of hard failure, most commonly secondary to trauma. We noted that majority of those who discontinued use of their implant after revision surgery had associated traumatic injuries that ultimately delayed their presentation and surgery.

Acquired cholesteatoma after cochlear implants: case series and literature review.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence and management of acquired cholesteatoma after cochlear implantation in pediatric and adult patients. METHODS: Retrospective case review of pediatric and adult cochlear implants (CI) followed at a tertiary referral center and literature review of acquired cholesteatoma after CI surgery, to identify its prevalence, cause, and treatment. RESULTS: Nine pediatric CIs were diagnosed with cholesteatoma in seven patients after 6.4 ± 4 years from CI surgery, and two adults after 11.3 and 21.7 years from CI surgery. Thirty-four pediatric cases and 26 adult cases are described in the literature. Cholesteatoma has a prevalence of 0.54% in pediatric CIs, and 1.79% in adult CIs (case series and literature). Adult cases were diagnosed significantly later compared to pediatric cases (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.0460). Three pediatric cholesteatomas were treated with conservative surgery and preservation of the CI; they all developed recurrent disease. The remaining pediatric cases underwent subtotal petrosectomy with simultaneous CI explantation and staged reimplantation. Only one case recurred. The adult cases underwent simultaneous subtotal petrosectomy, explantation, and reimplantation. Similarly, 33.3% of cases treated with conservative/reconstructive surgery in the literature required revision surgery or conversion to subtotal petrosectomy against 6.2% of subtotal petrosectomies in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Cholesteatoma after CI is a rare and late-onset complication of CIs. It is more prevalent in the adult CI population, although it affects children significantly earlier. The treatment of choice is subtotal petrosectomy and CI explantation with simultaneous or staged reimplantation.

Implantation and reimplantation: epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis over the last 30 years.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the increasing number of cochlear implant (CI) recipients, growing indications, and the aging population, the reimplantation of CI recipients has become a focus of attention. The aim of this study is to examine the causes, timing, and postoperative speech understanding in a large cohort over the past 30 years. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was conducted on over 4000 CI recipients and 214 reimplanted children and adults from 1993 to 2020. This involved collecting and comparing data on causes, manufacturer information, and demographic data. In addition, a comparison of speech understanding in Freiburg monosyllables and numbers before and after reimplantation was carried out. RESULTS: Children did not exhibit elevated rates of reimplantation. The overall reimplantation rate in the entire cohort was 5%. The CI overall survival rate after 10 years in the entire cohort was 95.2%. Device failure was the most common reason for reimplantation, with 48% occurring within the first 5 years after implantation. The second most common reason was medical complications, with the risk of reimplantation decreasing as more time passed since the initial implantation. There were no significant differences in Freiburg numbers and monosyllable comprehension before and after reimplantation, both in the overall cohort and in the subcohorts based on indications. Even a technical upgrade did not result in a significant improvement in speech understanding. DISCUSSION: There was no significant difference in the frequency of reimplantation based on patient age, especially when comparing children and adults. Device failure is by far the most common indication for reimplantation, with no significant difference in implant survival between manufacturers. Patients most often choose the same manufacturer for reimplantation. The likelihood of reimplantation decreases with increasing time since the initial implantation. The indication for reimplantation should be carefully considered, as on average, no improved speech understanding is achieved, regardless of the cause, even with a technical upgrade.

Success Rate After 2-Stage Spacer-Free Total Hip Arthroplasty Exchange and Risk Factors for Reinfection: A Prospective Cohort Study of 187 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage prosthesis exchange is the treatment of choice for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of a total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially when the bone and surrounding soft tissues are compromised or difficult-to-treat pathogens are implicated. The aims of our study were as follows: (1) to determine the outcome of 2-stage prosthesis exchange for the treatment of PJI after THA and (2) to determine the risk factors for reinfection leading to subsequent revision surgeries after reimplantation. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 187 consecutive patients who underwent a 2-stage THA exchange with resection arthroplasty for PJI from 2013 to 2019. The mean (± SD) duration of follow-up was 54.2 ± 24.9 months (range, 36 to 96), and the mean interval until reimplantation was 9.8 ± 8.9 weeks (range, 2 to 38). All patients remained in a spacer-free girdlestone situation between the 2 stages of treatment. Patients who remained infection-free after their 2-stage treatment were considered to have achieved treatment success. RESULTS: The overall success rate was 85.6%. The cumulative probability of reinfection was 11.5% after one year and 14% after 2 years after reimplantation. High virulence or difficult-to-treat pathogens were significant and independent risk factors for reinfection (HR [hazard ratio] = 3.71, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.47 to 9.36, P = .006 and HR = 3.85, 95% CI: 1.73 to 8.57, respectively, P = .001), as was previous 2-stage hip prosthesis exchange (HR = 3.58, 95% CI: 1.33 to 9.62, P = .01). Overall reoperation and revision rates were 26.2 and 16.6%, respectively. Re-infected patients had an 80% higher probability of reoperation than noninfected ones (P < .001, log-rank = 102.6), and they were 55% more likely to undergo revision surgery during their follow-up (P < .001, log-rank = 55.4). CONCLUSIONS: Reinfection rates after 2-stage spacer-free THA revision for PJI still remain high but are comparable to those including cement spacers. Patients who have had prior failed 2-stage implant exchanges or are infected by high-grade or difficult-to-treat pathogens are at high risk for treatment failure.

Diagnostic and Predictive Efficacy of Synovial Fluid Versus Serum C-Reactive Protein Levels for Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Reimplantation Success.

BACKGROUND: A 2-stage exchange revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is associated with major risks for reinfection. Although serum markers are frequently used for diagnosis, their effectiveness remains debatable. Synovial fluid markers may offer a more accurate diagnosis of PJI; however, the importance of these biomarkers, notably synovial fluid C-reactive protein (syCRP), remains controversial, particularly in the context of reimplantation. The present study aimed to clarify these diagnostic uncertainties by evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of syCRP versus serum CRP (seCRP) levels in the context of PJI and recurring or persisting infections before reimplantation. METHODS: A total of 186 patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: aseptic revision (n = 112) and PJI revision (n = 74). Of the PJI group, 65 were categorized as success and 9 as failure, based on the presence of recurrent or persistent infection before reimplantation. The syCRP and seCRP levels and their changes were assessed preoperatively and in the first-stage and second-stage revisions. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curves (AUCs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Both seCRP and syCRP levels were significantly elevated in the PJI group compared with the aseptic group (P < .001). The ROC curve analysis highlighted the enhanced diagnostic accuracy of syCRP for PJI, with an AUC of 0.93 versus 0.80 for seCRP. Furthermore, syCRP proved to be more reliable in predicting reimplantation success, exhibiting an AUC of 0.86 versus 0.63 for seCRP. In evaluating trends in CRP levels to determine reimplantation timing, changes in syCRP levels demonstrated superior diagnostic utility, exhibiting an AUC of 0.79 versus 0.63 for changes in seCRP levels. CONCLUSIONS: In assessing PJI and infections before reimplantation, syCRP may offer enhanced accuracy compared with seCRP. Nevertheless, variations in both syCRP and seCRP levels did not consistently predict the outcome of reimplantation.

Prognostic Implications of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Two-Stage Knee Arthroplasty Reimplantations: A Minimum Five-Year Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical challenge of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPICs) persists in 2-stage resection arthroplasty for managing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total knee arthroplasty.(TKA). This study aimed to investigate the incidence of UPICs during the definitive reimplantation phase of 2-stage resection arthroplasty of the knee and to assess both the infection-free and revision-free survivorship of the implanted prosthesis. METHODS: This retrospective study included 450 2-stage resection arthroplasties of primary knee prostheses performed between January 2012 and April 2017. Patients were excluded if they: (1) underwent three or more staged resections, (2) had ambiguous clinical documentation or deviated from the 2-stage protocol, or (3) underwent revision arthroplasty prior to the PJI. Additionally, patients presumed aseptic before the second-stage reimplantation were excluded if they lacked joint aspiration or met the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI before implantation. RESULTS: After exclusions, 300 patients were analyzed. Among them, 14% had UPIC during the second-stage reimplantation. The follow-up time was 2,316 (range, 1,888 to 3,737) days and 2,531 (range, 1,947 to 3,349) days for UPIC and negative intraoperative culture (NIC) groups, respectively. Rerevision due to subsequent PJI occurred in 26.2% of UPIC patients and 15.1% of NIC patients. The 2-year infection-free survival rates for the NIC, one UPIC, and ≥ two UPIC cohorts were 99.5, 98.2, and 94.3%, respectively, while the 5-year survival rates were 92.1, 91.1, and 54.3%, respectively. The unfavorable survivorship was significantly different in multiple UPIC cases (P < 0.001). Multiple UPICs with pathogens consistent with the first-stage findings were strongly associated with the risk of reinfection (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An UPIC was identified in 14% of second-stage reimplantations. Patients who had multiple UPICs demonstrated truncated survivorship and suboptimal outcomes relative to the NIC and single UPIC cohorts, especially with pathogen consistency to the first-stage surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Isolated laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteric reimplantation (I-LEVUR) for upper moiety ectopic ureter without lower moiety vesicoureteric reflux.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of isolated laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteric reimplantation (I-LEVUR) for upper moiety ectopic ureter in patients with non-refluxing lower moiety ureter and avoid reimplanting normal lower moiety orifice. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2024, 12 patients (8 females, 4 males) with ectopic ureter associated with a duplex system underwent I-LEVUR. Preoperative assessment included ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), and magnetic resonance urography (MRU)/retrograde pyelogram (RGP). The procedure involved laparoscopic extravesical approach dissecting only the ectopic ureter in lower most part, preserving vascularity, and performing an isolated reimplantation without manipulating lower moiety ureter. RESULTS: Twelve patients, with a median age of 2.8 years, underwent I-LEVUR. The mean operative time was 127.5 min. No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative follow-up (median: 78.5 months) showed no cases of ureteral obstruction or significant complications. Urinary continence improved in all patients. Two patients developed mild vesicoureteral reflux, managed conservatively, and one patient had minor urine leak which resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSION: I-LEVUR is a viable and effective alternative to traditional en bloc reimplantation for upper moiety ectopic ureter. It preserves the normal ureteric orifice, reduces surgical trauma, and offers excellent outcomes in terms of renal function and urinary continence. Further studies with larger cohorts, control group of common sheath reimplantation, randomization, robust statistical validation and longer follow-up are recommended.

[Macroreplantation of the upper extremity: Inventory in 2024]. / Macro-réimplantation du membre supérieur : état des lieux en 2024.

Macro-amputations are extremely serious traumas and represent one of the rare extreme emergencies in hand and upper limb surgery. Their rarity, especially in our developed countries, makes their treatment relatively unknown by surgical and anesthetic teams. However, the action plan to use during a macro-reimplantation, the decisive elements of pre- and post-operative management, and the key stages of the surgery, must be perfectly known, because they determine the success of a major reimplantation, for the limb survival and the future functional result. After a brief historical overview, the literature review proposed here provides an opportunity for an update on these formidable injuries and propose a treatment algorithm to guide the medical team in the management of these complex patients.

Robot-assisted Foley Tie Ureteric Tapering and Reimplantation.

Objective: This study aimed to introduce and evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a novel surgical technique, robot-assisted Foley tie ureteric tapering (RAFUT) and reimplantation, specifically designed for intravesical ureteral tapering during pediatric robotic-assisted ureteric reimplantation. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on pediatric patients diagnosed with primary vesicoureteric reflux (VUR), who underwent RAFUT between January 2019 and July 2021. Patient records were reviewed to assess preoperative characteristics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes. RAFUT involved meticulous patient positioning, precise port placement with a 6 mm separation, and bladder anchoring to maintain pneumovesicum. Ureteric tapering was performed with the Foley tie technique to enhance surgical precision. The primary outcome measures included operative time, complications, and postoperative VUR resolution. Results: All four patients underwent successful intravesical RAFUT without any intraoperative or postoperative complications. The age of the patients ranged from 3 to 12 years, with varying bladder capacities (range: 210-550 mL). The operating times ranged from 180 to 210 min, and the estimated blood loss was 35-50 mL. None of the patients required conversion to open surgery. Patients demonstrated resolution of VUR on postoperative imaging, and none experienced recurrent urinary tract infections during follow-up, which ranged from 1.5 to nearly 4 years. Conclusion: RAFUT represents a safe and effective surgical technique for intravesical ureteral tapering during pediatric robotic-assisted ureteric reimplantation. This innovative approach addresses the challenges posed by intravesical surgery for dilated ureters, maintains anatomical orientation, and offers precise excision and suturing capabilities.

Upcoming evidence in clinical practice of two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection.

Total joint arthroplasty is the recommended treatment for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis, as it reduces disability and pain and restores joint function. However, prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of this procedure, with the two-stage exchange being the most common treatment method. While there is consensus on diagnosing prosthetic joint infection, there is a lack of agreement on the parameters that can guide the surgeon in performing definitive reimplantation in a two-stage procedure. One approach that has been suggested to improve the accuracy of microbiologic investigations before definitive reimplantation is to observe a holiday period from antibiotic therapy to improve the accuracy of cultures from periprosthetic tissues, but these cultures report some degree of aspecificity. Therefore, several pieces of evidence highlight that performing reimplantation using continuous antibiotic therapy should be considered a safe and effective approach, leading to higher cure rates and a shorter period of disability. Dosage of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ERS) and D-dimer are helpful in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection, but only D-dimer has shown sufficient accuracy in predicting the risk of infection recurrence after a two-stage procedure. Synovial fluid analysis before reimplantation has been shown to be the most accurate in predicting recurrence, and new cutoff values for leukocyte count and neutrophil percentage have shown a useful predictive rule to identify patients at risk of unfavourable outcome. A new scoring system based on a numerical score calculated from the beta coefficient derived through multivariate analysis of D-dimer levels, synovial fluid leukocytes and relative neutrophils percentage has demonstrated high accuracy when it comes to guiding the second step of two-stage procedure. In conclusion, reimplantation may be a suitable option for patients who are on continuous therapy without local symptoms, and with CRP and ERS within the normal range, with low synovial fluid leukocytes (< 952/mL) and a low relative neutrophil percentage (< 52%) and D-dimer below 1100 µg/mL. A numerical score derived from analysing these three parameters can serve as a valuable tool in determining the feasibility of reimplantation in these patients.

Risk factors for early septic failure after two-stage exchange total knee arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: The cause of early septic failure after two-stage exchange revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and the factors affecting it are not well known. The purpose of this study was to determine the surgical outcomes and the risk factors for early septic failure after two-stage revision TKA for chronic PJI. METHODS: We identified a total of 246 adult patients who met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) diagnostic criteria for chronic PJI at two academic tertiary hospitals from March 2012 to December 2018. Finally, 151 patients who consecutively received two-stage exchange revision TKA for chronic PJI and who had a minimum 3-year follow-up were enrolled and retrospectively reviewed. Successful surgical treatment was evaluated for two-stage revision TKA and risk factors for early septic failure were identified. RESULTS: Early septic failures occurred within 3 years after reimplantation in 48 patients (31.8%). After accounting for potentially confounding variables, we found that male patient [odds ratio (OR): 2.753, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.099-6.893, p = 0.031], fungus or mycobacterial infection (OR: 5.224, 95% CI 1.481-18.433, p = 0.01), and positive culture at reimplantation (OR: 4.407, 95% CI 1.255-15.480, p = 0.021) were independently associated with early septic failure after two-stage exchange revision TKA. CONCLUSION: Male patients, fungus or mycobacterial infection, and positive culture at reimplantation were independently associated with an increased risk of early septic failure after two-stage exchange revision TKA despite normal C-reactive protein values prior to reimplantation. Further prospective and high-quality studies are needed to determine the risk factors of two-stage exchange revision TKA for chronic PJI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level IV; retrospective comparison; treatment study.

Genital Mutilation in Males.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Genital mutilation in males can range from minor injuries (cuts from a blade) to severe urological emergencies (testicular or penile amputation). Due to the rarity of these events, there is a lack of extensive reports, as most of the available literature is regarding single cases. Genital mutilation has been associated with psychotic and non-psychotic causes, psychiatric conditions, drug consumption, sexual practices, or even cultural or religious beliefs. It is crucial to perform a psychiatric evaluation of these patients to obtain the best therapeutic approach. This manuscript serves as a review of the currently available knowledge regarding male genital mutilation. RECENT FINDINGS: A great variety of reasons have been associated with genital mutilation. Previous authors have distinguished between those that present with a clear mental health precursor from cases with no psychotic background. Nevertheless, sometimes, it is difficult to make this distinction. Recently, reconstructive techniques for amputation cases have moved towards a microsurgical approach in order to improve outcomes. A holistic therapeutic approach must be performed to increase the chances of effective treatment. Close collaboration between urologists, psychiatrists, and emergency doctors is essential to ensure the best care for patients performing genital mutilation. Future publications must evaluate differences in treatment options and the impact that these have on the long-term well-being of patients undergoing genital self-mutilation.