Intradialytic Oral Protein Supplementation and Nutritional and Inflammation Outcomes in Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is a common finding in hemodialysis patients and can increase oxidative stress and inflammation levels. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, nonblinded, parallel trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 92 hemodialysis patients from a single center with malnutrition according to subjective global assessment (SGA) score (SGA score > 7). INTERVENTION: 3 treatment groups (23 patients each) received 220mL of fermented vitamin E-fortified whey beverage (15g of whey protein concentrate + 600IU of vitamin E) or 220mL of fermented whey beverage (15g of whey protein concentrate) or vitamin E (600IU) 3 times a week for 8 weeks. The control group (23 patients) received no intervention. OUTCOME & MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were change in SGA score and malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS) from baseline to the end of the trial. RESULTS: At the end of the study, 83 patients were analyzed (2, 3, 1, and 3 patients left the study in the vitamin E-fortified whey beverage, whey beverage, vitamin E, and control groups, respectively). Changes in SGA scores were -3.48 (95% CI, -4.90 to -2.00), -3.22 (95% CI, -4.13 to -2.30), -1.70 (95% CI, -3.20 to -0.24), and 1.56 (95% CI, 0.60 to 2.50) for the vitamin E-fortified whey beverage, whey beverage, vitamin E, and control groups, respectively (overall P<0.001; P≤0.001 for each treatment group vs control). Changes in MISs were -3.17 (95% CI, -4.40 to -1.90), -1.83 (95% CI, -2.50 to -1.10), -2.30 (95% CI, -3.50 to -1.10), and 1.48 (95% CI, 0.65 to 2.30) for the vitamin E-fortified whey beverage, whey beverage, vitamin E, and control groups, respectively (overall P<0.001; P<0.001 for each treatment group vs control). Few adverse effects were reported in any group. LIMITATIONS: Lack of blinding, small sample size, and short duration. CONCLUSIONS: Whey protein in the form of a new fermented whey beverage and vitamin E supplementation may improve SGA score and MIS in the short term.

Ten-year all-cause mortality in hospitalized non-surgical patients based on nutritional status screening.

OBJECTIVE: Malnutrition is common in patients admitted to hospital due to acute illness and contributes to negative patient outcomes. In Slovakia there is a lack of relevant data on malnutrition in hospitalized patients, particularly based on chronic co-morbidity and survival. The aim of the present study was to explore the prevalence of malnutrition in hospitalized chronic patients, its relationship to co-morbidity and its impact on 10-year survival. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nutritional status was estimated by Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), BMI and serum albumin level. Survival was assessed from the National Insurance Registry over a 10-year period. The association between nutritional status measured by SGA and 10-year survival controlling for age, gender, BMI and serum albumin was analysed using Cox regression. SUBJECTS: Data were taken from the medical records of 202 consecutively admitted chronic patients. Results Median age was 63·5 years; 55·4 % were males; median BMI was 25·9 kg/m2; median serum albumin level was 39·0 g/l. Based on SGA evaluation, 38·1 % did not have sufficient nutritional status (SGA classification B and C). Malnutrition was more common in patients who were older (P=0·023), with lower BMI (P<0·001), who had gastrointestinal (P=0·049) and oncologic co-morbidity (P=0·021) and lower albumin level (P=0·049). In-hospital mortality was 3 %, but during the following 10 years 52 % died. Cox regression analysis controlling for age, gender, BMI and serum albumin showed that SGA was an independent predictor of death (hazard ratio=1·55; 95 % CI 1·04, 2·32; P=0·031). CONCLUSIONS: SGA is a simple screening tool that can be routinely used in hospitalized Slovak medical patients to predict the risk of death. Improving patient nutrition could thus reduce mortality.

Is handgrip strength and key pinch measurement related with biochemical parameters of nutrition in peritoneal dialysis patients?

BACKGROUNDS & OBJECTIVE: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) frequently causes Protein Energy Wasting (PEW), which is an important morbidity and mortality factor. Although it is difficult to assess PEW with a reliable method, there are various methods such as Handgrip strength test (HST), serum albumin, cholesterol, etc. HST is a simple and reliable antropometric method which is used for nutritional status and body muscle strength. This study aims to assess the relationship between HST and biochemical markers in evolution of nutritional status of ESRD patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 36 consecutive patients, who are on peritoneal dialysis and 36 healthy -control subjects. Jamar-hand dynamometer was used for handgrip strength test; a pinch gauge was used for key pinch. Other antropometric tests included skin fold thicknesses at biceps, triceps, umbilical, suprailiac and subscapular regions; circumferences at waist hip, neck and midarm. Biochemical tests were performed only in Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) group. SPSS for Windows ver. 15.0 was used for statistics. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 49.3±14.4, and mean age of control group was 43.8±10.6 (p=0.075). In PD group dominant hand dynamometer test 1,2 and 3 results were 19.3±9.3 kg, 25.3±10.8 kg, 25.5± 10.6 kg and; 34.2±10.3 kg, 34.4±9.8 kg, 34.6±10.0 kg for control group (p< 0,001). Right key pinch results were 6.7±1.9 kg for patients; 13.5±4.5 kg for control group (p<0.001). Left key pinch results were 6.8±1.9 kg for patients; 13.2±4.4 kg for control group (p<0.001). There was not any significant relationship concerning handgrip or key pinch tests with biochemical parameters. CONCLUSION: Handgrip Strength Test and key pinch may be reliable, cheap and easily performed tests for the diagnosis of Protein Energy Wasting in patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.

Nutritional status and dietary intake before hospital admission of pulmonary tuberculosis patients.

Conducting research on nutritional status and dietary intake of pulmonary tuberculosis patients is essential for developing interventions in clinical nutrition practice and treatment during hospitalization, which can improve the quality of patients life. This cross-sectional descriptive study aimed to determine nutritional status and some related factors (such as geography, occupation, educational level, economic classification, etc.) of 221 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis who were examined and treated at the Respiratory Tuberculosis Department, National Lung Hospital in July 2019-May 2020. The results showed that the risk of undernutrition: According to BMI (Body Mass Index): 45.8% of patients were malnourished, 44.2% normal and 10.0% overweight/obese. According to MUAC (Mid-Upper Arm Circumference): 60.2% of patients were malnourished, 39.8% of patients were normal. According to SGA (Subjective Global Assessment): 57.9% of patients were at risk of undernutrition, of which 40.7% were at moderate risk of undernutrition and 17.2% risk of severe undernutrition. Classification of nutritional status according to serum albumin index: 50% of patients were malnourished, the rate of undernutrition of mild, moderate and severe levels was 28.9%, 17.9% and 3.2%, respectively. Most patients eat with others and eat less than four meals a day. The average dietary energy of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in was 1242.6 ± 46.5 Kcal and 1084 ± 57.9 Kcal, respectively. 85.52% of patients did not eat enough food, 4.07% had enough, 10.41% consumed excess energy. The ratio of energy-generating substances in the diet (Carbohydrate:Protein:Lipid) was on average 54:18:28 for males and 55:16:32 for females. Most of the study population had diets that did not meet the experimental study in terms of micronutrient content. Specifically, more than 90% do not meet the requirements for magnesium, calcium, zinc, and vitamin D. The water-soluble and fat-soluble vitamins respond poorly, only about 30-40%. Selenium is the mineral with the best response rate, above 70%. Our findings revealed that the majority of the study subjects had poor nutritional status, as evidenced by diets lacking in essential micronutrients.

Assessment of nutritional status of oncology patients at hospital admission: A Portuguese real-world study.

Background: Nutritional status in patients with cancer has a determining role in the evolution of the disease and tolerance to treatments. Severity of undernutrition impacts morbidity and mortality in cancer patients and can limit patient response to the optimal therapies if nutritional issues are not appropriately addressed and managed. Despite the importance of malnutrition for the clinical evolution of oncology patients, there is not yet a universally accepted standard method for evaluating malnutrition in such patients. The aim of this study was to stratify the nutritional status of inpatients at an Oncology Department. Methods: This is an observational study with 561 cancer patients, assessed at admission to a Medical Oncology Department from November 2016 to February 2020. All patients were considered eligible. Non-compliant and/or comatose patients were excluded. Nutritional status was assessed using the PG-SGA, BMI classified with the WHO criteria, and calculation of the percentage of weight loss in the previous 3-6 months. Results: A total of 561 patients (303 F: 258 M; mean age 65 ± 13 years) were included. One-third of the patients, n=191/561 (34%), lost 6% of their weight in the month prior to admission and 297/561 (53%) patients lost 10.2% of weight in the previous 6 months. Mean BMI was 24.1 ± 5.8 kg/m2; N = 280/561 (50%) patients had regular BMI according to the WHO criteria. N = 331/561 (59%) patients reported eating less in the month prior to admission. N = 303/561 (54%) had moderate/severe deficits of muscle and adipose compartments. The PG-SGA identified 499/561 (89%) patients as moderately/severely malnourished, of which 466/561 (83%) patients scored ≥9 points, meeting criteria for a critical need for nutritional support. Fifteen percent of patients scored >4 points, indicating a need for directed therapy for symptom control and only 1% scored <2 points (maintenance nutritional counseling). Conclusion: In this oncological setting, a higher proportion of patients were nutritionally-at-risk or with moderate/severe malnutrition. The large majority of patients in this study presented with a critical need for nutritional intervention. These findings highlight the need for an integrated assessment of nutritional status at patient referral. This will allow early and timely nutrition care, which is recommended to prevent or reverse further deterioration of the condition and to optimize treatment administration.

Malnutrition and its relation with diabetic foot ulcer severity and outcome: a review.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition has a detrimental effect on wound healing; hence, it might influence the outcome in people with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).The aim of this manuscript is to overview studies that describe the prevalence of malnutrition in DFU patients and assess the relation between malnutrition, DFU severity, and outcome. METHODS: A literature review was performed. Malnutrition had to be defined by anthropometry and/or validated screening and assessment tools. RESULTS: Five papers were included: one RCT, three prospective cohort studies and one retrospective observational study. A substantial number of patients were at risk for malnutrition (49%-70%) or were malnourished (15%-62%). In one study, nutritional status was related to DFU severity. Three authors demonstrated a negative influence of malnutrition on outcome. Two studies examined the prevalence of malnutrition after six months, but did not detect a decline in malnutrition rates. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a large heterogeneity, all papers indicated that malnutrition is highly prevalent among DFU patients. Notwithstanding the lack of unequivocal evidence, malnutrition might have a negative influence on DFU outcome. Therefore, clinicians should pay attention to the nutritional status of people with a DFU.Abbreviations: BMI: Body Mass Index; DFU: Diabetic Foot Ulcer; DM: Diabetes Mellitus; GNRI: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index; HbA1c: Glycated Hemoglobin; IWGDF: International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot; LEA: Lower Extremity Amputation; MNA: Mini Nutritional Assessment; MNA-SF: Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form; MUST: Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool; NRS-2002: Nutritional Risk Screening-2002; PAD: Peripheral Arterial Disease; RCT: randomized controlled trial; SGA: Subjective Global Assessment.

Nutritional Screening and Anthropometry in Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Due to the high prevalence of malnutrition among hospitalized patients, screening and assessment of nutritional status should be routinely performed upon hospital admission. The main objective of this observational study was to evaluate the prevalence of and the risk for malnutrition, as identified by using three nutritional screening tests, and to observe whether some anthropometric and functional parameters used for nutritional evaluation were related to these test scores. METHODS: This single-center observational study included 207 patients admitted from the emergency department for hospitalization in either the internal medicine or surgery units of our institution from September 2017 to December 2018. The prevalence of malnutrition among this patient sample was evaluated by using the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Body mass index (BMI), bioimpedance analysis (BIA), handgrip strength (HGS) and calf circumference (CC) assessments were also performed. RESULTS: According to the NRS-2002, 93% of the patients were at no risk or at low nutritional risk (NRS score < 3), and 7% were at a high nutritional risk (NRS score ≥ 3). On the other hand, according to the SGA, 46.3% of the patients were well-nourished (SGA-a), 49.8% were moderately malnourished (SGA-b), and 3.9% were severely malnourished (SGA-c). Finally, according to the GLIM criteria, 18% patients were malnourished. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), phase angle (PhA), CC and HGS were significantly lower in the patients with NRS scores ≥ 3, SGA-c and in patients with stage 1 and stage 2 malnutrition, according to the GLIM criteria. CONCLUSION: The NRS-2002, the SGA and the GLIM criteria appear to be valuable tools for the screening and assessment of nutritional status. In particular, the lowest NRS-2002, SGA and GLIM scores were associated with the lowest PhA and CC. Nevertheless, a weekly re-evaluation of patients with better screening and assessment scores is recommended to facilitate early detection of changes in nutritional status.

Can Overnutrition Lead to Wasting?-The Paradox of Diabetes Mellitus in End-Stage Renal Disease Treated with Maintenance Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The population of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) may be at increased risk of protein energy wasting (PEW). The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of DM on selected indicators of PEW in the ESRD population that was undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). METHODS: A total of 515 MHD patients were divided into two subgroups with and without DM. The evaluation of diet composition, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), SGA, and laboratory and BIS analyses were performed. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality was recorded. RESULTS: DM patients had lower albumin (3.93 (3.61-4.20) vs. 4.10 (3.80-4.30) g/dL, p < 0.01), total cholesterol (158 (133-196) vs. 180 (148-206) mg/dL, p < 0.01), and creatinine (6.34 (5.08-7.33) vs. 7.12 (5.70-8.51) mg/dL, p < 0.05). SGA score (12.0 (10.0-15.0) vs. 11.0 (9.0-13.0) points, p < 0.001), BMI (27.9 (24.4-31.8) vs. 25.6 (22.9-28.8) kg/m2, p < 0.001), fat tissue index (15.0 (11.4-19.6) vs. 12.8 (9.6-16.0) %, p < 0.001), and overhydration (2.1 (1.2-4.1) vs. 1.8 (0.7, 2.7) L, p < 0.001) were higher in the DM group. Increased morbidity, reflected in the CCI and mortality-both all-cause and cardiovascular-were observed in DM patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis recipients with DM experience overnutrition with a paradoxically higher predisposition to PEW, expressed by a higher SGA score and lower serum markers of nutrition. This population is also more comorbid and is at higher risk of death, including from cardiovascular causes.

A narrative review of malnutrition in chronic liver disease.

Interest in research on malnutrition is decreasing due to thoughts that the problem of malnutrition has been solved in an age of over-nourishment or obesity and defining malnutrition is not uniform. This study aimed to critically appraise the prevalence of malnutrition according to various diagnostic tools and proportion of severity used in previous studies. A literature review was performed using a total of 16 studies published between 1980 and 2020 regarding malnutrition in patients with chronic liver disease. Most of the analyzed studies were conducted before 2010, and only a few studies were conducted after 2010. Nutrition assessment tool (NAT) and nutrition screening tool (NST) to explain malnutrition were distinguished; however, there was no clear distinction between them. NST often used questionnaires while NST used various malnutrition measuring tools. Our results show that, in the age of over-nourishment, reduction in malnutrition in chronic liver disease still hasn't been significant. Malnutrition prevalence in studies published prior to 2,000 ranged between 13.3% and 85% (mean, 37.6%), whereas that in studies published after 2,000 ranged between 13.3% and 78.5% (mean, 35.2%). Malnutrition prevalence largely depends on the diagnostic tool and proportion of disease severity in the target population. The prevalence of malnutrition in patients with chronic liver diseases varies widely. This big difference is related to various diagnostic tools, mixed etiologies, and different disease severity in different studies. The prevalence of malnutrition was 36.4% (10-80.3%) in all patients with liver disease, 39.9% (13.3-80.3%) in compensated liver disease, and 44.1% (26.7-93.6%) in decompensated cirrhosis. Malnutrition prevalence was 38.2% and 23.7% in alcoholism-related and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related diseases, respectively. Malnutrition also largely depended on the judgement tool. Malnutrition prevalence according to the diagnostic tool was approximately 28-85% for subjective global assessment (SGA), 30.8-78.5% for anthropometric approach, and 21-80.3% for clinical judgment. It became similar over time.

Nutrition assessment and its effect on various clinical variables among patients undergoing liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is highly prevalent in patients undergoing liver transplantation and has been associated to various clinical variables and outcome of the surgery. METHODS: We recruited 54 adult patients undergoing living donor liver transplant (LT) as study sample. Nutrition assessment was performed by body mass index (BMI), BMI for ascites, albumin, subjective global assessment (SGA) and anthropometry [mid upper arm circumference (MUAC), mid arm muscle circumference (MAMC), and triceps skin-fold (TSF)], Hand Grip strength, and phase angle of the body. Prevalence and comparison of malnutrition was performed with various clinical variables: aetiology, Child Turcotte Pugh scores and model for end stage liver disease (ESLD) grades, degree of ascites, blood product usage, blood loss during the surgery, mortality, days [intensive care unit (ICU), Ventilator and Hospital], and Bio-impedance analysis [weight, fat mass, fat free mass (FFM), muscle mass and body fat%]. RESULTS: Assessment of nutrition status represents a major challenge because of complications like fluid retention, hypoalbuminemia and hypoproteinemia. Different nutrition assessment tools show great disparity in the level of malnutrition among ESLD patients. In the present study recipient nutrition status evaluation by different nutrition assessment tools used showed malnutrition ranging from 3.7% to 100%. BMI and anthropometric measurements showed lower prevalence of malnutrition than phase angle and SGA whereas hand grip strength showed 100% malnutrition. Agreement among nutrition assessment methods showed moderate agreement (κ=0.444) of SGA with phase angle of the body. Malnutrition by different assessment tools was significantly associated to various clinical variables except MELD and days (ICU, Ventilator and Hospital). SGA was significantly (P<0.05) associated to majority of the clinical variables like aetiology, child Turcotte Pugh grades, degree of ascites, blood product usage, blood loss during the surgery, BIA (fat mass, FFM, muscle mass and body fat%). CONCLUSIONS: The different nutrition assessment tools showed great variability of results. SGA showed moderate agreement with phase angle of the body and was associated with various clinical and prognostic variables of liver transplantation.

Malnutrition in geriatric trauma patients: Screening methods in comparison.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition in geriatric patients is very common and an important outcome factor when treating injuries and fractures. There is actually no clear definition of the term malnutrition or recommendation for a screening method. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the nutritional status of geriatric trauma patients using different screening procedures. We tested whether the body mass index (BMI) gives indication for malnutrition or if there is a correlation with more specific test procedures. METHODS: The BMI and the data of three specific screening procedures, Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) were calculated; clinical parameters were registered. RESULTS: There was proof of correlation (p< 0.001) between BMI and SGA; also between BMI and NRS was a significant correlation (p= 0.0004). There was less significant correlation between BMI and MNA (p= 0.05). All three screening methods correlated (p< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: BMI and subjective statements provide first important information. The SGA not only correlates well with the BMI, but also complements the overall picture with individual information regarding medical history and clinical findings. Other more extensive methods, such as the NRS and the MNA, also show correlation and complement the overall picture with individual information.

Comparison of nutritional diagnosis methods and prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with neoplasms and digestive tract diseases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nowadays studies are advised to compare nutritional risk assessed by different instruments with clinical outcomes. This study compared nutritional diagnosis methods and identified the best predictor of clinical outcomes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 500 hospitalized patients with neoplasms and digestive tract diseases (DTD). Their nutritional status was determined by nutritional risk screening (NRS), subjective global assessment (SGA), and anthropometry, and compared with the clinical outcomes. The Kappa coefficient measured the agreement between the methods. Associations between risk factors and clinical outcomes were investigated by Cox, univariate logistic, and multiple logistic regression analyses at a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: In DTD and cancer patients, SGA and NRS presented good agreement, but agreement of either with anthropometry was poor. According to Cox regression, both SGA and NRS predicted complications in DTD patients. However, none of the instruments was capable of predicting complications in cancer patients or death in DTD patients. In cancer patients, SGA and age were considered risk factors for death. In DTD patients, age, SGA, and NRS predicted a long hospital stay. In cancer patients, long stays were associated with age and SGA. CONCLUSION: SGA and NRS are highly sensitive for predicting complications in DTD patients. Old age and SGA predicted death in cancer patients. Advanced age and SGA also predicted long hospital stays for DTD and cancer patients, but NRS predicted long hospital stays only for DTD patients.