A Reversible Chemogenetic Switch for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T†Cells.

As a revolutionary cancer treatment, the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy suffers from complications such as cytokine release syndromes and T cell exhaustion. Their mitigation desires controllable activation of CAR-T cells that is achievable through regulatory display of CARs. By embedding the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease (HCV-NS3) between the single-chain variable fragment (scFv) and the hinge domain, we showed that the display of anti-CD19 scFv on CAR-T cells was positively correlated to the presence of a clinical HCV-NS3 inhibitor asunaprevir (ASV). This novel CAR design that allows the display of anti-CD19 scFv in the presence of ASV and its removal in the absence of ASV creates a practically reversible chemical switch. We demonstrated that the intact CAR on T cells can be repeatedly turned on and off by controlling the presence of ASV in a dose dependent manner both in vitro and in vivo, which enables delicate modulation of CAR-T activation during cancer treatment.

Favorable outcome of retreatment by direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C patients with daclatasvir plus asunaprevir combination therapy failure.

AIM: In patients with hepatitis C virus, treatment failure of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir combination therapy (DCV + ASV) seems to become intractable due to the induction of resistance-associated substitutions. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of retreatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in patients with DCV + ASV therapy failure, as well as changes in drug resistance mutations. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients re-treated with DAAs after DCV + ASV failure between December 2015 and April 2018. All patients were analyzed for amino acid substitutions, and additional treatment regimens were selected based on the results and current treatment guidelines. RESULTS: The sustained virological response rate with second-line treatment was 81.8% (36/44), and relapse occurred in five of 16 patients who received sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and three of seven patients who received DCV/ASV/beclabuvir. Third- and fourth-line treatments were also tried in relapsed cases, and the overall sustained virological response rates were 90.9% (40/44) and 93.2% (41/44), respectively. A high rate of viral clearance was eventually observed. Before second-line treatment, the prevalence of mutations in the NS5A and NS3/4A regions was 100% (44/44) and 86.4% (38/44), respectively. There was no significant increase in the number of amino acid substitutions in patients for whom second-line treatment failed. CONCLUSIONS: Amino acid substitutions were frequently observed in patients with DCV + ASV failure, but most patients achieved a sustained virological response after retreatment with DAAs. Although the spread of drug-resistant viruses due to unsuccessful DAA treatment was a matter of concern, most cases of DCV + ASV failure were overcome with additional treatment.

HCV genotype 1-6 NS3 residue 80 substitutions impact protease inhibitor activity and promote viral escape.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Protease inhibitors (PIs) are of central importance in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. HCV NS3 protease (NS3P) position 80 displays polymorphisms associated with resistance to the PI simeprevir for HCV genotype 1a. We investigated the effects of position-80-substitutions on fitness and PI-resistance for HCV genotypes 1-6, and analyzed evolutionary mechanisms underlying viral escape mediated by pre-existing Q80K. METHODS: The fitness of infectious NS3P recombinants of HCV genotypes 1-6, with engineered position-80-substitutions, was studied by comparison of viral spread kinetics in Huh-7.5 cells in culture. Median effective concentration (EC50) and fold resistance for PIs simeprevir, asunaprevir, paritaprevir, grazoprevir, glecaprevir and voxilaprevir were determined in short-term treatment assays. Viral escape was studied by long-term treatment of genotype 1a recombinants with simeprevir, grazoprevir, glecaprevir and voxilaprevir and of genotype 3a recombinants with glecaprevir and voxilaprevir, next generation sequencing, NS3P substitution linkage and haplotype analysis. RESULTS: Among tested PIs, only glecaprevir and voxilaprevir showed pan-genotypic activity against the original genotype 1-6 culture viruses. Variants with position-80-substitutions were all viable, but fitness depended on the specific substitution and the HCV isolate. Q80K conferred resistance to simeprevir across genotypes but had only minor effects on the activity of the remaining PIs. For genotype 1a, pre-existing Q80K mediated accelerated escape from simeprevir, grazoprevir and to a lesser extent glecaprevir, but not voxilaprevir. For genotype 3a, Q80K mediated accelerated escape from glecaprevir and voxilaprevir. Escape was mediated by rapid and genotype-, PI- and PI-concentration-dependent co-selection of clinically relevant resistance associated substitutions. CONCLUSIONS: Position-80-substitutions had relatively low fitness cost and the potential to promote HCV escape from clinically relevant PIs in vitro, despite having a minor impact on results in classical short-term resistance assays. LAY SUMMARY: Among all clinically relevant hepatitis C virus protease inhibitors, voxilaprevir and glecaprevir showed the highest and most uniform activity against cell culture infectious hepatitis C virus with genotype 1-6 proteases. Naturally occurring amino acid changes at protease position 80 had low fitness cost and influenced sensitivity to simeprevir, but not to other protease inhibitors in short-term treatment assays. Nevertheless, the pre-existing change Q80K had the potential to promote viral escape from protease inhibitors during long-term treatment by rapid co-selection of additional resistance changes, detected by next generation sequencing.

Durability of Sustained Virologic Response and Improvement of Fibrosis Markers after Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir Treatment in Genotype 1b Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients: a Real Life and Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The long-term data with direct acting antiviral agents were rare. This study investigated the durability of a sustained virologic response (SVR) and the improvement of fibrosis after daclatasvir and asunaprevir (DCV/ASV) treatment in genotype 1b (GT1b) hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. METHODS: A total of 288 HCV GT1b patients without baseline non-structural 5A (NS5A) resistance-associated substitution (RAS) treated with DCV/ASV were enrolled. Virologic response was measured at 12 weeks and 1 year after treatment completion. In cirrhotic patients, liver function, aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4 index, fibrosis index (FI), and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) at baseline and 1 year after treatment completion were evaluated. RESULTS: SVR12 was obtained in 278 patients (96.5%). Six patients who checked NS5A RAS after treatment failure were RAS positive. Only one patient showed no durability of SVR. In cirrhotic patients who achieved SVR12 (n = 59), the changes of albumin (3.8 [2.2-4.7] to 4.3 [2.4-4.9] g/dL; P < 0.001), platelet count (99 [40-329] to 118 [40-399] × 10³/mm³; P < 0.001), APRI (1.8 [0.1-14.8] to 0.6 [0.1-4.8]; P < 0.001), FIB-4 index (5.45 [0.6-32.8] to 3.3 [0.4-12.2]; P < 0.001), FI (5.5 [0.6-32.8] to 3.3 [0.4-12.2]; P < 0.001), and LSM (17.2 [5.3-48.0] to 11.2 [3.7-28.1] kPa; P = 0.001) between baseline and 1 year after treatment completion were observed. CONCLUSION: DCV/ASV treatment for HCV GT1b infected patients without RAS achieved high SVR rates and showed durable SVR. Cirrhotic patients who achieved SVR12 showed the improvement of liver function and fibrosis markers.

Limitations of daclatasvir/asunaprevir plus beclabuvir treatment in cases of NS5A inhibitor treatment failure.

Combined daclatasvir (DCV)/asunaprevir (ASV) plus beclabuvir (BCV) treatment shows a high virological response for genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients. However, its efficacy for patients for whom previous direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy failed is not known. We analysed the efficacy of DCV/ASV/BCV treatment for HCV-infected mice and chronic hepatitis patients. Human hepatocyte chimaeric mice were injected with serum samples obtained from either a DAA-naïve patient or a DCV/ASV treatment failure and were then treated with DCV/ASV alone or in combination with BCV for 4 weeks. DCV/ASV treatment successfully eliminated the virus in DAA-naïve-patient HCV-infected mice. DCV/ASV treatment failure HCV-infected mice developed viral breakthrough during DCV/ASV treatment, with the emergence of NS5A-L31V/Y93H HCV resistance-associated variants (RAVs) being observed by direct sequencing. DCV/ASV/BCV treatment inhibited viral breakthrough in NS5A-L31V/Y93H-mutated HCV-infected mice, but HCV relapsed with the emergence of NS5B-P495S variants after the cessation of the treatment. The efficacy of the triple therapy was also analysed in HCV-infected patients; one DAA-naïve patient and four prior DAA treatment failures were treated with 12 weeks of DCV/ASV/BCV therapy. Sustained virological response was achieved in a DAA-naïve patient and one of the DCV/ASV treatment failures through DCV/ASV/BCV therapy; however, HCV relapse occurred in the other patients with prior DCV/ASV and/or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir treatment failures. DCV/ASV/BCV therapy seems to have limited efficacy for patients with NS5A RAVs for whom prior DAA treatment has failed.

Evolution and persistence of resistance-associated substitutions of hepatitis C virus after direct-acting antiviral treatment failures.

Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV+ASV) treatment is an all-oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for the genotype 1b HCV-infected patients. In this study, we investigated how resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) evolved after treatment failures and assessed the effect of those substitutions on viral fitness. Sequencing of NS5A and NS3 revealed typical RASs after treatment failures. Interestingly, the RASs of NS3 reverted to the wild-type amino acid within 1 year after treatment failures. However, the RASs of NS5A were stable and did not change. The effect of NS5A and NS3 RASs on viral RNA replication was assessed after mutagenic substitution in the genotype 1b HCV RNA. Among single substitutions, the effect of D168V was more substantial than the others and the effect of the triple mutant combination (D168V+L31V+Y93H) was the most severe. The RAS at NS5A Y93 affected both viral RNA replication and virus production. Finally, the effect of trans-complementation of NS5A was demonstrated in our co-transfection experiments and these results suggest that such a trans-complementation effect of NS5A may help maintain the NS5A RASs for a long time even after cessation of the DAA treatment. In conclusion, the results from this investigation would help understand the emergence and persistence of RASs.

Daclatasvir and asunaprevir treatment in patients infected by genotype 1b of hepatitis C virus with no or subtle resistant associated substitutions (RAS) in NS5A-Y93.

In this study, we investigated the real-world data of the first approved interferon-free regimen in Japan, daclatasvir and asunaprevir (DCV+ASV), in chronic hepatitis C patients infected HCV genotype 1b with no or subtle amount of baseline resistant associated substitutions (RAS). Among 924 patients registered in our multicenter study, 750 patients who were proven not to be infected with NS5A-Y93H RAS by direct sequencing and to have no or subtle amount (less than 20%) of NS5A-Y93H RAS by probe assays (Cycleave or PCR invader assay) were included in this study. We investigated the anti-viral effect and factors associated with SVR12. In statistical analysis, P < 0.05 was considered as significant. The SVR12 rate in this population was 92.1% (562/618). Factors associated with SVR12 were male (odds ratio: 2.128; 95%CI: 1.134-4.000, P = 0.019); lower serum γGTP (odds ratio: 1.007; 95%CI: 1.002-1.012, P = 0.006); lower HCV-RNA (odds ratio: 1.848; 95%CI: 1.087-3.145, P = 0.023), and RVR (odds ratio: 6.250; 95%CI: 2.445-15.873, P < 0.001). No patients with γGTP ≧ 80 IU/L without RVR showed SVR12 (0/4, 0%) and one patients with γGTP ≧ 20-< 80 IU/L and HCV-RNA ≧ 6.5 logIU/mL without RVR (5/10, 50%) and two female patients with RVR but γGTP ≧ 80 IU/L and HCV-RNA ≧ 6.5 logIU/mL (7/13, 53.8%) showed a low SVR12 rate. In the present study, we showed a good viral response with DCV-ASV treatment and identified four predictive factors associated with SVR12. These four markers could be a good predictive markers for the viral effect of this treatment regimen in patients with no or subtle amount of RAS in NS5A-Y93.

Retreatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir with or without lead-in interferon-ß injections in patients infected with genotype 1b hepatitis C virus after unsuccessful daclatasvir/asunaprevir therapy.

AIM: To improve the therapeutic efficacy of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) for the retreatment of patients after daclatasvir/asunaprevir (DCV/ASV), a customized therapy with or without lead-in interferon (IFN)-ß injections was formulated according to the types of resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) in the non-structural protein (NS)5A region of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: Thirty-three patients failing prior DCV/ASV received SOF/LDV for 12 weeks. Patients with HCV carrying unfavorable NS5A-RAS and/or those previously treated with simeprevir were given lead-in IFN-ß injections twice a day for 2 weeks; sequential changes in the NS5A-RAS during the injection period were evaluated using deep sequencing. RESULTS: Lead-in injections were not undertaken in 27 patients; a sustained viral response (SVR) was achieved in 26 patients, while viral relapse occurred in 1 patient with HCV carrying NS5A-L28M/R30H/Y93H mutations. Among the 6 patients receiving lead-in injections, viral relapse occurred in 2 patients who had an unfavorable IFN-λ3-related gene single nucleotide polymorphism allele; both patients had been previously treated with simeprevir, and HCV carrying NS5A-L31V/Y93H mutations had emerged after DCV/ASV. Deep sequencing revealed no changes in the NS5A-RAS profiles during the lead-in injection period in either patient. In contrast, in a patient with a favorable allele who was infected with similar unfavorable HCV strains, NS5A-L31/Y93 wild-type strains appeared during the injection period, enabling an SVR. CONCLUSION: Using customized therapies based on the NS5A-RAS profiles, a high SVR rate was obtained after SOF/LDV in patients failing prior DCV/ASV. Lead-in IFN-ß injections did not improve the efficacy in patients with HCV carrying unfavorable NS5A-RAS except in those with a favorable IFN-λ3-related gene allele.

Efficacy of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir in patients with hepatitis C virus infection undergoing and not undergoing hemodialysis.

AIM: To evaluate the virologic responses and clinical course of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir treatment in non-hemodialysis (non-HD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: A total of 1113 non-HD patients and 67 HD patients were assessed. To evaluate pretreatment factors contributing to sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12), univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. To adjust for differences in patient background, propensity score matching was undertaken. RESULTS: The overall SVR12 rates were 91.6% in non-HD patients and 95.5% in HD patients. Compared with non-HD patients, HD patients were younger, were more likely to be male, were less likely to have received interferon-based pretreatment, had a lower viral load, and had lower levels of alanine transaminase, hemoglobin, and α-fetoprotein. Multivariate analysis revealed that viral load, α-fetoprotein, L31 substitution negative, and Y93 substitution negative were independent predictive factors for SVR12 in non-HD patients. The proportion of patients with undetectable HCV-RNA during the initial 4 weeks was significantly higher in HD patients than in non-HD patients. The SVR12 rate was clearly higher in HD patients than in non-HD patients, although the difference was not statistically significant. After propensity score matching to adjust for viral load, α-fetoprotein, L31 substitution, and Y93 substitution, these trends disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: For treatment of HCV genotype 1 infection, daclatasvir plus asunaprevir is useful not only in non-HD patients but also in HD patients. Viral load, α-fetoprotein levels, L31 substitution, and Y93 substitution influence treatment course and outcome.

Usefulness of semiquantitative PCR-Invader assay for selecting candidates for daclatasvir plus asunaprevir combination therapy among patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b.

AIMS: PCR-Invader is a highly sensitive assay for detecting non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) resistance-associated variants (RAVs) of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Here, we validated the accuracy of the semiquantitative PCR-Invader (SQ-PI) assay compared to direct sequencing (DS) for identifying NS5A RAVs, and we evaluated the treatment efficacy of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV + ASV) for patients judged to be non-positive for NS5A RAVs by SQ-PI. METHODS: Detection rates of NS5A RAVs by SQ-PI and DS were compared for 204 patients with HCV genotype 1b. Patients with non-positive results for NS5A RAVs by SQ-PI were treated by DCV + ASV, and the efficacy of this treatment was examined. RESULTS: All samples judged as negative for NS5A RAVs by SQ-PI were similarly judged by DS. However, 29.7% of samples judged as negative for Y93H by DS were judged as weakly positive or positive by SQ-PI. Among 108 patients who were judged as negative by SQ-PI and treated by DCV + ASV, rates of sustained virologic response at 24 weeks (SVR24) were 96.3% in intention-to-treat analysis and 99.0% in patients who completed treatment. Among patients who were weakly positive for Y93H on SQ-PI, the SVR24 rate was 95.0% (19/20). This rate was 100% (78/78) in patients who were negative for Y93H on SQ-PI and completed treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment efficacy of DCV + ASV was extremely high among patients who were non-positive for NS5A RAVs on SQ-PI, especially for patients with negative results.

Mixed HCV Infection of Genotype 1B and Other Genotypes Influences Non-response during Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir Combination Therapy.

Daclatasvir (DCV) + asunaprevir (ASV) combination therapy has become available for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) serogroup 1 infection. We studied the efficacy of this therapy by focusing on the factors associated with sustained virological responses (SVR) including resistance-associated variants (RAVs) and mixed infection of different HCV genotypes. We enrolled 951 HCV serogroup 1-positive patients who received this combination therapy at our hospital or affiliated hospitals. The presence of RAVs in non-structural (NS) regions 3 and 5A was analyzed by direct sequencing. HCV genotypes were determined by PCR with genotype-specific primers targeting HCV core and NS5B regions. SVR was achieved in 91.1% of patients. Female sex, age > 70 years, and RAVs were significantly associated with non-SVR (p<0.01 for all). Propensity score-matching results among the patients without RAVs regarding sex, age, and fibrosis revealed that mixed HCV infection determined by HCV NS5B genotyping showed significantly lower SVR rates than 1B-mono infection (p=0.02). Female sex and RAVs were significant factors associated with treatment failure of this combination therapy for patients with HCV serogroup 1 infection. Mixed HCV infection other than 1B-mono infection would be useful for predicting treatment failure.

Efficacy and safety of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir therapy for chronic hepatitis C patients with renal dysfunction.

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with renal dysfunction. Daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy showed a high virological response for genotype 1 chronic HCV-infected patients with renal dysfunction on hemodialysis. However, the safety and efficacy of the therapy for patients with renal dysfunction who are not on hemodialysis are not well-known. In total, 147 patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection were treated with 24 weeks of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir therapy. Among these patients, 126 had normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 ) and 21 had renal dysfunction (eGFR < 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 ). Plasma concentrations of daclatasvir and asunaprevir after 5 days of treatment were the same in the normal renal function and renal dysfunction groups. Early virological response (4, 8, 48, 96, and 168 hr after the start of the therapy) was similar between the two groups. End-of-treatment response was achieved in 122 (96.8%) and 20 (95.2%) patients with normal renal function and with renal dysfunction, respectively, and sustained virological response was achieved in 119 (94.4%) and 20 (95.2%) patients. The frequency of adverse events was also comparable between the two groups. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was required for only one patient in each group. Renal function did not change either during or after treatment in both groups. In conclusion, renal function is unlikely to have a significant impact on blood kinetics of daclatasvir and asunaprevir. This combination therapy was effective and safe for patients without hemodialysis. J. Med. Virol. 89:665-671, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Impact of resistance-associated variant dominancy on treatment in patients with HCV genotype 1b receiving daclatasvir/asunaprevir.

Sustained virological responses (SVR) by daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) therapy for genotype 1b hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients has been significantly affected by pre-existence of Y93 H resistance-associated variants (RAVs) in the non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) region. The aim of this study was to elucidate the dominancy of naturally occurring RAVs in viral quasispecies on treatment outcomes in patients with HCV. In total, 138 patients were prospectively selected from 152 patients treated with DCV and ASV, where evaluation of treatment outcomes at 12 weeks post-treatment was possible. Pre-treatment RAVs in the non-structural protein 3 and NS5A regions were detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-Invader assays, and the ratio of Y93H RAVs in viral quasispecies was measured by quantitative PCR-Invader assay. Among 25 patients detected the Y93H RAV, the Y93H ratio was 1-25% in 5 patients, 26-75% in 7 patients, and ≥76% in 13 patients. Overall, SVR at 12 weeks after the completion of treatment (SVR12) was 91% (125/138), and those with Y93H ratios of <1%, 1-25%, 26-75%, and ≥76% were 99%, 100%, 71%, and 23%, respectively. Thus, the SVR12 decreased as the HCV Y93H ratio increased (P < 0.0001). The dominancy of pre-treatment RAVs of DCV and ASV affected its treatment outcomes, suggesting that evaluating the dominancy of HCV RAVs could be required for every other direct-acting antiviral agent treatments. J. Med. Virol. 89:99-105, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Favorable efficacy of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir in treatment of elderly Japanese patients infected with HCV genotype 1b aged 70 and older.

The combination of daclatasvir and asunaprevir is efficacious in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but its efficacy and predictors of efficacy in the elderly (≥70 years) remain unclear. In this study, 844 patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection, were treated with daclatasvir (60 mg once daily) plus asunaprevir (100 mg twice daily) for 24 weeks. Using the intention-to-treat analysis, the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 87% and 88% for all 844 patients and 411 elderly (>70 years of age), respectively. In both groups, multivariate analysis identified NS5A-Y93H mutation (<20%), pretreatment (failure of treatment except for triple therapy with simeprevir, or treatment naive), and level of viremia (<6.0 log IU/ml) as independent predictors of SVR. Direct sequencing showed a significantly higher rate of NS3-D168 mutation at baseline in non-responders to triple therapy with simeprevir (44%) than others (2%). Alfa-fetoprotein (AFP) level and liver stiffness were significantly lower after end of treatment than at baseline, in both the SVR and non-SVR groups. In conclusion, daclatasvir-asunaprevir combination achieved high SVR in HCV genotype 1b patients, including elderly patients. Viral factors negatively influenced the response to treatment. Treatment improved AFP level and liver stiffness (surrogate markers of hepatocellular carcinoma), regardless of treatment efficacy. J. Med. Virol. 89:91-98, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir as salvage therapy for HCV genotype 1 failures to prior NS5A inhibitors regimens.

There is little information on retreatment efficacy and predictors of the combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir) for patients who fail to respond to NS5A inhibitors. NS5A resistance variants are known to persist for long periods after such treatment. Here, we evaluated 54 patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection, free of decompensated cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, for sustained virological response after 12 weeks (SVR12) of once-daily treatment with 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir. Intention-to-treat analysis showed SVR12 of 70%. Using ultra-deep sequencing, non-responder to ledipasvir/sofosbuvir showed no change in the rates of detection of NS5A and NS5B resistant-variants at re-elevation of viral loads, relative to baseline. According to response to prior treatment, SVR12 rates were 18, 69, 94, and 100% in non response, viral breakthrough, relapse, and discontinuation due to adverse events, respectively. SVR12 rates in non response were significantly lower than those of the others. Multivariate analysis identified response to previous treatment (failure except for non response) and FIB4 index (<3.25) as significant determinants of SVR12. The SVR12 rates were significantly lower in patients with FIB4 index of ≥3.25 and had not responded to prior treatment, relative to others. The specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive values were high for prediction of poor response based on the combination of two predictors. In conclusion, our study indicated that ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is a potentially useful salvage treatment for patients who fail prior NS5A inhibitors-based therapy. Response to prior treatment was an important predictor of retreatment efficacy.

Real-life prevalence of resistance-associated variants against non-structural protein 5A inhibitors and efficiency of Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir therapy in Korean patients with genotype 1b hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treatment are tolerable and highly effective in a shorter period of time than before. However, resistance-associated variants (RAVs) can affect the efficacy of DAAs. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-life prevalence of RAVs against non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors in Korean patients with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: All consecutive patients with CHC genotype 1b who underwent a RAV test at a single referral hospital were enrolled. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients (male 53, female 89) were tested for RAVs. The average age of the patients was 58 years. Liver cirrhosis was found in 34.5% (49/142) of patients, and 19.0% (29/142) of patients had previously undergone interferon-based treatment. Twenty-nine patients (20.4%) had RAVs (Y93 or L31). Y93H, L31, or Y93H with L31 were detected in 22 (15.5%), 8 (5.6%), and 1 (0.7%) patients, respectively. The presence of RAV was not affected by previous interferon-based treatment or by the existence of liver cirrhosis. Among 113 patients without baseline NS5A RAVs, 72 patients started daclatasvir (DCV) + asunaprevir (ASV) treatment and 95% (68/72) patients achieved virologic response at week 4. Virologic response at end of treatment and sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment were achieved by 94% (68/72) and 94% (68/72), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In Korean patients with genotype 1b CHC, 20.4% (29 of 142) of patients showed RAVs against NS5A inhibitors. Patient without RAVs who received treatment with DCV + ASV showed high virologic response rates in Korea.

Short-duration treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus with daclatasvir, asunaprevir, beclabuvir and sofosbuvir (FOURward study).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The phase 2, FOURward study (NCT02175966) investigated short-duration therapy (4/6 weeks) with four direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) with distinct mechanisms of action in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype-1. METHODS: Non-cirrhotic patients were randomized 1:1 to DCV-TRIO (fixed-dose daclatasvir 30 mg, asunaprevir 200 mg and beclabuvir 75 mg) twice-daily + sofosbuvir 400 mg once-daily for 4 or 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12). Patients without SVR12 were offered retreatment based on the DAA resistance profile at failure; patients with resistance to ≤1 DCV-TRIO component received DCV-TRIO + RBV for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with HCV genotype-1 were enrolled; 79% had genotype-1a infection and median baseline HCV-RNA levels were high (9 × 106  IU/mL). Most patients had undetectable HCV-RNA at end of treatment (96% [n=27/28]); however, relapse occurred in 77% (n=10/13) and 43% (n=6/14) treated for 4 and 6 weeks, leading to SVR12 rates of 29% (n=4/14) and 57% (n=8/14) respectively. SVR12 was higher in patients with lower baseline HCV-RNA (<2 million IU/mL, 71% [n=5/7]; ≥2 million IU/mL, 33% [n=7/21]). None of the 16 non-SVR12 patients had NS3 or NS5B resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) detected at failure. All 15 patients retreated with DCV-TRIO + RBV for 12 weeks achieved SVR12. All regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Short-duration treatment with four DAAs with distinct mechanisms of action was insufficient for most patients with genotype-1 infection and high baseline viraemia. Non-SVR12 was not associated with emergence of NS3 or NS5B RAS and retreatment with DCV-TRIO + RBV for 12 weeks led to SVR in all patients.

The efficacy and safety of dual oral therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir for genotype 1b in Japanese real-life settings.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is important to investigate the treatment outcomes in patients excluded from clinical trials (CTR). The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 24-week daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-1b infection. METHODS: A total of 651 HCV-1b patients started dual oral therapy with DCV and ASV for 24 weeks in Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo. Among them, 276 patients met phase III CTR inclusion criteria. The sustained virological response (SVR) rate after treatment and the adverse events during therapy were compared between CTR-met (patients who met the inclusion criteria) and CTR-unmet (patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria) groups. RESULTS: SVR12 was achieved in 87.0% (240/276) and 86.7% (325/375) in CTR-met and CTR-unmet patients respectively. SVR12 rate in simeprevir-experienced patients was 52.9% (9/17). SVR12 rate in patients without resistance-associated variant (RAV) of NS3 or NS5A loci was 93.7% (416/444). However, the SVR12 rates in patients with NS3-D168, NS5A-L31 and Y93 single RAV at baseline were 55.0% (11/20), 73.9% (17/23) and 65.6% (63/96) respectively. The safety profiles in both CTR-met and CTR-unmet patients were similar. The discontinuation rate as a result of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation was only 2.9%. Seven (2.5%) patients in CTR-met group and 20 (5.3%) in CTR-unmet group discontinued therapy because of adverse events other than the ALT elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Dual oral therapy with DCV and ASV in real-life settings was well tolerated with a similar safety profile and achieved similar SVR12 rates as that of CTR.

Asunaprevir and daclatasvir for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: A Japanese multicenter experience.

The safety and efficacy of an IFN-free regimen using asunaprevir (ASV) and daclatasvir (DCV) for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) have not been evaluated in Japan. A multicenter study of LT recipients (n = 74) with recurrent HCV genotype 1b infection treated with ASV-DCV for 24 weeks was performed. Medical history was positive for pegylated interferon and ribavirin (Peg-IFN/RBV) in 40 (54.1%) patients, and for simeprevir (SMV) with Peg-IFN/RBV in 12 (16.2%) patients. Resistance-associated variants (RAVs) were positive at D168 (n = 1) in the NS3, and at L31 (n = 4), Y93 (n = 4), and L31/Y93 (n = 1) in the NS5A region of the HCV genome. Sixty-one (82.4%) patients completed the 24-week treatment protocol. Although sustained viral response (SVR) was achieved in 49 (80.3%) patients, it was achieved in only two (16.7%) patients among those with histories of receiving SMV (n = 12). Univariate analysis showed that a history of SMV (P < .01) and the presence of mutations in NS5A (P = .02) were the significant factors for no-SVR. By excluding the patients with either a history of SMV-based treatment or RAVs in NS3/NS5A, the SVR rate was 96.4%. By excluding the patients with a history of SMV and those with RAVs in NS3/NS5A, viral clearance of ASV-DCV was favorable, with a high SVR rate.

Effectiveness and safety of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b aged 75 years and over with or without cirrhosis.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 24-week daclatasvir (NS5A inhibitor) plus asunaprevir (NS3/4 A protease inhibitor) treatment for elderly patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b infection. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter study consisted of 321 Japanese HCV genotype 1b patients who were interferon-ineligible/intolerant or non-responders to interferon-based regimens, including 103 (32.1%) aged ≥75 years and 127 (39.6%) with cirrhosis. Sustained virological response (SVR) at 24 weeks after the end of treatment and adverse effects were analyzed according to age. RESULTS: The overall SVR rate was 90.3%. In terms of by age, 94.5% (69/73), 88.3% (128/145), and 90.3% (93/103) of the patients aged <65, 65-74, and ≥75 years, respectively, achieved SVR. For the entire cohort, pre-existent NS5A resistance-associated variants and prior simeprevir failure were independently associated with treatment failure. According to the analysis of patients without these unfavorable pretreatment factors, 90.8% (89/98) aged ≥75 years achieved SVR, although this was significantly lower than for those aged <65 years (98.5%, 66/67) (P < 0.05). The frequency of adverse effects was comparable for the <75 and ≥75 age groups, the most common being an elevated alanine aminotransferase level (>150 U/L, 8.7%), however, no decompensating events were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for HCV genotype 1b was well tolerated and effective for patients without pre-existent NS5A resistance-associated variants or simeprevir failure, irrespective of fibrosis status. However, it was less effective for very old patients aged ≥75 years compared to those aged <65.