Alzheimer's disease medication use and adherence patterns by race and ethnicity.

BACKGROUND: We examined racial and ethnic differences in medication use for a representative US population of patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). METHODS: We examined cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine initiation, non-adherence, and discontinuation by race and ethnicity, using data from the 2000-2016 Health and Retirement Study linked with Medicare and Medicaid claims. RESULTS: Among newly diagnosed ADRD patients (n = 1299), 26% filled an ADRD prescription ≤90 days and 36% ≤365 days after diagnosis. Among individuals initiating ADRD-targeted treatment (n = 1343), 44% were non-adherent and 24% discontinued the medication during the year after treatment initiation. Non-Hispanic Blacks were more likely than Whites to not adhere to ADRD medication therapy (odds ratio: 1.50 [95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.09]). DISCUSSION: Initiation of ADRD-targeted medications did not vary by ethnoracial group, but non-Hispanic Blacks had lower adherence than Whites. ADRD medication non-adherence and discontinuation were substantial and may relate to cost and access to care. HIGHLIGHTS: Initiation of anti-dementia medications among newly diagnosed Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) patients was low in all ethnoracial groups. ADRD medication non-adherence and discontinuation were substantial and may relate to cost and access to care. Compared to Whites, Blacks and Hispanics had lower use, poorer treatment adherence, and more frequent discontinuation of ADRD medication, but when controlling for disease severity and socioeconomic factors, racial disparities diminish. Our findings demonstrate the importance of adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics and disease severity when studying medication use and adherence in ADRD patients.

Racial/ethnic disparities in initiation and persistent use of anti-dementia medications.

BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic disparities in anti-dementia medications use in longitudinally followed research participants are unclear. METHODS: The study included initially untreated participants followed in National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set who were ≥65 at baseline with Alzheimer's disease dementia. OUTCOMES: Outcomes for acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) treatment included (1) any new AChEI treatment during follow-up, and (2) persistence of treatment during follow-up categorized into: intermittent treatment (< 50% follow-ups reporting treatment), persistent (≥50% follow-ups), and always treated. Outcomes for memantine treatment were similarly constructed. RESULTS: Controlling for participant characteristics, Black and Hispanic participants remained less likely than White participants to report any new AChEI or memantine treatment during follow-up. Among those who reported new treatment during follow-up, both Black and Hispanic participants were less likely than White participants to be persistently treated with AChEI and memantine. DISCUSSION: Substantial racial/ethnic treatment disparities remain in controlled settings of longitudinal research in which participants have access to dementia experts, suggesting wider disparities in the larger community.

Antidementia medication use by aged care facility residents with dementia.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the use of antidementia medications in Australia. Other countries have reported sociodemographic disparities in use. Our objective was to estimate prevalence, duration, and time to initiation of antidementia medication (cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine) among Australians with dementia in residential aged care facilities and to evaluate resident and facility factors associated with use. METHODS: Dynamic retrospective cohort study of people with dementia in 68 residential aged care facilities during 2014 to 2017 using electronic health record and medication administration data. Regression evaluated relationships between medication use (prevalence, duration, and time to initiation) and resident and facility characteristics. RESULTS: Five thousand three hundred fifty-four residents with dementia were included in the analyses. Annual prevalence of antidementia medication use was less than 10% each year and decreased during the study period by 2-percentage points by 2017 (relative to 2014). Antidementia medication use varied by sociodemographic characteristics (3-points lower for single, 4-points lower for divorced relative to married residents, and 3-points higher for Australian-born). Each point in ADL score was associated with 0.1-point lower medication use. Antidementia medication use was lower in outer regional facilities. Most comorbidities were associated with lower antidementia medication use (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease and heart failure 3-points lower, respiratory disease, and diabetes 2-points lower). Age had a complex relationship with antidementia medication use that varied by sex and if medication was started before or after admission. After admission, males initiated antidementia medication earlier than females. CONCLUSIONS: Antidementia medication use in Australian facilities was lower than in other countries and varied by clinical and sociodemographic factors.

Safety and Efficacy of Anti-dementia Agents in the Extremely Elderly Patients with Dementia.

BACKGROUND: There are debates on representation and generalizability of previous randomized controlled trials about anti-dementia agents in the oldest old population. In this context, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anti-dementia agents in the very elderly patients with dementia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with dementia 1) who were 85 years or older, 2) got started anti-dementia agents, and 3) went through follow-up evaluation about one year thereafter. As a control, patients with dementia who were less than 85 years old with similar inclusion criteria were randomly selected during the same period. The adverse drug effects and discontinuation rates were investigated with self-reported complaint after starting or increasing anti-dementia drugs. For efficacy outcome, we also analyzed the change in neuropsychological results during follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 77 dementia patients who were at least 85 years were enrolled. As a control group, 78 patients with dementia who were younger than 85 was analyzed. The adverse drug effects were observed in 26 (33.3%) patients in the younger old and in 26 (33.8%) in the oldest old (P = 0.095). Twenty-one patients (26.9%) in the younger old group and 13 patients (16.9%) in the oldest old group discontinued their medication (P = 0.131). There were no differences between the two groups about changes of Mini-Mental State Examination and Instrumental Activity of Daily Living scores over time. CONCLUSION: The use of anti-dementia agents in the oldest old dementia patients may be safe and effective as the younger old dementia patients.

Impact of type 2 diabetes and its duration on incidence rates of dementia death and medication prescription in the Australian population during 2003-2016.

AIMS: To quantify rates of dementia treatment and death among Australians with type 2 diabetes relative to those without diabetes using linked national registries of Australia. METHODS: The study included 891,418 people with type 2 diabetes registered on the National Diabetes Services Scheme and a randomly sampled, population-based comparison group (n = 1,131,369). Outcomes included dementia death (all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD) or vascular dementia), and first prescription of cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine. RESULTS: Excess dementia risk was observed in the diabetes group for the composite outcome of all-cause dementia death or dementia medication prescription but varied with age at diabetes diagnosis and its duration. At age 70, the rate of dementia death/medication prescription was ∼1.3 (95% CI 1.2, 1.3) and 1.1 (95% CI 1.1, 1.2) times higher in people with ten and five years of diabetes duration, respectively. Individual outcomes showed that diabetes was associated with a higher incidence of vascular dementia death, whereas an increased risk of AD death was only observed beyond âˆ¼10 years of diabetes duration. Further, the incidence of dementia medication prescription was lower among people with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: A higher incidence of AD death in the setting of 10+ years of diabetes duration coupled with a lower incidence of AD treatment suggests an under-recognition of this dementia phenotype among people with type 2 diabetes.

Sex, environment, and death rate in a dementia cohort: a seven-years Bayesian survival analysis using medications data from a contaminated area in Italy.

Introduction: Studies have analyzed the effects of industrial installations on the environment and human health in Taranto, Southern Italy. Literature documented associations between different variables and dementia mortality among both women and men. The present study aims to investigate the associations between sex, environment, age, disease duration, pandemic years, anti-dementia drugs, and death rate. Methods: Data from the regional medication registry were used. All women and men with an anti-dementia medication between 2015 and 2021 were included and followed-up to 2021. Bayesian mixed effects logistic and Cox regression models with time varying exposures were fitted using integrated nested Laplace approximations and adjusting for patients and therapy characteristics. Results: A total of 7,961 person-years were observed. Variables associated with lower prevalence of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) medication were male sex (OR 0.63, 95% CrI 0.42-0.96), age 70-79 years (OR 0.17, 95% CrI 0.06-0.47) and ≥ 80 years (OR 0.08, 95% CrI 0.03-0.23), disease duration of 2-3 years (OR 0.43, 95% CrI 0.32-0.56) and 4-6 years (OR 0.21, 95% CrI 0.13-0.33), and pandemic years 2020 (OR 0.50, 95% CrI 0.37-0.67) and 2021 (OR 0.47, 95% CrI 0.33-0.65). Variables associated with higher mortality were male sex (HR 2.14, 95% CrI 1.75-2.62), residence in the contaminated site of national interest (SIN) (HR 1.25, 95% CrI 1.02-1.53), age ≥ 80 years (HR 6.06, 95% CrI 1.94-18.95), disease duration of 1 year (HR 1.50, 95% CrI 1.12-2.01), 2-3 years (HR 1.90, 95% CrI 1.45-2.48) and 4-6 years (HR 2.21, 95% CrI 1.60-3.07), and pandemic years 2020 (HR 1.38, 95% CrI 1.06-1.80) and 2021 (HR 1.56, 95% CrI 1.21-2.02). Variables associated with lower mortality were therapy with AChEIs alone (HR 0.69, 95% CrI 0.56-0.86) and in combination with memantine (HR 0.54, 95% CrI 0.37-0.81). Discussion: Male sex, age, disease duration, and pandemic years appeared to be associated with lower AChEIs medications. Male sex, residence in the SIN of Taranto, age, disease duration, and pandemic years seemed to be associated with an increased death rate, while AChEIs medication seemed to be associated with improved survival rate.

The 2018 Japan Floods Increased Prescriptions of Antidementia Drugs Among Disaster Victims.

OBJECTIVES: Natural disasters can impair the cognitive function of older victims. However, it is unknown whether such natural disasters affect drug treatment for dementia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the 2018 Japan Floods, the second largest water-related disaster in Japan, on the prescriptions of antidementia drugs (ADD) for older people (≥65 years of age). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prescription data in Hiroshima, Okayama, and Ehime prefectures for 1 year before and after the disaster were extracted from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims. From the database, we selected 1,710,119 people age 65 years or over as the study participants. METHODS: In logistic regression models, sex- and age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of victims for new ADD prescriptions were calculated. Trends for the ORs before and after the disaster were evaluated using difference-in-difference models. Whether or not there was an increase in the trend for ADD prescriptions (daily dose or number of drug types) was also evaluated among continuous ADD users. RESULTS: Among 1,710,119 participants, 15,994 (0.9%) were recorded as a disaster-victims, and 112,289 (6.6%) were prescribed ADD. Among original nonusers, after the disaster, victims were more likely to start using ADD than nonvictims who had not been affected [adjusted OR = 1.33 (95% CI 1.16-1.52)]. Among continuous users, an increasing trend for ADD prescriptions was more often observed for victims than nonvictims [1.61 (1.13-2.31)]. This effect was robust even after the predisaster trend of ADD use was taken into consideration. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The disaster increased the number of users of antidementia medications. The findings suggest the need for evidence-based recommendations to address cognitive impairment among disaster victims, which is lacking in current clinical and disaster guidelines worldwide.