Lessons learned? Intended and unintended effects of India's second-generation maternal cash transfer scheme.

The maternity benefit scheme piloted as Indira Gandhi Matritva Sahyog Yojana (IGMSY) since 2011 and recently rolled out as Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana (PMMVY) incentivizes mothers to participate in infant health-promoting activities. It has become India's largest conditional cash transfer program ever, outrivaling the country's first-generation maternity benefit scheme Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), which incentivizes institutional delivery and has been criticized for its unintended side effects on fertility. We approach IGMSY's geographically targeted pilot phase as a natural experiment and use data from a large national health survey to estimate its effects by a matched-pair difference-in-differences approach. Consistent with the program's conditions, we find increases in infant immunization. As side effect, long-term utilization of public health facilities becomes more frequent and intervals between eligible births increase by 17%. Our findings suggest that India'ns second-generation maternity benefit scheme has been more carefully designed than its predecessor, with side effects that support the program's broader objectives. But both direct and indirect effects are small and can make only a small contribution to redressing India's dismal maternal and child health record.

Effect of cash incentives on tetanus toxoid vaccination among rural Nigerian women: a randomized controlled trial.

Tetanus toxoid vaccination is freely available for most women in developing countries, yet maternal and neonatal tetanus are still prevalent in 13 countries, 9 of which are in sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated whether providing cash incentives increases the uptake of tetanus toxoid vaccination among women of childbearing age in rural northern Nigeria. We randomized amounts of cash incentives to women in three groups: 5 Nigerian naira (C5), 300 naira (C300), and 800 naira (C800) (150 naira = 1 U.S. dollar). Overall, of 2,482 women from 80 villages, 1,803 (72.6%) women successfully received the vaccination (419 of 765 [54.8%] women in C5, 643 of 850 [75.7%] women in C300, and 741 of 867 [85.5%] women in C800). Women in C300 and C800 were significantly more likely to receive the vaccine than women in C5. We further found that transportation costs are one of the significant barriers that prevent women from receiving vaccination at clinics, and that cash incentives compensate for transportation costs unless such costs are large.

Does provision of cash incentive to HIV-infected tuberculosis patients improve the treatment success in programme settings? A cohort study from South India.

BACKGROUND: In April 2018, the Government of India launched 'Nikshay Poshan Yojana' (NPY), a cash assistance scheme (500 Indian rupees [~8 USD] per month) intended to provide nutritional support and improve treatment outcomes among tuberculosis (TB) patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment outcomes of HIV-infected TB patients initiated on first-line anti-TB treatment in five selected districts of Karnataka, India before (April-September 2017) and after (April-September 2018) implementation of NPY. METHODS: This was a cohort study using secondary data routinely collected by the national TB and HIV programmes. RESULTS: A total of 630 patients were initiated on ATT before NPY and 591 patients after NPY implementation. Of the latter, 464 (78.5%, 95% CI: 75.0%-81.8%) received at least one installment of cash incentive. Among those received, the median (inter-quartile range) duration between treatment initiation and receipt of first installment was 74 days (41-165) and only 16% received within the first month of treatment. In 117 (25.2%) patients, the first installment was received after declaration of their treatment outcome. Treatment success (cured and treatment completed) in 'before NPY' cohort was 69.2% (95% CI: 65.6%-72.8%), while it was 65.0% (95% CI: 61.2%-68.8%) in 'after NPY' cohort. On adjusted analysis using modified Poisson regression we did not find a statistically significant association between NPY and unsuccessful treatment outcomes (adjusted relative risk-1.1, 95% CI: 0.9-1.3). CONCLUSION: Contrary to our hypothesis and previous evidence from systematic reviews, we did not find an association between NPY and improved treatment outcomes.

'I am on treatment since 5 months but I have not received any money': coverage, delays and implementation challenges of 'Direct Benefit Transfer' for tuberculosis patients - a mixed-methods study from South India.

Background: In March 2018, the Government of India launched a direct benefit transfer (DBT) scheme to provide nutritional support for all tuberculosis (TB) patients in line with END TB strategy. Here, the money (@INR 500 [~8 USD] per month) is deposited electronically into the bank accounts of beneficiaries. To avail the benefit, patients are to be notified in NIKSHAY (web-based notification portal of India's national TB programme) and provide bank account details. Once these details are entered into NIKSHAY, checked and approved by the TB programme officials, it is sent to the public financial management system (PFMS) portal for further processing and payment. Objectives: To assess the coverage and implementation barriers of DBT among TB patients notified during April-June 2018 and residing in Dakshina Kannada, a district in South India. Methods: This was a convergent mixed-methods study involving cohort analysis of patient data from NIKSHAY and thematic analysis of in-depth interviews of providers and patients. Results: Of 417 patients, 208 (49.9%) received approvals for payment by PFMS and 119 (28.7%) got paid by 1 December 2018 (censor date). Reasons for not receiving DBT included (i) not having a bank account especially among migrant labourers in urban areas, (ii) refusal to avail DBT by rich patients and those with confidentiality concerns, (iii) lack of knowledge and (iv) perception that money was too little to meet the needs. The median (IQR) delay from diagnosis to payment was 101 (67-173) days. Delays were related to the complexity of processes requiring multiple layers of approval and paper-based documentation which overburdened the staff, bulk processing once-a-month and technological challenges (poor connectivity and issues related to NIKSHAY and PFMS portals). Conclusion: DBT coverage was low and there were substantial delays. Implementation barriers need to be addressed urgently to improve uptake and efficiency. The TB programme has begun to take action.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cash Incentives or Peer Support to Increase HCV Treatment for Persons With HIV Who Use Drugs: The CHAMPS Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite access to direct-acting antivirals, barriers to a hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure persist, especially among persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH) who use drugs. Interventions such as peer mentors or cash incentives may improve the care continuum. METHODS: The CHAMPS (Chronic HepAtitis C Management to ImProve OutcomeS) study randomized 144 PLWH, recruited from an outpatient clinic, with substance use disorders into three treatment groups: usual care (UC) (n = 36), UC plus cash incentives (n = 54), and UC plus peer mentors (n = 54) to evaluate HCV treatment uptake and cure. All participants received 12-weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF). Trained peer mentors had well-controlled HIV and HCV. Cash incentives were contingent on visit attendance (maximum $220). The primary endpoint was HCV treatment initiation; secondary endpoints included sustained virologic response (SVR) and HCV reinfection. RESULTS: The majority of participants were male (61%), Black (93%), and unemployed (85%). Depression and active drug and alcohol use were common. Overall, 110 of 144 (76%) participants initiated LDV/SOF. Although treatment initiation rates were higher in PLWH randomized to peers (83%, 45 of 54) or cash (76%, 41 of 54) compared to UC (67%, 24 of 36), these differences were not statistically significant (P = .11). Most PLWH who initiated treatment achieved SVR (100 of 110, 91%). LDV/SOF was well tolerated; peers and cash had no effect on drug and alcohol use during therapy. One individual from the cash cohort experienced HCV reinfection. CONCLUSION: After removal of system barriers, one-third of PLWH in UC did not initiate HCV treatment. Among those who initiated, SVR rates were high. Research involving PLWH who use drugs should focus on overcoming barriers to treatment initiation. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: The registration data for the trial are in the ClinicalTrials.gov database, number NCT02402218.

The effect of primary care visits on other health care utilization: A randomized controlled trial of cash incentives offered to low income, uninsured adults in Virginia.

We conducted a randomized controlled trial, enrolling low-income uninsured adults in Virginia (United States), to determine whether cash incentives are effective at encouraging a primary care provider (PCP) visit, and at lowering utilization and costs. Subjects were randomized to four groups: untreated controls, and one of three incentive arms with incentives of $0, $25, or $50 for visiting a PCP within six months of group assignment. We used the exogenous variation generated by the experiment to obtain causal evidence on the effects of a PCP visit. We observed modest reductions in non-urgent emergency department visits and increased outpatient visits, but no reductions in overall costs. These findings in utilization are consistent with the expectation that PCPs offer an alternative to the emergency department for non-emergent conditions. Total costs did not decline because any savings from avoiding the emergency department were offset by increased outpatient utilization.

Financial incentives in health: New evidence from India's Janani Suraksha Yojana.

This paper studies the health effects of one of the world's largest demand-side financial incentive programmes--India's Janani Suraksha Yojana. Our difference-in-difference estimates exploit heterogeneity in the implementation of the financial incentive programme across districts. We find that cash incentives to women were associated with increased uptake of maternity services but there is no strong evidence that the JSY was associated with a reduction in neonatal or early neonatal mortality. The positive effects on utilisation are larger for less educated and poorer women, and in places where the cash payment was most generous. We also find evidence of unintended consequences. The financial incentive programme was associated with a substitution away from private health providers, an increase in breastfeeding and more pregnancies. These findings demonstrate the potential for financial incentives to have unanticipated effects that may, in the case of fertility, undermine the programme's own objective of reducing mortality.