Efficacy and safety of covered self-expandable metal stent for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Covered self-expanding metal stents (C-SEMS) are used for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) management. Despite increasing evidence, comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of C-SEMS in MHBO management is lacking. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were screened up to March 31, 2024 for studies including MHBO treated by a C-SEMS. Studies meeting predefined inclusion criteria, including adult MHBO patients treated with C-SEMS placement, reporting technical success, clinical success, and adverse event rates, were selected. Data synthesis and statistical analysis were performed using the random effects model, with heterogeneity and publication bias assessment. RESULTS: From 401 articles, seven studies were included. Pooled technical and clinical success rate of C-SEMS was 96.7% (95% CI 92.6-98.6%, I2=0%) and 91.6% (95% CI 86.1-95.0%, I2=0%). Overall adverse events were reported in 16.6% (95% CI 11.2-23.9%, I2=24%) of cases which included cholangitis (7.4%), pancreatitis (5.9%), liver abscess (5.9%), and cholecystitis (2.8%). Stent migration and recurrent biliary obstruction were observed in 8.9% and 49.6% of cases, respectively, with a median time to recurrent biliary obstruction of 142 days. Reintervention was successful in 92.5% of cases (95% CI 83.1-96.9%, I2=0%) CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis revealed high technical and clinical success rates of C-SEMS in MHBO. Adverse events, notably cholangitis, cholecystitis, and pancreatitis were <10%. RBO and stent migration was mitigated by C-SEMS removal and successful reintervention. Our findings highlight the efficacy and safety of C-SEMS in managing MHBO, warranting further research to optimize treatment strategies.

Endoscopic self-expandable metal stent versus endoscopy vacuum therapy for traumatic esophageal perforations: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic esophageal perforations (TEP) are a grave medical condition and require immediate intervention. Techniques such as Esophageal Self-Expandable Metal Stent (E-SEMS) and Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) show promise in reducing tissue damage and controlling esophageal leakage. The present study aims to compare the application of EVT to E-SEMS placement in TEP. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study valuated 30 patients with TEP. The E-SEMS and EVT groups were assessed for time of hospitalization, treatment duration, costs, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: Patients treated with EVT (24.4 ± 13.2) demonstrated significantly shorter treatment duration (p < 0.005) compared to the group treated with E-SEMS (45.8 ± 12.9) and patients submitted to E-SEMS demonstrated a significant reduction (p = 0.02) in the time of hospitalization compared to the EVT (34 ± 2 vs 82 ± 5 days). Both groups demonstrated a satisfactory discharge rate (E-SEMS 93.7% vs EVT 71.4%) but did not show statistically significant difference (p = 0.3155). E-SEMS treatment had a lower mean cost than EVT (p < 0.05). Descriptive statistics were utilized, arranged in table form, where frequencies, percentages, mean, median, and standard deviation of the study variables were calculated and counted. The Fisher's Exact Test was used to evaluate the relationship between two categorical variables. To evaluate differences between means and central points, the parametric t-test was utilized. Comparisons with p value up to 0.05 were considered significant. CONCLUSION: E-SEMS showed a shorter time of hospitalization, but a longer duration of treatment compared to EVT. The placement of E-SEMS and EVT had the same clinical outcome. Treatment with E-SEMS had a lower cost compared with EVT.

Impact of sarcopenia on recurrent biliary obstruction after EUS-guided biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Sarcopenia is an important prognostic factor for cancer patients. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of sarcopenia to predict recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) in patients with unresectable cancer after EUS-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD). METHODS: The study enrolled 113 patients who underwent EUS-BD using the self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) between April 2016 and December 2021 at Wakayama Medical University Hospital. The skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar spine level (L3) was calculated from computed tomography images. We analyzed the cumulative incidence of RBO at 180 days after stent insertion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables significantly associated with RBO. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were assigned to the sarcopenia group, and 37 were assigned to the non-sarcopenia group. The 180-day cumulative incidence of RBO was 11% in the non-sarcopenia group and 29% in the sarcopenia group (p = 0.034). The time to RBO was significantly shorter for the sarcopenia group (p = 0.028; Gray's test). Multivariate analyses identified sarcopenia as an independent prognostic factor for RBO (present vs absent; HR 4.61; 95% CI 1.76-12.10, p = 0.001). The rates of biliary sludge/food impaction were significantly higher in the sarcopenia group for the causes of RBO (p = 0.048). There were no significant differences between the sarcopenia and the non-sarcopenia groups with respect to related EUS-BD adverse events. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia is an independent indicator of RBO in patients with MBO who receive EUS-BD with SEMS.

Uncovered versus covered expandable metal stents for malignant gastric outlet obstruction caused by intrinsic and extrinsic tumors: meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) can be palliated by endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs). Studies comparing uncovered (USEMSs) and covered (CSEMSs) SEMSs have yielded inconclusive results. This meta-analysis compared USEMSs with CSEMSs in patients with GOO caused by intrinsic and extrinsic tumors. METHODS: Potentially relevant articles were identified by searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Medline. The primary outcome was stent dysfunction. Relationships between characteristics of tumors causing GOO and the stent dysfunction rate following USEMSs and CSEMS placement were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, six randomized controlled trials and 12 observational studies, including 2431 patients, were identified. Rate of stent dysfunction did not differ significantly between USEMSs and CSEMSs (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.25, I2 = 44%), but there was heterogeneity. Meta-regression analysis showed that heterogeneity of stent dysfunction was caused by a difference in the ratio of intrinsic-to-extrinsic tumors causing GOO between studies (coefficient, 0.944; 95% CI, 0.30-1.58). Studies were divided into intrinsic and extrinsic tumor groups. Subgroup analysis showed that the stent dysfunction rate did not differ between USEMSs and CSEMSs in the intrinsic tumor group (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.85-1.41; I2 = 32%). In the extrinsic tumor group, USEMS was associated with a lower rate of stent dysfunction than CSEMS (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.87; I2 = 25%). CONCLUSION: USEMS and CSEMS placement generally showed comparable outcomes among patients with GOO. USEMS was more effective than CSEMS for patients with GOO caused by extrinsic tumors.

Rescue technique for self-expandable metallic stent placement using ultrathin endoscope after failure of the conventional method in patients with malignant colon obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) can be used to treat malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO). Guidewire insertion to the proximal site of MCO is the most important step for SEMS placement. However, some patients cannot undergo guidewire insertion because of total obstruction or location at anatomically challenging areas. We report a guidewire insertion technique using an ultrathin endoscope (UTE) in patients with MCO in whom conventional SEMS insertion failed. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at three academic centers in Korea. The medical records of 956 consecutive patients who underwent SEMS placement during 2012-2021 were analyzed. After failing guidewire insertion using a colonoscope, a UTE was inserted. Guidewire insertion was done through the working channel of the UTE. Following guidewire insertion, the endoscope was removed from the patient. While removing the endoscope, the guidewire was advanced to be located at the originally inserted site. Then, the colonoscope was inserted over the guidewire, and SEMS was replaced. RESULTS: Conventional SEMS insertion failed in 75 patients. Of these, guidewire insertion using a UTE was tried in 59 patients. The rate of technical success was 91.5% (54/59). Considering all patients, the overall technical success rate of SEMS placement was 97.8% (935/956). This technique increased the technical success rate by 5.6% among the total cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The UTE facilitated guidewire insertion and enhanced the overall success rate for SEMS placement. In addition, this technique can be used as a rescue method when guidewire insertion fails using a colonoscope.

Safety of early oral intake after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticoenterostomy.

BACKGROUND: Techniques and devices for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hepaticoenterostomy (EUS-HES) procedures, including EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) and EUS-guided hepaticojejunostomy (EUS-HJS), have been developed; however, the optimal timing to begin oral intake after EUS-HES remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of early oral intake after EUS-HES. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients who underwent EUS-HES (EUS-HGS or EUS-HJS) between March 2015 and March 2022. Patients who had no problems with the results of blood tests and computed tomography examinations on the morning of day 1 after EUS-HES were classified as either the early intake group (started oral intake on day 1 after EUS-HES) or the late intake group (started oral intake on day 2 or later after EUS-HES). Patients' characteristics, procedure characteristics, and early postprocedural adverse events (within 14 days after the procedure) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled in this study. Forty-three patients had no problems with the results of examinations performed on the morning of day 1 after EUS-HES. Twenty-one patients comprised the early intake group and 22 comprised the late intake group. Adverse events that developed within 14 days after EUS-HES were not significantly different between groups (early 4.7% vs. late 9.0%; odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.0080-10.49; P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Starting oral intake on day 1 after EUS-HES did not increase postprocedural adverse events compared with starting oral intake on day 2 or later after EUS-HES.

Endoscopic vacuum therapy versus self-expandable metal stent for treatment of anastomotic leaks < 30 mm following oncologic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: a matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Management of anastomotic leaks after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy remains a challenge. Although intracavitary endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has shown great efficacy for large dehiscences, the optimal management of smaller leaks has not been standardized. This study aims to compare EVT versus self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) in the treatment of leaks < 30 mm in size, due to the lack of current data on this topic. METHODS: Patients undergoing EVT (cases) or SEMS (controls) between May 2017 and July 2022 for anastomotic leaks < 3 cm following oncologic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy were enrolled. Controls were matched in a 1:1 ratio based on age (± 3 years), BMI (± 3 kg/m2) and leak size (± 4 mm). RESULTS: Cases (n = 22) and controls (n = 22) showed no difference in baseline characteristics and leak size, as per matching at enrollment. No differences were detected between the two groups in terms of time from surgery to endoscopic treatment (p = 0.11) or total number of procedures per patient (p = 0.05). Remarkably, the two groups showed comparable results in terms of leaks resolution (90.9% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.11). The number of procedures per patient was not significant between the two cohorts (p = 0.05). The most frequent complication in the SEMS group was migration (15.3% of procedures). CONCLUSION: EVT and SEMS seem to have similar efficacy outcomes in the treatment of anastomotic defects < 30 mm after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. However, larger studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Outcomes after partially covered self-expandable metal stent placement for recurrent duodenal obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of partially covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) as an additional stent after recurrent duodenal obstruction (RDO) have not been elucidated. In this study, we compared outcomes of partially covered and uncovered SEMS placement after RDO in patients with malignant duodenal obstruction and explored factors affecting re-recurrent obstruction and overall survival in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing SEMS placement for RDO at a cancer institute in Japan from July 2014 to June 2021. Clinical variables and outcomes of patients undergoing partially covered and uncovered SEMS placement were compared. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients underwent SEMS placement after RDO, for which the COMVI stent was used in 38 cases and uncovered stents were used in 23 cases. Stent ingrowth was the most common cause of RDO (51.4%). Stent migration only occurred after partially covered stent placement (20% vs. 0%, p = 0.018). Choice of SEMS had no impact on time to re-RDO (median 2.8 vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.776) or overall survival (median 2.6 vs. 2.4 months, p = 0.703). Median overall survival was longer in patients receiving chemotherapy after second stenting (4.6 vs. 1.8 months, p < 0.001) and shorter in those with early RDO, regardless of the SEMS used. Use of the partially covered stent had no impact on survival or time to RDO. CONCLUSIONS: While outcomes after partially covered SEMS placement for RDO were not significantly different from uncovered SEMS, migration remains a concern when they are used as a second stent. Chemotherapy after second stenting was associated with longer overall survival but not with longer time to re-RDO.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Naso-gallbladder Drainage Using a Dedicated Catheter for Acute Cholecystitis After Transpapillary Metal Stent Placement for Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis is a significant adverse event after self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO); however, no appropriate treatment strategy has been established for its management. AIMS: This study aimed to examine the feasibility and utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided naso-gallbladder drainage (EUS-NGBD) for the management of acute cholecystitis occurring after SEMS placement. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated consecutive patients with acute cholecystitis after SEMS placement for unresectable MBO, in whom EUS-NGBD was attempted. The study outcomes included technical success, clinical success, procedure time, adverse event, and cholecystitis recurrence, associated with the procedure. RESULTS: During the study period, EUS-NGBD was performed for SEMS-related acute cholecystitis in 30 patients with MBO. The technical and clinical success rates were 96.7% (29/30) and 96.6% (28/29), respectively. The median procedure time was 15 min, and rate of procedure-related adverse event was 3.3% (1/30). The median duration from the procedure to tube removal was 9 days. No adverse events were observed after removal. The median hospitalization duration after the procedure was 14 days, and the median duration to the (re-)start of chemotherapy from cholecystitis onset was 13 days. The median overall survival after EUS-NGBD was 123 days, and the rate of cholecystitis recurrence until death was 4.2% (1/28). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that EUS-NGBD possesses good technical and clinical feasibility with an acceptable adverse event rates and short hospitalization and chemotherapy withdrawal period. Therefore, EUS-NGBD may be a good option for the treatment of SEMS-related cholecystitis in patients with MBO.

Endoscopic fully covered self-expandable metal stent and vacuum-assisted drainage to treat postoperative colorectal cancer anastomotic stenosis with fistula.

BACKGROUND: Digestive tract reconstruction is required after the surgical resection of a colorectal malignant tumor. Some patients may have concomitant anastomotic complications, such as anastomotic stenosis with fistula (ASF), postoperatively. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic fully covered self-expandable metal stent and homemade vacuum sponge-assisted drainage (FSEM-HVSD) for the treatment of ASF following the radical resection of colorectal cancer. METHODS: Patients treated with FESM-HVSD were prospectively analyzed and followed up for ASF following colorectal cancer treatment in our medical center from 2017 to 2021 for the observation and evaluation of its safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with a mean age of 55.80 ± 11.08 years were included. Nine patients (60%) underwent protective ileostomy. All 15 patients were treated with endoscopic FSEM-HVSD. The median time from the index operation to the initiation of FSEM-HVSD was 80 ± 20.34 days in patients who underwent protective ileostomy versus 11.4 ± 4.4 days in those who did not. The average number of endoscopic treatments per patient was 5.70 ± 1.25 times. The mean length of hospital stay was 27.60 ± 4.43 days. FSEM-HVSD treatment was successful in 13 patients, and no patients had any complications. The follow-up time was 1 year. Twelve of 15 (80%) patients achieved prolonged clinical success after FSEM-HVSD treatment, 1 experienced anastomotic tumor recurrence and underwent surgery again, and 1 patient required balloon dilation for anastomotic stenosis recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: FSEM-HVSD is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive treatment for ASF following colorectal cancer treatment. This technique could be the preferred treatment strategy for patients with ASF.

The optimal surgery timing after stenting in colorectal cancer patients with malignant obstruction: additionally compared with emergency surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine short-term and long-term outcomes according to time intervals after stenting and compared them with those of emergency surgery (ES) in colorectal cancer (CRC) with malignant obstruction. METHODS: CRC with malignant obstructions was reviewed retrospectively between January 2008 and July 2018. Of a total of 539 patients who visited the emergency room and underwent ES, 133 were enrolled in the ES group. Of a total of 567 patients who initially received stenting and subsequently underwent elective surgery, 220 were enrolled in the SEMS group. The interval between SEMS placement and elective surgery was classified as < 11 days, 11-17 days, and > 17 days. RESULTS: For those who received SEMS (n = 220), those with a time interval of 11-17 days (n = 97) had fewer hospital days than those with a time interval of < 11 days (n = 68) (8 days vs. 15 days) and less stoma formation than those with a time interval of > 17 days (n = 55) (1.0% vs. 14.6%). Multivariable analysis revealed a decreased risk of death for the group with a time interval of 11-17 days (20.6%) compared to the ES group (31.6%) (hazard ratio: 0.48; 95% confidence interval: 0.24-0.97). Disease-free survival was comparable between the SEMS and ES groups regardless of the time interval (log-rank p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: The time interval of 11-17 days after stenting to elective surgery appeared to be associated with the most favorable outcomes.

Esophageal Stents for the Management of Benign Esophageal Strictures in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.

Little is known about the efficacy and safety of esophageal stents for the management of esophageal strictures in children and adolescents. A systematic review was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of esophageal stents for the management of benign esophageal strictures in children and adolescents. Observational studies related to the examination of esophageal stents in pediatrics were extracted using the original databases by December 2021. We found 18 retrospective and prospective studies with a total of 340 children and adolescents. Overall, our findings show that different therapeutic modalities based on esophageal stents were offered to children and adolescents for various indications, in which most studies reported successful cases, although ineffective claims cannot be ignored. Fully covered self-expandable metal stent, self-expandable metal stent, and silastic esophageal stent were the stent types most used, although different materials and prototypes were reported as well. The number of stents used per patient and the duration of the stenting therapy varied widely (ranging from 1 to 584 days). Such treatments were not standardized because of different factors, such as different tolerance to complications in subjects aged 1 month and 16 years, frequent stent migration requiring removal followed or not by its replacement, different guides provided by each stent manufacturer, and successful healing of esophageal lesions. Different esophageal stents may be a reasonable therapeutic approach for the management of benign esophageal strictures in children and adolescents. We believe that esophagus-sparing methods like stents represent a promising alternative or adjunctive treatment to be considered in pediatrics.

Comparison of novel large-bore and conventional-bore covered self-expandable metal stents for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Multicenter, retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Covered self-expandable metal stent (cSEMS) for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has been developed to overcome tumor ingrowth but is prone to be associated with an increased risk of migration. Clinical impact of the novel large-bore cSEMS for malignant GOO remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 117 patients undergoing endoscopic cSEMS placement for malignant GOO were enrolled in this multicenter retrospective study. Technical and clinical success, adverse events, recurrent GOO, and survival after stent placement were compared between 24 mm-cSEMS (n = 49) and 20 mm-cSEMS (n = 68). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well-balanced and thus similar survival was observed between the two groups (136 days vs. 89 days, P = 0.60). Technical success rate of 100% and clinical success rate of 96% were achieved both in 24 mm-cSEMS and 20 mm-cSEMS, respectively. The median cumulative time to recurrent GOO was significantly longer in 24 mm-cSEMS than in 20 mm-cSEMS (380 days vs. 138 days, P = 0.01). The incidence of adverse events and recurrent GOO was comparable: 12% vs. 15% (P = 0.91), and 16% vs. 31% (P = 0.11); however, no stent migration was observed in 24 mm-cSEMS. In a subgroup analysis, the superiority of 24 mm-cSEMS to 20 mm-cSEMS was demonstrated in extrinsic cancers (380 days vs. 121 days, P = 0.01) but not in intrinsic cancers (151 days vs. not reached, P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: The 24 mm-cSEMS may improve time to recurrent GOO with ensuring acceptable safety in patients with malignant GOO.

Efficacy of pancreatic duct stenting to prevent postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after covered self-expandable metal stent deployment.

OBJECTIVES: Although covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) are associated with the risk of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis due to pancreatic duct (PD) orifice obstruction, they are often used for biliary drainage treatment in malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of PD stenting in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis after CSEMS implantation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 554 patients with transpapillary CSEMS for MBO. Patients with noninitial deployment, benign disease, CSEMS deployment above the papilla, surgically altered anatomy, uncovered self-expandable metal stents, multiple thin self-expandable metal stents, and unavailable procedure videos were excluded. Logistic regression analysis estimated the association between PD stenting and post-ERCP pancreatitis incidence. We adjusted for age, sex, pancreatitis history, prophylactic rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, naïve papilla, MBO etiology, and prolonged biliary cannulation time. RESULTS: Among 554 patients, 67 (12.1%) experienced post-ERCP pancreatitis. Post-ERCP pancreatitis was recorded in 13.7% of patients in the non-PD stenting and 4.3% in the PD stenting groups. Pancreatic duct stenting was associated with lower risks of post-ERCP pancreatitis (odds ratio [OR] 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.099-0.79; P = 0.028). In multivariable analysis, the association between PD stenting and lower post-ERCP pancreatitis incidence was consistent (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.062-0.58; P = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic duct stenting could reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis after CSEMSs.

Development of devices for interventional endoscopic ultrasound for the management of pancreatobiliary diseases.

A variety of devices have been developed for interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). EUS-guided drainage of the bile duct and pancreatic duct, as well as fluid collection adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract, is performed by a procedure involving puncture, guidewire manipulation, tract dilation, and stent placement. Devices specialized for interventional EUS are being developed for each step of the procedure. Mechanical dilators such as bougie, balloon, and electrocautery dilators are used for tract dilation. Various types of plastic stents, self-expandable metal stents, and lumen-apposing metal stents specifically designed for interventional EUS are now available, including one-step devices developed to improve the efficacy and safety of interventional EUS. In addition, radiofrequency ablation and the placement of fiducial markers and radioactive seeds under EUS guidance are now becoming established for pancreatic neoplasms. Such development of specialized devices has expanded the indications for interventional EUS, increased the success rate, and lowered the adverse event rate.

Endovascular repair of bilateral sciatic artery aneurysm with Covera® self expandable covered stents - case report.

A persistent sciatic artery is an embryological remnant of the internal iliac artery that occurs in 0.03% to 0.06% of the population and may develop aneurysmal degeneration. Aneurysms can lead to distal embolization with increased risk of limb loss, especially if the sciatic artery is the main arterial supply to the limb. A sciatic artery aneurysm must be treated whenever diagnosed, because of the high risk of complications. Treatment options include open, endovascular, or hybrid repair. This manuscript describes a patient with bilateral persistence of the sciatic arteries, both with aneurysmal degeneration, who underwent endovascular repair with Covera® (Bard Medical, Georgia-USA) covered stents.

Modified non-flared fully covered self-expandable metal stent for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Durable biliary drainage is essential in patients with pancreatic cancer in the era of effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Plastic stent (PS) tends to occlude easily, and current metal stents are designed for nonresectable cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of a modified non-flared fully covered self-expandable metal stent (M-FCSEMS) during the perioperative period in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Consecutive patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma had a 12-mm M-FCSEMS (M-FCSEMS group) or 7-Fr PS (PS group) placed for biliary decompression before NACT or curative-intent surgery. The primary outcome was the re-intervention rate, and secondary outcomes were technical success, stent patency, and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Endoscopic stent placement was technically successful in all 60 patients. Twenty-three patients underwent surgery and 37 NACT before surgery. Re-intervention was performed in 10.0% (3/30) of patients in the M-FCSEMS group and 36.7% (11/30) of patients in the PS group (P = 0.030). The stent patency at 180 days was 89.8% (95% confidence interval, 77.3-100.0%) in the M-FCSEMS group and 30.2% (95% confidence interval, 11.4-80.0%) in the PS group (P < 0.0001). Stent-related AEs occurred in 10.0% (3/30) in the M-FCSEMS group and 40.0% (12/30) in the PS group (P = 0.015). Surgery-related AEs occurred in 10.5% (2/19) and 14.3% (3/21) in the M-FCSEMS and PS groups (P = 0.549). CONCLUSIONS: Modified non-flared fully covered self-expandable metal stents are effective and safe for durable biliary drainage in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer during the perioperative period.

Endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Short-Type Balloon Enteroscope in Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is expected to prolong stent patency for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, its feasibility when used in conjunction with a balloon enteroscope (BE) in patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA) remains unknown. AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of RFA combined with metal stent insertion under BE guidance for MBO in patients with SAA. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients who underwent treatment between October 2016 and January 2021 and met the eligibility criteria were investigated retrospectively. Study outcomes included technical and clinical success, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), and other adverse events besides RBO associated with RFA with metal stent placement using BE. RESULTS: Technical and clinical success rates were 100% (37/37) each. The rates of early and late adverse events were 8.1% (3/37) and 8.1% (3/37), respectively. RBO occurred in 32.4% (12/37) of the patients, and the median time to RBO was 296 days. The cause of RBO was ingrowth in eight patients, overgrowth in three patients, and indeterminate in one patient. All reinterventions for RBO were successful using the BE approach; all ingrowths, except one, were recanalized using additional RFA without additional stent placement. The frequency of reintervention-related adverse events was 9.1% (1/11). The median time to RBO after reintervention was 166 days. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the technical safety and feasibility as well as good long-term outcomes of endobiliary RFA combined with metal stent placement under BE guidance. This approach may be a useful option for treating MBO in patients with SAA.

Differences in clinical outcomes according to the time interval between the bridge to surgery stenting and surgery for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is commonly used as a bridge to surgery (BTS) for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO). However, the optimal time interval between BTS stenting and surgery for left-sided MCO is unclear, and the results of previous studies are conflicting. This study aimed to determine the differences in clinical outcomes according to the time interval between BTS stenting and surgery in left-sided MCO. METHODS: Data from 594 patients who underwent SEMS placement for MCO between January 2009 and December 2018 were reviewed. Among them, 148 patients who underwent SEMS placement as BTS treatment and curative surgery were enrolled. The enrolled patients were divided into three groups according to the interval between BTS stenting and surgery: group 1 (interval ≤2 weeks), group 2 (interval 2-3 weeks), and group 3 (interval >3 weeks). RESULTS: Group 2 and 3 patients underwent significantly higher rates of laparoscopic surgery than those in group 1 (83.7, 81.0 vs. 53.2 %, respectively; P=0.003, P=0.003, respectively). Also, rates of stoma formation directly after resection were significantly higher in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (21.3 vs 2.3, 6.9%, respectively; P=0.008, P=0.043, respectively). Bridging interval had no effect on SEMS-related complications, resection-related complications, 90-day mortality, permanent stoma formation, 3-year disease-free survival, and 3-year overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: A bridging interval of > 2 weeks between BTS stenting and surgery for left-sided MCO is preferable for lower stoma formation rates and higher rates of laparoscopic approach operation, with no difference in short-term and long-term outcomes including complication, mortality, and survival.

Covered versus uncovered metal stent for endoscopic drainage of a malignant distal biliary obstruction: Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The role of a covered vs. an uncovered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) is not clear. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of covered vs. uncovered SEMS for patients with MDBO after endoscopic insertion. METHODS: A systematic meta-analysis of all relevant articles listed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was performed. Fixed effects or random effects models were used to investigate pooled effects with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 2358 patients from 12 eligible studies. Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) was significantly longer for covered SEMS (mean difference, 45.51 days; 95% CI 11.79-79.24). Although there was no significant difference in the RBO rate, subgroup analysis in pancreatic cancer occupying more than 90% (PC) revealed that the RBO rates were significantly lower for covered SEMS (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% CI 0.25-0.74). Stent migration, sludge formation, and overgrowth were significantly more common with a covered SEMS (OR 7.92, 95% CI 4.01-15.64; OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.89-5.59; OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.20-3.43, respectively). The rate of ingrowth was significantly lower for covered SEMS. There was no significant difference in total procedure-related adverse events between the two types of SEMS. CONCLUSIONS: A covered SEMS is superior to an uncovered SEMS with respect to prevention of RBO in patients with MDBO, particularly those caused by PC.