Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in allergy: Targeting IgE, cytokine, and alarmin pathways.

The etiology of allergy is closely linked to type 2 inflammatory responses ultimately leading to the production of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), a key driver of many allergic conditions. At a high level, initial allergen exposure disrupts epithelial integrity, triggering local inflammation via alarmins including IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP, which activate type 2 innate lymphoid cells as well as other immune cells to secrete type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13, promoting Th2 cell development and eosinophil recruitment. Th2 cell dependent B cell activation promotes the production of allergen-specific IgE, which stably binds to basophils and mast cells. Rapid degranulation of these cells upon allergen re-exposure leads to allergic symptoms. Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying allergic pathophysiology have significantly shaped the development of therapeutic intervention strategies. In this review, we highlight key therapeutic targets within the allergic cascade with a particular focus on past, current and future treatment approaches using monoclonal antibodies. Specific targeting of alarmins, type 2 cytokines and IgE has shown varying degrees of clinical benefit in different allergic indications including asthma, chronic spontaneous urticaria, atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, food allergies and eosinophilic esophagitis. While multiple therapeutic antibodies have been approved for clinical use, scientists are still working on ways to improve on current treatment approaches. Here, we provide context to understand therapeutic targeting strategies and their limitations, discussing both knowledge gaps and promising future directions to enhancing clinical efficacy in allergic disease management.

Tezepelumab for refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis-related asthma.

Conventional immunosuppressants are ineffective for the management of EGPA-related asthma. Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TLSP) that has proven efficacy in several phase 3 studies for the treatment of asthma. We treated with off-label tezepelumab the first two patients with severe refractory EPGA-related asthma. These preliminary findings suggest that targeting upstream signaling of the T2 inflammatory pathway can improve symptoms, reduce BVAS and increase Asthma Control Test scores, even in patients with refractory asthma who have failed several previous lines of treatment. Nevertheless, by analogy with dupilumab-induced IL-4/13 blockade, the persistence of sputum eosinophilia (reported in both patients) raises questions as to whether TSLP inhibition could lead to a rebound of eosinophilia and potentially to eosinophil-related symptoms in patients with EGPA.

Tezepelumab decreases airway epithelial IL-33 and T2-inflammation in response to viral stimulation in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory virus infections are main triggers of asthma exacerbations. Tezepelumab, an anti-TSLP mAb, reduces exacerbations in patients with asthma, but the effect of blocking TSLP on host epithelial resistance and tolerance to virus infection is not known. AIM: To examine effects of blocking TSLP in patients with asthma on host resistance (IFNß, IFNλ, and viral load) and on the airway epithelial inflammatory response to viral challenge. METHODS: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF, n = 39) and bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) were obtained from patients with uncontrolled asthma before and after 12 weeks of tezepelumab treatment (n = 13) or placebo (n = 13). BECs were cultured in vitro and exposed to the viral infection mimic poly(I:C) or infected by rhinovirus (RV). Alarmins, T2- and pro-inflammatory cytokines, IFNß IFNλ, and viral load were analyzed by RT-qPCR and multiplex ELISA before and after stimulation. RESULTS: IL-33 expression in unstimulated BECs and IL-33 protein levels in BALF were reduced after 12 weeks of tezepelumab. Further, IL-33 gene and protein levels decreased in BECs challenged with poly(I:C) after tezepelumab whereas TSLP gene expression remained unaffected. Poly(I:C)-induced IL-4, IL-13, and IL-17A release from BECs was also reduced with tezepelumab whereas IFNß and IFNλ expression and viral load were unchanged. CONCLUSION: Blocking TSLP with tezepelumab in vivo in asthma reduced the airway epithelial inflammatory response including IL-33 and T2 cytokines to viral challenge without affecting anti-viral host resistance. Our results suggest that blocking TSLP stabilizes the bronchial epithelial immune response to respiratory viruses.

Tezepelumab in patients with allergic and eosinophilic asthma.

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease commonly driven by allergic and/or eosinophilic inflammation, both of which may be present in severe disease. Most approved biologics for severe asthma are indicated for specific phenotypes and target individual downstream type 2 components of the inflammatory cascade. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody (immunoglobulin G2λ), binds specifically to thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), an epithelial cytokine that initiates and sustains allergic and eosinophilic inflammation in asthma. By blocking TSLP, tezepelumab has demonstrated efficacy across known asthma phenotypes and acts upstream of all current clinically used biomarkers. In a pooled analysis of the phase 2b PATHWAY (NCT02054130) and phase 3 NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279) studies, compared with placebo, tezepelumab reduced the annualized asthma exacerbation rate over 52 weeks by 62% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53, 70) in patients with perennial aeroallergen sensitization (allergic asthma); by 71% (95% CI: 62, 78) in patients with a baseline blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/µL; and by 71% (95% CI: 59, 79) in patients with allergic asthma and a baseline blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/µL. This review examines the efficacy and mode of action of tezepelumab in patients with allergic asthma, eosinophilic asthma and coexisting allergic and eosinophilic phenotypes.

Early response to Tezepelumab in type-2 severe asthma patients non-responders to other biological treatments: a real-life study.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies play a crucial role in the treatment of severe asthma. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a pivotal factor in the pathophysiology of asthma. Although randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of Tezepelumab, evidence gaps remain in real-world scenarios. OBJECTIVE: We sought investigate Tezepelumab's response in a clinical setting, focusing on patients who previously failed to other asthma mAbs. METHODS: Real-life study with severe uncontrolled asthma patients despite mAb treatment, requiring a switch to Tezepelumab. Follow-up was done four to six months after initiation of Tezepelumab. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the response in patients with poor response or intolerance to other mAbs. RESULTS: Nine patients were followed up during 7 months. Patients were predominantly middle-aged females with eosinophilic or eosinophilic-allergic phenotypes. Patients had a median failure rate of 2 mAbs (IQR 2-3), with an uncontrolled asthma (median of 2 severe exacerbations the previous year, airflow obstruction and 78% corticosteroid dependence). Tezepelumab demonstrated after 4 to 6 months of treatment reduce corticosteroid dependence (complete withdrawal in 2/7 patients), no exacerbations in 6/9, symptoms control improvement (Asthma Control Test score improved in 5/9) and modulate lung function (improving in 3/9 patients). These findings align with clinical trial results, suggesting Tezepelumab's potential in real-world settings. CONCLUSION: In real-world scenarios, despite the study's limitations, our results underscore Tezepelumab's promise as a therapeutic option for uncontrolled severe asthma, and may be useful for non-responders to other mAbs. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Long-term safety of tezepelumab in patients with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Tezepelumab has demonstrated its effectiveness in patients with asthma, but its safety, especially for long-term use, needs to be further explored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety of long-term use of tezepelumab in patients with asthma. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. STUDY SELECTIONS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of asthma with tezepelumab, compared with placebo, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to weighted mean differences (WMDs) and risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Seven RCTs (enrolling 2050 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Serious adverse event (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95), upper respiratory tract infection (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.96), and asthma (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.76) were more frequent in the placebo groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with at least one adverse event (AE), AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment, all-cause death, influenza, bronchitis, nasopharyngitis, headache, and hypertension between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Long-term (12-52 wk) use of tezepelumab in patients with asthma does not increase the incidence of adverse events.

Positioning of Tezepelumab in Severe Asthma.

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases and is estimated to be severe in 3%-10% of affected patients. There is a need for additional biologic treatments that are highly efficacious across the spectrum of severe uncontrolled asthma. Currently available drugs inhibit 1 or 2 specific cytokines or IgE antibodies and thus only partially suppress the complex type 2 (T2) inflammatory cascade. Biologics targeting more upstream molecules in the pathophysiological pathway of asthma could treat asthma more effectively. Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal immunoglobulin G2λ antibody that targets the cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). It is the first marketed biologic against an epithelial cell-derived cytokine, preventing binding of TSLP to its receptor and reducing the immune stimuli that TSLP can trigger in different asthma endotypes. Tezepelumab reduces downstream biomarkers of inflammation, such as blood and airway eosinophils, FeNO, IgE, IL-5, and IL-13. Tezepelumab provides a clinical benefit in severe asthma, reducing the annualized asthma exacerbation rate in patients with either high or low levels of biomarkers of T2 inflammation, although the effect is greater among those with high levels. The drug has been shown to improve asthma control, quality of life, and lung function and reduce airway hyperresponsiveness. Therefore, tezepelumab can be used across the spectrum of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, especially in T2-high patients. This review includes a positioning statement by the authors, all of whom are members of the SEAIC Asthma Committee.

Role of Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin in the Pathophysiology of Asthma and Clinical and Biological Effects of Blockade With Tezepelumab.

BACKGROUND: The airway epithelium is the first line of defense of the respiratory system against the external environment. It plays an active role in the initiation of immune and allergic responses against potential hazards. Among the various specialized cells and cytokines that participate in epithelium-induced responses, alarmins are particularly interesting, given their ample role in mediating T2 and non-T2 inflammatory mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of asthma. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is an alarmin with broad effects in asthma that result from its widespread action on multiple cell types, including eosinophils, mast cells, dendritic cells, and group-2 innate lymphoid cells. Its role in allergy-mediated responses, eosinophilic inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, mucus hyperproduction, viral tolerance, and airway remodeling is of the utmost importance, as more comprehensive asthma assessments have been developed to explore these pathogenic features. Therefore, blockade with targeting molecules, such as monoclonal antibodies, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option, particularly in patients with multiple pathogenic pathways. In this review, we examine the roles of alarmins (mainly TSLP) in the pathogenesis of asthma and clinical expression and discuss the effects of inhibiting TSLP on several inflammatory and clinical outcomes. We also review the literature supporting treatment with anti-TSLP biologics and the unanswered questions and unmet needs associated with targeting alarmins in asthma.

Real-life experience after 3 months with tezepelumab before marketing approval.

BACKGROUND: Tezepelumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), implicated in asthma pathogenesis, and that has been approved for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma in Spain in October 2023. This study evaluates our experience with Tezepelumab for those patients who received the indicated drug off-label prior to its commercialization. METHODS: We conducted a real-life observational study on three patients from the Severe Asthma Unit of the Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Spain, who received Tezepelumab off-label before its official approval. We analyzed symptoms control based on ACT, exacerbations, reductions in the doses of oral corticosteroid, lung function, blood changes and safety at 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: Tezepelumab demonstrated efficacy in improving asthma control and a notable reduction in emergency department visits. OCS use decreased, with one patient halving their prednisone dose. Lung function, particularly FEV1 and FEV1/FVC parameters, improved, but no significant changes were observed in FeNO levels, blood eosinophil counts and total IgE. The treatment exhibited a favorable safety profile with no reported adverse effects during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary real-world experience prior to the official approval of tezepelumab in Spain, this monoclonal antibody showed promising results and suggests its potential as a valuable alternative for the treatment of severe asthma.

Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how the efficacy of tezepelumab, approved for the treatment of type 2 high and low asthma, compares to the efficacy of other biologics for type 2-high asthma. OBJECTIVES: We sought to conduct an indirect comparison of tezepelumab to dupilumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic asthma. METHODS: The investigators conducted a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analyses. They identified randomized controlled trials indexed in PubMed, Embase, or Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 2000, and August 12, 2022. Outcomes included exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, and the Asthma Control Questionnaire. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials (n = 9201) met eligibility. Tezepelumab (relative risk: 0.63; 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.46-0.86) was associated with significantly lower exacerbation rates than benralizumab and larger improvements in FEV1 compared to mepolizumab (mean difference [MD]: 66; 95% CI: -33 to 170) and benralizumab (MD: 62; 95% CI: -22 to 150), though the 95% CI crossed the null value of 0. Mepolizumab improved the Asthma Control Questionnaire score the most, but this improvement was not significantly different from that of tezepelumab (tezepelumab vs mepolizumab; MD: 0.14; 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.38). For efficacy by clinically important thresholds, tezepelumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab achieved a >99% probability of reducing exacerbation rates by ≥50% compared to placebo, but benralizumab had only a 66% probability of doing so. Tezepelumab and dupilumab had a probability of 1.00 of improving prebronchodilator FEV1 by ≥100 mL above placebo. Compared to mepolizumab, dupilumab had >90% chance for improving FEV1 by ≥50 mL, but none of the differences between biologics exceeded 100 mL. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with eosinophilic asthma, tezepelumab and dupilumab were associated with greater improvements (although below clinical thresholds) in exacerbation rates and lung function than benralizumab or mepolizumab.

The New Therapeutic Frontiers in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Biological Drugs.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a multifaceted disease characterized by a wide heterogeneity of clinical manifestations, endoscopic and histopathologic patterns, and responsiveness to therapy. From the perspective of an effective approach to the patient, the different inflammatory mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of EoE and biologics, in particular monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), targeting these pathways are needed. Currently, the most relevant is dupilumab, which interferes with both interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 pathways by binding IL-4 receptor α, and is the only mAb approved by the European Medicine Agency and US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of EoE. Other mAbs investigated include mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab (interfering with IL-5 axis), cendakimab and dectrekumab (anti-IL-13s), tezepelumab (anti-TSLP), lirentelimab (anti-SIGLEG-8), and many others. Despite the undeniable economic impact of biologic therapies, in the near future, there will be room for further reflection about the opportunity to prescribe biologic agents, not only as a last-line therapy in selected cases such as patients with comorbidities involving common pathways. Although recent findings are very encouraging, the road to permanent success in the treatment of EoE is still long, and further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of mAbs and to discover new potential targets.

Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin and Tezepelumab in Airway Diseases: From Physiological Role to Target Therapy.

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), is a protein belonging to a class of epithelial cytokines commonly called alarmins, which also includes IL-25 and IL-33. Functionally, TSLP is a key player in the immune response to environmental insults, initiating a number of downstream inflammatory pathways. TSLP performs its role by binding to a high-affinity heteromeric complex composed of the thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor (TSLPR) chain and IL-7Rα. In recent years, the important role of proinflammatory cytokines in the etiopathogenesis of various chronic diseases such as asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPDs), and chronic spontaneous urticaria has been studied. Although alarmins have been found to be mainly implicated in the mechanisms of type 2 inflammation, studies on monoclonal antibodies against TSLP demonstrate partial efficacy even in patients whose inflammation is not definable as T2 and the so-called low T2. Tezepelumab is a human anti-TSLP antibody that prevents TSLP-TSLPR interactions. Several clinical trials are evaluating the safety and efficacy of Tezepelumab in various inflammatory disorders. In this review, we will highlight major recent advances in understanding the functional role of TSLP, its involvement in Th2-related diseases, and its suitability as a target for biological therapies.

[Tezepelumab (Tezspire®) : new biological treatment of severe asthma]. / Le médicament du mois. Tézépélumab (Tezspire®) : nouveau traitement biologique de l'asthme sévère.

Here we present pharmacological and clinical properties of a new biological targeting TSLP (Thymic Stromal LymphoPoietin). Tezspire® is the name of this targeted treatment which contains 210 mg tezepelumab administered subcutaneously once a month. As compared to placebo, tezepelumab reduced exacerbations whatever the baseline blood eosinophil counts, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) level and atopic status. The response was higher in patients exhibiting the highest levels of blood eosinophils and FeNO. Tezepelumab also improved pre- bronchodilatation forced expiratory volume in one second, symptomatic control of asthma and quality of life. Tezepelumab proved a broad anti-inflammatory effect by blocking IL-4, IL-13 and IL-5 pathways, inducing a significant reduction in serum total IgE levels, FeNO, blood and sub-mucosal eosinophils, without affecting neutrophil level. Tezepelumab also reduced bronchial hyperresponsiveness and mucus plugs.

Cet article présente les propriétés pharmacologiques et cliniques d'un nouveau traitement biologique ciblant TSLP («Thymic Stromal LymphoPoietin¼). Ce nouveau traitement ciblé porte le nom de Tezspire® et contient 210 mg de tézélépumab qui doit être administré par voie sous-cutanée une fois par mois. Comparé au placebo, le tézélépumab réduit les exacerbations quels que soient le taux d'éosinophiles systémiques, le taux de monoxyde d'azote (FeNO) dans l'air expiré ou le statut atopique. La réponse au traitement est plus importante chez les patients présentant les taux les plus élevés d'éosinophiles sanguins et de FeNO. Le tézélépumab améliore également les valeurs de volume expiré maximal par seconde avant bronchodilatation, le contrôle symptomatique de l'asthme et la qualité de vie. Le tézélépumab a démontré un effet anti-inflammatoire élargi en bloquant les voies IL-4, IL-13 et IL-5, induisant de ce fait une réduction significative des taux d'IgE sériques, de FeNO, d'éosinophiles sanguins et sous-muqueux, sans impact sur le taux de neutrophiles. Le tézélépumab réduit également l'hyperréactivité bronchique.

Efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with evidence of severe allergic asthma: Results from the phase 3 NAVIGATOR study.

BACKGROUND: Allergic asthma is the most common phenotype among patients with severe asthma. In the phase 3 NAVIGATOR study (NCT03347279), tezepelumab significantly reduced the annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) versus placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. This exploratory analysis evaluated the efficacy of tezepelumab in NAVIGATOR participants with evidence of severe allergic asthma. METHODS: Patients (12-80 years old) receiving medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and ≥ 1 additional controller medication, with or without oral corticosteroids, were randomized to tezepelumab 210 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks in NAVIGATOR. In this analysis, the AAER, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ), patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and type 2 biomarker levels were evaluated in patients grouped by sensitivity to perennial aeroallergens, confirmed symptomatic allergy, and eligibility for omalizumab treatment according to the United States (OMA-US) and the European Union (OMA-EU) prescribing information, including subgroups according to baseline blood eosinophil counts and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels. RESULTS: Of 1059 patients who received treatment in NAVIGATOR, 680 (64%) had perennial aeroallergen sensitivity and 318 (30%) had confirmed symptomatic allergy; 379 (36%) and 359 (34%) patients were OMA-US- and OMA-EU-eligible, respectively. Tezepelumab reduced the AAER over 52 weeks versus placebo by 58% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47-67) to 68% (95% CI: 55-77) across these subgroups. Among omalizumab-eligible patients, AAERs were reduced in patients across baseline blood eosinophil counts and FeNO levels. Tezepelumab improved FEV1 and PROs, and reduced type 2 biomarkers, versus placebo in patients with and without perennial allergy. CONCLUSIONS: Tezepelumab was efficacious in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with evidence of allergic inflammation, defined by multiple clinically relevant definitions. These findings further support the benefits of tezepelumab in a broad population of patients with severe asthma, including those with severe allergic asthma.

Effects of Tezepelumab on Quality of Life of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To assess the effects of tezepelumab on quality of life (QoL) in patients with moderate-to-severe, uncontrolled asthma. RECENT FINDINGS: Tezepelumab improves pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and reduces the annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) in patients with moderate-to-severe, uncontrolled asthma. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to September 2022. We included randomized controlled trials comparing tezepelumab versus placebo in patients aged ≥ 12 years with asthma on medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids with ≥ 1 additional controller medication for ≥ 6 months and who had ≥ 1 asthma exacerbation in the 12 months before enrollment. We estimated effects measures with a random-effects model. Of 239 records identified, three studies were included, with a total of 1,484 patients. Tezepelumab significantly decreased biomarkers of T helper 2-driven inflammation, including blood eosinophil count (MD -135.8 [95% CI -164.37, -107.23]) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (MD -9.64 [95% CI -13.75, -5.53]); improved PFTs, including pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD 0.18 [95% CI 0.08-0.27]); reduced the AAER (MD 0.47 [95% CI 0.39-0.56]); improved asthma-specific health-related QoL in the Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (MD -0.33 [95% CI -0.34, -0.32]), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 Years and Older (MD 0.34 [95% CI 0.33, -0.35]), Asthma Symptom Diary (MD -0.11 [95% CI -0.18, -0.04]), and European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Questionnaire (SMD 3.29 [95% CI 2.03, 4.55]) scores, although not clinically important; and did not change key safety outcomes, including any adverse event (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.56-1.09]).

Tezepelumab in the Treatment of Uncontrolled Severe Asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of subcutaneous tezepelumab in the treatment of severe uncontrolled asthma. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using the following terms: tezepelumab, Tezspire, AMG157, and MEDI9929. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Articles published in English between January 2000 and March 2022 related to pharmacology, safety, and clinical trials were assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: In a phase 2 trial, tezepelumab at low, medium, and high doses reduced the annualized asthma exacerbation rate by 62%, 71%, and 66%, respectively, when compared with placebo (P < 0.001). In addition to significant reduction of asthma exacerbation rate in the overall treatment population, a phase 3 trial showed significant reduction of asthma exacerbation across all subgroups analyzed regardless of serum eosinophil count (EOS), fractionated exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) level, or allergic status as determined by IgE sensitivity. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Tezepelumab is indicated to treat nonallergic and noneosinophilic severe uncontrolled asthma phenotypes in addition to type 2 inflammatory asthma. When selecting the most appropriate biologic agent, consider the risks, benefits, and costs. There is a paucity of data on the efficacy of tezepelumab in patients with comorbid conditions. In the case of a patient presenting with uncontrolled severe asthma with such comorbid conditions, it may be prudent to consider a biologic therapy that can target both. CONCLUSION: Tezepelumab has shown clinical utility in severe uncontrolled asthma regardless of phenotype, fulfilling the need for treatment options in individuals with severe, uncontrolled, noneosinophilic, and nonallergic asthma.

Adverse Effects Under Th2 Biologics (Dupilumab and Tezepelumab) in a Patient with Severe Asthma and Atopic Dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: This is the first report of a patient with severe asthma and atopic dermatitis that developed local perioral skin infection which onset coincided with the patient's treatment with dupilumab (candida albicans) and later with tezepelumab (microscopic detection of yeast). CASE PRESENTATION: Besides moderate headache, macular exanthema was found after administration of tezepelumab, which was subsequently accompanied by a worsening of symptoms upon reexposure to the treatment. Both sensations needed multidisciplinary treatment and both antibody therapies were stopped.

Response to Monoclonal Antibodies in Asthma: Definitions, Potential Reasons for Failure, and Therapeutic Options for Suboptimal Response.

Real-life data reveal that more than half of severe asthma patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) do not achieve a complete response. Response to mAbs must be assessed holistically, considering all the clinically meaningful therapeutic goals, not only reduction of exacerbations and oral corticosteroids. There are 2 different ways of measuring the response to mAbs. One, qualitative, classifies patients according to the degree of disease control they have achieved, without explaining how much a given patient improves relative to the baseline (pre-mAb) clinical situation; the other, quantitative, scores the changes occurring after treatment. Both methods are complementary and essential to making clinical decisions on whether to continue treatment. The various potential causes of suboptimal response to mAbs include incorrect identification of the specific T2 pathways, comorbidities that reduce the room for improvement, insufficient dose, autoimmune phenomena, infections, change in the initial inflammatory endotype, and adverse events. Once a suboptimal response has been confirmed, a well-structured and multifaceted assessment of the potential causes of failure should be performed, with emphasis on the resulting inflammatory process of the airway after mAb therapy and the presence of chronic or recurrent infection. This investigation should guide the decision on the best therapeutic approach. The present review aims to help clinicians gain insights into how to measure response to mAbs and proceed in cases of suboptimal response.

Dramatic Response to Tezepelumab as an Initial Biologic Agent for Refractory Asthma Associated with Type 2 and Non-type 2 Traits.

A 74-year-old Japanese woman presented with a 45-year history of refractory asthma. She had been treated with inhaled corticosteroids, a long-acting ß2-agonist, and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist for 6 months. She also had a repeated viral infection. Her condition had been characterized as a refractory asthma associated with type 2 and non-type 2 traits. We began treatment with tezepelumab. The control of the patient's asthma symptoms and quality of life improved greatly within 1 month (changes in eosinophil count from 748 to 96 /µL, in FeNO from 32 to 17 ppb, in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score from 3.59 to 6.68, and in the Asthma Control Test score from 13 to 23). Tezepelumab was effective as an initial biologic agent for a patient with refractory asthma associated with type 2 and non-type 2 traits.

Impact of Biologic Therapy on the Small Airways Asthma Phenotype.

The small airways dysfunction (SAD) asthma phenotype is characterised by narrowing of airways < 2 mm in diameter between generations 8 and 23 of the bronchial tree. Recently, this has become particularly relevant as measurements of small airways using airway oscillometry for example, are strong determinants of asthma control and exacerbations in moderate-to-severe asthma. The small airways can be assessed using spirometry as forced expiratory flow rate between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25-75) and has been deemed more accurate in detecting small airways dysfunction than forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Oscillometry as the heterogeneity in resistance between 5 and 20 Hz (R5-R20), low frequency reactance at 5 Hz (X5) or area under the reactance curve between 5 Hz and the resonant frequency can also be used to assess the small airways. The small airways can also be assessed using the multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) test giving rise to values including functional residual capacity, lung clearance index and ventilation distribution heterogeneity in the conducting (Scond) and the acinar (Sacin) airways. The ATLANTIS group showed that the prevalence of small airways disease in asthma defined on FEF25-75, oscillometry and MBNW all increased with progressive GINA asthma disease stages. As opposed to topical inhaler therapy that might not adequately penetrate the small airways, it is perhaps more intuitive that systemic anti-inflammatory therapy with biologics targeting downstream cytokines and upstream epithelial anti-alarmins may offer a promising solution to SAD. Here we therefore aim to appraise the available evidence for the effect of anti-IgE, anti-IL5 (Rα), anti-IL4Rα, anti-TSLP and anti-IL33 biologics on small airways disease in patients with severe asthma.